BACKGROUND:The appropriate sequence of different imagings and indications of thoracic computed tomography(TCT)in evaluating chest trauma have not yet been clarified at present.The current study was undertaken to deter...BACKGROUND:The appropriate sequence of different imagings and indications of thoracic computed tomography(TCT)in evaluating chest trauma have not yet been clarified at present.The current study was undertaken to determine the value of chest X-ray(CXR)in detecting chest injuries in patients with blunt trauma.METHODS:A total of 447 patients with blunt thoracic trauma who had been admitted to the emergency department(ED)in the period of 2009–2013 were retrospectively reviewed.The patients met inclusion criteria(age>8 years,blunt injury to the chest,hemodynamically stable,and neurologically intact)and underwent both TCT and upright CXR in the ED.Radiological imagings were re-interpreted after they were collected from the hospital database by two skilled radiologists.RESULTS:Of the 447 patients,309(69.1%)were male.The mean age of the 447 patients was 39.5±19.2(range 9 and 87 years).158(35.3%)patients were injured in motor vehicle accidents(MVA).CXR showed the highest sensitivity in detecting clavicle fractures[95%CI 78.3(63.6–89)]but the lowest in pneuomediastinum[95%CI 11.8(1.5–36.4)].The specificity of CXR was close to 100%in detecting a wide array of entities.CONCLUSION:CXR remains to be the first choice in hemodynamically unstable patients with blunt chest trauma.Moreover,stable patients with normal CXR are candidates who should undergo TCT if significant injury has not been ruled out.展开更多
Purpose:To investigate the accuracy and efficiency of bedside ultrasonography application performed by certified sonographer in emergency patients with blunt abdominal trauma.Methods:The study was carried out from 201...Purpose:To investigate the accuracy and efficiency of bedside ultrasonography application performed by certified sonographer in emergency patients with blunt abdominal trauma.Methods:The study was carried out from 2017 to 2019.Findings in operations or on computed tomography(CT)were used as references to evaluate the accuracy of bedside abdominal ultrasonography.The time needed for bedside abdominal ultrasonography or CT examination was collected separately to evaluate the efficiency of bedside abdominal ultrasonography application.Results:Bedside abdominal ultrasonography was performed in 106 patients with blunt abdominal trauma,of which 71 critical patients received surgery.The overall diagnostic accordance rate was 88.68%.The diagnostic accordance rate for liver injury,spleen injury,kidney injury,gut perforation,retroperitoneal hematoma and multiple abdominal organ injury were 100%,94.73%,94.12%,20.00%,100%and 81.48%,respectively.Among the 71 critical patients,the diagnostic accordance rate was 94.37%,in which the diagnostic accordance rate for liver injury,spleen injury,kidney injury,gut perforation and multiple abdominal organ injury were 100%,100%,100%,20.00%and 100%.The mean time for imaging examination of bedside abdominal ultrasonography was longer than that for CT scan(4.45±1.63 vs.2.38±1.19)min;however,the mean waiting time before examination(7.37±2.01 vs.16.42±6.37)min,the time to make a diagnostic report(6.42±3.35 vs.36.26±13.33)min,and the overall time(17.24±2.33 vs.55.06±6.96)min were shorter for bedside abdominal ultrasonography than for CT scan.Conclusion:Bedside ultrasonography application provides both efficiency and reliability for the assessment of blunt abdominal trauma.Especially for patients with free peritoneal effusion and critical patients,bedside ultrasonography has been proved obvious advantageous.However,for negative bedside ultrasonography patients with blunt abdominal trauma,we recommend further abdominal CT scan or serial ultrasonography scans subsequently.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND:The appropriate sequence of different imagings and indications of thoracic computed tomography(TCT)in evaluating chest trauma have not yet been clarified at present.The current study was undertaken to determine the value of chest X-ray(CXR)in detecting chest injuries in patients with blunt trauma.METHODS:A total of 447 patients with blunt thoracic trauma who had been admitted to the emergency department(ED)in the period of 2009–2013 were retrospectively reviewed.The patients met inclusion criteria(age>8 years,blunt injury to the chest,hemodynamically stable,and neurologically intact)and underwent both TCT and upright CXR in the ED.Radiological imagings were re-interpreted after they were collected from the hospital database by two skilled radiologists.RESULTS:Of the 447 patients,309(69.1%)were male.The mean age of the 447 patients was 39.5±19.2(range 9 and 87 years).158(35.3%)patients were injured in motor vehicle accidents(MVA).CXR showed the highest sensitivity in detecting clavicle fractures[95%CI 78.3(63.6–89)]but the lowest in pneuomediastinum[95%CI 11.8(1.5–36.4)].The specificity of CXR was close to 100%in detecting a wide array of entities.CONCLUSION:CXR remains to be the first choice in hemodynamically unstable patients with blunt chest trauma.Moreover,stable patients with normal CXR are candidates who should undergo TCT if significant injury has not been ruled out.
基金supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation for Youth of China(Grant number 81301237).
文摘Purpose:To investigate the accuracy and efficiency of bedside ultrasonography application performed by certified sonographer in emergency patients with blunt abdominal trauma.Methods:The study was carried out from 2017 to 2019.Findings in operations or on computed tomography(CT)were used as references to evaluate the accuracy of bedside abdominal ultrasonography.The time needed for bedside abdominal ultrasonography or CT examination was collected separately to evaluate the efficiency of bedside abdominal ultrasonography application.Results:Bedside abdominal ultrasonography was performed in 106 patients with blunt abdominal trauma,of which 71 critical patients received surgery.The overall diagnostic accordance rate was 88.68%.The diagnostic accordance rate for liver injury,spleen injury,kidney injury,gut perforation,retroperitoneal hematoma and multiple abdominal organ injury were 100%,94.73%,94.12%,20.00%,100%and 81.48%,respectively.Among the 71 critical patients,the diagnostic accordance rate was 94.37%,in which the diagnostic accordance rate for liver injury,spleen injury,kidney injury,gut perforation and multiple abdominal organ injury were 100%,100%,100%,20.00%and 100%.The mean time for imaging examination of bedside abdominal ultrasonography was longer than that for CT scan(4.45±1.63 vs.2.38±1.19)min;however,the mean waiting time before examination(7.37±2.01 vs.16.42±6.37)min,the time to make a diagnostic report(6.42±3.35 vs.36.26±13.33)min,and the overall time(17.24±2.33 vs.55.06±6.96)min were shorter for bedside abdominal ultrasonography than for CT scan.Conclusion:Bedside ultrasonography application provides both efficiency and reliability for the assessment of blunt abdominal trauma.Especially for patients with free peritoneal effusion and critical patients,bedside ultrasonography has been proved obvious advantageous.However,for negative bedside ultrasonography patients with blunt abdominal trauma,we recommend further abdominal CT scan or serial ultrasonography scans subsequently.