Objective To evaluate the effects of endovascular embolization treatment for intracranial aneurysms in different time. Methods The clinical data of 165 cases of ruptured intracranial aneurysm treated by endovascular t...Objective To evaluate the effects of endovascular embolization treatment for intracranial aneurysms in different time. Methods The clinical data of 165 cases of ruptured intracranial aneurysm treated by endovascular treatment were analysed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 3 groups accrodding to展开更多
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stent placement for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms. Data sources We searched six databases, including Pubmed, Embase, SCI-expanded, the Cochrane Librar...Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stent placement for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms. Data sources We searched six databases, including Pubmed, Embase, SCI-expanded, the Cochrane Library, ISI Proceedings and ProQuest Dissertations ＆ Theses for the relevant studies using multiple key words from December, 1997 to February, 2009. Study selection Thirty-three studies about stent placement for intracranial aneurysms were identified, which reported data from a total of 1069 patients with 1121 intracranial aneurysms. Data extraction We prepared a standardized data extraction form （DEF）, which was used by two independent researchers to extract data from the included 33 studies. Results The overall initial complete occlusion rate was 52.5% （456/869, 95% CI： 49.2%-55.8%）. The overall complication rate was 14.3% （162/1130, 95% CI： 12.3%-16.4%）, of which 3.6% （38/1044, 95% CI： 2.5%-4.8%） were permanent. Clinical follow-up showed a dependence rate of 8.4% （39/465, 95% CI： 5.9%-10.9%）. Angiographic follow-up showed an improvement rate of 24.3% （117/481, 95% CI： 20.5%-28.2%） and a recurrence rate of 12.9% （62/481, 95% CI： 9.9%-15.9%）. Chi-squared tests were performed to compare the following subgroups： self-expandable vs. balloon-expandable stents, unruptured vs. acutely ruptured aneurysms, and with vs. without pre-medication. Statistical significance was reached in eight tests. Conclusions Intracranial stent is a safe and effective tool for embolizing complex intracranial aneurysms. Self-expandable stents are significantly easier and safer than balloon-expandable stents with respect to navigation and deployment through the tortuous cerebral vasculature. Patients with acutely ruptured aneurysms are more likely to be dependent, but not more likelv to suffer more orocedure-related comolications.展开更多
文摘Objective To evaluate the effects of endovascular embolization treatment for intracranial aneurysms in different time. Methods The clinical data of 165 cases of ruptured intracranial aneurysm treated by endovascular treatment were analysed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 3 groups accrodding to
文摘Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stent placement for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms. Data sources We searched six databases, including Pubmed, Embase, SCI-expanded, the Cochrane Library, ISI Proceedings and ProQuest Dissertations ＆ Theses for the relevant studies using multiple key words from December, 1997 to February, 2009. Study selection Thirty-three studies about stent placement for intracranial aneurysms were identified, which reported data from a total of 1069 patients with 1121 intracranial aneurysms. Data extraction We prepared a standardized data extraction form （DEF）, which was used by two independent researchers to extract data from the included 33 studies. Results The overall initial complete occlusion rate was 52.5% （456/869, 95% CI： 49.2%-55.8%）. The overall complication rate was 14.3% （162/1130, 95% CI： 12.3%-16.4%）, of which 3.6% （38/1044, 95% CI： 2.5%-4.8%） were permanent. Clinical follow-up showed a dependence rate of 8.4% （39/465, 95% CI： 5.9%-10.9%）. Angiographic follow-up showed an improvement rate of 24.3% （117/481, 95% CI： 20.5%-28.2%） and a recurrence rate of 12.9% （62/481, 95% CI： 9.9%-15.9%）. Chi-squared tests were performed to compare the following subgroups： self-expandable vs. balloon-expandable stents, unruptured vs. acutely ruptured aneurysms, and with vs. without pre-medication. Statistical significance was reached in eight tests. Conclusions Intracranial stent is a safe and effective tool for embolizing complex intracranial aneurysms. Self-expandable stents are significantly easier and safer than balloon-expandable stents with respect to navigation and deployment through the tortuous cerebral vasculature. Patients with acutely ruptured aneurysms are more likely to be dependent, but not more likelv to suffer more orocedure-related comolications.
