Purpose:Rapid decompressive craniectomy(DC)was the most effective method for the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage(HICH)with cerebral hernia,but the mortality and disability rate is still high.We susp...Purpose:Rapid decompressive craniectomy(DC)was the most effective method for the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage(HICH)with cerebral hernia,but the mortality and disability rate is still high.We suspected that hematoma puncture drainage(PD)+DC may improve the therapeutic effect and thus compared the combined surgery with DC alone.Methods:From December 2013 to July 2019,patients with HICH from Linzhi,Tibet and Honghe,Yunnan Province were retrospectively analyzed.The selection criteria were as follows:(1)altitude≥1500 m;(2)HICH patients with cerebral hernia;(3)Glascow coma scale score of 4-8 and time from onset to admission≤3 h;(4)good liver and kidney function;and(5)complete case data.The included patients were divided into DC group and PD+DC group.The patients were followed up for 6 months.The outcome was assessed by Glasgow outcome scale(GOS)score,Kaplan-Meier survival curve and correlation between time from admission to operation and prognosis.A good outcome was defined as independent(GOS score,4-5)and poor outcome defined as dependent(GOS score,3-1).All data analyses were performed using SPSS 19,and comparison between two groups was conducted using separatet-tests or Chi-square tests.Results:A total of 65 patients was included.The age ranged 34-90 years(mean,63.00±14.04 years).Among them,31 patients had the operation of PD+DC,whereas 34 patients underwent DC.The two groups had no significant difference in the basic characteristics.After 6 months of follow-up,in the PD+DC group there were 8 death,4 vegetative state,4 severe disability(GOS score 1-3,poor outcome 51.6%);8 moderate disability,and 7 good recovery(GOS score 4-5,good outcome 48.4%);while in the DC group the result was 15 death,6 vegetative state,5 severe disability(poor outcome 76.5%),4 moderate disability and 4 good recovery(good outcome 23.5%).The GOS score and good outcome were significantly less in DC group than in PD+DC group(Z=-1.993,p=0.046;χ2=4.38,p=0.043).However,there was no significant difference regarding the survival curve between PD+DC group and DC group.The correlation between the time from admission to operation and GOS at 6 months(r=-0.41,R2=0.002,p=0.829)was not significant in the PD+DC group,but significant in the DC group(r=-0.357,R2=0.128,p=0.038).Conclusion:PD+DC treatment can improve the good outcomes better than DC treatment for HICH with cerebral hernia at a high altitude.展开更多
目的:探讨小骨窗经外侧裂-岛叶入路显微手术与立体定向穿刺引流术治疗基底节区脑出血的优劣差异。方法:选取2017年1月-2018年1月本院收治的62例基底节区脑出血患者,按照随机数字法分为两组,对照组31例予以立体定向穿刺引流术,研究组31...目的:探讨小骨窗经外侧裂-岛叶入路显微手术与立体定向穿刺引流术治疗基底节区脑出血的优劣差异。方法:选取2017年1月-2018年1月本院收治的62例基底节区脑出血患者,按照随机数字法分为两组,对照组31例予以立体定向穿刺引流术,研究组31例予以小骨窗经外侧裂-岛叶入路显微手术治疗。比较两组患者临床指标、血清指标、术后神经功能缺损程度。结果:研究组血肿清除率(93.54%)明显高于对照组(25.80%),研究组再出血发生率(3.22%)明显低于对照组(12.92%),研究组卒中相关性肺炎发生率(9.67%)明显低于对照组(22.54%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组颅内感染发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组血肿体积变化率、引流(血)量明显高于对照组,研究组术后5 d脑水肿体积增加率、引流管置管时间均明显低于研究组,研究组手术时间明显长于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者术前SOD、CRP、MDA、IL-6比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后3 d两组SOD均显著降低,CRP、MDA、IL-6均显示升高,且研究组CRP、IL-6均低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组GOS评分、术后21 d SNSS评分、Barthel评分、术后7 d SNSS评分均明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:小骨窗经外侧裂-岛叶入路显微手术对基底节区脑出血疾病中脑血肿有很强清除效果,且能有效降低患者再次出血风险,减轻出血区周围脑组织水肿程度,改善患者神经功能。展开更多
基金supported by Grant No.SWH2017JSZD07 from The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University's"Science and Technology Innovation Program",Grant No.81571116 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China.
文摘Purpose:Rapid decompressive craniectomy(DC)was the most effective method for the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage(HICH)with cerebral hernia,but the mortality and disability rate is still high.We suspected that hematoma puncture drainage(PD)+DC may improve the therapeutic effect and thus compared the combined surgery with DC alone.Methods:From December 2013 to July 2019,patients with HICH from Linzhi,Tibet and Honghe,Yunnan Province were retrospectively analyzed.The selection criteria were as follows:(1)altitude≥1500 m;(2)HICH patients with cerebral hernia;(3)Glascow coma scale score of 4-8 and time from onset to admission≤3 h;(4)good liver and kidney function;and(5)complete case data.The included patients were divided into DC group and PD+DC group.The patients were followed up for 6 months.The outcome was assessed by Glasgow outcome scale(GOS)score,Kaplan-Meier survival curve and correlation between time from admission to operation and prognosis.A good outcome was defined as independent(GOS score,4-5)and poor outcome defined as dependent(GOS score,3-1).All data analyses were performed using SPSS 19,and comparison between two groups was conducted using separatet-tests or Chi-square tests.Results:A total of 65 patients was included.The age ranged 34-90 years(mean,63.00±14.04 years).Among them,31 patients had the operation of PD+DC,whereas 34 patients underwent DC.The two groups had no significant difference in the basic characteristics.After 6 months of follow-up,in the PD+DC group there were 8 death,4 vegetative state,4 severe disability(GOS score 1-3,poor outcome 51.6%);8 moderate disability,and 7 good recovery(GOS score 4-5,good outcome 48.4%);while in the DC group the result was 15 death,6 vegetative state,5 severe disability(poor outcome 76.5%),4 moderate disability and 4 good recovery(good outcome 23.5%).The GOS score and good outcome were significantly less in DC group than in PD+DC group(Z=-1.993,p=0.046;χ2=4.38,p=0.043).However,there was no significant difference regarding the survival curve between PD+DC group and DC group.The correlation between the time from admission to operation and GOS at 6 months(r=-0.41,R2=0.002,p=0.829)was not significant in the PD+DC group,but significant in the DC group(r=-0.357,R2=0.128,p=0.038).Conclusion:PD+DC treatment can improve the good outcomes better than DC treatment for HICH with cerebral hernia at a high altitude.
文摘目的:探讨小骨窗经外侧裂-岛叶入路显微手术与立体定向穿刺引流术治疗基底节区脑出血的优劣差异。方法:选取2017年1月-2018年1月本院收治的62例基底节区脑出血患者,按照随机数字法分为两组,对照组31例予以立体定向穿刺引流术,研究组31例予以小骨窗经外侧裂-岛叶入路显微手术治疗。比较两组患者临床指标、血清指标、术后神经功能缺损程度。结果:研究组血肿清除率(93.54%)明显高于对照组(25.80%),研究组再出血发生率(3.22%)明显低于对照组(12.92%),研究组卒中相关性肺炎发生率(9.67%)明显低于对照组(22.54%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组颅内感染发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组血肿体积变化率、引流(血)量明显高于对照组,研究组术后5 d脑水肿体积增加率、引流管置管时间均明显低于研究组,研究组手术时间明显长于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者术前SOD、CRP、MDA、IL-6比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后3 d两组SOD均显著降低,CRP、MDA、IL-6均显示升高,且研究组CRP、IL-6均低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组GOS评分、术后21 d SNSS评分、Barthel评分、术后7 d SNSS评分均明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:小骨窗经外侧裂-岛叶入路显微手术对基底节区脑出血疾病中脑血肿有很强清除效果,且能有效降低患者再次出血风险,减轻出血区周围脑组织水肿程度,改善患者神经功能。
