Clinical application of accommodating intraocular lens

The present review describes recent advances in application of accommodating intraocular lenses （AIOLs）. Standard monofocal intraocular lenses （MIOLs） only correct distance vision, while AIOLs are designed to allow both good distance vision and near vision, which is achieved through the contraction and relaxation of ciliary muscles by providing transformation of the axial movement or curvature of the lens. Thus, AIOLs may be a better choice for those patients who demand a higher level of visual performance. Since techniques to analyze the performance of AIOLs have not been standardized, and there is a variety of both subjective and objective methods, it is hard to measure the performance of these intraocular lenses. By evaluating advantages and disadvantages of various AIOLs, and introducing techniques for measurement the performance postoperative, this paper can provide some relative information on choosing the type of AIOLs in the clinic.

Visual performance with accommodating and multifocal intraocular lenses

AIM： To compare the visual functional outcomes with accommodating and multifocal intraocular lenses（IOLs）.METHODS： Our retrospective comparative study included 51 patients（60 eyes） received implantation of an accommodating IOL（Tetraflex;16 patients,20 eyes）,a refractive multifocal IOL（Re Zoom;18 patients,20 eyes）,or a diffractive multifocal IOL（ZMA00;17 patients,20 eyes）.Subjective refraction,visual acuity,contrast sensitivity（CS）,intraocular aberration,and subjective photic phenomena were detected at 3mo after surgery.RESULTS： The spherical equivalent in the three groups was-0.38±0.54 D,0.14±0.56 D,and 0.35±0.41 D,respectively.No statistically significant differences were found in uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity among the groups（P=0.39）.The Re Zoom group had significantly better distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity than the ZMA00 group（P=0.003）.The ZMA00 group had significantly better near visual acuity than the other groups（P〈0.05）.Better contrast sensitivity values were observed in the Tetraflex group under most of the spatial frequencies conditions（P=0.025）.The total aberration was lowest in the ZMA00 group（P=0.000）,and the spherical aberration was highest in the Tetraflex group（P=0.000）.The three groups had similar frequency of ghosting and glare,and the Tetraflex group had a low rate of halos（P=0.01）.CONCLUSION： Both accommodating and multifocal IOLs can successfully restore distance and uncorrected intermediate visual acuities.Tetraflex accommodating IOLs perform better in CS and with less halos of photic phenomena.Re Zoom refractive multifocal IOLs havebetter performance in distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity than ZMA00 diffractive multifocal IOLs,and the latter achieved better near visual acuity and efficiently decreased the optical aberration.

Sutured scleral fixation of existing subluxated/dislocated acrylic one-piece intraocular lenses

AIM:To evaluate the visual and refractive outcomes in cases after sutured scleral fixation of existing subluxated or dislocated acrylic one-piece intraocular lenses(IOLs).METHODS:This study retrospectively enrolled a consecutive series of patients who underwent a surgery of sutured existing subluxated or dislocated IOLs from October 2018 to June 2020.All patients underwent comprehensive preoperative and postoperative ophthalmologic examination,and data were collected including age,sex,surgical indications,best-corrected visual acuity,refractive error,intraocular pressure.Presence of intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications was documented.RESULTS:A total of 20 consecutive cases were enrolled for analysis with mean final follow-up period 9.8±5.3mo.Visual acuity improved from a mean of 0.35(0.46±0.32 logMAR)preoperatively to 0.61(0.21±0.18 logMAR)at the 3-month follow-up(P=0.002).The mean amount of preoperative keratometric astigmatism and total postoperative refractive astigmatism was-1.24±0.80 diopters(D)and-1.42±0.97 D,respectively.There was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative astigmatism(P=0.156).The mean IOL-induced astigmatism was-0.23±0.53 D.The mean spherical equivalent at the 3-month follow-up was-0.1±0.94 D.No major complications were noted during the follow-up period.CONCLUSION:Surgical techniques using sutured scleral fixation of existing subluxated or dislocated acrylic one-piece IOLs result in favorable visual and refractive outcomes without major complications.

Biocompatibility of light responsive materials prepared for accommodative intraocular lenses manufacturing

AIM:To investigate the biocompatibility and bacterial adhesion properties of light responsive materials(LRM)and analyze the feasibility and biosafety of employing LRM in the preparation of accommodative intraocular lenses(AIOLs).METHODS:Employing fundamental experimental research techniques,LRM with human lens epithelial cells(hLECs)and human retinal pigment epithelium cells(ARPE-19 cells)were co-cultured.Commercially available intraocular lenses(IOLs)were used as controls to perform cell counting kit-8(CCK-8),cell staining under varying light intensities,cell adhesion and bacterial adhesion experiments.RESULTS:LRM exhibited a stronger inhibitory effect on the proliferation of ARPE19 cells than commercially available IOLs when co-cultured with the undiluted extract for 96h(P<0.05).Under other culturing conditions,the effects on the proliferation of hLECs and ARPE-19 cells were not significantly different between the two materials.Under the influence of light irradiation at intensities of 200 and 300 mW/cm^(2),LRM demonstrated a markedly higher inhibitory effect on the survival of hLECs compared to commercially available IOLs(P<0.0001).They also showed a stronger suppressive effect on the survival rate of ARPE-19 cells,with significant differences observed at 200 mW/cm^(2)(P<0.001)and extremely significant differences at 300 mW/cm^(2)(P<0.0001).Additionally,compared to commercially available IOLs,LRM had a higher number of cells adhering to their surface(P<0.05),as well as a significantly greater number of adherent bacterium(P<0.0001).CONCLUSION:LRM,characterized by their excellent non-contact tunable deformability and low cytotoxicity to ocular tissues,show considerable potential for use in the fabrication of AIOLs.These materials demonstrate strong cell adhesion;however,during photothermal conversion processes involving shape deformation under various light intensities,the resultant temperature rise may harm surrounding cells.These factors suggest that while the material plays a positive role in reducing the incidence of posterior capsule opacification(PCO),it also poses potential risks for retinal damage.Additionally,the strong bacterial adhesion of these materials indicates an increased risk of endophthalmitis.

Modeling monocular form deprivation in rabbits using a simulated-cataract intraocular lens

AIM:To establish an animal model of form deprivation amblyopia based on a simulated cataract intraocular lens(IOLs).METHODS:Poly(dimethyl siloxane)-SiO_(2) thin films(PSF)with different degrees of opacity as IOL materials were prepared.The light transmission of the PSF-IOL was measured,and its in vitro biosafety was determined by cell counting kit(CCK)-8 assay using the HLEC-B3 cell line and ARPE-19 cell line.Subsequently,the in vivo safety was determined by implanting the PSF-IOL with 10%wt SiO_(2) into the right eyes of New Zealand white rabbits(PSF-IOL group),and compared with two control groups:contralateral comparison group and normal control(NC)group(Contralateral comparison group:the fellow eye;NC group:a group of binocular normal rabbits without intervention).The flash visual-evoked potentials(F-VEPs)were measured to verify amblyopia.RESULTS:PSFs containing 0,2%,and 10%wt SiO_(2) were successfully constructed.The 0 SiO_(2) PSF was transparent,while the 10%wt SiO_(2) PSF was completely opaque.It was found that PSF did not induce unwanted cytotoxicity in HLECs and ARPE19 cells in vitro.In vitro,PSF-IOL with 10%wt SiO_(2) was also non-toxic,and no significant inflammation or structural changes occurred after four weeks of PSF-IOL implantation.Finally,our IOL-simulated congenital cataract rabbit detected by F-VEPs suggested tentative amblyopia.CONCLUSION:A PSF-IOL that mimics cataracts is created.A novel form deprivation model is created by the IOL-simulated congenital cataract rabbit.It can be developed fast and stable and holds great potential for future study.

Intraocular lens selection in diabetic patients:How to increase the odds for success

The incidence of cataracts is significantly higher in diabetic individuals,particularly in younger age groups,with rates quadrupled in those under 65 and doubled in those over 65 compared to non-diabetics.Cataract surgery in diabetic patients poses many challenges:Poor epithelial healing,decreased corneal sensitivity,increased central corneal thickness,decreased endothelial cell count,variable topography,poor pupillary dilatation,anterior capsular phimosis,posterior capsular opacification(PCO),chances of progression of diabetic retinopathy(DR),zonular weakness,and vitreous prolapse and diabetic macular edema.Selection of an appropriate intraocular lens(IOL)is crucial for visual rehabilitation and monitoring DR.The choice of IOL in diabetic cataract patients is a challenging scenario.Square-edge IOLs are favored for their capacity to mitigate PCO,whereas hydrophilic counterparts may incur calcification in the setting of proliferative DR.The advisability of premium IOLs for achieving spectacle independence warrants judicious evaluation,particularly in the presence of advanced retinopathy.Optimal IOL placement within the capsular bag is advocated to minimize postoperative complications.Rigorous preoperative assessment and informed patient counseling regarding IOL options are indispensable for optimizing surgical outcomes.This review article covers various aspects regarding the choice of IOLs in different case scenarios and complications in the diabetic population.

Clinical Effect Analysis of Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation for Correcting High Myopia and Astigmatism

Objective:To explore the corrective effect of posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation with phakic eyes in the treatment of high myopia and astigmatism.Methods:From May 2023,the hospital began to collect the case data of diagnosis and treatment of high myopia and astigmatism.By May 2024,310 cases were included,all of which were treated with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.The visual acuity,astigmatism and axial position of the intraocular lens were observed before and after treatment.Results:At different time points after the operation,the patient’s vision was significantly improved compared with that before the operation(P<0.05),and the vision level was equal to or greater than the best-corrected vision before the operation.At different time points after the operation,the average rotation of the intraocular lens was less than 5 degrees.Astigmatism was significantly lower than that before the operation(P<0.05).After the operation,the intraocular pressure increased in 11 cases,accounting for 3.55%,with no adverse complications such as lens turbidity,glare and obvious halo occurring.Conclusion:The posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation with phakic eyes has an ideal correction effect in the treatment of high myopia and astigmatism,which can effectively improve the vision level of patients and reduce the degree of astigmatism,and has high effectiveness and safety.

Considerations in the management of single-piece intraocular lenses outside the capsular bag

AIM: To investigate the outcomes of off label singlepiece acrylic intraocular lenses(SPA-IOL) ciliary sulcus placement compared to three-piece IOL(3P-IOL). METHODS: The charts of eight consecutive eyes of patients who received sulcus-placed SPA-IOLs between 2006 and 2009 were reviewed. None of the patients underwent IOL exchange. Charts of six age-matched patients who received sulcus placed 3P-IOLs were reviewed as a control group. RESULTS: Mean follow up was 16 mo for SPA-IOL and 23 mo for 3P-IOL. Five of 8 patients in the SPA-IOL group required chronic use of IOP lowering medications at final follow up. Of these, one patient needed glaucoma implant surgery for uncontrolled IOP. One patient in the 3P-IOL group used chronic aqueous suppression pre- and postoperatively. Four of eight eyes with SPAIOL were treated with chronic topical steroids and or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for cystoid macu-la edema, chronic uveitis, pigment dispersion syndrome or a combination of the above, compared to none in the control group. Mean best-corrected visual acuity was 20/35 in the SPA-IOL group and 20/47 in the 3PIOL group.CONCLUSION: Sulcus placed SPA-IOLs are associated with increased ocular morbidity. In select cases good visual acuity may be achieved. Due to postoperative rotation of sulcus placed toric SPA-IOLs stable astigmatism correction cannot be achieved. Alternative intraocular lenses should be considered when in-the-bag placement of SPA-IOL is not possible.

Multifocal and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses

Advances in intraocular lens(IOL)design have rendered cataract surgery a refractive procedure.Newer IOL types include bifocal,trifocal and extended depth of focus(EDOF)IOLs.Their basic difference nestles in the number of focal points that each lens provides,which in turn leads to different visual outcomes.Familiarity of surgeons with the various characteristics of each lens is of utmost importance for accurate IOL selection to match each patient’s needs.In this review,we aim to compare the clinical outcomes after implantation of multifocal and EDOF IOLs in terms of distance,intermediate and near vision,contrast sensitivity,and reading performance.Finally,we discuss the defocus curve and the optical and photic phenomena associated with each type of IOL.

Combined pars plana vitrectomy and suture less scleral fixation of foldable intraocular lens:single surgery visual rehabilitation of dislocated lens/intraocular lens

Background:To evaluate efficacy and safety of combined pars plana vitrectomy(PPV)and scleral fixated intraocular lens(SFIOL)surgery as a single procedure.Methods:Retrospective interventional case series done at a tertiary eye care center in Northern India.Eleven patients who underwent combined PPV and SFIOL surgery were included and analyzed retrospectively.Results:Mean age of the patients was 43.36±15.12 years(range,22-64 years).Eight were male.Mean baseline best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)was 0.78±0.63 logMAR units while the mean post-operative BCVA at 6 months follow-up was 0.37±0.29 logMAR units,the visual gain being statistically significant(P=0.021).None of the patients had a drop in BCVA with nine patients having final BCVA better than 0.48 logMAR units.Choroidal detachment(CD)was the only notable complication,seen in three patients.Other complications included two cases of intraoperative retinal breaks,a case each of reversible corneal edema,ocular hypertension and cystoid macular edema.Conclusions:Combined PPV and SFIOL is an efficacious procedure for managing IOL/lens dislocation and aphakia in a single surgery.There may be short-term reversible complications with no impact on final visual gain.

Postoperative visual performance with a bifocal and trifocal diffractive intraocular lens during a 1-year follow-up

AIM：To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes with a diffractive bifocal and trifocal intraocular lens（IOL）during a 12-month follow-up.METHODS：Prospective comparative study including75 eyes of 38 patients（44-70y）undergoing uneventful cataract surgery.Each patient was randomly assigned to one type of IOL,bifocal（35 eyes）or trifocal（40 eyes）.Visual,refractive,and contrast sensitivity changes were evaluated in a 12-month follow-up.The binocular defocus curve was also measured at 12mo postoperatively.RESULTS：No statistically significant differences between groups were found in postoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities（P≥0.276）.Postoperative corrected near visual acuity（33 cm）was significantly better in the trifocal group during all follow-up（P≤0.004）as well as 6-month uncorrected near（P=0.008）and distancecorrected near visual acuities（P=0.016）（33/40 cm）.Significantly better uncorrected intermediate and distance corrected-intermediate visual acuity were found during all follow-up in the trifocal group（P〈0.001）,which was consistent with differences among groups in binocular defocus curve.Differences among groups in contrast sensitivity were minimal,being only significant at 6 months for some low to medium spatial frequencies（P≤0.006）.CONCLUSION：Bifocal and trifocal diffractive IOLs are able to provide an effective visual restoration which is maintained during a 12-month follow-up,with a clear benefit of the trifocal IOL for the intermediate vision.

Visual function and higher order aberration after implantation of aspheric and spherical multifocal intraocular lenses:a meta-analysis

AIMTo assess the visual outcomes of aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) compared with spherical multifocal IOL after cataract surgery.

Accuracy of eight intraocular lens power calculation formulas for segmented multifocal intraocular lens

AIM:To evaluate the accuracy of eight different intraocular lens(IOL)power calculation formulas for a segmented multifocal IOL.METHODS:A total of 53 eyes of 41 adult cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification and implantation with the SBL-3 segmented multifocal IOL between January 1,2017 and January 31,2019 were included in this retrospective study.Preoperative biometry measurements were obtained using an IOL Master.Manifest refraction was performed at least 4 wk postoperatively.Accuracy of the eight formulas[Barrett Universal II,Emmetropia Verifying Optical(EVO),Haigis,Hill-RBF 2.0,Hoffer Q,Holladay 1,Kane,and SRK/T]was analyzed.RESULTS:Using current lens constants,all formulas exhibited errors of slight myopic shift in refractive prediction.The Barrett Universal II formula had a significantly lower median absolute error(MedAE)than did Holladay 1(P=0.02),Kane(P=0.001)and Hill-RBF 2.0(P<0.001)formulas.The Haigis formula had a lower MedAE value than did the Hill-RBF 2.0 formula(P=0.005).Differences in MedAE values among SRK/T,EVO and Hoffer Q formulas were not significant.After optimizing lens constants,the MedAE values of all formulas were reduced;significant changes were noted for EVO(P=0.022),Haigis(P=0.048);Hill-RBF 2.0(P=0.014),Holladay 1(P=0.045)and Kane(P=0.022)formulas.All formulas performed equally well after optimization of lens constants(P=0.203).CONCLUSION:All eight formulas tend to result in a myopic shift when using current lens constants.Optimized lens constants improve the accuracy of these formulas among adult Chinese patients.

Hydrophobic versus hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification: a Meta-analysis

AIM: To conduct a Meta-analysis pooling randomized controlled trials(RCTs) to compare hydrophobic with hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses in terms of posterior capsule opacification(PCO) development.METHODS: Electronic databases including PubMed,Embase, and the Cochrane Library were queried from their starting till January 2020. RCTs investigating the impact of hydrophobic versus hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses on PCO were considered eligible in this study. The pooled effect estimates were calculated using the random-effects model.RESULTS: Thirteen RCTs comprising of 939 patients(1263 eyes) were covered in this study. Patients with hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses had a lower PCO score than those with a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses [standard mean difference:-1.80;95% confidence interval(CI):-2.62 to-0.98;P<0.001]. Moreover, the frequency of neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet(Nd:YAG)capsulotomy in patients with hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses was significantly lower than patients with hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses(relative risk: 0.38;95%CI: 0.20-0.71;P=0.003).CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses are superior to hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses in patients after cataract surgery due to lower PCO score and reduced Nd:YAG capsulotomy. While similar studies are conducted by other researchers, the present study conducted subgroup analyses that show superior results with hydrophobic lenses in trials conducted in western countries.

Comparison of trifocal toric and bifocal toric intraocular lens implantation in patients with cataract and high corneal astigmatism

AIM:To investigate and compare the quality of life,satisfaction,contrast sensitivity,glare,depth perception,and intraocular lens(IOL)rotation in patients who underwent trifocal toric and bifocal toric IOLs.METHODS:A total of 80 eyes of 40 patients were included in this prospective study.Twenty patients in each group were implanted with trifocal toric and bifocal toric IOL,respectively.Preoperative and postoperative 6-month measurements were recorded for both patient groups.Comprehensive anterior and posterior segment examinations,distance-intermediate-near visual acuity values and the visual function scale questionnaire results were evaluated at these examinations.Patient satisfaction,contrast sensitivity,glare,intermediate-near and distance stereopsis and IOL rotation were also evaluated.RESULTS:No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of distance and near visual acuities(P=0.269,P=0.451).Intermediate visual acuity was significantly increased in the trifocal toric group(P<0.001).The visual function scale results were increased after surgery in both groups(P=0.001 and P<0.001),with no difference determined between them(P=0.158 and P=0.691).The number of patients wearing glasses was low in both groups and there was no significant difference between the groups(P>0.05).The overall satisfaction in the trifocal toric group was significantly higher than in the bifocal toric group(P=0.03).The highest sensitivity was observed at 6 cpd spatial frequency in all patients under photopic conditions(1.80±0.24 logU,1.74±0.20 logU).Distance-intermediate-near binocular depth perception results in both groups were higher in the trifocal toric group(P=0.02,0.048,0.003,respectively).Although there was no significant difference for 3 meters stereopsis,the trifocal toric group had higher depth perception(P=0.577).Mean rotation was 5.76°±3.93°in the trifocal toric group and 12°±7.1°in the bifocal toric group.CONCLUSION:Better results in the middle distance are obtained in the trifocal toric group and less IOL rotation due to digital system-coordinated surgery.Moreover,the overall satisfaction in the trifocal toric group is significantly higher than in the bifocal toric group.

Flapless one-knot suture:a novel surgical technique for transscleral fixation of C-loop intraocular lenses

AIM:To describe a novel suture approach for transscleral fixation of C-loop intraocular lenses(IOL)and to compare the surgical outcomes with the four-haptics posterior chamber(PC)-IOL technique.METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed 16 eyes of 16 patients who underwent transscleral fixation of C-loop PCIOLs using a flapless one-knot suture technique,which were followed up for longer than 17mo.In this technique,the capsulorless IOL was suspended using a single suture for transscleral fixation of four feet.Then we compared its surgical outcomes and complications with the four-haptics PC-IOLs using the Student's t test and Chi-square test.RESULTS:Sixteen patients of 16 eyes with a mean age of 58.3±10.1y(42-76y)who received transscleral C-loop IOL implantation due to trauma,vitrectomy,or cataract surgery with inadequate capsule support showed improved visual acuity.The difference was not significant between two IOLs except the surgery time(P>0.05).The mean operation times of C-loop IOL surgery was 24.1±1.83min and 31.3±4.47min of the four-haptics PC-IOL method(P<0.0001).In the C-loop IOLs group,there was statistical difference between the preoperative and the postoperative UCVA(log MAR,1.20±0.50 vs 0.57±0.32,P=0.0003).There was no statistical difference between the preoperative and the postoperative BCVA(log MAR,0.66±0.46 vs 0.40±0.23,P=0.056).However,there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative UCVA and BCVA between the two IOLs(P>0.05).We did not detect any optic capture,IOL decentration or dislocation,suture exposed,or cystoid macular edema in patients underwent C-loop IOLs surgery.CONCLUSION:The novel flapless one-knot suture technique for transscleral fixation of C-loop IOL is a simple,reliable,and stable technique.

Comparative analysis of visual quality between unilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens

·AIM:To compare visual quality after unilateral cataract surgery with implantation of trifocal intraocular lens(IOL)and asymmetric refractive multifocal IOL.·METHODS:The prospective nonrandom,comparative study consisted of 60 eyes of 60 patients suffering unilateral cataract surgery with implantation of two different IOLs:AT LISA tri 839 MP(30 eyes;Carl Zeiss Meditec,Germany)and LS-313 MF30(30 eyes;Oculentis GmbH,Germany).Visual acuity,refractive outcome,contrast sensitivity,defocus curves,quality of vision,and optical phenomena were evaluated at3 mo postoperatively.·RESULTS:There were no statistical differences between groups in uncorrected distance visual acuity(P=0.13)and uncorrected near visual acuity(P=0.54).In contrast,uncorrected intermediate visual acuity was better in trifocal group compared to the refractive multifocal group(P=0.02).No significant statistical between-group difference was detected in cylinder(P=0.43).Compared to trifocal group,spherical refraction and spherical equivalent in refractive multi focal group were more myopic(P<0.01).Under photopic conditions,no significant statistical differences were found between groups in contrast sensitivity at 3 and 6 cycles per degree(cpd).The refractive multifocal group performed better at 12 and 18 cpd than the trifocal group(P=0.01,P=0.034,respectively).The questionnaires of quality of vision and optical phenomena showed no differences between groups.·CONCLUSION:Trifocal IOL is superior to refractive multifocal IOL in intermediate visual acuity.Rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal IOL is more myopic in automated refraction and significantly better for the photopic contrast sensitivity at high frequency.

Encouraging Visual Outcome of a New Accommodative Intraocular Lens: A Retrospective Long-Term Study with a Mean Follow-Up of 5.3 Years

Purpose: To assess the visual outcome after implantation of the new Hydrophylic IOL type 41 B/G accommodating intraocular lens (AIOL). Methods: The presented lens was implanted during cataract surgery. All patients were offered follow-ups, allowing two postoperative measurements to be performed at 3 months and between 2020 and 2021. The mean time between lens implantation and last follow-up was 5.3 years (min. 1 year, max. 10 years). Excluded were patients with age-related macular degeneration or amblyopia. Patients with a foreign lens implanted into the second eye were included in a separate control group. Corrected distance (CDVA) and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at 5 m, and corrected near (CNVA) and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 40 cm were assessed. Furthermore, the postoperative spherical equivalent (SE), the dependence on spectacles and the occurrence of optical phenomena were evaluated. Results: The final study cohort consists of 65 patients with 119 implanted AIOLs. Significantly better visual results were obtained in both postoperative follow-ups compared with the preoperative results. The mean values of the last follow-up for the UNVA, CNVA, UDVA, and CDVA were 0.107 ± 0.10;0.039 ± 0.08;0.097 ± 0.11;and 0.040 ± 0.09 logMAR, respectively. Visual outcomes remained on a high level for up to 10 years and showed significantly better results compared to the control group. Postoperative SE was significantly improved. Nearly 70% of patients were no longer dependent on glasses. Furthermore, the occurrence of disturbing optical phenomena was denied by all patients. Conclusion: The results of this AIOL are particularly promising, especially since gratifying visual results could still be measured 10 years after implantation.

Optical biometry intraocular lens power calculation using different formulas in patients with different axial lengths

AIM: To investigate the predictability of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using the IOLMaster and different IOL power calculation formulas in eyes with various axial length (AL). METHODS: Patients were included who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with IOL implantation in the Department of Ophthalmology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China from February 2007 to January 2009. Preoperative AL and keratometric values (Ks) were measured by IOLMaster optical biometry. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on AL less than 22mm (Group 1), 22-26mm (Group 2), and more than 26mm (Group 3). The power of the implanted IOL was used to calculate the predicted postoperative spherical equivalence (SE) by various formulas: the Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T. The predictive accuracy of each formula was analyzed by comparing the difference between the actual and predicted postoperative SE (MedAE, median absolute error). All the patients had follow-up periods exceeding 3 months. RESULTS: Totally, there were 200 eyes (33 eyes in Group 1, 92 eyes in Group 2, 75 eyes in Group 3). In all patients, the Haigis had the significantly lower MedAE generated by the other formulas (P【0.05). In Group 1 to 3, the MedAE calculated by the Haigis was either significantly lower or comparable to those calculated by the other formulas.CONCLUSION: Compared with other formulas using IOLMaster biometric data, the Haigis formula yields superior refractive results in eyes with various AL.

Long-term vision-threatening complications of phakic intraocular lens implantation for high myopia

AIMTo report the long-term vision-threatening complications in patients who underwent phakic intraocular lens (pIOLs) implantation for high myopia.