Background:Concurrent chemoradiotherapy(CCRT)is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC).However,the optimal radiotherapy regimen,particularly in terms of total dose and pla...Background:Concurrent chemoradiotherapy(CCRT)is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC).However,the optimal radiotherapy regimen,particularly in terms of total dose and planned range of irradiation field,remains unclear.This phase III clinical trial aimed to compare the survival benefits between different radiation doses and different target fields.Methods:This trial compared two aspects of radiation treatment,total dose and field,using a two-by-two factorial design.The high-dose(HD)group received 59.4 Gy radiation,and the standard-dose(SD)group received 50.4 Gy.The involved field irradiation(IFI)group and elective nodal irradiation(ENI)group adopted different irradiation ranges.The participants were assigned to one of the four groups(HD+ENI,HD+IFI,SD+ENI and SD+IFI).The primary endpoint was overall survival(OS),and the secondary endpoints included progressionfree survival(PFS).The synergy indexwas used to measure the interaction effect between dose and field.Results:The interaction analysis did not reveal significant synergistic effects between the dose and irradiation field.In comparison to the target field,patients in IFI or ENI showed similar OS(hazard ratio[HR]=0.99,95%CI:0.80-1.23,p=0.930)and PFS(HR=1.02,95%CI:0.82–1.25).TheHDtreatment did not show significantly prolonged OS compared with SD(HR=0.90,95%CI:0.72–1.11,p=0.318),but it suggested improved PFS(25.2 months to 18.0 months).Among the four groups,the HD+IFI group presented the best survival,while the SD+IFI group had the worst prognosis.No significant difference in the occurrence of severe adverse events was found in dose or field comparisons.Conclusions:IFI demonstrated similar treatment efficacy to ENI in CCRT of ESCC.The HD demonstrated improved PFS,but did not significantly improve OS.The dose escalation based on IFI(HD+IFI)showed better therapeutic efficacy than the current recommendation(SD+ENI)and is worth further validation.展开更多
基金Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province of China,Grant/Award Number:2017CXZC1206National Natural Science Foundation of China,Grant/Award Number:81874224+1 种基金Academic promotion program of Shandong First Medical University,China,Grant/Award Number:2019LJ004Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province,Grant/Award Numbers:2021LCZX04,2021SFGC0501。
文摘Background:Concurrent chemoradiotherapy(CCRT)is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC).However,the optimal radiotherapy regimen,particularly in terms of total dose and planned range of irradiation field,remains unclear.This phase III clinical trial aimed to compare the survival benefits between different radiation doses and different target fields.Methods:This trial compared two aspects of radiation treatment,total dose and field,using a two-by-two factorial design.The high-dose(HD)group received 59.4 Gy radiation,and the standard-dose(SD)group received 50.4 Gy.The involved field irradiation(IFI)group and elective nodal irradiation(ENI)group adopted different irradiation ranges.The participants were assigned to one of the four groups(HD+ENI,HD+IFI,SD+ENI and SD+IFI).The primary endpoint was overall survival(OS),and the secondary endpoints included progressionfree survival(PFS).The synergy indexwas used to measure the interaction effect between dose and field.Results:The interaction analysis did not reveal significant synergistic effects between the dose and irradiation field.In comparison to the target field,patients in IFI or ENI showed similar OS(hazard ratio[HR]=0.99,95%CI:0.80-1.23,p=0.930)and PFS(HR=1.02,95%CI:0.82–1.25).TheHDtreatment did not show significantly prolonged OS compared with SD(HR=0.90,95%CI:0.72–1.11,p=0.318),but it suggested improved PFS(25.2 months to 18.0 months).Among the four groups,the HD+IFI group presented the best survival,while the SD+IFI group had the worst prognosis.No significant difference in the occurrence of severe adverse events was found in dose or field comparisons.Conclusions:IFI demonstrated similar treatment efficacy to ENI in CCRT of ESCC.The HD demonstrated improved PFS,but did not significantly improve OS.The dose escalation based on IFI(HD+IFI)showed better therapeutic efficacy than the current recommendation(SD+ENI)and is worth further validation.
