Catholyte engineering to release the capacity of iodide for high-energy-density iodine-based redox flow batteries

Due to the high solubility,high reversibility,and low cost of iodide,iodine-based redox flow batteries(RFBs)are considered to have great potential for upscaling energy storage.However,their further development has been limited by the low capacity of I−as one-third of the I−is used to form I3−(I2I−)during the charging process.Herein,we have demonstrated that the pseudohalide ion,thiocyanate(SCN−),is a promising complexing agent for catholyte of iodinebased RFBs to free up the I−by forming iodine-thiocyanate ions([I2SCN]−)instead of I3−,unlocking the capacity of iodide.Applying this strategy,we have demonstrated iodine-based RFBs with full utilization of iodide to achieve high capacity and high energy density.Both the zinc/iodine RFB and polysulfide/iodine RFB with SCN−complex agent achieve their theoretical capacity of around 160 A h Lposolyte^(−1)(6.0MI−in catholyte).Therefore,the zinc/iodine RFB delivers a high energy density of 221.34Wh Lposolyte^(−1),and the polysulfide/iodine RFB achieves a highenergy density of 165.62Wh Lposolyte^(−1).It is believed that this effective catholyte engineering can be further generalized to other iodine-based RFBs,offering new opportunities to unlock the capacity of iodide and achieve high energy density for energy storage.

Acute non-renal adverse events after unenhanced and enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Aim: Investigating the incidence of non-renal acute adverse events (AAEs) in patients undergoing unenhanced or enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) (four groups) using the ac- tive interview-method. Methods: The imaging procedure followed the standards of the department. Furthermore, the iodine-based (nonionic monomer) and gadolinium-based (cyclic) contrast agent was the same as used for all other examinations in the department. All patients were interviewed for 72 hours after the MR or CT examination regarding occurrence of AAEs using a structured questionnaire. Results: A total of 1358 patients (259 with enhanced MR, 434 with unenhanced MR, 450 with enhanced CT and 215 with unenhanced CT) were enrolled. AAEs were significantly higher (P unenhanced MR [39 (9.0%)] and CT [5 (2.3%)] groups. Dizziness was significantly [19 (7.3%), (P frequent in the enhanced MR. The same AAEs were reported in both contrast groups and control groups. Conclusion: AAEs which are mainly considered to be caused by the contrast medium are also experienced by patients undergoing CT or MR without contrast. Enhanced MR is correlated with more reactions than unenhanced MR and enhanced CT. Dizziness was reported more frequently after MR than CT, both with and without contrast;more patients were CNS examined with MR and with CT.