BACKGROUND Utilizing the large jumbo cup in revision total hip arthroplasty is an effective approach to cure many lacunar and segmental peripheral bone defects.However,with the use of the jumbo cup,the center of the h...BACKGROUND Utilizing the large jumbo cup in revision total hip arthroplasty is an effective approach to cure many lacunar and segmental peripheral bone defects.However,with the use of the jumbo cup,the center of the hip joint may become elevated relative to the primary acetabulum,and the diameter of the large cup is greater.AIM To study the height and the significance of the elevation of the hip joint center.METHODS Eighty-eight patients matched the criteria for this condition and were included in the study.The center height of the hip joint was measured relative to the opposite normal hip joint.The diameter of the jumbo cup was measured and checked according to operation notes,and the diameter of the jumbo cup was measured with a prosthesis label.Then,the horizontal and vertical centers of rotation were measured on the surgical side and opposite side.The average center height of the hip joint on the renovated side and the opposite side and the position of the hip cup relative to the teardrop were compared using a paired t-test.RESULTS Radiometric analysis showed that the average hip joint center was elevated by 7.6 mm.The rotational center height delta of the renovated hip was 7.6±5.6 mm,and there was an obvious difference between the two groups(P=0.00).The difference in horizontal distance was 0.5±5.1 mm(-11.5-14.0 mm),and there was no obvious difference between the two groups(P=0.38).According to the foreign standard,the rotational center height delta of the renovated hip was 7.5±6.2 mm,and there was a significant difference between the two groups(P=0.00).There was no obvious difference between the domestic and foreign standards(P>0.05)between the two groups.CONCLUSION The application of the jumbo cup elevates the rotational center of the hip joint,but it is feasible and effective to use the jumbo cup.展开更多
The biomechanical effects of acetabular revision with jumbo cups are unclear.This study aimed to compare the biomechanical effects of bionic trabecular metal vs.titanium jumbo cups for the revision of acetabular bone ...The biomechanical effects of acetabular revision with jumbo cups are unclear.This study aimed to compare the biomechanical effects of bionic trabecular metal vs.titanium jumbo cups for the revision of acetabular bone defects.We designed and reconstructed American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons(AAOS)type I–III acetabular bone defect models using computed tomography scans of a man without acetabular bone defects.The implantation of titanium and trabecular metal jumbo cups was simulated.Stress distribution and relative micromotion between the cup and host bone were assessed using finite element analysis.Contact stress on the screws fixing the cups was also analyzed.The contact stress analysis showed that the peak contact stress between the titanium jumbo cup and the host bone was 21.7,20.1,and 23.8 MPa in the AAOS I–III models,respectively;the corresponding values for bionic tantalum jumbo cups decreased to 4.7,6.7,and 11.1 MPa.Analysis of the relative micromotion showed that the peak relative micromotion between the host bone and the titanium metal cup was 10.2,9.1,and 11.5μm in the AAOS I–III models,respectively;the corresponding values for bionic trabecular metal cups were 17.2,18.2,and 31.3μm.The peak contact stress on the screws was similar for the 2 cup types,and was concentrated on the screw rods.Hence,acetabular reconstruction with jumbo cups is biomechanically feasible.We recommend trabecular metal cups due to their superior stress distribution and higher relative micromotion,which is within the threshold for adequate bone ingrowth.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Utilizing the large jumbo cup in revision total hip arthroplasty is an effective approach to cure many lacunar and segmental peripheral bone defects.However,with the use of the jumbo cup,the center of the hip joint may become elevated relative to the primary acetabulum,and the diameter of the large cup is greater.AIM To study the height and the significance of the elevation of the hip joint center.METHODS Eighty-eight patients matched the criteria for this condition and were included in the study.The center height of the hip joint was measured relative to the opposite normal hip joint.The diameter of the jumbo cup was measured and checked according to operation notes,and the diameter of the jumbo cup was measured with a prosthesis label.Then,the horizontal and vertical centers of rotation were measured on the surgical side and opposite side.The average center height of the hip joint on the renovated side and the opposite side and the position of the hip cup relative to the teardrop were compared using a paired t-test.RESULTS Radiometric analysis showed that the average hip joint center was elevated by 7.6 mm.The rotational center height delta of the renovated hip was 7.6±5.6 mm,and there was an obvious difference between the two groups(P=0.00).The difference in horizontal distance was 0.5±5.1 mm(-11.5-14.0 mm),and there was no obvious difference between the two groups(P=0.38).According to the foreign standard,the rotational center height delta of the renovated hip was 7.5±6.2 mm,and there was a significant difference between the two groups(P=0.00).There was no obvious difference between the domestic and foreign standards(P>0.05)between the two groups.CONCLUSION The application of the jumbo cup elevates the rotational center of the hip joint,but it is feasible and effective to use the jumbo cup.
基金This work was supported by funding from China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(No:2020M670863)Jilin Scientific and Technological Development Program(No:20230203089SF).
文摘The biomechanical effects of acetabular revision with jumbo cups are unclear.This study aimed to compare the biomechanical effects of bionic trabecular metal vs.titanium jumbo cups for the revision of acetabular bone defects.We designed and reconstructed American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons(AAOS)type I–III acetabular bone defect models using computed tomography scans of a man without acetabular bone defects.The implantation of titanium and trabecular metal jumbo cups was simulated.Stress distribution and relative micromotion between the cup and host bone were assessed using finite element analysis.Contact stress on the screws fixing the cups was also analyzed.The contact stress analysis showed that the peak contact stress between the titanium jumbo cup and the host bone was 21.7,20.1,and 23.8 MPa in the AAOS I–III models,respectively;the corresponding values for bionic tantalum jumbo cups decreased to 4.7,6.7,and 11.1 MPa.Analysis of the relative micromotion showed that the peak relative micromotion between the host bone and the titanium metal cup was 10.2,9.1,and 11.5μm in the AAOS I–III models,respectively;the corresponding values for bionic trabecular metal cups were 17.2,18.2,and 31.3μm.The peak contact stress on the screws was similar for the 2 cup types,and was concentrated on the screw rods.Hence,acetabular reconstruction with jumbo cups is biomechanically feasible.We recommend trabecular metal cups due to their superior stress distribution and higher relative micromotion,which is within the threshold for adequate bone ingrowth.