Objective:To systematically evaluate TCM of Fuzheng and Kangai combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of Advanced NSCLC,including the efficacy and effect on the quality of life of patients.Methods:Two researchers...Objective:To systematically evaluate TCM of Fuzheng and Kangai combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of Advanced NSCLC,including the efficacy and effect on the quality of life of patients.Methods:Two researchers independently searched the literature of clinical trails from Jan.2010 until Jun.2020 in the Cochrane Library,Pubmed,Embase,CBM,CNKI,WanFang Data and VIP database.Also,they had been evaluated and extracted strictly by REVMAN 5.3.Results:A total of 1303 patients were included in 15 articles.The meta analysis shows that the TCM of Fuzheng and Kangai combined with chemotherapy can improve the objective response rate[OR=2.14,95%CI(1.67,2.74),P<0.00001],disease control rate[OR=2.54,95%CI(1.88,3.42),P<0.00001]and KPS score[OR=3.28,95%CI(1.92,5.60),P<0.0001],decrease the incidence rate of liver injury[OR=0.34,95%CI(0.21,0.54),P=0.003],hemoglobin reduction[OR=0.53,95%CI(0.28,1.01),P=0.05],leukopenia[OR=0.22,95%CI(0.13,0.39),P<0.00001],thrombocytopenia[OR=0.32,95%CI(0.21,0.50),P<0.00001],toxic effects on the digestive systems[OR=0.30,95%CI(0.19,0.46),P<0.00001].Conclusions:the experimental group was better than control one in short-term efficacy and KPS score.Furthermore,the experimental group can reduce the incidence rate of myelosuppression,toxicity of digestive system and liver.展开更多
Objective: To evaluate the immunoregulation of KangAi (KA) injection combined with chemo-treatment (chemo) for Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We systematically searched the literature of PubMed, EMBASE, ...Objective: To evaluate the immunoregulation of KangAi (KA) injection combined with chemo-treatment (chemo) for Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We systematically searched the literature of PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases for all Randomized controlled trials (published from the earliest possible year to January 2019, no language restrictions) comparing KA injection combined with chemo and chemo alone in patients with NSCLC. Our main endpoints were immune function, clinical efficiency, KPS score and adverse events. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was applied for quality assessment. Results: 11 studies involving 1060 participants were included. The immune function (MD=3.18, 95% CI: 0.98-4.00, P<0.00001), clinical response rate (RR=1.28, 95%CI: 1.17-1.40, P<0.00001), KPS score (RR=1.86, 95%CI: 1.35-2.57, P=0.0002), and adverse events (RR=0.57, 95%CI: 0.50-0.65, P<0.00001) in the group of KA injection plus Chemo were vastly different from those in Chemo alone. Conclusion: KA injection combined with Chemo in the treatment of NSCLC improved the immune function, clinical efficiency and safety compared to Chemo alone. However, because many of the methodologies included in randomized controlled trials are of poor quality, more rigorous design and large randomized controlled trials are needed to test this benefit.展开更多
基金National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81974543)。
文摘Objective:To systematically evaluate TCM of Fuzheng and Kangai combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of Advanced NSCLC,including the efficacy and effect on the quality of life of patients.Methods:Two researchers independently searched the literature of clinical trails from Jan.2010 until Jun.2020 in the Cochrane Library,Pubmed,Embase,CBM,CNKI,WanFang Data and VIP database.Also,they had been evaluated and extracted strictly by REVMAN 5.3.Results:A total of 1303 patients were included in 15 articles.The meta analysis shows that the TCM of Fuzheng and Kangai combined with chemotherapy can improve the objective response rate[OR=2.14,95%CI(1.67,2.74),P<0.00001],disease control rate[OR=2.54,95%CI(1.88,3.42),P<0.00001]and KPS score[OR=3.28,95%CI(1.92,5.60),P<0.0001],decrease the incidence rate of liver injury[OR=0.34,95%CI(0.21,0.54),P=0.003],hemoglobin reduction[OR=0.53,95%CI(0.28,1.01),P=0.05],leukopenia[OR=0.22,95%CI(0.13,0.39),P<0.00001],thrombocytopenia[OR=0.32,95%CI(0.21,0.50),P<0.00001],toxic effects on the digestive systems[OR=0.30,95%CI(0.19,0.46),P<0.00001].Conclusions:the experimental group was better than control one in short-term efficacy and KPS score.Furthermore,the experimental group can reduce the incidence rate of myelosuppression,toxicity of digestive system and liver.
基金the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 81574066,81873362,81704156)the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (grant numbers 21615427,21616318)+1 种基金the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (grant numbers 2016A030310093, 2017A030310024)Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Guangdong Province, China (grant number 20161067).
文摘Objective: To evaluate the immunoregulation of KangAi (KA) injection combined with chemo-treatment (chemo) for Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We systematically searched the literature of PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases for all Randomized controlled trials (published from the earliest possible year to January 2019, no language restrictions) comparing KA injection combined with chemo and chemo alone in patients with NSCLC. Our main endpoints were immune function, clinical efficiency, KPS score and adverse events. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was applied for quality assessment. Results: 11 studies involving 1060 participants were included. The immune function (MD=3.18, 95% CI: 0.98-4.00, P<0.00001), clinical response rate (RR=1.28, 95%CI: 1.17-1.40, P<0.00001), KPS score (RR=1.86, 95%CI: 1.35-2.57, P=0.0002), and adverse events (RR=0.57, 95%CI: 0.50-0.65, P<0.00001) in the group of KA injection plus Chemo were vastly different from those in Chemo alone. Conclusion: KA injection combined with Chemo in the treatment of NSCLC improved the immune function, clinical efficiency and safety compared to Chemo alone. However, because many of the methodologies included in randomized controlled trials are of poor quality, more rigorous design and large randomized controlled trials are needed to test this benefit.
