Traditional Mongolian medicine(TMM)integrates Tibetan and Chinese medicine with indigenous Mongolian practices,focusing on the balance of three core essences:Khii,Shar,and Badgan,derived from the Five Elements-earth,w...Traditional Mongolian medicine(TMM)integrates Tibetan and Chinese medicine with indigenous Mongolian practices,focusing on the balance of three core essences:Khii,Shar,and Badgan,derived from the Five Elements-earth,water,fire,wind,and space.These essences regulate both physical and psychological processes,and their imbalance,often caused by diet,behavior,or environment,leads to disease.TMM utilizes holistic diagnostic methods such as pulse diagnosis,visual inspection,and lifestyle evaluation to identify imbalances of three essences.Treatments include herbal remedies,dietary adjustments,behavior modification,and accessory therapies like moxibustion and massage to restore balance.This mini review examines the philosophical underpinnings,diagnostic techniques,and therapeutic strategies to Khii,Shar,and Badgan,highlighting their importance in both traditional and modern integrative healthcare.展开更多
Objective:This article uses a meta-analysis system to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the method of spleen-invigorating,kidney-tonifying and blood-activating combined with western medicine in the treatment of diabet...Objective:This article uses a meta-analysis system to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the method of spleen-invigorating,kidney-tonifying and blood-activating combined with western medicine in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy,in order to provide evidence-based medicine for the clinical treatment of this disease.Methods:Computer search(January 2009 to June 2020)published in CNKI,Wanfang database,and Weipu Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database with simple western medicine conventional treatment(control group)and on the basis of control group Randomized Controlled Trial(RCT)of the treatment of diabetic nephropathy with spleen-invigorating,kidney-tonifying and blood-activating(experimental group),and manual retrieval of relevant literature that meets the inclusion criteria.Two researchers independently carried out literature screening,and used the improved Jadad rating scale for quality evaluation,and finally used RevMan5.3 statistical software for meta-analysis.Results:A total of 15 randomized controlled trials were included,with a total of 1218 patients,including 621 in the experimental group and 597 in the control group.Meta-analysis showed that the experimental group was improving clinical efficacy(OR=4.35,95%CI[3.12,6.08],P<0.00001),FPG(MD=-0.49,95%CI[-0.89,-0.09],P=0.02),24h urine protein quantification(MD=-0.54,95%CI[-0.90,-0.18],P=0.003),mALB(MD=-15.95,95%CI[-18.12,-13.79],P<0.0001),BUN(MD=-1.79,95%CI[-2.99,-0.59],P=0.004),SCr(MD=-47.63,95%CI[-83.43,-11.83],P=0.009),TC(MD=-1.02,95%CI[-1.42,-0.62],P<0.00001),etc.may be better than the control group;The test group is improving TG(MD=-1.02,95%CI[-1.42,-0.62],P<0.00001)there is no significant difference compared with the control group.Conclusion:The method of spleen-invigorating,kidney-tonifying and blood-activating combined with conventional western medicine treatment of diabetic nephropathy may be superior to conventional western medicine treatment in terms of improving clinical efficacy,FPG,24h urine protein quantification,mALB,BUN,SCr,TC,etc.However,due to the small number and low quality of the literature included in this study,more in-depth research needs to further expand the sample size and include higher quality RCTs.展开更多
In the pilot project of the substantive reform of court trials,“unexpected” judgments appeared constantly because the traditional documentary investigation mode has been replaced by an investigation mode under the p...In the pilot project of the substantive reform of court trials,“unexpected” judgments appeared constantly because the traditional documentary investigation mode has been replaced by an investigation mode under the principle of directness and verbalism. This change in the logic of factual judgments has caused a change in the methods of evidence examination. In traditional evidence examination, evidence obtained from investigations is supposed to be genuine and reliable. In the substantive reform of court trials, it is presumed that evidence obtained from investigations cannot be fully trusted and it is easier to ascertain the facts of the case by investigating using the principles of directness, verbalism and individualized judging methods for evidence examinations. In practice, there are three main factors affecting the genuineness of evidence: the cognitive rules of testifiers, the motivation of the subjects who provide evidence, and the methods used by investigators to obtain evidence. Based on any one of these three factors, it cannot be concluded that evidence obtained from investigations is superior to evidence presented in court. The substantive court investigation is more advantageous to establishing the facts of a case than the traditional court investigation. The essential characteristics of the substantive reform of court trials are pursuing reality in essence instead of in form, and using the files of the court trials instead of the files of the investigation to avoid the evidence obtained through investigations from playing a decisive role in the adjudication thus making criminal procedures trial-centered rather than investigation-centered.展开更多
基金supported by Science and Technology Young Talents Development Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region(NJYT22048)NMPA Key Laboratory Open Fund Project(MDK2023025).
文摘Traditional Mongolian medicine(TMM)integrates Tibetan and Chinese medicine with indigenous Mongolian practices,focusing on the balance of three core essences:Khii,Shar,and Badgan,derived from the Five Elements-earth,water,fire,wind,and space.These essences regulate both physical and psychological processes,and their imbalance,often caused by diet,behavior,or environment,leads to disease.TMM utilizes holistic diagnostic methods such as pulse diagnosis,visual inspection,and lifestyle evaluation to identify imbalances of three essences.Treatments include herbal remedies,dietary adjustments,behavior modification,and accessory therapies like moxibustion and massage to restore balance.This mini review examines the philosophical underpinnings,diagnostic techniques,and therapeutic strategies to Khii,Shar,and Badgan,highlighting their importance in both traditional and modern integrative healthcare.
基金The second round of construction project of the National Traditional Chinese Medicine School Inheritance Studio of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine(Guo TCM Ren Jiao Han[2019]No.62)Scientific Research Project of the Shaanxi Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine(No.2019-ZZ-LC006)Shaanxi The construction project of famous traditional Chinese medicine inheritance studio of Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine(No.2019017).
文摘Objective:This article uses a meta-analysis system to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the method of spleen-invigorating,kidney-tonifying and blood-activating combined with western medicine in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy,in order to provide evidence-based medicine for the clinical treatment of this disease.Methods:Computer search(January 2009 to June 2020)published in CNKI,Wanfang database,and Weipu Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database with simple western medicine conventional treatment(control group)and on the basis of control group Randomized Controlled Trial(RCT)of the treatment of diabetic nephropathy with spleen-invigorating,kidney-tonifying and blood-activating(experimental group),and manual retrieval of relevant literature that meets the inclusion criteria.Two researchers independently carried out literature screening,and used the improved Jadad rating scale for quality evaluation,and finally used RevMan5.3 statistical software for meta-analysis.Results:A total of 15 randomized controlled trials were included,with a total of 1218 patients,including 621 in the experimental group and 597 in the control group.Meta-analysis showed that the experimental group was improving clinical efficacy(OR=4.35,95%CI[3.12,6.08],P<0.00001),FPG(MD=-0.49,95%CI[-0.89,-0.09],P=0.02),24h urine protein quantification(MD=-0.54,95%CI[-0.90,-0.18],P=0.003),mALB(MD=-15.95,95%CI[-18.12,-13.79],P<0.0001),BUN(MD=-1.79,95%CI[-2.99,-0.59],P=0.004),SCr(MD=-47.63,95%CI[-83.43,-11.83],P=0.009),TC(MD=-1.02,95%CI[-1.42,-0.62],P<0.00001),etc.may be better than the control group;The test group is improving TG(MD=-1.02,95%CI[-1.42,-0.62],P<0.00001)there is no significant difference compared with the control group.Conclusion:The method of spleen-invigorating,kidney-tonifying and blood-activating combined with conventional western medicine treatment of diabetic nephropathy may be superior to conventional western medicine treatment in terms of improving clinical efficacy,FPG,24h urine protein quantification,mALB,BUN,SCr,TC,etc.However,due to the small number and low quality of the literature included in this study,more in-depth research needs to further expand the sample size and include higher quality RCTs.
文摘In the pilot project of the substantive reform of court trials,“unexpected” judgments appeared constantly because the traditional documentary investigation mode has been replaced by an investigation mode under the principle of directness and verbalism. This change in the logic of factual judgments has caused a change in the methods of evidence examination. In traditional evidence examination, evidence obtained from investigations is supposed to be genuine and reliable. In the substantive reform of court trials, it is presumed that evidence obtained from investigations cannot be fully trusted and it is easier to ascertain the facts of the case by investigating using the principles of directness, verbalism and individualized judging methods for evidence examinations. In practice, there are three main factors affecting the genuineness of evidence: the cognitive rules of testifiers, the motivation of the subjects who provide evidence, and the methods used by investigators to obtain evidence. Based on any one of these three factors, it cannot be concluded that evidence obtained from investigations is superior to evidence presented in court. The substantive court investigation is more advantageous to establishing the facts of a case than the traditional court investigation. The essential characteristics of the substantive reform of court trials are pursuing reality in essence instead of in form, and using the files of the court trials instead of the files of the investigation to avoid the evidence obtained through investigations from playing a decisive role in the adjudication thus making criminal procedures trial-centered rather than investigation-centered.
