The study examines traditional design approaches for intermediate spaces of residential buildings to support environmentally driven design strategies of current practices.For the evaluation of the potential of traditi...The study examines traditional design approaches for intermediate spaces of residential buildings to support environmentally driven design strategies of current practices.For the evaluation of the potential of traditional design strategies,traditional houses of Korea and Turkey are explored by making a detailed comparison of maru and sofa according to theoretical considerations on intermediate spaces.After examining the concept of the intermediate space and the general characteristics of Korean and Turkish traditional housing,10 cases from 17th to 19th centuries are selected and compared to clarify the features of maru and sofa as intermediate spaces.Based on the results,the arrangement of maru shows characteristics of contradiction between interior rooms and intermediate spaces in a monotonous structural repetition,while sofa presents an apparently hierarchical spatial composition.Sofa has the placeness quality,while maru has the quality of plurality,actively mixing both inside and outside environments.While maru allows various free access with clear spatial continuity,sofa produces a sequential spatial experience with the pleasure of different architectural qualities.Finally,the study suggests opened type and closed type of intermediate space as two possible strategies for modern houses based on the results of comparative analyses.Recent environmental studies in architecture should consider intermediate spaces of various traditional houses due to the insights and possibilities these spatial elements may potentially provide to both architectural practice and theory,especially in a pandemic era.展开更多
基金supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF)grant funded by the Korean government(MSIP),grant number 2019R1F1A10609421F1A.
文摘The study examines traditional design approaches for intermediate spaces of residential buildings to support environmentally driven design strategies of current practices.For the evaluation of the potential of traditional design strategies,traditional houses of Korea and Turkey are explored by making a detailed comparison of maru and sofa according to theoretical considerations on intermediate spaces.After examining the concept of the intermediate space and the general characteristics of Korean and Turkish traditional housing,10 cases from 17th to 19th centuries are selected and compared to clarify the features of maru and sofa as intermediate spaces.Based on the results,the arrangement of maru shows characteristics of contradiction between interior rooms and intermediate spaces in a monotonous structural repetition,while sofa presents an apparently hierarchical spatial composition.Sofa has the placeness quality,while maru has the quality of plurality,actively mixing both inside and outside environments.While maru allows various free access with clear spatial continuity,sofa produces a sequential spatial experience with the pleasure of different architectural qualities.Finally,the study suggests opened type and closed type of intermediate space as two possible strategies for modern houses based on the results of comparative analyses.Recent environmental studies in architecture should consider intermediate spaces of various traditional houses due to the insights and possibilities these spatial elements may potentially provide to both architectural practice and theory,especially in a pandemic era.
