BACKGROUND Percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)is an effective method for the treatment of neurologically intact Kümmell’s disease,but bone cement leakage during surgery is a problem that deserves attention.AIM To r...BACKGROUND Percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)is an effective method for the treatment of neurologically intact Kümmell’s disease,but bone cement leakage during surgery is a problem that deserves attention.AIM To reduce bone cement leakage and evaluate the effect of the sequential infusion of bone cement during PVP for the treatment of stage I or II Kümmell’s disease.METHODS Patients with Kümmell’s disease treated in our hospital from September 2015 to September 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were divided into two groups:Traditional single infusion and sequential infusion(SI).The visual analog scale(VAS)and Oswestry disability index(ODI)were evaluated and compared,and duration of operation,bone cement content and complications were recorded.RESULTS Forty-five patients were included in this study;there were 24 in the traditional single infusion group and 21 in the SI group.The VAS and ODI were significantly different for both groups when compared pre-and postoperatively,whereas the differences between 1 wk postoperatively and at the final follow-up were not statistically.When the VAS and ODI of the two groups were compared,there were no significant differences at any time point.The leakage rate of bone cement was significantly lower in the SI group(14.3%,3 of 21)than that in the traditional single infusion group(41.7%,10 of 24).CONCLUSION SI in unipedicular PVP is a safe and effective procedure for neurologically intact Kümmell’s disease,and this technique could decrease the incidence of bone cement leakage.展开更多
目的:对比单纯经皮椎体成形术(PVP)与应用刮匙器结合PVP治疗椎体内缺血性骨坏死(Kummell病)的临床疗效。方法:对本科2019年1月至2021年3月期间诊断为Ⅰ期或Ⅱ期Kummell病且行单纯PVP或刮匙器结合PVP治疗的35例患者进行回顾性研究,其中...目的:对比单纯经皮椎体成形术(PVP)与应用刮匙器结合PVP治疗椎体内缺血性骨坏死(Kummell病)的临床疗效。方法:对本科2019年1月至2021年3月期间诊断为Ⅰ期或Ⅱ期Kummell病且行单纯PVP或刮匙器结合PVP治疗的35例患者进行回顾性研究,其中观察组15例采用刮匙器结合PVP治疗,对照组20例采用单纯PVP治疗。对比两组手术前、术后第3天、术后3个月随访时的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、椎体前缘高度、Cobb角。同时观察术中骨水泥填充情况、渗漏情况、分布情况及相关并发症。结果:术中骨水泥注入量观察组与对照组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组发生骨水泥渗漏2例,其中椎体前骨水泥渗漏1例,上终板渗漏1例,对照组见椎体前渗漏1例,观察组骨水泥渗漏率比较对照组,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后第3天的VAS评分、ODI、椎体前缘高度、Cobb角较术前均有好转,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后3 d VAS评分、ODI、椎体前缘高度及Cobb角较对照组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后3个月随访时各指标与术后3 d比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后X线显示观察组11例患者骨水泥分布呈弥散型,4例呈团块型,对照组中13例呈致密团块型,7例呈弥散型,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:刮匙器结合PVP相较于单纯PVP,二者在缓解患者腰背部疼痛,改善功能,恢复后凸畸形及椎体高度方面没有明显差异。但刮匙器的使用可以使得骨水泥在椎体内更加充分地弥散,其是否有助于减少远期椎体再塌陷有待进一步研究。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)is an effective method for the treatment of neurologically intact Kümmell’s disease,but bone cement leakage during surgery is a problem that deserves attention.AIM To reduce bone cement leakage and evaluate the effect of the sequential infusion of bone cement during PVP for the treatment of stage I or II Kümmell’s disease.METHODS Patients with Kümmell’s disease treated in our hospital from September 2015 to September 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were divided into two groups:Traditional single infusion and sequential infusion(SI).The visual analog scale(VAS)and Oswestry disability index(ODI)were evaluated and compared,and duration of operation,bone cement content and complications were recorded.RESULTS Forty-five patients were included in this study;there were 24 in the traditional single infusion group and 21 in the SI group.The VAS and ODI were significantly different for both groups when compared pre-and postoperatively,whereas the differences between 1 wk postoperatively and at the final follow-up were not statistically.When the VAS and ODI of the two groups were compared,there were no significant differences at any time point.The leakage rate of bone cement was significantly lower in the SI group(14.3%,3 of 21)than that in the traditional single infusion group(41.7%,10 of 24).CONCLUSION SI in unipedicular PVP is a safe and effective procedure for neurologically intact Kümmell’s disease,and this technique could decrease the incidence of bone cement leakage.
文摘目的:对比单纯经皮椎体成形术(PVP)与应用刮匙器结合PVP治疗椎体内缺血性骨坏死(Kummell病)的临床疗效。方法:对本科2019年1月至2021年3月期间诊断为Ⅰ期或Ⅱ期Kummell病且行单纯PVP或刮匙器结合PVP治疗的35例患者进行回顾性研究,其中观察组15例采用刮匙器结合PVP治疗,对照组20例采用单纯PVP治疗。对比两组手术前、术后第3天、术后3个月随访时的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、椎体前缘高度、Cobb角。同时观察术中骨水泥填充情况、渗漏情况、分布情况及相关并发症。结果:术中骨水泥注入量观察组与对照组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组发生骨水泥渗漏2例,其中椎体前骨水泥渗漏1例,上终板渗漏1例,对照组见椎体前渗漏1例,观察组骨水泥渗漏率比较对照组,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后第3天的VAS评分、ODI、椎体前缘高度、Cobb角较术前均有好转,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后3 d VAS评分、ODI、椎体前缘高度及Cobb角较对照组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后3个月随访时各指标与术后3 d比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后X线显示观察组11例患者骨水泥分布呈弥散型,4例呈团块型,对照组中13例呈致密团块型,7例呈弥散型,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:刮匙器结合PVP相较于单纯PVP,二者在缓解患者腰背部疼痛,改善功能,恢复后凸畸形及椎体高度方面没有明显差异。但刮匙器的使用可以使得骨水泥在椎体内更加充分地弥散,其是否有助于减少远期椎体再塌陷有待进一步研究。
