Objective: To assess patient reported swallowing outcomes before and after injec-tion medialization laryngoplasty in patients with unilateral vocal fold immobility (UVFI). Methods: Case series with chart review of pat...Objective: To assess patient reported swallowing outcomes before and after injec-tion medialization laryngoplasty in patients with unilateral vocal fold immobility (UVFI). Methods: Case series with chart review of patients with UVFI who underwent injection media-lization laryngoplasty at a community laryngology practice by a single clinician between October 2015 and December 2017. Patient-reported validated surveys of swallowing impair-ment, Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10), demographics, etiology and duration of symptoms were recorded before and after injection. A paired t test was done on EAT-10 surveys before and after IML to assess for statistical significance. Results: Twenty-one patients with UVFI and glottic insufficiency underwent IML between October 2015 and December 2017. Nineteen of 21 patients (90％) presented with dysphagia (EAT-10 ≥ 3). 76％ of patients with dysphagia reported improvement in swallowing function af-ter IML. The EAT-10 scores of UVFI patients with dysphagia before and after IML were 17.0 ± 14.0 and 4.2 ± 9.6, respectively (p = 0.004). Conclusions: Nearly all patients with UVFI and glottic insufficiency report associated dysphagia. Three fourths of these patients perceive improvement in their swallowing function after injection medialization laryngoplasty. Patients with idiopathic UVFI may have a more sus-tained improvement and those with severe preop dysphagia may not benefit. Further research is necessary to refine patient selection and to assess duration of improved swallowing function.展开更多
Objective: To report voice outcome measures after injection laryngoplasty using the transnasal or transoral flexible endoscopic technique. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent flexible endosco...Objective: To report voice outcome measures after injection laryngoplasty using the transnasal or transoral flexible endoscopic technique. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent flexible endoscopic injection laryngoplasty between June 2010 and August 2016 was carried out. Only those patients who had pre- and post-injection voice outcome measures recorded were included. Voice outcome measures recorded included perceptual voice evaluation using GRBAS, Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10), maximum phonation time (MPT) and closed quotient (CQ) before and after treat-ment. Results: Forty-six patients were identified, of which 32 had pre- and post-injection voice outcome measures recorded. There were 19 males and 13 females. The mean age was 56.97 years (range 20—86 years) and the most common indication was unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Thirteen patients had a transnasal flexible endoscopic injection), while 19 patients were in-jected transorally. Following injection laryngoplasty, there was significant improvement in the mean grade of dysphonia (2.81 vs. 1.22, P < 0.01, roughness (2.44 vs. 1.34, P < 0.01), breathiness (2.72 vs. 1.13, P < 0.01), asthenia (2.78 vs. 1.06, P < 0.01), and strain (2.44 vs. 1.19, P < 0.01), MPT (3.85 s vs. 9.85 s, P < 0.01) and mean CQ (0.19 vs. 0.46, P < 0.01). There was also a decrease in the mean VHI-10 score (33.31 vs. 7.94, P < 0.01). Conclusion: s: Patients achieved significant improvement in both subjective and objective voice measures after flexible endoscopic injection laryngoplasty via the nasal or transoral route. Voice outcomes were comparable to those reported for other approaches. This tech-nique provides an alternative approach for the management of patients with vocal fold paral-ysis or glottal insufficiency.展开更多
Objective: To review current literature and experience with Gore-Tex? implant extrusion following medialization thyroplasty, as well as to report the unique case of Gore-Tex? implant extrusion following revision media...Objective: To review current literature and experience with Gore-Tex? implant extrusion following medialization thyroplasty, as well as to report the unique case of Gore-Tex? implant extrusion following revision medialization thyroplasty.Methods: Review of existing literature and description of personal experience with unique case of Gore-Tex? implant extrusion following revision medialization thyroplasty.Results: Review of existing literature found no prior reported cases of Gore-Tex? implant extrusion following revision medialization thyroplasty. Risk factors for implant extrusion include the pressure of the implant on insertion and the inability to secure the implant. Cases of implant extrusion can be managed operatively via an endoscopic or via an external open approach.Conclusion: This is the first reported case of Gore-Tex? implant extrusion following revision medialization thyroplasty. Careful consideration should be given in revision medialization thyroplasty as additional implant material may cause increased pressure, a risk factor for implant extrusion.展开更多
文摘Objective: To assess patient reported swallowing outcomes before and after injec-tion medialization laryngoplasty in patients with unilateral vocal fold immobility (UVFI). Methods: Case series with chart review of patients with UVFI who underwent injection media-lization laryngoplasty at a community laryngology practice by a single clinician between October 2015 and December 2017. Patient-reported validated surveys of swallowing impair-ment, Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10), demographics, etiology and duration of symptoms were recorded before and after injection. A paired t test was done on EAT-10 surveys before and after IML to assess for statistical significance. Results: Twenty-one patients with UVFI and glottic insufficiency underwent IML between October 2015 and December 2017. Nineteen of 21 patients (90％) presented with dysphagia (EAT-10 ≥ 3). 76％ of patients with dysphagia reported improvement in swallowing function af-ter IML. The EAT-10 scores of UVFI patients with dysphagia before and after IML were 17.0 ± 14.0 and 4.2 ± 9.6, respectively (p = 0.004). Conclusions: Nearly all patients with UVFI and glottic insufficiency report associated dysphagia. Three fourths of these patients perceive improvement in their swallowing function after injection medialization laryngoplasty. Patients with idiopathic UVFI may have a more sus-tained improvement and those with severe preop dysphagia may not benefit. Further research is necessary to refine patient selection and to assess duration of improved swallowing function.
文摘Objective: To report voice outcome measures after injection laryngoplasty using the transnasal or transoral flexible endoscopic technique. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent flexible endoscopic injection laryngoplasty between June 2010 and August 2016 was carried out. Only those patients who had pre- and post-injection voice outcome measures recorded were included. Voice outcome measures recorded included perceptual voice evaluation using GRBAS, Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10), maximum phonation time (MPT) and closed quotient (CQ) before and after treat-ment. Results: Forty-six patients were identified, of which 32 had pre- and post-injection voice outcome measures recorded. There were 19 males and 13 females. The mean age was 56.97 years (range 20—86 years) and the most common indication was unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Thirteen patients had a transnasal flexible endoscopic injection), while 19 patients were in-jected transorally. Following injection laryngoplasty, there was significant improvement in the mean grade of dysphonia (2.81 vs. 1.22, P < 0.01, roughness (2.44 vs. 1.34, P < 0.01), breathiness (2.72 vs. 1.13, P < 0.01), asthenia (2.78 vs. 1.06, P < 0.01), and strain (2.44 vs. 1.19, P < 0.01), MPT (3.85 s vs. 9.85 s, P < 0.01) and mean CQ (0.19 vs. 0.46, P < 0.01). There was also a decrease in the mean VHI-10 score (33.31 vs. 7.94, P < 0.01). Conclusion: s: Patients achieved significant improvement in both subjective and objective voice measures after flexible endoscopic injection laryngoplasty via the nasal or transoral route. Voice outcomes were comparable to those reported for other approaches. This tech-nique provides an alternative approach for the management of patients with vocal fold paral-ysis or glottal insufficiency.
文摘Objective: To review current literature and experience with Gore-Tex? implant extrusion following medialization thyroplasty, as well as to report the unique case of Gore-Tex? implant extrusion following revision medialization thyroplasty.Methods: Review of existing literature and description of personal experience with unique case of Gore-Tex? implant extrusion following revision medialization thyroplasty.Results: Review of existing literature found no prior reported cases of Gore-Tex? implant extrusion following revision medialization thyroplasty. Risk factors for implant extrusion include the pressure of the implant on insertion and the inability to secure the implant. Cases of implant extrusion can be managed operatively via an endoscopic or via an external open approach.Conclusion: This is the first reported case of Gore-Tex? implant extrusion following revision medialization thyroplasty. Careful consideration should be given in revision medialization thyroplasty as additional implant material may cause increased pressure, a risk factor for implant extrusion.
