Conservative Treatment of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Prolapse by Epidural Injection Combined with Massage under Traction

Ｃｏｍｂｉｎｅｄ ｗｉｔｈ Ｍａｓｓａｇｅ ｕｎｄｅｒ ＴｒａｃｔｉｏｎＣｏｎｓｅｒｖａｔｉｖｅＴｒｅａｔｍｅｎｔｏｆＬｕｍｂａｒＩｎｔｅｒｖｅｒｔｅｂｒａｌＤｉｓｃＰｒｏｌａｐｓｅｂｙＥｐｉｄｕｒａｌＩｎｊｅｃｔｉｏｎＣｏｍｂｉｎｅｄｗｉｔｈＭａｓ...

80 CASES OF PROLAPSE OF LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC TREATED BY ROUND-SHARP NEEDLE

Objective: To observe the therapeutic effect of round-sharp needle for prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc. Methods: A total of 80 cases of lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse were treated by puncturing Qihaishu (气海俞 BL 24), Guanyuanshu (关元俞 BL 26), etc., with round-sharp needle, once every week, continuously for 4 sessions. Results: After the treatment, of the 80 cases, 56 (70 %) were cured, 16 (20%) improved,and 8 (10)%) failed, with an effective rate of 90%. Conclusion: Round-sharp needle works well in the treatment of prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc.

TREATMENT OF 247 CASES OF PROLAPSE OF LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLUM-BLOSSOM MAGNETIC NEEDLE THERAPY

Objective: To observe the therapeutic effect of comprehensive plum-blossom magnetic needle therapy on prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc. Methods: 247 cases of prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc were treated first with manual treatment and then with plum-blossom magnetic needle therapy and effect-increasing pad therapy at specified points and reactive points. Results: After treatment for 2 therapeutic courses,153 cases were cured accounting for 61.94%, 71 cases were markedly effective accounting for 28.75%, 22 cases were improved accounting for 8.91% and the rest one failed,accounting for 0.45%. Conclusion: The comprehensive plum-blossom magnetic needle therapy has a better therapeutic effect on prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc.

CLINICAL OBSERVATION ON TREATMENT OF 80 CASES OF PROLAPSE OF LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC BY COMBINATION OF ACUPUNCTURE AND MEDICINE

cases of prolapse of lumbar intervetebral disc were randomly divided into treatment and control groups. 80 cases in treatment group were treated with combination of acupuncture, oral administration of Chinese medicinal herbs, traction, point injection and intravenous drip of energy dehydration mixture; 70 cases in control group were managed by combination of acupuncture, oral administration of herbal medicines, traction, acupoint injection (without energy dehydration mixture). The results showed that the curative rate and the total effective rate of the treatment group were 91.25% and 98.75% separately, while those of the control group 62.86% and 92.86% respectively. Comparison of the curative rate between the 2 groups showed a remarkable significance (P<0.01). The observation demonstrated that combined treatment of prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc with traditional Chinese and Western medicine is an effective approach.

Tuina Therapy of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Protrusion

ＴｕｉｎａＴｈｅｒａｐｙｏｆＬｕｍｂａｒＩｎｔｅｒｖｅｒｔｅｂｒａｌＤｉｓｃＰｒｏｔｒｕｓｉｏｎ￥ＪｉａｎｇＷｅｉｚｈｕａｎｇ（ＩｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｅｏｆＯｒｔｈｏＰ．／ＴｒａｕｍａＣｈｉｎａＡｃａｄｅｍｙｏｆＴｒａｄｉｔｉｏｎａｌＣｈｉｎｅｓｅＭｅｄｉ...

CLINICAL OBSERVATION ON LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC HERNIATION TREATED BY TRACTION COMBINED WITH ACUPUNCTURE

Objective: To observe the therapeutic effect of traction combined with acupuncture on lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (LIDH). Methods:Eighty-three patients diagnosed as LIDH were randomly divided into treatment group (n=42)and control group (n=41). In the treatment group, besides lumbar traction, electroacupuncture at Jiaji (EX-B 2, L 3～5), Shenshu (BL 23), Qihai (CV 6), Mingmen (GV 4), Huantiao (GB 30), Chengshan (BL 57) and Yanglingquan (GB 34) was added. In the control group, only lumbar traction was applied. Results: In treatment group, the cure plus markedly effective rate was 80.95% with a total effective rate of 92.86%, while in control group, it was 39.02% with a total effective rate of 80.48%. The therapeutic effect in the treatment group was obviously better than that in the control group (P<0.001). Conclusion: Lumbar traction plus EA can effectively alleviate or even eliminate clinical symptoms and signs of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

ELECTROACUPUNCTURE TREATMENT OF 176 CASES OF LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROTRUSION

In the present paper, 176 cases of lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion are treated with electroacupuncture (EA) and topical heat irradiation. Local tender-point is used as the main acupoint, combined with Tunzhong, Tiaoyue, Weizhong (BL 40) and Yanglingquan (GB 34). The treatment is conducted once daily, with 15 sessions being a therapeutic course. Following treatment, of 176 cases, 46 (26. 1%) are cured, 90 (51. 1%) have prominent improvement, 35 (19.8%) have amelioration and 5 (2.8%) have no apparent changes, with a total effective rate of 97.0%.

Effective Therapy to Treat Prolapse of Lumbar Intravertibral Disc

ＥｆｆｅｃｔｉｖｅＴｈｅｒａｐｙｔｏＴｒｅａｔＰｒｏｌａｐｓｅｏｆＬｕｍｂａｒＩｎｔｒａｖｅｒｔｉｂｒａｌＤｉｓｃ￥ＨｕＺｈｅｎｂａｎｇ（ＪｉｎｈｕＨｏｓｐｉｔａｌ，ＳｈｕｎｄｅＣｉｔｙ，ＧｕａｎｇｄｏｎｇＰｒｏｖｉｎｃｅ）Ｔｈｅａｕｔｈｅｒｓａｍｍ...

Therapy of auricular subcutaneous penetration needling combined with row acupuncture at the meridian sinew in 103 cases of prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc

Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of auricular subcutaneous penetration needling combining with row acupuncture at meridian sinew on prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc. Methods One hundred and three patients with prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc were treated with a combined treatment of auricular subcutaneous penetration needling and row acupuncture at meridian sinew. Results Of 103 patients, 46 cases were cured, 33 were markedly effective, 21 effective and 3 ineffective. The total effective rate was 97.1% （100/103）. Conclusion The combined treatment of auricular subcutaneous penetration needling and row acupuncture at meridian sinew has a significant efficacy for the treatment of prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc.

Observation of efficacy on prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc treated with body acupuncture and wrist-ankle acupuncture

Objective To observe the clinical effects of body acupuncture and wrist-ankle acupuncture on prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc, Methods One hundred and eighty cases of prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc were randomly divided into body acupuncture and wrist-ankle acupuncture group （observation group） and simple body acupuncture group （control group）, 90 cases in each one. In observation group, body acupuncture was applied on Ahshi points of lumbar region, lumbar Jiájǐ （夹脊EX-B 2）, Dàchángshú（大肠俞 BL 25）, etc. and wrist-ankle acupuncture was applied on lower No. 4, 5 and 6 regions. In control group, simple body acupuncture was applied on the same points as observation group. Results The lumbar vertebral function and pain scale were improved in either group in comparison before and after treatment （P〈0.05）. Concerning pain improvement, the total effective rate was 95.6% in observation group, which was superior to that （86.7%） in control group （P〈0.05）. Concerning the improvement of lumbar vertebral function, the total effective rate was 90.0% in observation group and 93.3% in control group, without significant difference between two groups （P〉0.05）. Conclusion Combined therapy of body acupuncture and wrist-ankle acupuncture demonstrates apparent analgesia in prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc.

Clinical Observation on Treatment of 67 Cases with Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation with Abdomen Acupuncture

Objective： To compare the clinical efficacy of abdomen acupuncture with body acupuncture for treating lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion. Methods： One hundred and thirty three patients were randomly allocated to a treatment group of 67 cases and a control group of 66 cases. The patients in the treatment group received abdomen acupuncture and those in the control group, body acupuncture. The improvements in the symptoms were compared after treatment. Results： The efficacy rate was 95.5% in the treatment group and 86.4% in the control group; there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups （P〈0.05）. The cure rate after one course of treatment was significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： Abdomen acupuncture has a good effect on lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion with a short course of treatment.

Electroacupuncture plus waist-strengthening exercises for herniation of lumbar intervertebral disc

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture plus waist-strengthening exercises in treating herniation of lumbar intervertebral disc. Methods Fifty patients with herniation of lumbar intervertebral disc were treated with eleetroaeupuncture at the points of Shiqizhui （十七椎 EX-B 8）, Yaoyangguan（腰阳关 GV 3）, Huantiao （环跳 GB 30）, Yanglingquan （阳陵泉GB 34） and waist-strengthening exercises. The total scores of general symptoms were evaluated before the treatment and after four months and seven months of treatment to compare the therapeutic effects. Results The total scores of general symptoms after four months and seven months of treatment were 15.30±5.66 and 19.08±4.57 respectively, which were much higher than the score of 7.42±2.20 before the treatment （both P〈0.01 ）, in addition, the score after seven months of treatment was higher than that after four months of treatment. The variation of scores in patients with different types after treatment was statistically significant （P〈0.05）, and the best effect can he seen in the blood stagnation type of patients with herniation of hnnbar intervertebral disc, then less the patients with liver and kidney deficiency type. Conclusion Electroacupuneture plus waist-strengthening exercises has a satisfactory therapeutic effect on herniation of lumbar intervertebral diste, the longer course of treatment is, the beffer therapeutic effect achieved.

浮针疗法联合口服消髓化核汤治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床研究

目的:探讨浮针疗法联合口服消髓化核汤治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法:将60例腰椎间盘突出症患者随机分为联合治疗组和消髓化核汤治疗组,每组30例。联合治疗组采用浮针疗法联合口服消髓化核汤治疗,消髓化核汤治疗组单纯采用口服消髓化核汤治疗。浮针疗法每隔3~4 d进行1次,共治疗5~6次,消髓化核汤连续口服20 d。比较2组患者治疗前和治疗结束后1 d的腰腿部疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)及治疗结束后12个月的腰椎间盘突出重吸收率。结果:联合治疗组退出3例、消髓化核汤治疗组退出5例。治疗结束后1 d,2组患者腰腿部疼痛VAS评分、ODI均低于治疗前[(7.07±1.71)分,(2.97±1.81)分,t=27.981,P=0.000;(7.18±1.52)分,(3.99±1.87)分,t=28.198,P=0.000;(33.53±7.60)%,(9.20±6.47)%,t=29.734,P=0.000;(33.40±7.70)%,(14.00±7.62)%,t=29.541,P=0.000];治疗前,2组患者腰腿部疼痛VAS评分、ODI的组间差异无统计学意义(t=0.263,P=0.793;t=0.067,P=0.946);治疗结束后1 d,联合治疗组患者腰腿部疼痛VAS评分、ODI均低于消髓化核汤治疗组(t=2.155,P=0.035;t=2.631,P=0.011)。治疗结束后12个月,联合治疗组患者椎间盘突出重吸收率高于消髓化核汤治疗组[(36.61±15.31)%,(22.47±9.72)%,t=-4.268,P=0.000]。结论:浮针疗法联合口服消髓化核汤治疗腰椎间盘突出症,能够缓解疼痛、改善腰椎功能,促进椎间盘突出重吸收,且疗效优于单纯口服消髓化核汤。

扶阳罐循经温推联合益肾活血汤治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床研究

目的观察扶阳罐循经温推联合益肾活血汤治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法选取2019年9月至2020年5月收治的138例腰椎间盘突出症患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为2组,对照组69例采用常规推拿治疗,治疗组69例予扶阳罐循经温推联合益肾活血汤治疗。2组均治疗10天后统计疗效,比较2组治疗前后疼痛症状[分别用日本骨科学会(JOA)下腰痛评分及疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分进行评定]及炎症因子[包括白细胞介素6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)及IL-4]水平变化情况,比较2组治疗期间不良反应发生状况。结果与本组治疗前比较,2组治疗后JOA下腰痛评分均升高(P<0.05),疼痛VAS评分均降低(P<0.05),且治疗组治疗后JOA下腰痛评分高于对照组(P<0.05),疼痛VAS评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。与本组治疗前比较,2组治疗后血清炎症因子IL-6、TNF-α水平均降低(P<0.05),IL-4水平均升高(P<0.05),且治疗组治疗后IL-6、TNF-α水平均低于对照组(P<0.05),IL-4水平高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗组不良反应总发生率4.3%(3/69),对照组不良反应总发生率7.2%(5/69),2组不良反应总发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论扶阳罐循经温推联合益肾活血汤治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效确切,可有效改善患者疼痛症状,抑制炎症反应,临床应用安全可靠。

小针刀联合补肾活血祛痛方治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床观察

目的 探讨小针刀联合补肾活血祛痛方治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的临床效果。方法 选取2016年7月—2018年4月沈阳市中医院收治的135例患者作为研究对象,将所有患者随机分为甲组(小针刀联合补肾活血祛痛方)、乙组(补肾活血祛痛方)和丙组(小针刀),观察与对比3组患者的腰痛分级、治疗前后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和总体效果。结果 甲组总有效率为97.78%(44/45),高于乙组的88.89%(40/45)、丙组的82.22%(37/45),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);甲组治疗后VAS评分下降程度明显大于乙组和丙组;甲组治疗后Denis腰痛分级明显优于乙组和丙组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对LDH患者进行小针刀联合补肾活血祛痛方治疗可以有效缓解患者的疼痛程度、缩短患者的住院时间、提升患者的生活质量,同时患者腰椎功能可以得到快速恢复,值得临床应用与推广。

腰椎立体定位斜扳法与传统腰椎斜扳法对椎间盘及关节突关节软骨影响的有限元分析

目的:分析腰椎立体定位斜扳法与传统腰椎斜扳法对椎间盘及关节突关节软骨的影响。方法:选取1例成年男性L_(4-5)椎间盘突出症患者(椎间盘向左后方突出),采用西门子Light Speed 64排螺旋CT进行腰椎和骨盆扫描,层厚0.5 mm。基于CT扫描数据,应用三维有限元建模软件建立腰椎-骨盆三维有限元模型,通过与文献数据比较验证模型有效性后,分析腰椎立体定位斜扳法与传统腰椎斜扳法作用下腰椎-骨盆整体应力、L_(4-5)椎间盘应力和位移、L_(4-5)关节突关节软骨应力和位移、L_(4-5)上下关节突表面中心点相对空间距离。结果:①腰椎-骨盆三维有限元模型建立及验证结果。建立的腰椎-骨盆三维有限元模型共有550215个节点、344359个单元,高度模拟了腰椎-骨盆的结构与材料特性。在模拟加载条件下,L_(4-5)节段屈伸、侧屈、轴向旋转活动范围与文献中的既往研究结果基本相同。②模型整体应力。实施传统腰椎斜扳法时,腰椎-骨盆三维有限元模型最大应力为5.31 MPa,主要集中于L_(1)、L_(2)、L_(4)、L_(5)椎体;实施腰椎立体定位斜扳法时,腰椎-骨盆三维有限元模型最大应力为29.30 MPa,主要集中于L_(1)、L_(2)椎体及L_(3)、L_(4)、L_(5)椎弓根。③L_(4-5)椎间盘应力及位移。实施传统腰椎斜扳法时,L_(4-5)椎间盘纤维环平均等效应力为1.12 MPa,纤维环整体向左、向前、向下发生位移,平均位移分别为0.36 mm、0.20 mm、0.05 mm;髓核平均等效应力为0.02 MPa,髓核整体向左、向前、向下发生位移,平均位移分别为0.35 mm、0.24 mm、0.06 mm。实施腰椎立体定位斜扳法时,L_(4-5)椎间盘纤维环平均等效应力为1.14 MPa,纤维环整体向左、向前、向下发生位移,平均位移分别为0.39 mm、1.30 mm、0.05 mm;髓核平均等效应力为0.02 MPa,髓核整体向左、向前、向下发生位移,平均位移分别为0.38 mm、1.30 mm、0.07 mm。④L_(4-5)关节突关节软骨应力及位移。实施传统腰椎斜扳法时,L_(4-5)左侧和右侧关节突关节软骨平均等效应力分别为2.46 MPa、3.18 MPa,平均位移分别为1.10 mm、0.21 mm;实施腰椎立体定位斜扳法时,L_(4-5)左侧和右侧关节突关节软骨平均等效应力分别为2.70 MPa、3.22 MPa,平均位移分别为1.46 mm、0.65 mm。⑤L_(4-5)上下关节突表面中心点相对空间距离。实施传统腰椎斜扳法时,L_(4-5)左、右侧上下关节突表面中心点相对空间距离分别为0.75 mm、0.34 mm;实施腰椎立体定位斜扳法时,L_(4-5)左、右侧上下关节突表面中心点相对空间距离分别为0.81 mm、0.23 mm。结论:腰椎立体定位斜扳法与传统腰椎斜扳法均能使腰椎间盘突出症患者病变节段椎间盘及关节突关节软骨产生一定的应力和位移;相较于传统腰椎斜扳法,腰椎立体定位斜扳法能使病变节段椎间盘和关节突关节软骨产生更大的应力和位移,这也可能是腰椎立体定位斜扳法比传统腰椎斜扳法治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效更佳的原因。

腰椎定点旋转手法治疗L_(4)~S_(1)双节段腰椎间盘突出症力学效应的三维有限元分析

目的:分析腰椎定点旋转手法治疗L_(4)~S_(1)双节段腰椎间盘突出症(lumbar disc herniation,LDH)的力学效应。方法:提取1名健康成年男性志愿者脊柱L_(4)~S_(1)段的CT薄层扫描数据,建立正常脊柱L_(4)~S_(1)节段三维有限元模型,并进行有效性验证。基于建立的正常脊柱L_(4)~S_(1)节段三维有限元模型,通过调整椎间盘高度和髓核体积及修改髓核和纤维环的材料属性模拟椎间盘退变,建立L_(4)~S_(1)双节段LDH(左旁中央型)三维有限元模型。在建立的L_(4)~S_(1)双节段LDH三维有限元模型上,模拟腰椎定点旋转手法操作,并以拇指推顶位置为条件,建立2种操作模式(拇指推顶于L_(4)棘突上为M1,拇指推顶于L_(5)棘突上为M2)。分析腰椎定点旋转手法2种操作模式下,L_(4)~S_(1)双节段LDH三维有限元模型整体应力变化情况,L_(4~5)和L_(5)S_(1)椎间盘纤维环与髓核的应力和位移情况,以及L_(4~5)和L_(5)S_(1)关节突关节软骨接触力与应变情况。结果:(1)正常脊柱L_(4)~S_(1)节段三维有限元模型的建立与验证结果。建立的正常脊柱L_(4)~S_(1)节段三维有限元模型共有508705个节点、318640个单元,经验证可用于进一步研究。(2)L_(4)~S_(1)双节段LDH三维有限元模型整体应力测定结果。M1操作模式下,模型整体应力最大为16.85 MPa,主要集中于L_(4~5)、L_(5)S_(1)的上下软骨终板和L_(5)椎体,以及L_(4~5)、L_(5)S_(1)关节突关节;M2操作模式下,模型整体应力最大为15.02 MPa,主要集中于L_(4~5)、L_(5)S_(1)关节突关节和L_(4)椎弓根,以及L_(5)双侧椎板。(3)椎间盘纤维环应力与位移测定结果。M1操作模式下,L_(4~5)和L_(5)S_(1)纤维环的最大等效应力分别为4.3 MPa、3.8 MPa,L_(4~5)纤维环向左、向前、向上的最大位移分别为0.31 mm、0.24 mm、1.20 mm,L_(5)S_(1)纤维环向左、向前、向上的最大位移分别为0.20 mm、0.23 mm、1.10 mm;M2操作模式下,L_(4~5)和L_(5)S_(1)纤维环的最大等效应力分别为4.2 MPa、3.7 MPa,L_(4~5)纤维环向左、向前、向上的最大位移分别为0.35 mm、0.24 mm、1.10 mm,L_(5)S_(1)纤维环向左、向前、向上的最大位移分别为0.32 mm、0.22 mm、1.00 mm。(4)椎间盘髓核应力与位移测定结果。M1操作模式下,L_(4~5)和L_(5)S_(1)髓核的最大等效应力分别为0.35 MPa、0.32 MPa,L_(4~5)髓核向左、向前、向上的最大位移分别为0.10 mm、0.46 mm、0.41 mm,L_(5)S_(1)髓核向左、向前、向上的最大位移分别为0.08 mm、0.40 mm、0.40 mm;M2操作模式下,L_(4~5)和L_(5)S_(1)髓核的最大等效应力分别为0.34 MPa、0.31 MPa,L_(4~5)髓核向左、向前、向上的最大位移分别为0.23 mm、0.46 mm、0.41 mm,L_(5)S_(1)髓核向左、向前、向上的最大位移分别为0.09 mm、0.45 mm、0.40 mm。(5)关节突关节软骨接触力与应变测定结果。M1操作模式下,L_(4~5)左右侧关节突关节软骨最大接触力分别为17.0 MPa、15.8 MPa,最大应变值分别为0.34%、0.32%;L_(5)S_(1)左右侧关节突关节软骨最大接触力分别为9.7 MPa、9.4 MPa,最大应变值分别为0.33%、0.27%。M2操作模式下,L_(4~5)左右侧关节突关节软骨最大接触力分别为15.0 MPa、13.0 MPa,最大应变值分别为0.31%、0.27%;L_(5)S_(1)左右侧关节突关节软骨最大接触力分别为10.0 MPa、8.4 MPa,最大应变值分别为0.29%、0.24%。结论:腰椎定点旋转手法治疗L_(4)~S_(1)双节段LDH,可使L_(4~5)和L_(5)S_(1)椎间盘产生一定的应力变化和位移,促进关节突关节滑动;且手法操作时拇指推顶于L_(4)棘突,力学效应更明显。

艾灸联合推拿手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症有效性和安全性的Meta分析

目的:系统评价艾灸联合推拿手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症(lumbar disc herniation,LDH)的有效性和安全性。方法:应用计算机检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、中国生物医学文献服务系统、中国知网、维普网、万方数据库,筛选艾灸联合推拿手法治疗LDH的随机对照试验,试验组采用艾灸联合推拿手法治疗,对照组采用单纯推拿手法治疗。采用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具对纳入研究的文献进行质量评估,采用RevMan5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:共检索到852篇文献,通过逐层筛选最终纳入12篇文献,均为中文文献。Meta分析结果显示,试验组临床总有效率、日本骨科协会腰痛疾患疗效评分均高于对照组[RR=1.18,95%CI(1.10,1.26),P=0.000;MD=3.77,95%CI(2.32,5.22),P=0.000],试验组疼痛视觉模拟量表评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数均低于对照组[MD=-1.53,95%CI(-1.93,-1.13),P=0.000;MD=-2.28,95%CI(-4.40,-0.16),P=0.040],2组不良反应发生率的差异无统计学意义[OR=0.59,95%CI(0.08,4.58),P=0.620]。结论:现有的证据表明,艾灸联合推拿手法治疗LDH具有较好的临床疗效和安全性,疗效优于单纯推拿手法治疗。

电针联合运动疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床观察

目的评估电针联合运动疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效及安全性。方法选取2022年10月—2023年2月收治的73例腰椎间盘突出症患者,按随机数字表法分为治疗组35例和对照组38例。治疗组采用针灸联合运动疗法,对照组采用传统康复疗法。比较2组治疗前后各项指标变化。结果治疗组治疗后腰痛程度、ODI得分均优于对照组(P<0.05);2组不良反应均较轻微,且治疗组复发率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论电针联合运动疗法可有效缓解腰椎间盘突出症患者疼痛和腰椎功能障碍,降低复发率,安全性高,值得临床推广。

中西医结合治疗肾虚血瘀型腰椎间盘突出症临床观察

目的:观察六味地黄汤加味联合甲钴胺片和右酮洛芬胶囊治疗肾虚血瘀型腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法:选取符合纳入标准的腰椎间盘突出症患者60例,采用随机数字表法将其分为两组各30例。对照组予甲钴胺片联合右酮洛芬胶囊,治疗组在对照组基础上加用六味地黄汤加味。2周为1个疗程,治疗2个疗程。比较两组患者治疗前后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、日本骨科协会评估治疗分数(JOA)评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数问卷表(ODI)评分。结果:治疗组总有效率为90.00%,高于对照组的66.67%(P<0.05);治疗后,治疗组VAS、JOA、ODI评分均明显改善(P<0.05),且改善程度优于对照组(P<0.05);治疗组复发率为7.40%,低于对照组的25.00%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:六味地黄汤加味联合甲钴胺片和右酮洛芬胶囊治疗肾虚血瘀型腰椎间盘突出症效果较好,可缓解患者腰部疼痛症状,改善其生活质量。