Phase Ⅱb trial of in vivo electroporation mediated dualplasmid hepatitis B virus DNA vaccine in chronic hepatitis B patients under lamivudine therapy

AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of in vivo electroporation(EP)-mediated dual-plasmid hepatitis B virus(HBV) DNA vaccine vs placebo for sequential combination therapy with lamivudine(LAM) in patients with chronic hepatitis B. METHODS Two hundred and twenty-five patients were randomized to receive either LAM + vaccine(vaccine group, n = 109) or LAM + placebo(control group, n = 116). LAM treatment lasted 72 wk. Patients received the DNA vaccine or placebo by intramuscular injection mediated by EP at weeks 12(start of treatment with vaccine or placebo, SOT), 16, 24, and 36(end of treatment with vaccine or placebo, EOT). RESULTS In the modified intent-to-treat population, morepatients had a decrease in HBV DNA > 2 log10 IU/m L in the vaccine group at week 12 after EOT compared with the control group. A trend toward a difference in the number of patients with undetectable HBV DNA at week 28 after EOT was obtained. Adverse events were similar. In the dynamic per-protocol set, which excluded adefovir(ADV) add-on cases at each time point instantly after ADV administration due to LAM antiviral failure, more patients had a decrease in HBV DNA > 2 log10 IU/mL in the vaccine group at week 12 and 28 after EOT compared with the control group. More patients with undetectable HBV DNA at week 28 after EOT in the vaccine group were also observed. Among patients with a viral load < 1000 copies/mL at week 12, more patients achieved HBeA g seroconversion in the vaccine group than among controls at week 36 after EOT, as well as less virological breakthrough and YMDD mutations. CONCLUSION The primary endpoint was not achieved using the HBV DNA vaccine. The HBV DNA vaccine could only be beneficial in subjects that have achieved initial virological response under LAM chemotherapy.

Impact of Lamivudine plus Adefovir therapy in chronic hepatitis B Iranian patients, resistant to Lamivudine treatment alone, on disease inhibition: A pilot study

AIM: To evaluate the impact of combination therapy with Lamivudine and Adefovir for treatment of chronic hepatitis B in Lamivudine-resistant patients. METHODS: Among the 110 adult chronic hepatitis B Iranian patients whom were treated with Lamivudine, for 36 months, nineteen patients (17%) with no any biochemical and viral responses to Lamivudine alone, were selected and enrolled in the study. Due to resistancy, Adefovir was added to Lamivudine, and continued for 30 months. We measured HBV_DNA viral load and serum AST, ALT in 0, 12, 24, 30 and 0, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 months, respectively. RESULTS: Between biochemical and viral characteristics, Repeated Measure analysis identified just biochemical markers— Aspartate Aminotransferase level (AST) (P = 0.002) and Alanine Aminotransferase level (ALT) (P = 0.007) —as predictors of response to treatment, while, viral marker—HBV DNA load—was not statistically significant (P = 0.128). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment for a long time, such as 21.5 ± 8.8 months, with Lami- vudine and Adefovir, can cause liver enzymes including AST and ALT, decreasing and being normal. But, this finding is not indicative, for HBV-DNA viral load.