Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely usedin Japan as a minimally invasive treatment for earlygastric cancer. The application of ESD has expanded tothe esophagus and colorectum. The indication criteriafor e...Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely usedin Japan as a minimally invasive treatment for earlygastric cancer. The application of ESD has expanded tothe esophagus and colorectum. The indication criteriafor endoscopic resection (ER) are established for eachorgan in Japan. Additional treatment, including surgery with lymph node dissection, is recommended when pathological examinations of resected specimens donot meet the criteria. Repeat ER for locally recurrent gastrointestinal tumors may be difficult because of submucosal fibrosis, and surgical resection is required inthese cases. However, ESD enables complete resectionin 82%-100% of locally recurrent tumors. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a well-developed sur-gical procedure for the local excision of rectal tumors.ESD may be superior to TEM alone for superficial rectaltumors. Perforation is a major complication of ESD,and it is traditionally treated using salvage laparotomy.However, immediate endoscopic closure followed byadequate intensive treatment may avoid the need forsurgical treatment for perforations that occur during ESD. A second primary tumor in the remnant stomach after gastrectomy or a tumor in the reconstructedorgan after esophageal resection has traditionally required surgical treatment because of the technical difficulty of ER. However, ESD enables complete resectionin 74%-92% of these lesions. Trials of a combination ofESD and laparoscopic surgery for the resection of gastric submucosal tumors or the performance of sentinellymph node biopsy after ESD have been reported, butthe latter procedure requires a careful evaluation of itsclinical feasibility.展开更多
目的探讨不同角度体位对行内镜下黏膜剥离术(ESD)的早期食管癌患者疼痛的改善效果和舒适度的影响,为患者ESD术后选择最佳体位提供依据。方法采用随机对照试验,选取2021年3月至2022年3月在南京鼓楼医院消化内科接受ESD的120例早期食管癌...目的探讨不同角度体位对行内镜下黏膜剥离术(ESD)的早期食管癌患者疼痛的改善效果和舒适度的影响,为患者ESD术后选择最佳体位提供依据。方法采用随机对照试验,选取2021年3月至2022年3月在南京鼓楼医院消化内科接受ESD的120例早期食管癌患者作为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为4组,每组30例,4组均为常规护理,A组术后取自由体位,B组术后取头高脚低30°卧位,C组术后取头高脚低45°卧位,D组术后取头高脚低60°卧位。观察对比4组患者术后回病房和术后8、16、24 h疼痛数字评定量表(NRS)评分及术后24 h Kolcaba舒适状况量表(GCQ)评分。结果A组男17例,女13例;B组男20例,女10例;C组男22例,女8例;D组男19例,女11例。所有患者年龄为30~85岁。4组患者术后疼痛NRS评分的时间主效应、分组主效应和交互效应均有统计学意义(F=618.13、12.14、6.75,均P<0.01)。4组患者术后回病房时的疼痛NRS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。D组术后8、16 h疼痛NRS评分分别为(1.93±0.64)、(0.60±0.47)分,低于A、B、C组(2.87±1.14)、(1.97±1.22)分,(2.17±0.83)、(0.97±0.61)分,(2.30±0.75)、(0.80±0.61)分,差异均有统计学意义(t值为0.79~4.72,均P<0.05);术后24 h B组疼痛NRS评分为(0.23±0.18)分,低于A、C、D组的(1.53±1.08)、(0.30±0.21)、(0.46±0.25)分,差异均有统计学意义(t=5.32、1.34、1.37,均P<0.05);A、B、C、D组患者术后24 h GCQ总分分别为(96.96±3.05)、(99.77±3.21)、(93.53±3.76)、(92.20±3.69)分,差异有统计学意义(F=29.59,P<0.05),且B组患者高于A、C、D组,差异均有统计学意义(t=3.15、7.01、8.52,均P<0.05)。结论针对性体位管理可有效减轻行ESD的早期食管癌患者术后疼痛,提高患者舒适度。展开更多
文摘Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely usedin Japan as a minimally invasive treatment for earlygastric cancer. The application of ESD has expanded tothe esophagus and colorectum. The indication criteriafor endoscopic resection (ER) are established for eachorgan in Japan. Additional treatment, including surgery with lymph node dissection, is recommended when pathological examinations of resected specimens donot meet the criteria. Repeat ER for locally recurrent gastrointestinal tumors may be difficult because of submucosal fibrosis, and surgical resection is required inthese cases. However, ESD enables complete resectionin 82%-100% of locally recurrent tumors. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a well-developed sur-gical procedure for the local excision of rectal tumors.ESD may be superior to TEM alone for superficial rectaltumors. Perforation is a major complication of ESD,and it is traditionally treated using salvage laparotomy.However, immediate endoscopic closure followed byadequate intensive treatment may avoid the need forsurgical treatment for perforations that occur during ESD. A second primary tumor in the remnant stomach after gastrectomy or a tumor in the reconstructedorgan after esophageal resection has traditionally required surgical treatment because of the technical difficulty of ER. However, ESD enables complete resectionin 74%-92% of these lesions. Trials of a combination ofESD and laparoscopic surgery for the resection of gastric submucosal tumors or the performance of sentinellymph node biopsy after ESD have been reported, butthe latter procedure requires a careful evaluation of itsclinical feasibility.
文摘目的探讨不同角度体位对行内镜下黏膜剥离术(ESD)的早期食管癌患者疼痛的改善效果和舒适度的影响,为患者ESD术后选择最佳体位提供依据。方法采用随机对照试验,选取2021年3月至2022年3月在南京鼓楼医院消化内科接受ESD的120例早期食管癌患者作为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为4组,每组30例,4组均为常规护理,A组术后取自由体位,B组术后取头高脚低30°卧位,C组术后取头高脚低45°卧位,D组术后取头高脚低60°卧位。观察对比4组患者术后回病房和术后8、16、24 h疼痛数字评定量表(NRS)评分及术后24 h Kolcaba舒适状况量表(GCQ)评分。结果A组男17例,女13例;B组男20例,女10例;C组男22例,女8例;D组男19例,女11例。所有患者年龄为30~85岁。4组患者术后疼痛NRS评分的时间主效应、分组主效应和交互效应均有统计学意义(F=618.13、12.14、6.75,均P<0.01)。4组患者术后回病房时的疼痛NRS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。D组术后8、16 h疼痛NRS评分分别为(1.93±0.64)、(0.60±0.47)分,低于A、B、C组(2.87±1.14)、(1.97±1.22)分,(2.17±0.83)、(0.97±0.61)分,(2.30±0.75)、(0.80±0.61)分,差异均有统计学意义(t值为0.79~4.72,均P<0.05);术后24 h B组疼痛NRS评分为(0.23±0.18)分,低于A、C、D组的(1.53±1.08)、(0.30±0.21)、(0.46±0.25)分,差异均有统计学意义(t=5.32、1.34、1.37,均P<0.05);A、B、C、D组患者术后24 h GCQ总分分别为(96.96±3.05)、(99.77±3.21)、(93.53±3.76)、(92.20±3.69)分,差异有统计学意义(F=29.59,P<0.05),且B组患者高于A、C、D组,差异均有统计学意义(t=3.15、7.01、8.52,均P<0.05)。结论针对性体位管理可有效减轻行ESD的早期食管癌患者术后疼痛,提高患者舒适度。
