Single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair in the treatment of adult female patients with inguinal hernia

BACKGROUND Women have a 3%lifetime chance of developing an inguinal hernia,which is not as common in men.Due to its cosmetic benefits,single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal(SIL-TAPP)inguinal hernia repair is becoming in-creasingly popular in the management of inguinal hernia in women.However,there are no studies comparing the safety and applicability of SIL-TAPP repair with conventional laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal(CL-TAPP)inguinal hernia repair for the treatment of inguinal hernia in women.AIM To compare the outcomes of SIL-TAPP and CL-TAPP repair in adult female patients with inguinal hernia and to estimate the safety and applicability of SIL-TAPP repair in adult female inguinal hernia patients.METHODS We retrospectively compared the clinical information and follow-up data of fe-male inguinal hernia patients who underwent SIL-TAPP inguinal hernia repair and those who underwent CL-TAPP inguinal hernia repair at the Affiliated Hos-pital of Nantong University from February 2018 to December 2020 and assessed the long-term and short-term outcomes of both cohorts.RESULTS This study included 123 patients,with 71 undergoing SIL-TAPP repair and 52 un-dergoing CL-TAPP repair.The two cohorts of patients and inguinal hernia charac-teristics were similar,with no statistically meaningful difference.The rate of intraoperative inferior epigastric vessel injury was lower in patients in the SIL-TAPP cohort(0,0%)than in patients in the CL-TAPP cohort(4,7.7%)and was significantly different(P<0.05).In addition,the median[interquartile range(IQR)]total hospitalization costs were significantly lower in patients in the SIL-TAPP cohort[$3287(3218-3325)]than in patients in the CL-TAPP cohort[$3511(3491-3599)].Postoperatively,the occurrence rate of trocar site hernia was lower in the SIL-TAPP cohort(0,0%)than in the CL-TAPP cohort(4,7.7%),and the median(IQR)cosmetic score was significantly higher in the SIL-TAPP cohort[10(10-10)]than in the CL-TAPP cohort[9(9-10)].CONCLUSION SIL-TAPP repair did not increase the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications in female in-guinal hernia patients.Moreover,female inguinal hernia patients who underwent SIL-TAPP repair had a lower probability of trocar site hernia and inferior epigastric vessel injury than female inguinal hernia patients who un-derwent CL-TAPP repair.In addition,female inguinal hernia patients who underwent SIL-TAPP repair reported a more aesthetically pleasing postoperative abdominal incision.Therefore,SIL-TAPP repair is a better option for the treatment of inguinal hernias in women.

Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Transabdominal Pre-Peritoneal Vs Open Tension-Free Hernia Repair in Treating Inguinal Hernia

Objective:To investigate and analyze the clinical outcomes of inguinal hernia patients treated with transabdominal pre-peritoneal repair(TAPP)versus open tension-free hernia repair.Methods:The study was carried out from January 2021 to August 2023,and a total of 50 inguinal hernia patients were selected for this study.The patients were randomly divided into a study group(n=25)and a control group(n=25)by the numerical table method.The patients in the control group were treated with open tension-free hernia repair,whereas the patients in the study group were treated with TAPP.The surgical and postoperative recovery indexes,complication rates,and recurrence rates of the two groups were compared.Results:There was no significant difference in the operative time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05),and the postoperative feeding time,time out of bed,and hospitalization time of the study group were shorter than those of the control group(P<0.05);the incidence rate of postoperative complications in the study group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05);and there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate of the two groups after operation(P>0.05).Conclusion:Compared to open tension-free hernia repair,TAPP offers a shorter postoperative recovery duration and hospitalization time,and reduces the incidence of complications.Therefore,this surgical method should be popularized in the treatment of inguinal hernia.

Laparoscopic repair via the transabdominal preperitoneal procedure for bilateral lumbar hernia: Three cases report and review of literature

A lumbar hernia is a rare entity, and a bilateral lumbar hernia is much rarer. From May 2015 to October 2017, we treated only three patients with bilateral lumbar hernias. One patient came to the hospital presenting with right-sided abdominal pain, and the other two patients presented with bilateral lumbar masses. The previous bilateral lumbar hernia reported in the literature was repaired by open surgery. The laparoscopic approach via the transabdominal preperitoneal(TAPP) procedure with the self-gripping Parietex ProG rip? mesh was performed at our center. The laparoscopic repair was conducted by a skilled hernia surgeon, and was successfully performed in the three patients. The patients resumed a semiliquid diet and had no activity restriction after six hours following the operation. No antibiotics were used after the surgery. The operative times of the three patients were 120 min, 85 min, and 130 min. The blood loss volumes of the three patients were 20 mL, 5 mL, and 5 mL. The visual analogue scale pain scores of the three patients were 1, 2, and 2 on postoperative day 1, and were 1, 2, and 1 on postoperative day 3. No perioperative complications, such as bulge, wound infection and hematoma, occurred after the surgery. All of the patients were discharged on the third day after the operation. There was no chronic pain and no hernia recurrence during the follow-up. This study showed that the laparoscopic TAPP approach with the self-gripping mesh is safe and feasible, and can be considered an alternative method for the treatment of bilateral lumbar hernias.

Single Incision Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair for Strangulated Groin Hernia

Introduction: Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has become more popular for various surgical procedures including hernia surgery. Initial results of SILS in elective hernia repair were comparable to those of conventional laparoscopic approaches. However the use of SILS in emergency case has not been widely reported. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the use of single incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair for patients presenting with strangulated groin hernia. Method: Emergency single incision laparoscopic TAPP repair were performed in our unit from June 2011 onwards for selected patients. Retrospectively data including the patient demographics, operative time, type of hernia, hospital stay, complications and recurrence rate were collected and analyzed. Result: There were a total of five patients in this series from June 2011 to June 2012. The median age was 62 years old with a male to female ratio of 4:1. Four patients had unilateral hernia (one femoral and three inguinal hernias) and one had bilateral hernia (unilaterally strangulated femoral hernia and bilaterally reducible indirect inguinal hernia). The median operative time was 75 minutes for patients with unilateral repair. None of the patients required bowel resection. The conversion rate to either conventional laparoscopic or open repair was zero. The median hospital stay was 2 days. No major complication or recurrence was detected. Conclusion: This series showed that single port laparoscopic TAPP repair for strangulated groin hernia is a feasible option with no major complication reported.

Laparoscopic bilateral inguinal hernia repair: Should it be the preferred technique?

Inguinal hernias are amongst the most common conditions requiring general surgical intervention.For decades,the preferred approach was the open repair.As laparoscopy became more popular and available and more surgeons became familiarized with this modality,laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair became an alternative.The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of laparoscopic inguinal repair,with a focus on bilateral inguinal hernias.Initial reports have shown promising clinical outcomes compared to those of conventional repair of bilateral hernias.However,there are only a few studies concerning laparoscopic repair of bilateral hernias.It is yet to be proven that laparoscopy is the“gold standard”in the treatment of bilateral inguinal hernias.So far,the choice of an inguinal hernia repair technique has been up to each surgeon,depending on their expertise and available resources after taking into consideration each patient’s needs.

Transabdominal Pre-Peritoneal Mesh for Inguinal Hernia Repair with External Fixation versus Mesh Stapling

Background: It is unknown whether stapling the mesh affects recurrence rate, incidence of neuralgia, and port-site hernia. We chose to fix it to the exterior reducing port size, cost and pain, at the same comparing this with traditional mesh stapling. Methods: We conducted a prospective trial for laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair on 120 patients in which we fixed the mesh to the anterior abdominal wall using either two prolene threads that passed to the exterior and tied in place or traditional mesh stapling. Results: The operative time is ranged from 35 to 70 minutes for external fixation, 30 to 60 minutes for mesh stapling, and 4 to 51 months for follow-up, and no recurrence occurred in both groups during the procedure. Two cases with post TAPP pain in mesh stapling patients are discussed with reduction of the cost and port size in external fixation patients. Conclusion: It is not necessary to secure the mesh during laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair from the interior and it is fixed only to the exterior allowing a reduction in size of the ports and considerable reduction in cost with elimination of TAPP associated post operative pain.

A New Alternative Technique for Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: Using Groin Innominate Fascial Island Flap

Aim: Despite the fact that reported low recurrence rates and improvement results, optimal surgical technique for in-guinal hernia repair was not found and recurrence was not eliminated. We used firstly groin innominate fascial island flap to reinforce the weak inguinal tissue for the repair. Methods: From the February 2010 to December 2010, 15 patients (13 male and 2 female) with inguinal hernia underwent repair with using island groin innominate fascial flap. The follow-up period ranged from 8 to 12 months (mean, 10 months). Results: Seroma developed in one case. Others had not any complications. Conclusion: Because of our technique avoids from the complications and drawbacks of the prosthetic mesh, autograft and abdominal wall flaps, we think that the groin deep fascial flap can be a good alternative to prosthetic meshes for reconstruction of inguinal hernia repair.

Current trends in laparoscopic groin hernia repair: A review

Hernia is a common problem of the modern world with its incidence more in developing countries. Inguinal hernia is the most common groin hernia repaired worldwide. With advancement in technology operative techniques of repair have also evolved. A Pub Med and COCHRANE database search was accomplished in this regard to establish the current status of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in view of recent published literature. Published literature support that laparoscopic hernia repair is best suited for recurrent and bilateral inguinal hernia although it may be offered for primary inguinal hernia if expertise is available.

Urological Affections after Laparoscopic Hernia Repair in Long-Term Follow up

Objectives: Chronic pain is a severe complication of mesh-based inguinal hernia repair. Pain upon ejaculation, testicular touch sensitivity and dysuria are apparent. Regarding the large amount of patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair, the problem seems quite evident. In this prospective, clinical, randomized, double-blind study we intended to investigate the biocompatibility of three different meshes and their influence on urological affections after operative procedure. Methods: 180 male patients with primary inguinal hernia undergoing TAPP were randomized for using a heavyweight (108 g/m2), double-filament PP mesh (Prolene, 10 9 15 cm, group A, n = 60), a multifilament, heavyweight variant (116 g/m2) of PP mesh (Serapren, 10 9 15 cm, group B, n = 60), or a composite mesh (polyglactin and PP) (Vypro II, 10 9 15 cm, group C, n = 60). We compared in terms of complications (seromas, recurrence rate), urological affections and life quality (SF-36 Health Survey). The follow-up period was 60 months. Results: Convalescence in group A was slower than in groups B and C: mean-term values of the visual scales for pain development were significantly (p th week postoperatively. There were no significant differences between groups B and C. Beyond the 12th post-interventional week the differences diminished. Conclusions: Independent which kind of mesh was implanted still 5% of patients suffered from urological affections 60 month later.

Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Mesh Hernioplasty: A Medical College Experience

Objectives: To determine the feasibility and patient’s outcome of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh hernioplasty for inguinal hernias. Patients and Methods: This study was carried out from March 2011 to April 2014. A total of 130 patients underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh hernioplasty (TAPP) for uncomplicated inguinal hernia. Of this, 10 patients presenting with bilateral inguinal hernias were operated in the single sitting. A 15 cm × 12 cm polypropylene mesh was used in all cases. Operative morbidity, postoperative pain, seroma formation, evidence of superficial infection, chronic groin pain and hernia recurrence were noted. The majority of the patients were discharged within 24 hours and follow-up was done at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months. Results: 130 patients presenting with uncomplicated inguinal hernias were operated over a period of three years in the department of surgery, Govt. Medical College Srinagar. The mean age of the patients was 39.18 years (range: 18 - 70 years). The median duration of operation was 48.5 minutes (range: 18 - 120 minutes). None of the procedure was converted to open inguinal hernia repair. Postoperative pain was observed in 9.23% of the cases and was easily controlled by oral analgesics. Six patients (4.62%) developed seroma, out of which one required aspiration while others settled conservatively. Two patients (1.54%) developed wound infection and one patient (0.77%) had recurrence. None of the patients developed scrotal hematoma or neuralgia. Return to normal activity after TAPP repair was found to be after a median of 16.1 days. Conclusion: Transabdominal preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia using proline mesh may be a safe and effective procedure with low morbidity, early return to normal activity and with a very low recurrence after six months follow-up.

Recurrent abdominal pain due to small bowel volvulus after transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty:A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND Compared with open mesh repair,transabdominal preperitoneal(TAPP)hernioplasty results in less chronic postoperative inguinal pain and faster postoperative recovery.However,it may still lead to rare but serious complications.Here we report a case of intestinal volvulus with recurrent abdominal pain as the only clinical symptom,which occurred 3 mo after TAPP repair for bilateral inguinal hernia.CASE SUMMARY A 50-year-old male patient underwent laparoscopic TAPP for bilateral inguinal hernias.After the operation,he experienced recurring pain in his lower right abdomen around the surgical area,which was relieved after symptomatic treatment.Three months after the surgery,the abdominal pain became severe and was aggravated over time.The whirlpool sign of the mesentery was seen on contrast-enhanced computed tomography(CT).Laparoscopic exploration confirmed that a barb of the V-Loc™suture penetrated the peritoneum,which caused the adhesion of the small intestinal wall to the site of peritoneal injury,forming intestinal volvulus.Since there was no closed-loop obstruction or intestinal ischemia,recurrent abdominal pain became the only clinical manifestation in this case.After laparoscopic lysis of adhesions and reduction of intestinal volvulus,the patient recovered and was discharged.CONCLUSION The possibility of intestinal volvulus should be considered in patients who experience recurrent abdominal pain following TAPP surgery during which barbed V-Loc sutures are used for closing the peritoneum.Contrast-enhanced CT and active laparoscopic exploration can confirm the diagnosis and prevent serious complications.

不同术式治疗腹股沟疝患者的效果

目的:比较腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)、腹腔镜全腹腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术(TEP)与传统无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝患者的效果。方法:选取2021年3月至2023年1月该院收治的141例腹股沟疝患者进行前瞻性研究,依据随机数字表法将其分为传统组、腹腔镜A组、腹腔镜B组各47例。传统组行无张力疝修补术治疗,腹腔镜A组行TAPP治疗,腹腔镜B组行TEP治疗,比较三组围术期指标水平、术后疼痛程度[视觉模拟评分法(VAS)]评分、手术前后应激指标水平[皮质醇(Cor)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)、促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)]水平、术后1周内并发症发生率和随访3个月的复发率。结果:腹腔镜A、B组手术时间、肠道功能恢复时间均长于传统组,下床活动时间均短于传统组,术中失血量均少于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);腹腔镜B组手术时间、下床活动时间均短于腹腔镜A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);腹腔镜A、B组术中失血量、肠道功能恢复时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);腹腔镜A、B组术后1 d、3 d和1周VAS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后3d,三组血清ACTH、NE、Cor水平均高于术前1 d,但腹腔镜B组<腹腔镜A组<传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);三组并发症发生率、复发率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:TEP、TAPP治疗腹股沟疝患者下床活动时间均短于传统无张力疝修补术治疗,术中失血量均少于传统无张力疝修补术治疗;TEP治疗腹股沟疝患者的手术时间、下床活动时间均短于TAPP治疗,应激指标水平均低于TAPP治疗和传统无张力疝修补术治疗,三种术式各有利弊。

腹腔镜下经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术治疗嵌顿性股疝的临床效果研究

目的:探讨腹腔镜下经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)在治疗嵌顿性股疝方面的安全性及有效性。方法:回顾分析2017年4月—2021年12月天津中医药大学第一附属医院收治的30例嵌顿性股疝患者的临床资料,根据手术方式分为腹腔镜组17例,开放组13例,比较两组患者的手术情况、住院时间、并发症及随访结果等。结果:腹腔镜组手术时间[(71.35±10.48)min vs(86.90±12.54)min,P=0.010]、术中出血量[(17.06±3.40)m L vs(33.69±6.55)m L,P<0.001]、住院天数少于开放组[(5.90±1.30)d vs(8.23±9.93)d,P<0.001],术后疼痛评分低于开放组[(1.12±0.33)vs(2.09±0.70),P<0.001],术后排气时间短于开放组[(14.82±4.20)h vs(21.64±3.17)h,P<0.001],差异均有统计学意义;两组术后并发症无统计差异,术后随访1年,两组患者均未见复发。结论:TAPP手术治疗嵌顿性股疝是安全有效的,具有减少手术时间及出血,促进患者康复的优势。

4K高清腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的临床研究

目的探究4K高清腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的临床效果及安全性。方法选取2018年1月至2022年7月如皋市中医院收治的92例老年腹股沟疝患者的病历资料行回顾性分析,按治疗方案分为2组。对照组42例,采用常规腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术治疗;研究组50例,采用4K高清腹腔镜联合经腹腹膜前修补术治疗。比较2组患者手术相关指标、术后疼痛程度[视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分法评估]、血气指标[动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO_(2))、动脉血氧分压(PaO_(2))、pH值]、血清炎症因子水平[血清C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素⁃6(IL⁃6)],记录术后并发症发生率。结果研究组手术时间长于对照组,首次下床活动时间、住院时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。术前及术后48 h,2组患者的PaCO_(2)、PaO_(2)、pH值组间及组内差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组术后24、48、72 h的VAS评分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。术后48 h,2组患者的CRP、IL⁃6均降低,且研究组低于对照组(P<0.05)。2组患者术后并发症发生率及复发率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论4K高清腹腔镜联合经腹腹膜前修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝,在促进患者术后恢复、减轻术后疼痛反应方面更具优越性,而相对于常规腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术,其手术时间稍长。

经腹腹膜前疝修补术与全腹膜外疝修补术治疗双侧腹股沟疝的效果比较

目的:分析并比较经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)与全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)两种手术方式用于双侧腹股沟疝治疗的效果。方法:选取100例双侧腹股沟疝患者作为研究对象,根据手术方式不同分为TAPP组和TEP组,每组50例患者,观察两组患者手术期间及术后相关指标,比较两组的疗效。结果:TAPP组患者平均手术时间、治疗费用均高于TEP组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。TAPP组与TEP组患者术中出血量、疼痛持续时间、术后排气时间、住院时间以及术后12 h、24 h痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者手术有效率、复发率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:经腹腹膜前疝修补术与全腹膜外疝修补术均可安全有效应用于双侧腹股沟疝的治疗,应根据患者身体状况合理选择适宜的手术方式,促进患者康复。

脐动脉索在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的临床意义

目的 探讨脐动脉索在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)中的临床意义。方法 回顾性分析2019年6月至2022年6月无锡市新吴区新瑞医院收治的60例腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,根据术中是否以脐动脉索为标志将患者分为2组。对照组和观察组均按常规操作步骤进行手术。观察组刻意显露脐动脉索,并以其为参照物精准游离手术平面与间隙,完成标准壁化,同时利用输精管与脐动脉索交汇所形成的夹角辅助固定补片。比较2组患者的手术时间、精索壁化时间、住院时间、膀胱表面出血量、疝囊完整剥离率、术后并发症发生及复发情况。结果 2组患者的手术时间、疝囊完整剥离率、住院时间、复发率及慢性疼痛、尿潴留等术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患者的精索壁化时间、膀胱表面出血量、血清肿发生率短/低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 脐动脉索形态恒定,解剖位置、走行相对固定。TAPP术中以脐动脉索作为参照、引导标志,尤其解剖层面致密不清或误入层面时,可指引术者在正确层面操作,规范精索壁化,减少出血、副损伤,且脐动脉索还可起到辅助补片固定,防止补片移位的作用。

腹腔镜下经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术后应用芒硝外敷防治血清肿的临床研究

目的:探讨腹腔镜下经腹腔腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后应用芒硝外敷防治血清肿的的临床疗效。方法:选取安徽省亳州市中医院2021年8月—2022年3月普通外科收治的腹股沟疝拟行腹腔镜疝修补术患者120例,采用随机数字表法随机分试验组和对照组,每组各60例。两组均接受腹腔镜下经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)。试验组术后即予以芒硝外敷,对照组予以沙袋压迫。比较两组患者术后血清肿发生情况以及其他手术指标。结果:两组患者在术后1 d VAS评分[(4.15±1.15)分vs(5.62±1.22)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在术后1 d、3 d、7 d、30 d血清肿发生率、术后1 d、3 d、7 d阴囊肿胀发生率、住院时间[(4.72±1.42)d vs(5.22±1.38)d]、手术时间[(108.20±46.41)min vs(104.17±44.52)min]、术中出血量[(5.83±0.94)m L vs(5.80±0.90)mL]差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:TAPP术后应用芒硝外敷可减轻术后疼痛,有助于降低术后血清肿的发生率,从而促进患者的快速康复,具有简单、方便及价廉等优势,值得临床推广使用。

腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前间隙疝修补术治疗老年嵌顿性腹股沟疝患者的效果

目的:观察腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前间隙疝修补术治疗老年嵌顿性腹股沟疝患者的效果。方法:选取2020年1月至2022年12月该院收治的121例老年嵌顿性腹股沟疝患者进行前瞻性研究,根据随机数字表法将其分为对照组60例和观察组61例。对照组采用无张力疝修补术治疗,观察组采用腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前间隙疝修补术治疗,比较两组围手术指标水平、手术前后疼痛程度[视觉模拟评分法(VAS)]评分、创伤应激反应指标[前列腺素E_(2)(PGE_(2))、促肾上腺皮质激素释放激素(CRH)、促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)]水平和术后1周并发症发生率。结果:观察组手术时间长于对照组,肛门排气时间和下床活动时间均短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后,观察组VAS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后,两组PGE_(2)、CRH、ACTH水平均高于术前,但观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前间隙疝修补术治疗老年嵌顿性腹股沟疝患者可改善围手术指标水平,降低VAS评分和创伤应激反应指标水平,效果优于无张力疝修补术治疗。

腹腔镜疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的有效性及安全性比较

目的探讨腹腔镜疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的有效性与安全性。方法随机选择2020年1月—2023年1月莆田学院附属医院胃肠外科收治的350例成人腹股沟疝患者,以随机数表法将其分为观察组(175例)和对照组(175例),对照组患者应用开放式无张力疝修补术治疗,观察组患者应用腹腔镜疝修补术治疗,比较两组患者的临床疗效,手术时间、下床活动时间、痛感持续时间、术中出血量、住院时间等手术及恢复指标,患者术后1~3 d视觉模拟评分(Visual Analogue Scale,VAS),发生切口感染、尿潴留等并发症发生率以及随访6个月的复发率。结果观察组治疗总有效率为97.71%,高于对照组的81.14%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=25.417,P<0.05)。观察组手术时间比对照组长,术中出血量、下床活动时间、痛感持续时间和住院时间等手术、恢复指标均短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。术后1~3 d观察组患者VAS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。并发症发生率为8.57%,低于对照组的20.57%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组随访6个月均未存在复发病例。结论针对成人腹股沟疝患者应用腹腔镜疝修补术治疗比开放式无张力疝修补术治疗更有效,安全性更高,患者术后疼痛少,恢复时间短。

腹腔镜疝修补术中补片固定方式的应用现状及研究进展

手术是治愈腹股沟疝的唯一手段。应用补片的疝修补术是当今标准腹股沟疝修补术,近年来随着微创技术的高速发展,大多倾向于腹腔镜下进行。随着该术式的广泛开展,诸如复发、疼痛、血清肿等一系列问题也日渐凸显。其中,补片固定方式的选择与应用与其密切相关,并在一定程度上决定疝修补的成败。本文对腹腔镜疝修补术中补片固定方式的应用现状进行综述。