Prevention of common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: Since the widespread adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the late 1980s, a rise in common bile duct (CBD) injury has been reported. We analyzed the factors contributing to a record of zero CBD injuries in 10 000 consecutive LCs. METHODS: The retrospective investigation included 10 000 patients who underwent LC from July 1992 to June 2007. LC was performed by 4 teams of surgeons. The chief main surgeon of each team has had over 10 years of experience in hepatobiliary surgery. Calot's triangle was carefully dissected, and the relationship of the cystic duct to the CBD and common hepatic duct was clearly identified. A clip was applied to the cystic duct at the neck of the gallbladder and the duct was incised with scissors proximal to the clip. The cystic artery was dissected by the same method. Then, the gallbladder was dissected from its liver bed. A drain was routinely left at the gallbladder bed for 1-2 days postoperatively. RESULTS: No CBD injuries occurred in 10 000 consecutive LCs, and there were 16 duct leaks (0.16%). Among these there were 10 Luschka duct leaks (0.1%) and 6 cystic duct leaks (0.06%). Four hundred thirty cases were converted to open cholecystectomy (OC), giving a conversion rate of 4.3%. After a mean follow-up of 17.5 months (range 6-24 months), no postoperative death due to LC occurred, and good results were observed in 95% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our 10 000 LCs with zero CBD injuries, the techniques used and practices at our department have been successful. Surgeon's expertise in biliary surgery, preoperative imaging, precise operative procedures, and conversion from LC to OC when needed are important measures to prevent CBD injuries.

Effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on lung function:A systematic review

AIM: To present and integrate findings of studies investigating the effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on various aspects of lung function.

Analysis of the Effect of Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy in Patients with Cholelithiasis and the Effect on CRP and IL-1βLevels

Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)and open cholecystectomy(OC)on cholelithiasis.Methods:92 cases of cholelithiasis patients admitted to the hospital in the past 2 years were selected and grouped by random number table;the observation group was treated with LC;the reference group was treated with OC,and the inflammatory factor and other indexes were compared.Results:The total effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the reference group,and the perioperative indexes were better than that of the reference group(P<0.05).Preoperatively,the C-reactive protein(CRP)and interleukin-1β(IL-1β)levels and immune function indexes of the two groups were compared,and no difference was seen(P>0.05).At 5 days postoperatively,the CRP and IL-1βlevels of the observation group were lower than those of the reference group,and the immune function indicators were higher than those of the reference group(P<0.05).The complication rate of the observation group was lower than that of the reference group(P<0.05).Conclusion:LC can increase the effective rate of cholelithiasis patients,improve their perioperative indexes,reduce the inflammatory response,protect patients’immune function,and ensure higher surgical safety.

Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy in elderly patients

AIM:To investigate the comparative effect of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in elderly patients.METHODS:Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has induced a revolution in the treatment of gallbladder disease.Nevertheless,surgeons have been reluctant to implement the concepts of minimally invasive surgery in older patients.A systematic review of Medline was embarked on,up to June 2013.Studies which provided outcome data on patients aged 65 years or older,subjected to laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy were considered.Mortality,morbidity,cardiac and pulmonary complications were the outcome measures of treatment effect.The methodological quality of selected studies was appraised using valid assessment tools.Τhe random-effects model was applied to synthesize outcome data.RESULTS:Out of a total of 337 records,thirteen articles(2 randomized and 11 observational studies)reporting on the outcome of 101559 patients(48195in the laparoscopic and 53364 in the open treatment group,respectively)were identified.Odds ratios(OR)were constantly in favor of laparoscopic surgery,in terms of mortality(1.0%vs 4.4%,OR=0.24,95%CI:0.17-0.35,P<0.00001),morbidity(11.5%vs 21.3%,OR=0.44,95%CI:0.33-0.59,P<0.00001),cardiac(0.6%vs 1.2%,OR=0.55,95%CI:0.38-0.80,P=0.002)and respiratory complications(2.8%vs 5.0%,OR=0.55,95%CI:0.51-0.60,P<0.00001).Critical analysis of solid study data,demonstrated a trend towards improved outcomes for the laparoscopic concept,when adjusted for age and co-morbid diseases.CONCLUSION:Further high-quality evidence is necessary to draw definite conclusions,although bestavailable evidence supports the selective use of laparoscopy in this patient population.

Early vs late cholecystectomy in mild gall stone pancreatitis: Anupdated meta-analysis and review of literature

BACKGROUND Gallstone pancreatitis is one of the most common causes of acute pancreatitis.Cholecystectomy remains the definitive treatment of choice to prevent recurrence.The rate of early cholecystectomies during index admission remains low due toperceived increased risk of complications.AIMTo compare outcomes including length of stay, duration of surgery, biliarycomplications, conversion to open cholecystectomy, intra-operative, and postoperativecomplications between patients who undergo cholecystectomy duringindex admission as compared to those who undergo cholecystectomy thereafter.METHODSStatistical Method: Pooled proportions were calculated using both Mantel-Haenszel method (fixed effects model) and DerSimonian Laird method (randomeffects model).RESULTSInitial search identified 163 reference articles, of which 45 were selected andreviewed. Eighteen studies (n = 2651) that met the inclusion criteria were includedin this analysis. Median age of patients in the late group was 43.8 years while thatin the early group was 43.6. Pooled analysis showed late laparoscopiccholecystectomy group was associated with an increased length of stay by 88.96 h(95%CI: 86.31 to 91.62) as compared to early cholecystectomy group. Pooled riskdifference for biliary complications was higher by 10.76% (95%CI: 8.51 to 13.01) in the late cholecystectomy group as compared to the early cholecystectomy group.Pooled analysis showed no risk difference in intraoperative complications [riskdifference: 0.41%, (95%CI: -1.58 to 0.75)], postoperative complications [riskdifference: 0.60%, (95%CI: -2.21 to 1.00)], or conversion to open cholecystectomy[risk difference: 1.42%, (95%CI: -0.35 to 3.21)] between early and latecholecystectomy groups. Pooled analysis showed the duration of surgery to beprolonged by 39.11 min (95%CI: 37.44 to 40.77) in the late cholecystectomy groupas compared to the early group.CONCLUSIONIn patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis early cholecystectomy leads to shorterhospital stay, shorter duration of surgery, while decreasing the risk of biliarycomplications. Rate of intraoperative, post-operative complications and chances ofconversion to open cholecystectomy do not significantly differ whethercholecystectomy was performed early or late.

Consecutive laparoscopic gallbladder and spleen resections in cirrhotic patients

AIM:To evaluate the feasibility,safety,and effectiveness of consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)plus splenectomy(LS)in liver cirrhosis patients.METHODS:From 2003 to 2013,17(group 1)patients with liver cirrhosis complicated by hypersplenism and symptomatic gallstones were treated with combined LC and LS,while 58(group 2)patients with liver cirrhosis and hypersplenism received LS alone.An additional 14(group 3)patients who received traditional open procedures during the same period were included as controls.Data were retrospectively collected and reviewed in regard to demographic characteristics and preoperative,intraoperative and postoperative features.Differences between the three groups were assessed by statistical analysis.RESULTS:The three groups showed no significant differences in the demographic characteristics or preoperative status.However,the patients treated with LC and LS required significantly longer operative time,shorter postoperative stay as well as shorter time of return to the first oral intake,and suffered less intraoperative blood loss as well as fewer postoperative surgical infections than the patients treated with traditional open procedures(group 1 vs group 3,P<0.05 for all).The patients treated with LC and LS showed no significant differences in the intraoperative and postoperative variables from those treated with LS alone(group 1 vs group 2).All patients showed significant improvements in the haematological responses(preoperative period vs postoperative period,P<0.05 for all).None of the patients treated with LC and LS presented with any gallstone-associated symptoms following discharge,while the patients treated with the traditional open procedures expressed complaints of discomfort related to their surgical incisions.CONCLUSION:Consecutive LC and LS is an appropriate treatment option for liver cirrhosis patients with gallstones and hypersplenism,especially for those with Child-Pugh A and B.

单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中转开腹或传统腹腔镜手术的影响因素

目的:探讨单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)中转手术的影响因素。方法:回顾分析2011年1月至2021年12月为916例患者行SILC的临床资料,其中883例成功完成SILC,33例中转手术,分析中转原因并对相应指标进行单因素、多因素Logistic分析。结果:33例中转患者中18例中转传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(胆管变异7例、胆囊动脉变异2例、腹腔粘连3例、胆囊体积大3例、胆囊壁厚2例、肥胖1例),15例中转开腹(胆管变异7例、腹腔粘连8例)。单因素分析结果显示,BMI、腹部手术史、腹腔粘连、胆囊长径>8 cm、胆囊壁厚度>3 mm、解剖变异是中转手术的影响因素(P<0.05);多因素Logistic分析结果显示,解剖变异(OR=8.103,95%CI=2.967~22.128,P<0.001)、BMI(OR=1.656,95%CI=1.391~1.971,P<0.001)、腹腔粘连(OR=3.782,95%CI=1.111~12.876,P=0.033)、胆囊长径>8 cm(OR=3.275,95%CI=1.266~8.467,P=0.014)、胆囊壁厚度>3 mm(OR=3.520,95%CI=1.321~9.384,P=0.012)是SILC中转的独立危险因素(P<0.05),而腹部手术史(OR=1.733,95%CI=0.565~5.317,P=0.336)不是独立危险因素(P>0.05)。结论:BMI、解剖变异、胆囊长径>8 cm、胆囊壁厚度>3 mm、腹腔粘连是SILC中转的独立危险因素,术前应充分评估患者情况,选择合理的手术方案,预估术中风险。

腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹手术对胆囊结石患者的影响

目的:探究腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹手术对胆囊结石患者的影响。方法:回顾性收集自2019年5月至2023年10月本院收治的104例胆囊结石患者的临床资料,根据手术方法将患者分为对照组(开腹手术,n=51)与观察组(腹腔镜胆囊切除术,n=53)。分析对比两组的治疗疗效;术后3 d采用酶联免疫法检测P物质、5-羟色胺以及去甲肾上腺素(Norepinephrine,NE)水平;术后1 w内评估患者术后恢复情况并于出院前判断患者术后并发症发生情况。结果:观察组的治疗有效率显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。术后3 d,两组的P物质、5-羟色胺、NE水平均上升,且观察组的P物质、5-羟色胺、NE水平均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组的肛门排气时间、下床活动时间以及住院时间均显著短于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组(5.66%)术后并发症发生率显著低于对照组(19.60%)(P<0.05)。结论:与传统开腹手术相比较,腹腔镜胆囊切除术对胆囊结石患者的临床疗效更好,能减轻术后的疼痛感,促进患者术后恢复,降低并发症发生率。

经胆囊板入路行腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石的可行性研究

目的探究经胆囊板入路行腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石的可行性。方法回顾性分析2020年1月至2023年1月于贵溪市人民医院行胆囊切除术的80例胆囊结石患者作为研究对象,根据手术方式的不同分为腹腔镜组(n=42)与开放组(n=38)。开放组行开放胆囊切除术治疗,腹腔镜组经胆囊板入路行腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗,比较两组手术指标、创伤应激反应指标、免疫功能指标及术后并发症发生情况。结果腹腔镜组手术时间短于开放组,术中出血量和术后引流液总量均少于开放组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后12、24、36、48 h,腹腔镜组视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分均低于开放组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后72 h,腹腔镜组皮质醇(cortisol,Cor)、白细胞介素-6(interleukin 6,IL-6)和血清C反应蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP)水平均低于开放组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后72 h,腹腔镜组CD3^(+)、CD4^(+)水平和CD4^(+)/CD8^(+)均高于开放组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腹腔镜组并发症发生率为23.81%,开放组为28.95%,两组比较差异无统计学意义。结论与开放胆囊切除术比较,经胆囊板入路行腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石效果更佳,可缓解患者术后疼痛,改善创伤应激反应,对患者术后免疫功能影响较小,安全性较高。

急性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除中转开腹患者术中低体温风险预警模型的构建与验证

目的:探讨急性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除中转开腹患者术中发生低体温的影响因素,基于独立危险因素构建并验证风险预测模型。方法:回顾性选取2019年1月至2023年12月收治的114例急性结石性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术中转开腹患者作为建模组,按6∶4比例纳入76例急性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术中转开腹患者作为验证组。根据建模组中患者是否发生低体温分为发生组与未发生组,通过单因素分析与多因素Logistic回归分析得出独立危险因素,并构建风险预测模型,使用R语言软件绘制相应的列线图,采用受试者工作特征曲线、校准曲线检验预测效能。采用验证集的数据对模型的预测效能进行外部验证。结果:建模组患者中30例发生低体温(发生组),84例未发生低体温(未发生组),发生率为26.32%。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄、麻醉方式、手术时间、术中补液量、术中冲洗液量、术中出血量、无主动保温措施均是急性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除中转开腹患者发生术中低体温的独立危险因素(OR>1,P<0.05),BMI是独立保护因素(OR<1,P<0.05)。基于以上独立影响因素构建的风险预测模型曲线下面积为0.969,对应的敏感度、特异度分别为93.9%与91.7%,校准曲线较为接近理想曲线,平均绝对误差为0.036。验证集的曲线下面积为0.970,对应的敏感度、特异度分别为94.7%与91.2%,校准曲线平均绝对误差为0.058。结论:急性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除中转开腹患者术中发生低体温受年龄、BMI、麻醉方式、手术时间、术中补液量、术中冲洗液量、术中出血量、主动保温措施影响,基于以上因素构建的风险预测模型具有良好的预测效能,可为预测并干预术中低体温提供参考。

急性结石性胆囊炎经腹腔镜胆囊切除中转开腹术治疗预后的影响因素

目的探讨急性结石性胆囊炎(ACC)经腹腔镜胆囊切除中转开腹术(CLOC)治疗预后的影响因素。方法回顾性分析2019年9月至2021年3月武汉市第七医院收治的68例ACC经CLOC治疗患者的临床资料,根据术后1年预后情况分为预后不良组(n=23)与预后良好组(n=45),比较两组临床资料,采用多元Logistic回归分析ACC经CLOC治疗患者预后的影响因素。结果两组年龄、体温、术前白细胞计数、右上腹肌紧张、胆囊壁厚度、胆囊肿大、胆囊颈部结石嵌顿、胆总管下段结石嵌顿、手术时机、上腹部手术史以及术者经验比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组性别比较差异无统计学意义。多元Logistic回归分析结果显示,术前白细胞计数>15×109/L(OR=2.528,95%CI:1.602~3.835)、右上腹肌紧张(OR=1.689,95%CI:1.234~2.046)、胆囊壁厚度≥6mm(OR=2.125,95%CI:1.628~4.159)、胆囊肿大(OR=1.399,95%CI:1.121~2.378)、胆囊颈部结石嵌顿(OR=1.539,95%CI:1.164~2.125)、胆总管下段结石嵌顿(OR=2.047,95%CI:1.533~3.862)及手术时机>48h(OR=1.936,95%CI:1.364~2.931)为ACC经CLOC治疗患者预后的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论术前白细胞计数、右上腹肌紧张、胆囊壁厚度、胆囊肿大、胆囊颈部结石嵌顿、胆总管下段结石嵌顿及手术时机是ACC经CLOC治疗患者预后不良的影响因素,临床可通过对其进行干预改善患者预后。

腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术治疗胆结石的效果观察

分析胆结石治疗中采用腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的效果。选取文安县医院2022年7月—2023年7月收治的60例胆结石患者为研究对象,按照双盲法将其平均分为对比组(开腹胆囊切除术治疗)与分析组(腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗),并对两组患者的生活质量、并发症发生情况、手术指标、术后恢复指标与治疗效果进行比较。结果表明,分析组患者的生活质量与手术效果显著高于对比组,而组内患者并发症发生率、手术指标以及术后恢复指标则显著低于对比组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究发现,腹腔镜下对胆结石患者开展胆囊切除术的效果明显,在降低并发症发生风险、改善患者生活与康复质量上意义出众,临床推广价值较高。

开放性小切口手术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆结石的临床效果比较

目的:比较开放性小切口手术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆结石的临床效果。方法:选取2019年6月—2020年6月民航西安医院收治的胆结石患者112例作为研究对象。采用随机数字表法分为小切口组与腹腔镜组,各56例。小切口组接受开放性小切口手术,腹腔镜组接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术。比较两组手术相关指标(术中出血量、手术时间、首次排气时间、住院时间)、治疗效果、疼痛程度、并发症发生情况。结果:腹腔镜组术中出血量少于小切口组,手术时间与住院时间短于小切口组,首次排气时间早于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。腹腔镜组治疗总有效率高于小切口组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。治疗后,两组视觉模拟评分法评分降低,腹腔镜组低于小切口组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。腹腔镜组并发症总发生率低于小切口组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论:腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆结石的临床效果优于开放性小切口手术,术中出血量少,手术时间短,术后恢复快,疼痛轻,并发症发生风险低。

万例腹腔镜胆囊切除术中转开腹原因分析(附156例报告)

目的 探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术 (LC)中转开腹的原因。 方法 对我院 1 991年 1 2月～ 2 0 0 1年 1 0月实施的1 2 6 72例LC中转开腹手术 1 5 6例进行回顾性分析。 结果 中转开腹率 1 2 3% (1 5 6 / 1 2 6 72 ) ,术中因病情复杂及术前误诊所致的被迫性开腹 92例 (5 8 97% ) ,术中因出现技术性并发症而导致强迫性开腹 4 7例 (30 1 3% ) ,延期开腹 1 7例 (1 0 90 % ) ,胆管损伤率 0 2 % (2 6 / 1 2 6 72 )。 结论 LC中转开腹主要原因为术前准备不充分 ,术者经验不足 ,病变复杂 。

老年患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术比较

目的对比研究老年良性胆囊疾病腹腔镜胆囊切除(laparoscopiccholecystectomy,LC)与开腹胆囊切除(opencholecystectomy,OC)安全性,为老年人胆囊切除术式的选择提供依据。方法60岁以上有胆囊切除适应证且耐受全麻的老年患者120例,按住院顺序单双号分为LC组和OC组,每组60例,比较手术时间、止痛剂使用情况、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、输液时间、卧床时间、术后并发症、住院时间等围手术期指标,比较2组总T3、TSH水平,腹肌功能恢复等康复指标。结果术后并发症、围手术期以及康复指标,LC组均优于OC组。TT3与术前相比,LC组(F=8·26,P=0·000)、OC组(F=124·70,P=0·000)均明显下降,OC组下降理明显;TSH与术前相比,LC组下降不明显(F=1·87,P=0·157),OC组下降明显(F=27·24,P=0·000)。术后7d直腿抬高试验次数LC组明显高于OC组(t=3·640,P=0·000)结论老年良性胆囊疾病患者行LC优于OC。

3种胆囊切除术的临床对比研究

目的比较3种胆囊切除术对组织的损伤程度。方法将180例胆囊结石、慢性胆囊炎、胆囊息肉患者随机分为腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)组和小切口胆囊切除术(MC)组、开腹胆囊切除(OC)组,各60例。对比其切口长度、术中出血量、手术时间。术后肛门排气时间、禁食时间、下床活动时间、止痛剂使用及住院时间。结果在切口长度、术中出血量、术后下地活动时间、进食、术后止痛剂使用及住院时间方面,LC、MC组明显优于OC组(P<0.01);而切口长度、术中出血量、住院时间、术后禁食时间及抗菌治疗使用时间,LC组明显优于MC组(P<0.01)。结论LC和MC组疗效明显优于OC组,LC优于MC组,临床应根据病情选择其中更合适患者的手术方法。

主动中转开腹在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的作用

目的 评估腹腔镜胆囊切除术中主动中转开腹对减少并发症的重要作用。方法 分析我院１６７例腹腔镜胆囊切除术中转开腹的原因。结果１５９例用腹腔镜完成胆囊切除，其中１例因迷走胆管漏于术后第４天开腹手术。其余８例中转开腹。结论 术中遇到严重粘连、解剖变异等超出术者处理能力时应适时主动中转开腹。

腹腔镜下三孔法胆囊切除术在急性胆囊炎治疗中的应用价值分析

目的:探讨腹腔镜下三孔法胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的治疗效果和应用价值。方法:选取107例急性胆囊炎患者,根据手术方式的不同将其分为观察组(54例)和对照组(53例),观察组采用腹腔镜手术,对照组采用传统手术。统计比较两组患者的手术情况和治疗效果。结果:观察组治疗总有效率为100%,其疗效明显优于对照组,两组总有效率比较有差异(x2=-2.289,P<0.05)。观察组在手术时间、术中出血量、肛门恢复排气时间和术后住院日均小于或短于对照组,两组相比有差异(t=17.443,t=50.511,t=9.679,t=14.103;P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜三孔法胆囊切除术与传统的开腹胆囊切除术相比优势明显,疗效好,安全性高,可作为急性胆囊炎胆囊切除的首选术式。

三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统开腹胆囊切除术的临床疗效比较

目的:观察三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术疗效及安全性,并与传统开腹胆囊切除术的临床疗效作比较,旨在为临床治疗胆囊疾病提供进一步的指导依据。方法:选择我院外科2008年1月～2010年1月住院的接受胆囊切除术的76例患者,根据手术方法的不同随机分为A组(三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术)和B组(传统开腹胆囊切除术)各38例,观察比较两组平均切口长度、平均手术时间、术中平均出血量、平均住院时间及术后并发症(切口感染、切口出血、胆漏、放射痛、胆管损伤)情况。结果:76例患者中行三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术组38例术后2～6d出院,无死亡病例。其中A组平均切口长度、平均手术时间、术中平均出血量、平均住院时间均明显短于B组(P<0.05);A组发生并发症如切口感染、切口出血、胆漏、放射痛的发生率明显低于B组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊外科疾病手术用时少,术中出血量少,发生切口出血、感染、胆漏等并发症少于传统手术组,且对患者创伤小,患者痛苦少,适合基层医院广泛推广和应用。

腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统开腹胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石临床疗效比较

目的比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术两种术式治疗胆囊结石的临床疗效。方法选取2012年5月至2013年3月我院行手术治疗胆囊结石患者120例,其中60例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术作为观察组,开腹胆囊切除术手术治疗60例作为对照组。观察并比较两组临床疗效结果。结果研究组术中出血量少于对照组,手术时间、胃肠道功能恢复时间及术后住院时间短于对照组,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组、观察组术后并发症发生率分别为20%、5.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜胆囊切除术具有创伤小、恢复快、住院时间短和并发症少等优点,值得临床推广。