BACKGROUND Situs inversus totalis(SIT)is a rare group of congenital developmental malformations in the clinical setting,with all organs in the chest and abdomen existing in a mirror image reversal of their normal posi...BACKGROUND Situs inversus totalis(SIT)is a rare group of congenital developmental malformations in the clinical setting,with all organs in the chest and abdomen existing in a mirror image reversal of their normal positions.Few reports have described laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in patients with SIT,and it is considered difficult even for an experienced surgeon because of the mirror positioning.We present a case report of laparoscopic radical resection of a colonic splenic flexure carcinoma in a patient with SIT.CASE SUMMARY A 72-year-old male was referred to our hospital with colonic splenic flexure carcinoma,and computed tomography showed that all the organs in the chest and abdomen were inverted.Laparoscopic hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision was safely performed.The operating surgeon stood on the patient’s left side,which is opposite of the normal location.CONCLUSION Abdominal computed tomography is an effective method for diagnosing SIT preoperatively in patients with colonic splenic flexure carcinomas.Laparoscopic radical resection is difficult,but it is well established and safe.The surgeon should stand in the opposite position and perform backhand operations.展开更多
BACKGROUND Radical resection offers the only hope for the long-term survival of patients with gallbladder carcinoma(GBC)above the T1b stage.However,whether it should be performed under laparoscopy for GBC is still con...BACKGROUND Radical resection offers the only hope for the long-term survival of patients with gallbladder carcinoma(GBC)above the T1b stage.However,whether it should be performed under laparoscopy for GBC is still controversial.AIM To compare laparoscopic radical resection(LRR)with traditional open radical resection(ORR)in managing GBC.METHODS A comprehensive search of online databases,including Medline(PubMed),Cochrane Library,and Web of Science,was conducted to identify comparative studies involving LRR and ORR in GBCs till March 2023.A meta-analysis was subsequently performed.RESULTS A total of 18 retrospective studies were identified.In the long-term prognosis,the LRR group was comparable with the ORR group in terms of overall survival and tumor-free survival(TFS).LRR showed superiority in terms of TFS in the T2/tumor-node-metastasis(TNM)Ⅱstage subgroup vs the ORR group(P=0.04).In the short-term prognosis,the LRR group had superiority over the ORR group in the postoperative length of stay(POLS)(P<0.001).The sensitivity analysis showed that all pooled results were robust.CONCLUSION The meta-analysis results show that LRR is not inferior to ORR in all measured outcomes and is even superior in the TFS of patients with stage T2/TNMⅡdisease and POLS.Surgeons with sufficient laparoscopic experience can perform LRR as an alternative surgical strategy to ORR.展开更多
AIM To evaluate a laparoscopic approach to gallbladder lesions including polyps, wall-thickening lesions, and suspected T1 and T2 gallbladder cancer(GBC).METHODS We performed 50 cases of laparoscopic whole-layer chole...AIM To evaluate a laparoscopic approach to gallbladder lesions including polyps, wall-thickening lesions, and suspected T1 and T2 gallbladder cancer(GBC).METHODS We performed 50 cases of laparoscopic whole-layer cholecystectomy(LCWL) and 13 cases of laparoscopic gallbladder bed resection(LCGB) for those gallbladder lesions from April 2010 to November 2016. We analyzed the short-term and long-term results of our laparoscopic approach. RESULTS The median operation time was 108 min for LCWL and 211 min for LCGB. The median blood loss was minimal for LCWL and 28 ml for LCGB. No severe morbidity occurred in either procedure. Nine patients who underwent LCWL and 7 who underwent LCGB were postoperatively diagnosed with GBC. One of these patients had undergone LCGB for pathologically diagnosed T2 GBC after LCWL. All of the final surgical margins were negative. Three of these 15 patients underwent additional open surgery. The mean follow-up period was 26 mo, and only one patient developed recurrence.CONCLUSION LCWL and LCGB are safe and useful procedures that allow complete resection of highly suspected or earlystage cancer and achieve good short-term and longterm results.展开更多
目的:探讨应用直接手助腹腔镜下直肠癌根治的可行性及近期临床疗效.方法:将我院2005-01/2007-01同期收治的直肠癌患者分为腹腔镜和传统开腹组各31例进行相应手术,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析.结果:腹腔镜组无1例中转开腹.腹腔镜组与开...目的:探讨应用直接手助腹腔镜下直肠癌根治的可行性及近期临床疗效.方法:将我院2005-01/2007-01同期收治的直肠癌患者分为腹腔镜和传统开腹组各31例进行相应手术,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析.结果:腹腔镜组无1例中转开腹.腹腔镜组与开腹组相比,术中平均出血量(150±42.5 mL vs 250±34.6 mL,P<0.05)、肠道功能恢复时间(2±1.0 d vs 4±1.0 d,P<0.05)、术后并发症发生率(3.2% vs 12.9%,P<0.05)均有显著差异,而手术时间、局部复发率及在淋巴结清扫范围方面无显著差异(P>0.05).结论:直接手助腹腔镜治疗直肠癌能取得与开腹手术同样的肿瘤根治性效果,并具有出血少、术后肠功能恢复快等优点.展开更多
基金Supported by Chongqing medical scientific research project(Joint project of Chongqing Health Commission and Science and Technology Bureau),No.2021MSXM309.
文摘BACKGROUND Situs inversus totalis(SIT)is a rare group of congenital developmental malformations in the clinical setting,with all organs in the chest and abdomen existing in a mirror image reversal of their normal positions.Few reports have described laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in patients with SIT,and it is considered difficult even for an experienced surgeon because of the mirror positioning.We present a case report of laparoscopic radical resection of a colonic splenic flexure carcinoma in a patient with SIT.CASE SUMMARY A 72-year-old male was referred to our hospital with colonic splenic flexure carcinoma,and computed tomography showed that all the organs in the chest and abdomen were inverted.Laparoscopic hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision was safely performed.The operating surgeon stood on the patient’s left side,which is opposite of the normal location.CONCLUSION Abdominal computed tomography is an effective method for diagnosing SIT preoperatively in patients with colonic splenic flexure carcinomas.Laparoscopic radical resection is difficult,but it is well established and safe.The surgeon should stand in the opposite position and perform backhand operations.
文摘BACKGROUND Radical resection offers the only hope for the long-term survival of patients with gallbladder carcinoma(GBC)above the T1b stage.However,whether it should be performed under laparoscopy for GBC is still controversial.AIM To compare laparoscopic radical resection(LRR)with traditional open radical resection(ORR)in managing GBC.METHODS A comprehensive search of online databases,including Medline(PubMed),Cochrane Library,and Web of Science,was conducted to identify comparative studies involving LRR and ORR in GBCs till March 2023.A meta-analysis was subsequently performed.RESULTS A total of 18 retrospective studies were identified.In the long-term prognosis,the LRR group was comparable with the ORR group in terms of overall survival and tumor-free survival(TFS).LRR showed superiority in terms of TFS in the T2/tumor-node-metastasis(TNM)Ⅱstage subgroup vs the ORR group(P=0.04).In the short-term prognosis,the LRR group had superiority over the ORR group in the postoperative length of stay(POLS)(P<0.001).The sensitivity analysis showed that all pooled results were robust.CONCLUSION The meta-analysis results show that LRR is not inferior to ORR in all measured outcomes and is even superior in the TFS of patients with stage T2/TNMⅡdisease and POLS.Surgeons with sufficient laparoscopic experience can perform LRR as an alternative surgical strategy to ORR.
文摘AIM To evaluate a laparoscopic approach to gallbladder lesions including polyps, wall-thickening lesions, and suspected T1 and T2 gallbladder cancer(GBC).METHODS We performed 50 cases of laparoscopic whole-layer cholecystectomy(LCWL) and 13 cases of laparoscopic gallbladder bed resection(LCGB) for those gallbladder lesions from April 2010 to November 2016. We analyzed the short-term and long-term results of our laparoscopic approach. RESULTS The median operation time was 108 min for LCWL and 211 min for LCGB. The median blood loss was minimal for LCWL and 28 ml for LCGB. No severe morbidity occurred in either procedure. Nine patients who underwent LCWL and 7 who underwent LCGB were postoperatively diagnosed with GBC. One of these patients had undergone LCGB for pathologically diagnosed T2 GBC after LCWL. All of the final surgical margins were negative. Three of these 15 patients underwent additional open surgery. The mean follow-up period was 26 mo, and only one patient developed recurrence.CONCLUSION LCWL and LCGB are safe and useful procedures that allow complete resection of highly suspected or earlystage cancer and achieve good short-term and longterm results.
文摘目的:探讨应用直接手助腹腔镜下直肠癌根治的可行性及近期临床疗效.方法:将我院2005-01/2007-01同期收治的直肠癌患者分为腹腔镜和传统开腹组各31例进行相应手术,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析.结果:腹腔镜组无1例中转开腹.腹腔镜组与开腹组相比,术中平均出血量(150±42.5 mL vs 250±34.6 mL,P<0.05)、肠道功能恢复时间(2±1.0 d vs 4±1.0 d,P<0.05)、术后并发症发生率(3.2% vs 12.9%,P<0.05)均有显著差异,而手术时间、局部复发率及在淋巴结清扫范围方面无显著差异(P>0.05).结论:直接手助腹腔镜治疗直肠癌能取得与开腹手术同样的肿瘤根治性效果,并具有出血少、术后肠功能恢复快等优点.
