Background： To evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic hysterectomy （LH） compared with abdominal hysterectomy （AH） in case of benign gynecological disease. Methods： A multi-center cohor...Background： To evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic hysterectomy （LH） compared with abdominal hysterectomy （AH） in case of benign gynecological disease. Methods： A multi-center cohort retrospective comparative study of population among 4,895 hysterectomies （3,539 LH vs.1,356 AH） between 2007 and 2013 was involved. Operative time （OT）, estimated blood loss （EBL）, intra-operative and post-operative complications, passing flatus; days with indwelling catheter, questionnaires covering pelvic floor functions and sexual functions were assessed. Results： The EBL （174.1±157.4 vs. 263.1±183.2 cc, LH and AH groups, respectively）, passing flatus （38.7±14.1 vs. 48.1±13.2 hours）, days with indwelling catheter （1.5±0.6 vs. 2.2±0.8 days）, use of analgesics （6.5% vs. 73.1%）, intra-operative complication rate （2.4% vs. 4.1%）, post-operative complication rate （2.3 % vs. 5.7%）, post-operative constipation （12.1% vs. 24.6%）, mild and serious stress urinary incontinence （SUI） post-operative （P〈0.001; P=0.014）, and proportion of Female Sexual Functioning Index （FSFI） total score 〈26.55 post-operative （P〈0.001） of the LH group were significantly less than those of AH group. There were no significant differences in OT （106.5±34.5 vs. 106.2±40.3 min） between the two groups. Conclusions： LH is a safe and efficient operation for improving patients＇ long-term quality of life （QoL）, and LH is a cost-effectiveness procedure for treating benign gynecological disease. LH is superior to AH due to reduced EBL, reduced post-operative pain and earlier passing flatus.展开更多
目的探讨单孔腹腔镜手术在卵巢良性肿瘤治疗方面的临床应用价值。方法将2014年2月-2016年8月收治的卵巢良性肿瘤患者分为两组,每组41例,观察组给予单孔腹腔镜手术治疗,对照组给予传统多孔腹腔镜妇科手术治疗。观察并记录两组患者手术效...目的探讨单孔腹腔镜手术在卵巢良性肿瘤治疗方面的临床应用价值。方法将2014年2月-2016年8月收治的卵巢良性肿瘤患者分为两组,每组41例,观察组给予单孔腹腔镜手术治疗,对照组给予传统多孔腹腔镜妇科手术治疗。观察并记录两组患者手术效果、术中与术后并发症情况、术后卵巢功能及美容满意度。结果两组患者手术过程顺利,无术中与术后并发症。观察组手术时间和术后美容满意度评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05),观察组术后排气时间、术后住院时间、术后24与72 h VAS评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05);两组术后雌二醇水平较术前明显降低(P<0.05),术后卵泡刺激素和黄体生成素水平较术前明显升高(P<0.05);两组术中出血量、手术前后雌二醇、卵泡刺激素和黄体生成素水平无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论单孔腹腔镜技术用于治疗良性卵巢肿瘤较多孔腹腔镜技术效果更好且无并发症,值得推广应用。展开更多
基金supported be Self-financing Research Project of Health and Family Planning commission in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (project number: Z2015626)Scientific Research and Technology Development Plan of Liuzhou Science and Technology Agency in Guangxi (project number: 2015J030508)
文摘Background： To evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic hysterectomy （LH） compared with abdominal hysterectomy （AH） in case of benign gynecological disease. Methods： A multi-center cohort retrospective comparative study of population among 4,895 hysterectomies （3,539 LH vs.1,356 AH） between 2007 and 2013 was involved. Operative time （OT）, estimated blood loss （EBL）, intra-operative and post-operative complications, passing flatus; days with indwelling catheter, questionnaires covering pelvic floor functions and sexual functions were assessed. Results： The EBL （174.1±157.4 vs. 263.1±183.2 cc, LH and AH groups, respectively）, passing flatus （38.7±14.1 vs. 48.1±13.2 hours）, days with indwelling catheter （1.5±0.6 vs. 2.2±0.8 days）, use of analgesics （6.5% vs. 73.1%）, intra-operative complication rate （2.4% vs. 4.1%）, post-operative complication rate （2.3 % vs. 5.7%）, post-operative constipation （12.1% vs. 24.6%）, mild and serious stress urinary incontinence （SUI） post-operative （P〈0.001; P=0.014）, and proportion of Female Sexual Functioning Index （FSFI） total score 〈26.55 post-operative （P〈0.001） of the LH group were significantly less than those of AH group. There were no significant differences in OT （106.5±34.5 vs. 106.2±40.3 min） between the two groups. Conclusions： LH is a safe and efficient operation for improving patients＇ long-term quality of life （QoL）, and LH is a cost-effectiveness procedure for treating benign gynecological disease. LH is superior to AH due to reduced EBL, reduced post-operative pain and earlier passing flatus.
文摘目的探讨单孔腹腔镜手术在卵巢良性肿瘤治疗方面的临床应用价值。方法将2014年2月-2016年8月收治的卵巢良性肿瘤患者分为两组,每组41例,观察组给予单孔腹腔镜手术治疗,对照组给予传统多孔腹腔镜妇科手术治疗。观察并记录两组患者手术效果、术中与术后并发症情况、术后卵巢功能及美容满意度。结果两组患者手术过程顺利,无术中与术后并发症。观察组手术时间和术后美容满意度评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05),观察组术后排气时间、术后住院时间、术后24与72 h VAS评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05);两组术后雌二醇水平较术前明显降低(P<0.05),术后卵泡刺激素和黄体生成素水平较术前明显升高(P<0.05);两组术中出血量、手术前后雌二醇、卵泡刺激素和黄体生成素水平无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论单孔腹腔镜技术用于治疗良性卵巢肿瘤较多孔腹腔镜技术效果更好且无并发症,值得推广应用。
