Objective:To systematically evaluate and compare the safety and effectiveness of esophagojejunostomy and traditional esophagojejunostomy in total laparoscopic total gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer,provi...Objective:To systematically evaluate and compare the safety and effectiveness of esophagojejunostomy and traditional esophagojejunostomy in total laparoscopic total gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer,providing evidence-based medical evidence for clinical practice.Methods:PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,Web of Science,CNKI,Wanfang and VIP databases were searched by computer,and the retrieval time was up to December 2021.Relevant literatures were obtained,and eligible studies were gradually screened and included.Cochrane ROB bias risk assessment tool and NOS scale were used to evaluate the quality of the articles,and required data were extracted from high-quality literatures.Finally,meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software.Results:Eleven studies were finally included,including 1398 patients,including 566 patients receiving overlap anastomosis and 832 patients receiving traditional anastomosis.The results show that overlap anastomosis and traditional anastomosis had the advantages of operation time(MD=0.63,95%CI=7.22,8.48,P=0.88),postoperative first exhaust time(MD=-0.13,95%CI=0.43,0.18,P=0.42),postoperative first feeding time(MD=0.02,95%CI=0.33,0.37,P=0.91),anastomotic leakage(OR=1.38,95%CI=0.73,2.63,P=0.32),and postoperative hospital stay(MD=-0.16,95%CI=0.82,0.51,P=0.64)had no significant differences(all P>0.05).Compared with traditional anastomosis,overlap anastomosis had longer anastomosis time(MD=5.60,95%CI=0.59,10.62,P=0.03),higher incidence of anastomotic bleeding(OR=2.48,95%CI=1.08,5.69,P=0.03),less intraoperative bleeding(MD=-6.42,MD=-6.42,OR=2.48,95%CI=1.08,P=0.03).95%CI=10.28,-2.56,P=0.001)and anastomotic stenosis(OR=0.17,95%CI=0.06,0.46,P=0.0006).Conclusion:Overlap esophagojejunostomy is a safe,effective and prognostic surgical method,and is expected to become the standard esophagojejunostomy in total laparoscopic total gastrectomy.展开更多
AIM: To test a new safe and simple technique for circular-stapled esophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy(LATG). METHODS: We selected 26 patients with gastric cancer who underwent LATG and Roux-en-Y gast...AIM: To test a new safe and simple technique for circular-stapled esophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy(LATG). METHODS: We selected 26 patients with gastric cancer who underwent LATG and Roux-en-Y gastrointestinal reconstruction with semi-end-to-end esophagojejunal anastomosis. RESULTS: LATG with semi-end-to-end esophagojejunal anastomosis was successfully performed in all 26 patients. The average operation time was 257 ± 36 min, with an average anastomosis time of 51 ± 17 min and an average intraoperative blood loss of 88 ± 46 mL. The average postoperative hospital stay was 8 ± 3 d. There were no complications and no mortality in this series.CONCLUSION: The application of semi-end-to-end esophagojejunal anastomosis after LATG is a safe and feasible procedure, which can be easily performed and has a short operation time in terms of anastomosis.展开更多
BACKGROUND Although several methods of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy(TLTG)have been reported.The best anastomosis technique for LTG has not been established.AIM To investigate the effectiveness and surgical o...BACKGROUND Although several methods of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy(TLTG)have been reported.The best anastomosis technique for LTG has not been established.AIM To investigate the effectiveness and surgical outcomes of TLTG using the modified overlap method compared with open total gastrectomy(OTG)using the circular stapled method.METHODS We performed 151 and 131 surgeries using TLTG with the modified overlap method and OTG for gastric cancer between March 2012 and December 2018.Surgical and oncological outcomes were compared between groups using propensity score matching.In addition,we analyzed the risk factors associated with postoperative complications.RESULTS Patients who underwent TLTG were discharged earlier than those who underwent OTG[TLTG(9.62±5.32)vs OTG(13.51±10.67),P<0.05].Time to first flatus and soft diet were significantly shorter in TLTG group.The pain scores at all postoperative periods and administration of opioids were significantly lower in the TLTG group than in the OTG group.No significant difference in early,late and esophagojejunostomy(EJ)-related complications or 5-year recurrence free and overall survival between groups.Multivariate analysis demonstrated that body mass index[odds ratio(OR),1.824;95%confidence interval(CI):1.029-3.234,P=0.040]and American Society of Anaesthesiologists(ASA)score(OR,3.154;95%CI:1.084-9.174,P=0.035)were independent risk factors of early complications.Additionally,age was associated with≥3 Clavien-Dindo classification and EJrelated complications.CONCLUSION Although TLTG with the modified overlap method showed similar complication rate and oncological outcome with OTG,it yields lower pain score,earlier bowel recovery,and discharge.Surgeons should perform total gastrectomy cautiously and delicately in patients with obesity,high ASA scores,and older ages.展开更多
背景腹腔镜手术已获得普遍应用,但一部分研究者仍对完全腹腔镜技术持观望态度。目的 比较完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助两种手术方式在根治性全胃切除、食管空肠Roux-en-Y吻合术的围术期疗效。方法 回顾性分析解放军总医院第一医学中心普通外...背景腹腔镜手术已获得普遍应用,但一部分研究者仍对完全腹腔镜技术持观望态度。目的 比较完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助两种手术方式在根治性全胃切除、食管空肠Roux-en-Y吻合术的围术期疗效。方法 回顾性分析解放军总医院第一医学中心普通外科2018年1月-2020年12月采用根治性全胃切除、Roux-en-Y吻合术治疗的155例胃癌患者临床资料,年龄52~72岁,男性86例,女性69例,其中87例行完全腹腔镜手术(T组),68行腹腔镜辅助手术(L组)。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、手术切口长度、术后拔除胃管时间、术后排气时间、总住院时间、吻合口瘘发生率、吻合口出血发生率、十二指肠残端瘘发生率、术后切缘阳性率、淋巴结检出数及阳性率等。结果 两组患者年龄、性别、体质量指数、肿瘤TNM分期等临床基线资料差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05);完全腹腔镜手术组的术中出血量[(58.20±38.80) mL vs (98.13±47.87) mL,P<0.05]、手术切口长度[(4.03±1.03) cm vs.(10.99±1.01) cm,P<0.05]、术后拔除胃管时间[(13.43±1.57) h vs (63.01±21.29) h,P<0.05]、术后排气时间[(40.08±19.98) h vs (64.58±28.08) h,P<0.05]、总住院时间[(7.55±1.55) d vs (8.97±2.03) d,P<0.05]均优于腹腔镜辅助手术组;而两组在手术时间、淋巴结阳性检出率和术后近期并发症发生情况等方面的差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论 完全3D腹腔镜根治性全胃切除、食管空肠Roux-en-Y吻合术可以达到更好的临床效果,与腹腔镜辅助手术方法相比有手术创伤小、恢复快的特点。展开更多
文摘Objective:To systematically evaluate and compare the safety and effectiveness of esophagojejunostomy and traditional esophagojejunostomy in total laparoscopic total gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer,providing evidence-based medical evidence for clinical practice.Methods:PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,Web of Science,CNKI,Wanfang and VIP databases were searched by computer,and the retrieval time was up to December 2021.Relevant literatures were obtained,and eligible studies were gradually screened and included.Cochrane ROB bias risk assessment tool and NOS scale were used to evaluate the quality of the articles,and required data were extracted from high-quality literatures.Finally,meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software.Results:Eleven studies were finally included,including 1398 patients,including 566 patients receiving overlap anastomosis and 832 patients receiving traditional anastomosis.The results show that overlap anastomosis and traditional anastomosis had the advantages of operation time(MD=0.63,95%CI=7.22,8.48,P=0.88),postoperative first exhaust time(MD=-0.13,95%CI=0.43,0.18,P=0.42),postoperative first feeding time(MD=0.02,95%CI=0.33,0.37,P=0.91),anastomotic leakage(OR=1.38,95%CI=0.73,2.63,P=0.32),and postoperative hospital stay(MD=-0.16,95%CI=0.82,0.51,P=0.64)had no significant differences(all P>0.05).Compared with traditional anastomosis,overlap anastomosis had longer anastomosis time(MD=5.60,95%CI=0.59,10.62,P=0.03),higher incidence of anastomotic bleeding(OR=2.48,95%CI=1.08,5.69,P=0.03),less intraoperative bleeding(MD=-6.42,MD=-6.42,OR=2.48,95%CI=1.08,P=0.03).95%CI=10.28,-2.56,P=0.001)and anastomotic stenosis(OR=0.17,95%CI=0.06,0.46,P=0.0006).Conclusion:Overlap esophagojejunostomy is a safe,effective and prognostic surgical method,and is expected to become the standard esophagojejunostomy in total laparoscopic total gastrectomy.
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81071980
文摘AIM: To test a new safe and simple technique for circular-stapled esophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy(LATG). METHODS: We selected 26 patients with gastric cancer who underwent LATG and Roux-en-Y gastrointestinal reconstruction with semi-end-to-end esophagojejunal anastomosis. RESULTS: LATG with semi-end-to-end esophagojejunal anastomosis was successfully performed in all 26 patients. The average operation time was 257 ± 36 min, with an average anastomosis time of 51 ± 17 min and an average intraoperative blood loss of 88 ± 46 mL. The average postoperative hospital stay was 8 ± 3 d. There were no complications and no mortality in this series.CONCLUSION: The application of semi-end-to-end esophagojejunal anastomosis after LATG is a safe and feasible procedure, which can be easily performed and has a short operation time in terms of anastomosis.
基金the Institutional Review Board of the Asan Medical Center(approval No.2019-0702).
文摘BACKGROUND Although several methods of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy(TLTG)have been reported.The best anastomosis technique for LTG has not been established.AIM To investigate the effectiveness and surgical outcomes of TLTG using the modified overlap method compared with open total gastrectomy(OTG)using the circular stapled method.METHODS We performed 151 and 131 surgeries using TLTG with the modified overlap method and OTG for gastric cancer between March 2012 and December 2018.Surgical and oncological outcomes were compared between groups using propensity score matching.In addition,we analyzed the risk factors associated with postoperative complications.RESULTS Patients who underwent TLTG were discharged earlier than those who underwent OTG[TLTG(9.62±5.32)vs OTG(13.51±10.67),P<0.05].Time to first flatus and soft diet were significantly shorter in TLTG group.The pain scores at all postoperative periods and administration of opioids were significantly lower in the TLTG group than in the OTG group.No significant difference in early,late and esophagojejunostomy(EJ)-related complications or 5-year recurrence free and overall survival between groups.Multivariate analysis demonstrated that body mass index[odds ratio(OR),1.824;95%confidence interval(CI):1.029-3.234,P=0.040]and American Society of Anaesthesiologists(ASA)score(OR,3.154;95%CI:1.084-9.174,P=0.035)were independent risk factors of early complications.Additionally,age was associated with≥3 Clavien-Dindo classification and EJrelated complications.CONCLUSION Although TLTG with the modified overlap method showed similar complication rate and oncological outcome with OTG,it yields lower pain score,earlier bowel recovery,and discharge.Surgeons should perform total gastrectomy cautiously and delicately in patients with obesity,high ASA scores,and older ages.
文摘背景腹腔镜手术已获得普遍应用,但一部分研究者仍对完全腹腔镜技术持观望态度。目的 比较完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助两种手术方式在根治性全胃切除、食管空肠Roux-en-Y吻合术的围术期疗效。方法 回顾性分析解放军总医院第一医学中心普通外科2018年1月-2020年12月采用根治性全胃切除、Roux-en-Y吻合术治疗的155例胃癌患者临床资料,年龄52~72岁,男性86例,女性69例,其中87例行完全腹腔镜手术(T组),68行腹腔镜辅助手术(L组)。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、手术切口长度、术后拔除胃管时间、术后排气时间、总住院时间、吻合口瘘发生率、吻合口出血发生率、十二指肠残端瘘发生率、术后切缘阳性率、淋巴结检出数及阳性率等。结果 两组患者年龄、性别、体质量指数、肿瘤TNM分期等临床基线资料差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05);完全腹腔镜手术组的术中出血量[(58.20±38.80) mL vs (98.13±47.87) mL,P<0.05]、手术切口长度[(4.03±1.03) cm vs.(10.99±1.01) cm,P<0.05]、术后拔除胃管时间[(13.43±1.57) h vs (63.01±21.29) h,P<0.05]、术后排气时间[(40.08±19.98) h vs (64.58±28.08) h,P<0.05]、总住院时间[(7.55±1.55) d vs (8.97±2.03) d,P<0.05]均优于腹腔镜辅助手术组;而两组在手术时间、淋巴结阳性检出率和术后近期并发症发生情况等方面的差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论 完全3D腹腔镜根治性全胃切除、食管空肠Roux-en-Y吻合术可以达到更好的临床效果,与腹腔镜辅助手术方法相比有手术创伤小、恢复快的特点。
