Transumbilical enterostomy for Hirschsprung’s disease with a two-stage laparoscopy-assisted pull-through procedure

BACKGROUND A one-stage laparoscopic operation has recently been considered a favorable option for the management of patients with Hirschsprung's disease(HD)due to its superior cosmetic results.One-stage transanal endorectal pull-through for the treatment of rectosigmoid HD has been widely used in newborns without complications.However,enterostomy is required in some HD cases for enterocolitis and dilated colon.Our transumbilical enterostomy(TUE)and twostage laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty were effective and achieved a similar cosmetic effect to one-stage laparoscopy on the abdominal wall in patients with anorectal malformation,but the effect in patients with HD is unclear.AIM To evaluate the safety,efficacy and cosmetic results of TUE in two-stage laparoscopy-assisted pull-through for HD.METHODS From June 2013 to June 2018,53 patients(40 boys,13 girls;mean age at enterostomy:5.5±2.2 mo)who underwent enterostomy and two-stage laparoscopy-assisted pull-through for HD with stoma closure were reviewed at our institution.Two enterostomy approaches were used:TUE in 24 patients,and conventional abdominal enterostomy(CAE)in 29 patients.Eleven patients with rectosigmoid HD had severe preoperative enterocolitis or a dilated colon.26 patients had long-segment HD,and 16 patients had total colonic aganglionosis(TCA).The patients with left-sided HD underwent the two-stage laparoscopic Soave procedure,and the patients with right-sided HD and TCA underwent the laparoscopic Duhamel procedure.Demographics,enterostomy operative time,complications and cosmetic results were respectively evaluated.RESULTS There were no differences between the groups with respect to gender,age at enterostomy,weight and clinical type(P>0.05).No conversion to open technique was required.Two patients experienced episodes of stomal mucosal prolapse in the TUE group and 1 patient in the CAE group(8.33%vs 3.45%,P>0.05).No parastomal hernia was observed in either of the two groups.Wound infection at the stoma was seen in 1 case in the TUE group,and 2 cases in the CAE group(4.17%vs 6.90%,P>0.05).No obstruction was noted in any of the patients in the TUE group,whereas obstruction was found in 1 patient in the CAE group.Enterocolitis was observed in 3 and 5 patients in the TUE and CAE group,respectively(12.50%vs 17.24%,P>0.05).There was no significant difference between the TUE group and CAE group in terms of the incidence of soiling and constipation(P>0.05).The cosmetic result using the scar score in the TUE group was better than that in the CAE group(6.83±0.96 vs 13.32±1.57,P<0.05).CONCLUSION TUE is a safe and feasible method for the treatment of HD,and the staged enterostomy and two-stage laparoscopy-assisted pull-through achieved a similar cosmetic effect to the one-stage laparoscopic procedure.

Clinical Research of Transumbilical Singleport Laparoscopic Treatment For Pediatric Intussusception

Objective:To explore the feasibility and clinical efficacy of single port laparoscopic surgery through the umbilical cord for the treatment of pediatric intussusception.Method:Clinical data of 38 cases of pediatric intussusception treated with umbilical single port laparoscopic surgery from December 2017 to June 2019 were collected.The surgical method involves placing Trocar through the umbilical incision to establish pneumoperitoneum,inserting a single hole with a 0°laparoscopic operating channel,exploring intussusception,and performing non-invasive forceps to completely reduce it.After the reduction of intussusception,if intestinal malformation is found,the umbilical incision can be expanded to lift the diseased intestinal tract out of the abdominal cavity for resection.At the same time,clinical data of 24 children who underwent traditional porous laparoscopic intussusception surgery during the same period were collected,and the surgical time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,and satisfaction score of incision aesthetics were compared between the two groups of children.Result:Both groups of patients successfully completed the surgery,and compared with the porous laparoscopic group,the single hole laparoscopic group had a shorter surgical time[(32.4±8.6)minutes vs.(40.6±9.8)minutes,P<0.05],decreased bleeding volume[(5.5±1.5)mL vs.(8.6±2.2)mL,P<0.05],significantly shortened postoperative hospital stay[(4.6±1.2)d vs.(6.2±1.4)d,P<0.05],and significantly increased satisfaction score with incision aesthetics[(4.2±0.8)points vs.(3.2±0.7)points,P<0.05].Follow up for 6 months to 2 years showed no recurrence of intussusception.Conclusion:Transumbilical single port laparoscopic surgery is a safe and effective method for children with intussusception,which is characterized by small trauma,fast recovery,short operation time,and better aesthetic effect.

Modified technical protocol for single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using needle-type grasping forceps for acute simple appendicitis:A case report

BACKGROUND Because of the mild inflammatory status in acute uncomplicated appendicitis,our team developed a novel technical protocol for single-port laparoscopic appendec-tomy using needle-type grasping forceps(SLAN)and achieved positive clinical outcomes.However,the intraoperative procedure lacked stability and fluency due to a series of problems highlighted by the small incision design of the proto-col(only 1 cm long).Therefore,there is a growing clinical demand to further opti-mize the SLAN protocol.CASE SUMMARY An adult male patient was admitted for persistent right lower abdominal pain with preoperative computed tomography findings suggestive of appendicitis accompanied by localized peritonitis.A modified technical protocol for SLAN based on minimally invasive surgical principles was used,and the patient was confirmed to have acute simple appendicitis by postoperative pathological ana-lysis.Postoperative recovery was uneventful,and no postoperative complications,such as incision infection or severe incision pain,were observed.The patient was discharged successfully on postoperative day 2.CONCLUSION The modified technical protocol of SLAN may be a new minimally invasive surgical alternative for patients with acute simple appendicitis.

Clinical feasibility of laparoscopic left lateral segment liver resection with magnetic anchor technique:The first clinical study from China

BACKGROUND Magnetic anchor technique(MAT)has been applied in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy,but has not been reported in laparoscopic partial hepatectomy.AIM To evaluate the feasibility of the MAT in laparoscopic left lateral segment liver resection.METHODS Retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of eight patients who underwent laparoscopic left lateral segment liver resection assisted by MAT in our department from July 2020 to November 2021.The Y-Z magnetic anchor devices(Y-Z MADs)was independently designed and developed by the author of this paper,which consists of the anchor magnet and magnetic grasping apparatus.Surgical time,intraoperative blood loss,intraoperative accidents,operator experience,postoperative incision pain score,postoperative complications,and other indicators were evaluated and analyzed.RESULTS All eight patients underwent a MAT-assisted laparoscopic left lateral segment liver resection,including three patients undertaking conventional 5-port and five patients having a transumbilical single-port operation.The mean operation time was 138±34.32 min(range 95-185 min)and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 123±88.60 mL(range 20-300 mL).No adverse events occurred during the operation.The Y-Z MADs showed good workability and maneuverability in both tissue and organ exposure.In particular,the operators did not experience either a“chopstick”or“sword-fight”effect in the single-port laparoscopic operation.CONCLUSION The results show that the MAT is safe and feasible for laparoscopic left lateral segment liver resection,especially,exhibits its unique abettance for transumbilical single-port laparoscopic left lateral segment liver resection.

Transumbilical endoscopic surgery:History,present situation and perspectives

Transumbilical endoscopic surgery or laparo-endoscopic single site(LESS)surgery has become an exciting area of surgical development as innovation continues to move in the 21st century to minimally invasive surgery.The history,present situation and perspectives are reviewed and the nomenclature of this technique is discussed in this article.The range of this technique has been applied in almost all abdominal diseases,surgeries for morbid obesity,hernia and so on,in recent years.It is estimated that 50%-80%of traditional laparoscopic surgery could be performed transumbilically in the next five years according to the LESSCAR consensus.Although the concept of transumbilical laparoscopic surgery is gaining traction rapidly and the instruments have been improved greatly, we should not advocate for slightly improved cosmetic value over safety.Multicenter,randomized and clinical trials are necessary to further elucidate the safety and efficiency of this new technique.Research that examines the efficacy of the new instruments on the market may be helpful to simplify the confusing landscape of new and novel products designed for this purpose.

Single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study

Background:The incidence of uterine cesarean scar defect(niche)is high,and some patients require surgery.Single-port laparoscopy can reduce post-operative pain,and provide better cosmetic effects.This study was performed to evaluate the safety and superiority of single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of uterine cesarean scar defect(niche)in women after cesarean section.Methods:This study included 74 patients who were diagnosed with uterine cesarean niche at the Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital from January 2013 to June 2015.Thirty-seven patients underwent single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal surgery as the case group,and the remaining patients underwent vaginal repair surgery as the control group.We collected data from the inpatient and follow-up medical records.The clinical characteristics of these two groups were compared.The odds ratios and 95%confidential intervals were calculated for each variable by univariate and multivariate analyses.Results:Patients who underwent single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair had a significantly longer operation time(2.3[2.0-2.7]vs.2.0[1.6-2.3]h,P=0.015),shorter gas passage time(1.2[1.0-1.5]vs.1.7[1.0-2.0]days,P=0.012),shorter hospital stay(3.1[3.0-4.0]vs.4.5[4.0-6.0]days,P=0.019),and fewer complications(0 vs.4 cases).Univariate analysis showed that depth of the niche(P=0.021)the mild adhesiolysis score(P=0.035)and moderate adhesiolysis score(P=0.013)were associated with the bladder injury.Multivariate analysis showed that the moderate adhesiolysis score(P=0.029;95%confidence interval,1.318-3.526)was the strongest independent predictor of bladder injury.Conclusion:This study confirmed the safety and superiority of single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of uterine cesarean scars.

Overview of single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancers: Past, present, and the future

Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is implemented through a tailored minimal single incision through which a number of laparoscopic instruments access. Introduction of operation-customized port system, utilization of a camera without a separate external light, and instruments with different lengths has brought the favorable environment for SPLS. However, performing SPLS still creates several hardships compared to multiport laparoscopic surgery; a single-port system inevitably leads to clashing of surgical instruments due to crowding. To overcome such difficulties, investigators has developed novel concepts and maneuvers, including the concept of inverse triangulation and the maneuvers of pivoting, spreading out dissection, hanging suture, and transluminal traction. The final destination of SPLS is expected to be a completely seamless operation, maximizing the minimal invasiveness. Specimen extraction through the umbilicus can undermine cosmesis by inducing a larger incision. Therefore, hybrid laparoscopic technique, which combined laparoscopic surgical technique with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) - i.e., transvaginal or transanal route-, has been developed. SPLS and NOSE seemed to be the best combination in pursuit of minimal invasiveness. In the near future, robotic SPLS with natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery&#x02019;s way of specimen extraction seems to be pursued. It is expected to provide a completely or nearly complete seamless operation regardless of location of the lesion in the abdomen.

Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy:A non-randomized,agematched single center trial

AIM: To compare the safety of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomies with standard four-port cholecystectomies.METHODS: Between January 2011 and December 2012 datas were gathered from 100 consecutive patients who received a single-port cholecystectomy. Patient baseline characteristics of all 100 single-port cholecystectomies were collected(body mass index, age, etc.) in a database. This group was compared with 100 age-matched patients who underwent a conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the same period. Retrospectively, per- and postoperative data were added. The two groups were compared to each other using independent t-tests and χ2-tests, P values below 0.05 were considered significantly different.RESULTS: No differences were found between both groups regarding baseline characteristics. Operating time was significantly shorter in the total single-port group(42 min vs 62 min, P < 0.05); in procedures performed by surgeons the same trend was seen(45 min vs 59 min, P < 0.05). Peroperative complications between both groups were equal(3 in the single-port group vs 5 in the multiport group; P = 0.42). Although not significant less postoperative complications were seen in the single-port group compared with the multiport group(3 vs 9; P = 0.07). No statistically significant differences were found between both groupswith regard to length of hospital stay, readmissions and mortality. CONCLUSION: Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy has the potential to be a safe technique with a low complication rate, short in-hospital stay and comparable operating time. Single-port cholecystectomy provides the patient an almost non-visible scar while preserving optimal quality of surgery. Further prospective studies are needed to prove the safety of the single-port technique.

Technical and instrumental prerequisites for single-port laparoscopic solo surgery:state of art

With the aid of advanced surgical techniques and instruments, single-port laparoscopic surgery(SPLS) can be accomplished with just two surgical members: an operator and a camera assistant. Under these circumstances, the reasonable replacement of a human camera assistant by a mechanical camera holder has resulted in a new surgical procedure termed singleport solo surgery(SPSS). In SPSS, the fixation and coordinated movement of a camera held by mechanicaldevices provides fixed and stable operative images that are under the control of the operator. Therefore, SPSS primarily benefits from the provision of the operator's eye-to-hand coordination. Because SPSS is an intuitive modification of SPLS, the indications for SPSS are the same as those for SPLS. Though SPSS necessitates more actions than the surgery with a human assistant, these difficulties seem to be easily overcome by the greater provision of static operative images and the need for less lens cleaning and repositioning of the camera. When the operation is expected to be difficult and demanding, the SPSS process could be assisted by the addition of another instrument holder besides the camera holder.

Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy in pediatric living donor liver transplantation by single-port approach:A case report

BACKGROUND Single-port laparoscopy has been used in a variety of abdominal operations.We report the first case of single-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy in pediatric laparoscopic living donor liver transplantation.CASE SUMMARY A 28-year-old man volunteered for living liver donation to his daughter who was diagnosed with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension after the Kasai procedure for biliary atresia.His body mass index was 20.5 kg/m2.Liver dynamic computed tomography showed:(1)Left lateral graft volume of 232.76 cm3 with a graft-torecipient weight ratio of 2.59%;and(2)Right hepatic artery derived from the superior mesenteric artery.A single-port access system was placed through a transumbilical incision,including four trocars:two 12-mm ports for a camera and endoscopic stapler and two 5-mm working ports.Liver parenchyma was dissected by a Harmonic and Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator,while bipolar was used for coagulation.The bile duct was transected above the bifurcation by indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography.The specimen was retrieved from the umbilical incision.The total operation time was 4 h without blood transfusion.The final graft weight was 233.6 g with graft-torecipient weight ratio of 2.60%.The donor was discharged uneventfully on postoperative day 4.CONCLUSION Single-port laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy is feasible in pediatric laparoscopic living donor liver transplantation in an experienced transplant center.

Single-port laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid volvulus

AIM:To report our experience with single-port laparoscopic surgery(SPLS)for sigmoid volvulus(SV).METHODS:Between October 2009 and April 2013,10patients underwent SPLS for SV.SPLS was performed transumbilically or through a predetermined stoma site.Conventional straight and rigid-type laparoscopic instruments were used.After intracorporeal,segmental resection of the affected sigmoid colon,the specimen was extracted through the single-incision site.Patientdemographics and perioperative data were analyzed.RESULTS:SPLS for SV was successful in all 10 patients(4,resection and primary anastomosis;6,Hartmann’s procedure).The median operative time and postoperative hospitalization period were 168(range,85-315)min and 6.5(range,4-29)d,respectively.No intraoperative complications were noted;there were 2 postoperative complications,including 1 anastomotic leak.CONCLUSION:SPLS was a safe and feasible therapeutic approach for SV,when performed by a surgeon experienced in conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Evaluation of the Single-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy Learning Curve

Background: The use of single-port laparoscopy has gained popularity within recent years. Part of the appeal in learning this approach is that it draws heavily from concepts mastered through conventional laparoscopy. Various studies have shown the efficacy and feasibility of the single-port laparoscopic approach, but there are few that examine the learning curve in adopting this new technique. Objective: Our goal was to better define the learning curve in performing a single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Design: A review of prospectively gathered operative data was performed to analyze the results of single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomies performed within our institution by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. The first 100 cases were divided into quintiles. Comparisons were made among the cohorts regarding patient demographics, operative time, length of stay, conversions, and complications. Results: There was no difference among quintiles with regard to age, sex, BMI, or ASA class. Operative time, conversions, length of stay, and number of complications did not significantly vary among each group of patients. There was a significant difference in estimated blood loss and length of stay between the fifth cohort and the others due to one patient’s poor outcome. Conclusions: The single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy learning curve for surgeons already skilled in laparoscopy is short. There are few differences in various outcome measures among groups at any stage in the learning curve. The skills utilized to perform conventional laparoscopic colorectal surgery readily translate to the single-port approach and result in proficiency from nearly the start.

常规器械免举宫经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术

目的探讨常规器械免举宫经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术治疗宫颈病变的应用价值。方法选择2021年12月~2023年6月因宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变(high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion,HSIL)或宫颈癌ⅠA1期行腹腔镜全子宫切除术60例,按患者意愿行经脐单孔腹腔镜手术及多孔腹腔镜手术各30例,均使用常规器械,不使用举宫器,比较2组手术指标。结果2组均未出现中转开腹及泌尿系、肠道或大血管等损伤。单孔组出血量较少[(54.6±20.5)ml vs.(67.5±27.0)ml,P=0.041],排气较早[(27.6±8.0)h vs.(32.2±9.0)h,P=0.040],总住院时间较短[(4.4±1.5)d vs.(5.1±1.2)d,P=0.044]。2组子宫重量、手术时间以及术后并发症差异无显著性(P>0.05)。2组切口愈合良好,未出现与穿刺器相关的近期并发症(如穿刺孔感染、出血)或远期并发症(如脐疝、切口疝)。结论免举宫经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术出血少,术后恢复快,瘢痕最小化,并发症与传统腹腔镜手术相似。

经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗妇科良性疾病的效果对比

目的分析经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗妇科良性疾病的方法与效果。方法选取60例妇科良性疾病患者,按照随机抽签法将其分为对照组与观察组,各30例,分别实施传统腹腔镜与经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗,对比两组手术效果。结果与对照组对比,观察组术后疼痛评分更低,术后住院时间更短,住院费用更少(P<0.05)。观察组治疗满意度96.67%较对照组的76.67%高(P<0.05)。结论经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗妇科良性疾病效果更加确切,能够提高患者手术质量与治疗满意度,值得临床推广。

经脐单孔腹腔镜体外剥除良性巨大卵巢囊肿的临床分析

目的:探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜体外剥除良性巨大卵巢囊肿的安全性和可行性。方法:回顾性分析成都市第三人民医院2021年10月至2022年9月收治的行经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗的72例良性巨大卵巢囊肿患者的临床资料,其中单孔腹腔镜体外剥除囊肿31例(单孔体外剥除组),单孔腹腔镜体内剥除囊肿41例(单孔体内剥除组),比较两组手术时间、术中气腹使用时间、术中出血量、术中囊液渗漏率、术后肛门排气时间、术后24小时疼痛程度、术后住院时间等。结果:术中囊液渗漏率单孔体外剥除组(0 vs.21.1%)明显低于单孔体内剥除组(P<0.05)。单孔体外剥除组手术时间(60.19±5.64分钟vs.72.02±6.89分钟)、术中气腹使用时间(15.23±2.69分钟vs.53.83±6.74分钟)及术后肛门排气时间(28.16±3.53小时vs.32.24±3.87小时)均短于单孔体内剥除组(P<0.05)。两组术中出血量、术后24小时疼痛视觉模拟(VAS)评分及术后住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:单孔腹腔镜体外剥除囊肿手术在良性巨大卵巢囊肿剥除术中可以极大程度避免术中囊液腹腔内渗漏,更加遵循手术无瘤原则,同时缩短手术时间,促进术后快速康复,此手术方式安全可行,值得临床推广。

Single access laparoscopic surgery:Complementary or alternative to NOTES?

In recent years,single access laparoscopic surgery(SALS) and natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery(NOTES) have gained interest from both clinical and industrial point of view,with the increased development of different laparoscopic instruments,production of various access ports,and improvement of operative endoscopes.The main advantages stimulating these two approaches are the cosmetic result,the rapid recovery of the patient,and the reduced need for pain killers.SALS and NOTES are in part complementary and in part alternative techniques.Currently,SALS is much simpler and technically easier than NOTES.

经脐单孔腹腔镜保护卵巢功能的卵巢囊肿剥除术

目的 探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜保护卵巢功能的卵巢囊肿剥除术的经验。方法 2018年7月~2019年12月我院行56例单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术,术中横行切开脐部约2 cm,置入单孔套管穿刺器,建立人工气腹。超声刀避开卵巢门在其对侧切开卵巢皮质以保证良好血供,固定患侧卵巢,便于钝性分离囊肿并尽可能保留卵巢正常组织,选择2-0可吸收缝线缝合止血以及卵巢成形。结果 56例均顺利完成卵巢囊肿剥除术,其中3例双侧卵巢囊肿剥除术,3例联合输卵管切除,1例联合输卵管系膜囊肿剥除术,2例联合子宫肌瘤剔除术,1例联合阑尾切除术(因术后需腹腔引流,增加1个穿刺孔),1例联合宫腔镜子宫内膜息肉电切术,1例联合盆腔粘连松解术。手术时间(72.0±30.0)min。术后住院时间(5.0±0.6) d。无一例发生并发症。56例随访2~3年,平均1.5年,无并发症发生,无切口愈合不良,卵巢囊肿无复发。术后6、12个月与术前比较卵巢窦卵泡数差异无显著性[(7.02±1.57)个vs.(7.05±1.55)个,P=1.000;(6.93±1.46)个vs.(7.05±1.55)个,P=1.000]。术后3个月与术前比较卵巢基质血流差异无显著性(P>0.05),提示卵巢功能无减退。结论 保护卵巢功能的关键是术中合理选择手术器械与切口、精细化操作剥离卵巢囊肿以及保护卵巢的血供。

多孔与经脐单孔腹腔镜在异位妊娠行输卵管切除术患者中的应用对比

目的分析对比多孔与经脐单孔腹腔镜在异位妊娠行输卵管切除术患者中的应用效果。方法本研究以江苏省句容市妇幼保健院妇产科于2021年1月至2023年7月进行输卵管切除术治疗的异位妊娠患者作为分析对象,共52例。按手术入路的不同将患者分为对照组和研究组,各27例。对照组采取多孔腹腔镜输卵管切除术,研究组采用经脐单孔腹腔镜输卵管切除术。比较两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、术后疼痛情况、切口美观度、术后并发症发生情况。结果两组异位妊娠行输卵管切除术患者的手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),研究组的术后肛门排气时间短于对照组(P<0.05);研究组患者术后24 h的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)低于对照组,切口美观满意度高于对照组,且瘢痕自我评分(POSAS)低于对照组(P<0.05);研究组患者未发生术后出血、感染、腹腔粘连、发热并发症,对照组共发生5例,研究组术后并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论针对异位妊娠行输卵管切除术患者,多孔与经脐单孔腹腔镜在手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间方面的对比无明显差异,但经脐单孔腹腔镜下的输卵管手术切除的术后并发症少、感染风险小、切口更美观,让患者更满意。

经脐单孔腹腔镜下子宫动脉阻断术联合切开取胚术治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的安全性及可行性分析

目的分析经脐单孔腹腔镜下子宫动脉阻断术联合切开取胚术在治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠(CSP)的安全性及可行性。方法选取行经脐单孔腹腔镜下子宫动脉阻断术联合切开取胚术的11例CSP患者作为研究组,行多孔腹腔镜下子宫动脉阻断术联合切开取胚术的10例CSP患者作为对照组,比较2组的基线资料及围术期相关临床数据。结果经脐单孔腹腔镜组与对照组的患者年龄、妊娠次数、剖宫产次数、距上次剖宫产时间、临床分型、停经时间以及有无阴道出血症状比较差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。2组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后保留导尿时间比较差异亦无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。经脐单孔腹腔镜组的术后疼痛数字等级评定量表评分低于对照组,住院时间短于对照组(P均<0.05)。结论经脐单孔腹腔镜下子宫动脉阻断术联合切开取胚术与传统多孔腹腔镜下子宫动脉阻断术联合切开取胚术相比,能减轻CSP患者术后疼痛及缩短住院时间,且安全性相当,美容效果更好,具有可行性。

经脐单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床分析

目的探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床应用价值。方法回顾性分析我院2018年7月至2022年12月行腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术的93例患者的临床资料,其中行经脐单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术(单孔组)44例,行传统三孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术(对照组)49例。比较两组围手术期指标、术后24 h疼痛VAS评分、初次下床活动时间、术后住院时间、术后并发症发生率、切口愈合评分等。结果93例患者手术均顺利完成。两组患者术中增加辅助孔率、手术时间、手术出血量、术后24 h疼痛VAS评分、初次下床活动时间、术后住院时间及术后并发症比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);单孔组切口愈合评分明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。单孔组2例为后壁下段肌瘤,持针器难以到达而致缝合困难,术中增加1个穿刺孔便于缝合。两组均无中转开腹发生,亦无切口出血、感染、切口疝、粘连性肠梗阻等并发症,单孔组2例出现切口延期愈合。结论经脐单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术可达到传统多孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术同样的效果及安全性,同时具有标本取出方便、切口美观、创伤小等优点,更符合快速康复的理念,安全可行,值得临床推广。