Management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in rectal cancer:Is it time to reach an Agreement?

In this editorial,we proceed to comment on the article by Chua et al,addressing the management of metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes(mLLN)in stage II/III rectal cancer patients below the peritoneal reflection.The treatment of this nodal area sparks significant controversy due to the strategic differences followed by Eastern and Western physicians,albeit with a higher degree of convergence in recent years.The dissection of lateral pelvic lymph nodes without neoadjuvant therapy is a standard practice in Eastern countries.In contrast,in the West,preference leans towards opting for neoadjuvant therapy with chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy,that would cover the treatment of this area without the need to add the dissection of these nodes to the total mesorectal excision.In the presence of high-risk nodal characteristics for mLLN related to radiological imaging and lack of response to neoadjuvant therapy,the risk of lateral local recurrence increases,suggesting the appropriate selection of strategies to reduce the risk of recurrence in each patient profile.Despite the heterogeneous and retrospective nature of studies addressing this area,an international consensus is necessary to approach this clinical scenario uniformly.

Feasibility and limitations of combined treatment for lateral pelvic lymph node metastases in rectal cancer

Colorectal cancer ranks among the most commonly diagnosed cancers globally,and is associated with a high rate of pelvic recurrence after surgery.In efforts to mitigate recurrence,pelvic lymph node dissection(PLND)is commonly advocated as an adjunct to radical surgery.Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(NACRT)is a therapeutic approach employed in managing locally advanced rectal cancer,and has been found to increase the survival rates.Chua et al have proposed a combination of NACRT with selective PLND for addressing lateral pelvic lymph node metastases in rectal cancer patients,with the aim of reducing recurrence and improving survival outcomes.Nevertheless,certain studies have indicated that the addition of PLND to NACRT and total mesorectal excision did not yield a significant reduction in local recurrence rates or improvement in survival.Consequently,meticulous patient selection and perioperative chemotherapy may prove indispensable in ensuring the efficacy of PLND.

Current perspectives on the management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in rectal cancer

Significant controversies exist with regards to the optimal management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes metastases(mLLN)in patients with low rectal cancer.The differing views held by Japanese and Western clinicians on the management of mLLN have been well documented.However,the adequacy of pelvic lymph node dissection(PLND)or neoadjuvant chemoradiation(NACRT)alone in addition to total mesorectal excision(TME)have recently come into question,due to the relatively high incidence of lateral local recurrences following PLND and TME,or NACRT and TME alone.Recently,a more selective approach to PLND has been suggested,involving a combination of neoadjuvant therapy,followed by PLND only to patients in whom the oncological benefit is likely to outweigh the risk of potential adverse events.A number of studies have attempted to retrospectively identify certain nodal characteristics on preoperative imaging,such as nodal size,appearance,and size reduction following neoadjuvant therapy.However,no consensus has been reached regarding the optimal criteria for a selective approach to PLND,partly due to the heterogeneity and retrospective nature of most of these studies.This review aims to provide an overview of recent evidence with regards to the diagnostic challenges,considerations for,and outcomes of the current management strategies for mLLN in rectal cancer patients.

Application of indocyanine green-enhanced near-infrared fluorescence-guided imaging in laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for middle-low rectal cancer

BACKGROUND As one effective treatment for lateral pelvic lymph node(LPLN)metastasis(LPNM),laparoscopic LPLN dissection(LPND)is limited due to the complicated anatomy of the pelvic sidewall and various complications after surgery.With regard to improving the accuracy and completeness of LPND as well as safety,we tried an innovative method using indocyanine green(ICG)visualized with a near-infrared(NIR)camera system to guide the detection of LPLNs in patients with middle-low rectal cancer.AIM To investigate whether ICG-enhanced NIR fluorescence-guided imaging is a better technique for LPND in patients with rectal cancer.METHODS A total of 42 middle-low rectal cancer patients with clinical LPNM who underwent total mesorectal excision(TME)and LPND between October 2017 and March 2019 at our institution were assessed and divided into an ICG group and a non-ICG group.Clinical characteristics,operative outcomes,pathological outcomes,and postoperative complication information were compared and analysed between the two groups.RESULTS Compared to the non-ICG group,the ICG group had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss(55.8±37.5 mL vs 108.0±52.7 mL,P=0.003)and a significantly larger number of LPLNs harvested(11.5±5.9 vs 7.1±4.8,P=0.017).The LPLNs of two patients in the non-IVG group were residual during LPND.In addition,no significant difference was found in terms of LPND,LPNM,operative time,conversion to laparotomy,preoperative complication,or hospital stay(P>0.05).CONCLUSION ICG-enhanced NIR fluorescence-guided imaging could be a feasible and convenient technique to guide LPND because it could bring specific advantages regarding the accuracy and completeness of surgery as well as safety.

Prophylactic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in stage Ⅳ low rectal cancer

AIM To assess the clinical significance of prophylactic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) in stage Ⅳ low rectal cancer.METHODS We selected 71 consecutive stage Ⅳ low rectal cancer patients who underwent primary tumor resection,and enrolled 50 of these 71 patients without clinical LPLN metastasis.The patients had distant metastasis such as liver,lung,peritoneum,and paraaortic LN.Clinical LPLN metastasis was defined as LN with a maximum diameter of 10 mm or more on preoperative pelvic computed tomography scan.All patients underwent primary tumor resection,27 patients underwent total mesorectal excision(TME) with LPLND(LPLND group),and 23 patients underwent only TME(TME group).Bilateral LPLND was performed simultaneously with primary tumor resection in LPLND group.R0 resection of both primary and metastatic sites was achieved in 20 of 50 patients.We evaluated possible prognostic factors for 5-year overall survival (OS),and compared 5-year cumulative local recurrence between the LPLND and TME groups.RESULTS For OS,univariate analyses revealed no significant benefit in the LPLND compared with the TME group (28.7% vs 17.0%,P = 0.523); multivariate analysis revealed that R0 resection was an independent prognostic factor.Regarding cumulative local recurrence,the LPLND group showed no significant benefit compared with TME group (21.4% vs 14.8%,P = 0.833).CONCLUSION Prophylactic LPLND shows no oncological benefits in patients with Stage Ⅳ low rectal cancer without clinical LPLN metastasis.

Short term outcomes of minimally invasive selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for low rectal cancer

BACKGROUND Pelvic recurrence after rectal cancer surgery is still a significant problem despite the introduction of total mesorectal excision and chemoradiation treatment(CRT),and one of the most common areas of recurrence is in the lateral pelvic lymph nodes.Hence,there is a possible role for lateral pelvic lymph node dissection(LPND)in rectal cancer.AIM To evaluate the short-term outcomes of patients who underwent minimally invasive LPND during rectal cancer surgery.Secondary outcomes were to evaluate for any predictive factors to determine lymph node metastases based on pre-operative scans.METHODS From October 2016 to November 2019,22 patients with stage II or III rectal cancer underwent minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery and LPND.These patients were all discussed at a multidisciplinary tumor board meeting and most of them received neoadjuvant chemoradiation prior to surgery.All patients had radiologically positive lateral pelvic lymph nodes on the initial staging scans,defined as lymph nodes larger than 7 mm in long axis measurement,or abnormal radiological morphology.LPND was only performed on the involved side.RESULTS Majority of the patients were male(18/22,81.8%),with a median age of 65 years(44-81).Eighteen patients completed neoadjuvant CRT pre-operatively.18 patients(81.8%)had unilateral LPND,with the others receiving bilateral surgery.The median number of lateral pelvic lymph nodes harvested was 10(3-22)per pelvic side wall.8 patients(36.4%)had positive metastases identified in the lymph nodes harvested.The median pre-CRT size of these positive lymph nodes was 10 mm.Median length of stay was 7.5 d(3-76),and only 2 patients failed initial removal of their urinary catheter.Complication rates were low,with only 1 lymphocele and 1 anastomotic leak.There was only 1 mortality(4.5%).There have been no recurrences so far.CONCLUSION Chemoradiation is inadequate in completely eradicating lateral wall metastasis and there are still technical limitations in accurately diagnosing metastases in these areas.A pre-CRT lymph node size of≥10 mm is suggestive of metastases.LPND may be performed safely with minimally invasive surgery.

Selective lateral lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer

BACKGROUND Lateral lymph node metastasis is one of the leading causes of local recurrence in patients with advanced mid or low rectal cancer.Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(NCRT)can effectively reduce the postoperative recurrence rate;thus,NCRT with total mesorectal excision(TME)is the most widely accepted standard of care for rectal cancer.The addition of lateral lymph node dissection(LLND)after NCRT remains a controversial topic.AIM To investigate the surgical outcomes of TME plus LLND,and the possible risk factors for lateral lymph node metastasis after NCRT.METHODS This retrospective study reviewed 89 consecutive patients with clinical stage II-III mid or low rectal cancer who underwent TME and LLND from June 2016 to October 2018.In the NCRT group,TME plus LLND was performed in patients with short axis(SA)of the lateral lymph node greater than 5 mm.In the non-NCRT group,TME plus LLND was performed in patients with SA of the lateral lymph node greater than 10 mm.Data regarding patient demographics,clinical workup,surgical procedure,complications,and outcomes were collected.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the possible risk factors for lateral lymph node metastasis in NCRT patients.RESULTS LLN metastasis was pathologically confirmed in 35 patients(39.3%):26(41.3%)in the NCRT group and 9(34.6%)in the non-NCRT group.The most common site of metastasis was around the obturator nerve(21/35)followed by the internal iliac artery region(12/35).In the NCRT patients,46%of patients with SA of LLN greater than 7 mm were positive.The postoperative 30-d mortality rate was 0%.Two(2.2%)patients suffered from lateral local recurrence in the 2-year follow up.Multivariate analysis showed that cT4 stage(odds ratio[OR]=5.124,95%confidence interval[CI]:1.419-18.508;P=0.013),poor differentiation type(OR=4.014,95%CI:1.038-15.520;P=0.044),and SA≥7 mm(OR=7.539,95%CI:1.487-38.214;P=0.015)were statistically significant risk factors associated with LLN metastasis.CONCLUSION NCRT is not sufficient as a stand-alone therapy to eradicate LLN metastasis in lower rectal cancer patients and surgeons should consider performing selective LLND in patients with greater LLN SA diameter,poorer histological differentiation,or advanced T stage.Selective LLND for NCRT patients can have a favorable oncological outcome.

Laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection in two fascial spaces for locally advanced lower rectal cancer

BACKGROUND The procedure for lateral lymph node(LLN)dissection(LLND)is complicated and can result in complications.We developed a technique for laparoscopic LLND based on two fascial spaces to simplify the procedure.AIM To clarify the anatomical basis of laparoscopic LLND in two fascial spaces and to evaluate its efficacy and safety in treating locally advanced low rectal cancer(LALRC).METHODS Cadaveric dissection was performed on 24 pelvises,and the fascial composition related to LLND was observed and described.Three dimensional-laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with LLND was performed in 20 patients with LALRC,and their clinical data were analyzed.RESULTS The cadaver study showed that the fascia propria of the rectum,urogenital fascia,vesicohypogastric fascia and parietal fascia lie side by side in a medial-lateral direction constituting the dissection plane for curative rectal cancer surgery,and the last three fasciae formed two spaces(Latzko's pararectal space and paravesical space)which were the surgical area for LLND.Laparoscopic LLND in two fascial spaces was performed successfully in all 20 patients.The median operating time,blood loss and postoperative hospitalization were 178(152-243)min,55(25-150)mL and 10(7-20)d,respectively.The median number of harvested LLNs was 8.6(6-12),and pathologically positive LLN metastasis was confirmed in 7(35.0%)cases.Postoperative complications included lower limb pain in 1 case and lymph leakage in 1 case.CONCLUSION Our preliminary surgical experience suggests that laparoscopic LLND based on fascial spaces is a feasible,effective and safe procedure for treating LALRC.

Lateral pelvic lymph nodes for rectal cancer:A review of diagnosis and management

The current status and future prospects for diagnosis and treatment of lateral pelvic lymph node(LPLN)metastasis of rectal cancer are described in this review.Magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)is recommended for the diagnosis of LPLN metastasis.A LPLN-positive status on MRI is a strong risk factor for metastasis,and evaluation by MRI is important for deciding treatment strategy.LPLN dissection(LPLD)has an advantage of reducing recurrence in the lateral pelvis but also has a disadvantage of complications;therefore,LPLD may not be appropriate for cases that are less likely to have LPLN metastasis.Radiation therapy(RT)and chemoradiation therapy(CRT)have limited effects in cases with suspected LPLN metastasis,but a combination of preoperative CRT and LPLD may improve the treatment outcome.Thus,RT and CRT plus selective LPLD may be a rational strategy to omit unnecessary LPLD and produce a favorable treatment outcome.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy as Guidance for Lateral Neck Dissection in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

Introduction: The surgical management of lateral lymph nodes in differentiated thyroid carcinoma is controversies. Therefore, we analyzed whether sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) biopsy of the first draining nodes in the jugulo-carotid chain is an accurate technique to select patients with true-positive but nonpalpable lymph nodes for selective lateral node dissection. Materials and Methods: From January 2009 to December 2009, 12 patients with solitary papillary carcinoma measuring 2 cm by ultrasonography were included in this study. After the thyroid gland was exposed to avoid injuring the lateral thyroid lymphatic connection, approximately 0.2 ml of 5mg/ml indocyanine green was injected into the parenchyma of upper and lower thyroid gland. Some stained lymph nodes in the jugulo-carotid chain could be identified following the stained lymphatic duct and dissected as the SLN. After that, thyroidectomy with modified neck dissection was performed. Results: The mean tumor size was 22.1 ± 4.6 mm. Identification and biopsy of stained SLN in the ipsilateral jugulo-carotid chain was successful in all 12 cases. In 6 cases, histopathological analysis of SLNs revealed metastases of the papillary thyroid carcinoma. Among them, 2 cases had additional metastatic lymph nodes in the ipsilateral compartment. Of the 6 patients who had negative lymph node metastasis (LNM) in SLNs, all patients had negative LNM in the ipsilateral compartment. Conclusions: The method may be helpful in the detection of true-positive but nonpalpable lymph nodes and may support a decision to perform a selective lateral node dissection in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.

T1 rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma with bilateral enlarged lateral lymph nodes and unilateral metastasis:A case report

BACKGROUND There are a few cases of lateral lymph node(LLN)metastasis(LLNM)of T1 rectal cancer.Moreover,LLNM is easily missed,especially in patients with early-stage rectal cancer.To our knowledge,the possibility of bilateral LLNM before surgery has not been reported in previous studies.CASE SUMMARY A 36-year-old woman underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection at a local hospital owing to a clinical diagnosis of a rectal polyp.The pathology report showed a diagnosis of T1 rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma.She was considered to have bilateral LLNM after the examination at our hospital.Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision plus bilateral LLN dissection was performed and the pathological outcomes indicated unilateral LLNM.The patient received longcourse adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with no recurrence or metastasis observed during the 1-year follow-up period.CONCLUSION T1 rectal cancer could lead to LLNM and possibly,bilateral LLNM.Therefore,adequate clinical evaluation is essential for these patients.

Preoperative chemoradiation and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer:Two distinct principles

Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy(EPL) with total mesorectal excision(TME) has been reported to provide oncological benefit in lower rectal cancer in Japan.In Western countries EPL is not widely accepted because of frequent morbidity but instead preoperative chemoradiation(CRT) followed by TME has been established as a standard treatment for decreasing local recurrence.Recently,several studies have focused on the comparison between these two distinct therapeutic approaches in Western countries and Japan.A study comparing Dutch trial data and Japanese data revealed that EPL and RT are almost equivalent in decreasing local recurrence in lower rectal cancer as compared with TME alone.Considering that almost 45 survival can be achieved by EPL even in the presence of metastatic lateral lymph nodes(LLNs),EPL performed by experienced surgeons definitely contributes to decrease local recurrence.On the other hand,a randomized controlled trial in Japan that compared EPL with conventional TME following preoperative RT revealed that EPL is associated with a higher frequency of sexual and urinary dysfunction without oncological benefits in the presence of preoperative RT.On this point,preoperative CRT followed by conventional TME without EPL would be a better therapeutic approach in patients without evident metastatic LLNs.For future treatment,it would be desirable to have a narrower indication for EPL using full advantage of recent improvement in image diagnosis.Although objective comparison of these two principles between Japan and the West is difficult due to differences in patient groups,further studies would lead to the next great step towards future improvement in treating lower rectal cancer.

Fluorescence imaging-guided pelvic lymph node localization and resection of bladder cancer after intracutaneous injection of indocyanine green into the lower limbs and perineum

Background:Pelvic lymph node dissection(PLND)in radical cystectomy(RC)is of great significance,but the method and scope of PLND remain controversial.Based on the principle of indirect lymphadenography,we designed a method to localize the whole pelvic lymph nodes by intradermal injection of indocyanine green(ICG)through the lower limbs and perineum,and to evaluate the effectiveness of this method. Methods:In a single center,54 bladder cancer patients who underwent RC and PLND participated in a prospective clinical trial,which began on February 28,2022 and ended on December 30,2022.ICG solution was injected subcutaneously at the medial malleolus of both lower extremities and at both sides of the midline of the perineum.The fluorescent laparoscopy was used to trace,locate,and remove the targeted areas under the image fusion mode.The consistency of lymph node resection was determined by histopathological diagnosis.The impact of ICG guidance on the surgical time of PLND was compared with that of 11 bladder cancer patients who underwent RC and PLND without ICG injection,serving as the control group. Results:Perineal lower limb combined injection can provide comprehensive visualization of pelvic lymph nodes.This technique reduces PLND surgical time and increases the accuracy of PLND. Conclusion:Intracutaneous injection of ICG into the lower limbs and perineum can specifically mark pelvic lymph nodes.Intraoperative fluores-cence imaging can accurately identify,locate,and resect lymph nodes in the pelvic region,reducing PLND surgical time and increasing the accuracy of PLND.

Management of synchronous lateral pelvic nodal metastasis in rectal cancer in the era of neoadjuvant chemoradiation: A systemic review

BACKGROUND Lateral pelvic lymph node(LLN)metastasis(LLNM)occur in up to 28%of patients with low rectal tumours.While prophylactic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection(LLND)has been abandoned by most western institutions in the era of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy(CRT),the role of selective LLND in patients with enlarged LLN on pre-CRT imaging remains unclear.Some studies have shown improved survival and recurrence outcomes when LLNs show"response"to CRT.However,no management algorithm exists to differentiate treatment for"responders"vs"non-responders".AIM To determine if selective LLND in patients with enlarged LLNs results in improved survival and recurrence outcomes.METHODS A systemic search of Pub Med and Embase databases for studies reporting on patients with synchronous radiologically suspicious LLNM(s-LLNM)in rectal cancer receiving preoperative-CRT was performed.RESULTS Fifteen retrospective,single-centre studies were included.793 patients with sLLNM were evaluated:456 underwent TME while 337 underwent TME with7,LLND post-CRT.In the TME group,local recurrence(LR)rates range from 12.5%to 36%.Five-year disease free survival(DFS)was 42%to 75%.In the TME with LLND group,LR rates were 0%to 6%.Five years DFS was 41.2%to 100%.Radiological response was seen in 58%.Pathologically positive LLN was found in up to 94%of non-responders vs 0%to 20%in responders.Young age,low tumour location and radiological non-response were associated with final positive LLNM and lowered DFS.CONCLUSION LLND is associated with local control in patients with s-LLNM.It can be performed in radiological non-responders given a large majority represent true LLNM.Its role in radiological responders should be considered in selected high risk patients.

Early drainage removal in the management of lymphatic leakage after robotic pelvic lymph node dissection

Background:Radical prostatectomy(RP)and radical cystectomy(RC)with concurrent pelvic lymph node dissection(PLND)are considered as the curative surgical treatment options for localized prostate cancer(PC)or muscle-invasive bladder cancer(BC).Regarding lymphatic leakage management after PLND,there is no standard of care,with different therapeutic approaches having been reported with varying success rates.Methods:Seventy patients underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy during robotic RP and RC with postoperative pelvic drainage volume more than 50 mL/day before the removal of drainage tube,were retrospectively evaluated in this study between August 2015 and June 2023.If the pelvic drainage volume on postoperative Day 2 was more than 50 mL/day,a drainage fluid creatinine was routinely tested to rule out urine leakage.We removed the drainage if the patient had no significant abdominal free fluid collection,no abdominal distension or pain,no fever,and no abdominal tenderness.After 1-day observation of the vital signs and abdominal symptoms,the patient was discharged and followed-up in clinic for 2 weeks after surgery.Results:Forty-one cases underwent the early drainage removal even if the pelvic drainage volume was more than 50mL/day.Among these forty-one cases,twenty-five drainage tubes were removed when drainage volume was more than 100 mL/day.All the forty-one cases with pelvic drainage volume greater than 50mL/day were successfully managed with the early drainage removal.No paracentesis or drainage placement was required.No readmission occured during the follow-up period.Conclusion:It is safe to manage the high-volume pelvic lymphatic leakage by early clamping of the drainage tube,ultrasonography assessment of no significant residual fluid in the abdominal and pelvic cavity,and then the early removal of the drainage tube.

扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术对中高危前列腺癌患者预后的影响

目的评估扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ePLND)对接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)治疗的中高风险前列腺癌(PCa)患者预后的影响。方法选择2010年5月至2020年12月在濮阳市人民医院(1309例)和安阳市人民医院(1163例)进行RP治疗的PCa患者2472例。根据PCa患者是否行ePLND,将其分为ePLND组(2283例)和非ePLND组(189例)。其中ePLND组患者2283例,非ePLND组189例。患者随访时间为(13~107)个月,中位随访时间为56(24,72)个月。对比分析两组患者的术后生存状况。结果⑴术后5年:生化复发(BCR)率为60.80%,远处转移率41.22%,肿瘤特异性生存率(CSS)率为94.78%,总生存率为84.34。⑵是否进行ePLND对上述术后5年生存率的4个结局指标均无影响(P>0.05);⑶Cox回归显示,对PCa患者术后5年各结局指标而言:①Glea⁃son评分、肿瘤临床分期、术前血清PSA、穿刺活检针数阳性率、精囊侵犯是BCR的危险因素(P<0.05);②Gleason评分、肿瘤病理分期、肿瘤临床分期、术后切缘阳性、穿刺活检针数阳性率是远处转移的危险因素(P<0.05);③年龄、术前血清PSA、Gleason评分、肿瘤病理分期、肿瘤临床分期、术后切缘阳性、穿刺活检针数阳性率是肿瘤特异性生存CSS的危险因素(P<0.05)。④年龄、术前血清PSA、Gleason评分、肿瘤病理分期、肿瘤临床分期、穿刺活检针数阳性率是影响OS的危险因素(P<0.05)。结论在进行前列腺根治手术的中高危PCa患者中,ePLND对患者预后无显著影响。

根治性子宫切除术结合盆腔淋巴结清扫术对宫颈癌患者血清CA-199、CA125、SCC-Ag水平的影响

目的 探讨根治性子宫切除术结合盆腔淋巴结清扫术应用于宫颈癌患者的效果及对患者血清肿瘤标志物糖类抗原199(CA199)、糖类抗原125(CA125)、鳞状上皮细胞癌抗原(SCC-Ag)水平的影响。方法 选取2018年1月至2023年6月期间于芜湖市第二人民医院接受手术治疗的118例宫颈癌患者资料,根据手术方式不同分为传统开腹组(42例,接受传统开腹根治性子宫切除术)和微创组(76例,接受腹腔镜下根治性子宫切除术联合盆腔淋巴结清扫术),比较两组手术效果及患者血清肿瘤标志物水平差异。结果 微创组手术时间较开腹组更长,术中出血量较开腹组少,住院时间、胃肠道恢复时间短于开腹组,差异均有统计学意义(t=6.881、12.348、21.622、11.780,P<0.05);与术前比较,术后两组血清CA-199、CA125、SCC-Ag水平均下降:术前>术后2周>术后1月,微创组术后各时间点上述指标水平均低于开腹组,差异有统计学意义(F=237.516、8.733、6.182、251.616、12.520、7.069、250.512、14.554、4.663,P<0.05);微创组术后并发症总发生率低于开腹组,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.116,P<0.05)。结论 腹腔镜下根治性子宫切除术结合盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗宫颈癌,可以优化手术效果,促进术后康复,提高安全性,改善预后。

基于MRI探索用于术前预测直肠癌侧方淋巴结转移的短径截断值

目的:探讨基于侧方淋巴结(lateral pelvic lymph node, LPLN)短径预测术前进行新辅助治疗和未进行新辅助治疗的直肠癌患者LPLN转移的诊断标准。方法:回顾性收集分析自2012年01月至2019年12月中国侧方淋巴结协作组的机构数据库中行全直肠系膜切除术(total mesorectal excision, TME)+侧方淋巴结清扫术(lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis, LPLND)的临床怀疑LPLN肿大的直肠癌患者的临床病理资料。结果:共纳入446例患者,根据不同术前治疗策略,将所有患者分为新辅助治疗组和无新辅助治疗组。新辅助治疗组患者病理pCR/T1(9.0%vs 2.7%,P=0.013)和N0(41.9%vs 55.3%,P<0.001)的比例与无新辅助治疗组患者差异明显。此外,相比于无新辅助治疗组患者,新辅助治疗组患者手术时间明显延长(300.7 vs 277.4 min,P=0.018)。新辅助治疗组与无新辅助治疗组分别有40例(25.8%)和78例(26.8%)患者病理诊断为LPLN转移。髂内淋巴结是新辅助治疗组(16.1%)和无新辅助治疗组(15.8%)患者最常见的LPLN转移位置。新辅助治疗组患者平均转移LPLN短径(1.0 vs 1.4 mm,P=0.015)和无转移LPLN短径(0.6 vs 0.8 mm,P=0.005)明显短于无新辅助治疗组。无新辅助治疗组和新辅助治疗组患者分别以9 mm和7 mm作为LPLN截断值时,AUC值分别为0.817和0.745,有着较好的一致性。结论:接受新辅助治疗和未接受新辅助治疗的患者分别以7 mm和9 mm作为LPLN截断值时,有着最佳的预测LPLN转移的能力。

磁共振成像对直肠癌盆腔侧方淋巴结转移的诊断价值分析

目的:分析磁共振成像(MRI)对直肠癌盆腔侧方淋巴结转移(PLLNM)的诊断价值。方法:选取2020年3月—2022年2月新乡医学院第三附属医院收治的80例直肠癌患者作为研究对象,所有患者术前均接受MRI检查及病理活检确诊,均行直肠癌切除及盆腔淋巴结清扫术。以病理结果为金标准,计算MRI对直肠癌PLLNM的准确度、敏感度、特异度及一致性,比较不同性质淋巴结的MRI图像特征。采用Pearson检验分析MRI图像特征与直肠癌PLLNM的相关性,采用多因素logistic回归分析模型分析影响PLLNM的独立危险因素。结果:80例直肠癌患者经病理诊断共检出PLLNM 29例,未转移51例;MRI诊断共检出PLLNM 35例,未转移45例,两者的诊断一致性良好(Kappa=0.845)。PLLNM患者的边缘模糊及型号不均匀占比显著高于未转移者,淋巴结短径显著长于未转移者,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=12.342、8.136;t=13.857,P<0.01)。Pearson相关性分析结果显示,直肠癌PLLNM检出率与淋巴结短径、边缘模糊及信号不均匀具有正相关性(r>0,P<0.001)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,淋巴结信号是影响直肠癌PLLNM的独立危险因素。结论:MRI对直肠癌PLLNM的诊断效能较高,不同性质淋巴结的MRI图像特征存在明显差异,其中淋巴结短径、边缘模糊及信号不均匀与PLL-NM密切相关,淋巴结信号是影响直肠癌PLLNM的独立危险因素。用MRI测量淋巴结短径是诊断直肠癌PLLNM的可靠参数,对PLLNM的早期预测具有积极作用。

三孔同位入路法同期行腹腔镜下腹股沟及盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌的初步探索

目的:探讨三孔同位入路法同期行腹腔镜下腹股沟及盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌伴局部淋巴结转移的可行性、优势及初步经验。方法:回顾性分析2020年1月至2023年1月我院施行三孔同位入路法同期行腹腔镜下腹股沟及盆腔淋巴结清扫术的患者5例,手术步骤主要包括:下腹部腹腔镜三孔建立,沿Scarpa筋膜行双侧腹腔镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫,经腹腔行双侧或单侧腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫。记录手术及围手术期参数,并与开放腹股沟及盆腔淋巴结清扫术进行比较。结果:5例患者手术均顺利完成,手术时间(215.40±51.64)min,术中出血量中位数50 ml,单侧腹股沟淋巴结切除数量(11.10±2.42)个,单侧盆腔淋巴结切除数量(8.13±1.13)个,与开放手术相比,具有更少的术中出血量,更小的疼痛感、更短的腹股沟区皮下引流管留置时间和术后住院时间。结论:三孔同位入路法同期行腹腔镜下腹股沟及盆腔淋巴结清扫术是治疗阴茎癌局部淋巴结转移的可行且有效方案,在保证疗效显著的情况下,避免多次手术,减少患者的创伤和痛苦。