AIM To evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic vs open surgery for pathological T4(pT 4) colorectal cancer.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the short-and long-term outcomes of proven p...AIM To evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic vs open surgery for pathological T4(pT 4) colorectal cancer.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the short-and long-term outcomes of proven p T4 colorectal cancer patients who underwent complete resection by laparoscopic or open surgery from 2006 to 2015 at Guangdong General Hospital.RESULTS A total of 211 p T4 colorectal cancer patients were included in this analysis, including 101 cases in thelaparoscopy(LAP) group and 110 cases in the open surgery(OPEN) group [including 15(12.9%) cases of conversion to open surgery]. Clinical information(age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, etc.) did not differ between the two groups. In terms of blood loss, postoperative complications and rate of recovery, the LAP group performed significantly more favorably(P < 0.05). With regard to p T4 a/b and combined organ resection, there were significantly more cases in the OPEN group(P < 0.05). The 3-and 5-year overall survival rates were 74.9% and 60.5%, respectively, for the LAP group and 62.4% and 46.5%, respectively, for the OPEN group(P = 0.060). The 3-and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 68.0% and 57.3%, respectively, for the LAP group and 55.8% and 39.8%, respectively, for the OPEN group(P = 0.053). Multivariate analysis showed that ⅢB/ⅢC stage, lymph node status, and CA19-9 were significant predictors of overall survival. PT4 a/b, ⅢC stage, histological subtypes, CA19-9, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent factors affecting disease-free survival.CONCLUSION Laparoscopy is safely used in the treatment of p T4 colorectal cancer while offering advantages of minimal invasiveness and faster recovery. Laparoscopy is able to achieve good oncologic outcomes similar to those of open surgery. We recommend that laparoscopy be carried out in experienced centers. It is still required to screen the appropriate cases for laparoscopic surgery, optimize the preoperative diagnosis process, and reduce the conversion rate. Multi-center, prospective, and large-sample studies are required to assess these issues.展开更多
Objective To investigate the optimal margin in nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) 4 cm or less in diameter. Methods Eighty-two kidneys with RCC 4 cm or less in diameter resected by radical ne...Objective To investigate the optimal margin in nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) 4 cm or less in diameter. Methods Eighty-two kidneys with RCC 4 cm or less in diameter resected by radical nephrectomy were prospectively studied. The kidney samples were sectioned at 3 mm interval and examined for multicentricity. On each layer of tissue sectioned, parenchyma margin of 15 mm beyond pseudocapsule was continuously sectioned and examined for completeness of pseudocapsule and extra-pseudocapsule cancer lesion. The farthest distance between extra-pseudocapsule lesion and primary tumor was measured. PCNA expression was detected in 41 patients by using standard SP immunohistochemistry technique. Results The diameter of 82 primary tumors was 3. 4 ± 0. 8 cm (range 1.5-4.0 cm).Of these,31.7% (26/82) were found without intact pseudocapsules and 17.1% (14/82) with positive cancer lesions beyond pseudocapsule. The average distance between extra-pseudocapsule cancer lesion and primary tumor展开更多
In this editorial we comment on the article by Jaber et al.Autoimmune pancreatitis(AIP)represents a distinct form of pancreatitis,categorized into AIP-1 and AIP-2,characterized by obstructive jaundice,lymphoplasmacyti...In this editorial we comment on the article by Jaber et al.Autoimmune pancreatitis(AIP)represents a distinct form of pancreatitis,categorized into AIP-1 and AIP-2,characterized by obstructive jaundice,lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate,and fibrosis.AIP-1,associated with elevated immunoglobulin G4(IgG4)levels,exhibits higher relapse rates,affecting older males,while AIP-2 is less common and linked to inflammatory bowel disease.AIP is considered a manifestation of IgG4-related systemic disease,sharing characteristic histological findings.Steroids are the primary treatment,with emerging biomarkers like interferon alpha and inter-leukin-33.AIP poses an increased risk of various malignancies,and the assoc-iation with pancreatic cancer is debated.Surgery is reserved for severe cases,necessitating careful evaluation due to diagnostic challenges.AIP patients may have concurrent PanINs but display favorable long-term outcomes compared to pancreatic cancer patients.Thorough diagnostic assessment,including biopsy and steroid response,is crucial for informed surgical decisions in AIP.展开更多
基金Supported by Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province,No.2016A030310328 and No.2016A030313762
文摘AIM To evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic vs open surgery for pathological T4(pT 4) colorectal cancer.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the short-and long-term outcomes of proven p T4 colorectal cancer patients who underwent complete resection by laparoscopic or open surgery from 2006 to 2015 at Guangdong General Hospital.RESULTS A total of 211 p T4 colorectal cancer patients were included in this analysis, including 101 cases in thelaparoscopy(LAP) group and 110 cases in the open surgery(OPEN) group [including 15(12.9%) cases of conversion to open surgery]. Clinical information(age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, etc.) did not differ between the two groups. In terms of blood loss, postoperative complications and rate of recovery, the LAP group performed significantly more favorably(P < 0.05). With regard to p T4 a/b and combined organ resection, there were significantly more cases in the OPEN group(P < 0.05). The 3-and 5-year overall survival rates were 74.9% and 60.5%, respectively, for the LAP group and 62.4% and 46.5%, respectively, for the OPEN group(P = 0.060). The 3-and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 68.0% and 57.3%, respectively, for the LAP group and 55.8% and 39.8%, respectively, for the OPEN group(P = 0.053). Multivariate analysis showed that ⅢB/ⅢC stage, lymph node status, and CA19-9 were significant predictors of overall survival. PT4 a/b, ⅢC stage, histological subtypes, CA19-9, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent factors affecting disease-free survival.CONCLUSION Laparoscopy is safely used in the treatment of p T4 colorectal cancer while offering advantages of minimal invasiveness and faster recovery. Laparoscopy is able to achieve good oncologic outcomes similar to those of open surgery. We recommend that laparoscopy be carried out in experienced centers. It is still required to screen the appropriate cases for laparoscopic surgery, optimize the preoperative diagnosis process, and reduce the conversion rate. Multi-center, prospective, and large-sample studies are required to assess these issues.
文摘Objective To investigate the optimal margin in nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) 4 cm or less in diameter. Methods Eighty-two kidneys with RCC 4 cm or less in diameter resected by radical nephrectomy were prospectively studied. The kidney samples were sectioned at 3 mm interval and examined for multicentricity. On each layer of tissue sectioned, parenchyma margin of 15 mm beyond pseudocapsule was continuously sectioned and examined for completeness of pseudocapsule and extra-pseudocapsule cancer lesion. The farthest distance between extra-pseudocapsule lesion and primary tumor was measured. PCNA expression was detected in 41 patients by using standard SP immunohistochemistry technique. Results The diameter of 82 primary tumors was 3. 4 ± 0. 8 cm (range 1.5-4.0 cm).Of these,31.7% (26/82) were found without intact pseudocapsules and 17.1% (14/82) with positive cancer lesions beyond pseudocapsule. The average distance between extra-pseudocapsule cancer lesion and primary tumor
文摘In this editorial we comment on the article by Jaber et al.Autoimmune pancreatitis(AIP)represents a distinct form of pancreatitis,categorized into AIP-1 and AIP-2,characterized by obstructive jaundice,lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate,and fibrosis.AIP-1,associated with elevated immunoglobulin G4(IgG4)levels,exhibits higher relapse rates,affecting older males,while AIP-2 is less common and linked to inflammatory bowel disease.AIP is considered a manifestation of IgG4-related systemic disease,sharing characteristic histological findings.Steroids are the primary treatment,with emerging biomarkers like interferon alpha and inter-leukin-33.AIP poses an increased risk of various malignancies,and the assoc-iation with pancreatic cancer is debated.Surgery is reserved for severe cases,necessitating careful evaluation due to diagnostic challenges.AIP patients may have concurrent PanINs but display favorable long-term outcomes compared to pancreatic cancer patients.Thorough diagnostic assessment,including biopsy and steroid response,is crucial for informed surgical decisions in AIP.
