Objective:To evaluate the functional results and complications of the lingual mucosal graft(LMG)urethroplasty and to sum up the current state of the art of this surgical technique.Methods:A systematic search of PubMed...Objective:To evaluate the functional results and complications of the lingual mucosal graft(LMG)urethroplasty and to sum up the current state of the art of this surgical technique.Methods:A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus electronic databases was performed,according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses(PRISMA)statement.Studies involving male patients treated with LMG urethroplasty for urethral stricture were included.Complete protocol is available at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017080121.A meta-analysis comparing functional and long-term oral complication outcomes of LMG and buccal mucosal graft(BMG)was performed,calculating the odds ratio(OR)and 95%confidence interval(CI).Results:Twenty original articles were included in the qualitative analysis.Strictures of 1.5e16.5 cm have been treated with LMG urethroplasty,due to the improvement of harvesting technique and very low rate of long-term oral complications.Very good functional results have been reported by different authors for LMG urethroplasty,with lower rate of oral complications than BMG.The meta-analysis included six comparative studies involving 187 and 178 patients treated with LMG and BMG urethroplasty,respectively.An OR of 1.65(95%CI[0.95e2.87],I^2=0%)and 0.18(95%CI[0.03e1.26],I^2=68%)were found for LMG vs.BMG urethroplasty,in terms of success and oral complication rate,respectively.Conclusion:LMG urethroplasty can be reasonably considered a first choice technique for urethral stricture with very good results.Oral complications are temporary and minimally disabling,basically less than those for BMG,and depend mainly on the graft extent.展开更多
文摘Objective:To evaluate the functional results and complications of the lingual mucosal graft(LMG)urethroplasty and to sum up the current state of the art of this surgical technique.Methods:A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus electronic databases was performed,according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses(PRISMA)statement.Studies involving male patients treated with LMG urethroplasty for urethral stricture were included.Complete protocol is available at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017080121.A meta-analysis comparing functional and long-term oral complication outcomes of LMG and buccal mucosal graft(BMG)was performed,calculating the odds ratio(OR)and 95%confidence interval(CI).Results:Twenty original articles were included in the qualitative analysis.Strictures of 1.5e16.5 cm have been treated with LMG urethroplasty,due to the improvement of harvesting technique and very low rate of long-term oral complications.Very good functional results have been reported by different authors for LMG urethroplasty,with lower rate of oral complications than BMG.The meta-analysis included six comparative studies involving 187 and 178 patients treated with LMG and BMG urethroplasty,respectively.An OR of 1.65(95%CI[0.95e2.87],I^2=0%)and 0.18(95%CI[0.03e1.26],I^2=68%)were found for LMG vs.BMG urethroplasty,in terms of success and oral complication rate,respectively.Conclusion:LMG urethroplasty can be reasonably considered a first choice technique for urethral stricture with very good results.Oral complications are temporary and minimally disabling,basically less than those for BMG,and depend mainly on the graft extent.
