Liver transplantation is a major abdominal operation and the intimate anatomic relation of the liver with the right hemidiaphragm predisposes the patient to various manifestations in the chest cavity.Furthermore,chron...Liver transplantation is a major abdominal operation and the intimate anatomic relation of the liver with the right hemidiaphragm predisposes the patient to various manifestations in the chest cavity.Furthermore,chronic liver disease affects pulmonary function before and after liver transplantation resulting in a considerable percentage of patients presenting with morbidity related to chest complications.This review aims to identify the potential chest complications of surgical interest during or after liver transplantation.Complications of surgical interest are defined as those conditions that necessitate an invasive procedure(such as thoracocentesis or a chest tube placement)in the chest or a surgical intervention performed by a thoracic surgeon.These complications will be classified as perioperative and postoperative;the latter will be categorized as early and late.Although thoracocentesis or a chest tube placement is usually sufficient when invasive measures are deemed necessary,in some patients,thoracic surgical interventions are warranted.A high index of suspicion is needed to recognize and treat these conditions promptly.A close collaboration between abdominal surgeons,intensive care unit physicians and thoracic surgeons is of paramount importance.展开更多
INTRODUCTIONLiver surgery,was started in the late 1950s in Chinaand has developed rapidly in the past 40 years.The study on the diagnosis and treatment of primaryliver cancer in China underwent four stages:①Inthe 195...INTRODUCTIONLiver surgery,was started in the late 1950s in Chinaand has developed rapidly in the past 40 years.The study on the diagnosis and treatment of primaryliver cancer in China underwent four stages:①Inthe 1950s,the anatomical study of the liver lay asolid foundation for liver resection.①In展开更多
AIM: To investigate the treatment efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatic malignant tumor and the relevant complications.METHODS: A total of 338 patients with 763 hepatic tumors underwent ultrasound-guide...AIM: To investigate the treatment efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatic malignant tumor and the relevant complications.METHODS: A total of 338 patients with 763 hepatic tumors underwent ultrasound-guided RFA (565 procedures).There were 204 cases of hepatic cellular carcinoma (HCC)with 430 tumors, the mean largest diameter was 4.0 cm.Of them, 48 patients (23.5%) were in stages Ⅰ-Ⅱ (UICC Systems) and 156 (76.5%) in stages Ⅲ-Ⅳ There were 134 cases of metastatic liver carcinoma (MLC), with 333metastases in the liver, the mean diameter was 4.1 cm,the liver metastases of 96 patients (71.6%) came from gastrointestinal tract. Ninety-three percent of the 338patients were treated using the relatively standard protocol. Crucial attention must be paid to monitor the abnormal changes in ultrasound images as well as the vital signs of the patients to find the possible hemorrhage and peripheral structures injury in time. The tumors were considered as ablated completely, if no viability was found on enhanced CT within 24 h or at 1 mo after RFA. These patients were followed up for 3-57 mo.RESULTS: The ablation success rate was 93.3% (401/430tumors) for HCC and was 96.7% (322/333 tumors) for MLC. The local recurrence rate for HCC and MLC was 7.9% (34/430 tumors) and 10.5% (35/333 tumors),respectively. A total of 137 patients (40.5%) underwent 2-11times of repeated ablations because of tumor recurrence or metastasis. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year survival rate was84.6%, 66.6%, and 63.1%, respectively;the survival rate from 48 patients of Ⅰ-Ⅱ stage HCC was 93.7%, 80.4%,and 80.4%, respectively. The major complication rate in this study was 2.5% (14 of 565 procedures), which consisted of 5 hemorrhages, 1 colon perforation, 5 injuries of adjacent structures, 2 bile leakages, and 1 skin burn.CONCLUSION: RFA, as a minimally invasive local treatment,has become an effective and relatively safe alternative for the patients of hepatic malignant tumor, even of advanced liver tumor, tumor recurrence, and liver metastases. Knowledge about possible complications and their control may increase the treatment efficacy and help to promote the use of RFA technique.展开更多
The aim of this topic highlight is to review relevant evidence regarding the influence of the metabolic syndrome(MS) and its associated liver manifestation, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD), on the development...The aim of this topic highlight is to review relevant evidence regarding the influence of the metabolic syndrome(MS) and its associated liver manifestation, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD), on the development of liver cancer as well as their impact on the results of major liver surgery. MS and NAFLD, whose incidences are significantly increasing in Western countries, are leading to a changing profile of the patients undergoing liver surgery. A MEDLINE search was performed for relevant articles using the key words "metabolic syndrome", "liver resection", "liver transplantation", "non alcoholic fatty liver disease", "non-alcoholic steatohepatitis" and "liver cancer". On one hand, the MS favors the development of primary liver malignancies(hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma)either through NAFLD liver parenchymal alterations(steatosis, steatohepatitis, fibrosis) or in the absence of significant underlying liver parenchyma changes. Also, the existence of NAFLD may have a specific impact on colorectal liver metastases recurrence. On the other hand, the postoperative period following partial liver resection and liver transplantation is at increased risk of both postoperative complications and mortality. These deleterious effects seem to be related to the existence of liver specific complications but also higher cardio-vascular sensitivity in a setting of MS/NAFLD. Finally, the long-term prognosis after curative surgery joins that of patients operated on with other types of underlying liver diseases. An increased rate of patients with MS/NAFLD referred to hepatobiliary units has to be expected. The higher operative risk observed in this subset of patients will require specific improvements in their perioperative management.展开更多
Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms(PNENs) are rare and account for only 2%-4% of all pancreatic neoplasms. All PNENs are potential(neurendocrine tumors PNETs) or overt(neuroendocrine carcinomas PNECs) malignant,but a...Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms(PNENs) are rare and account for only 2%-4% of all pancreatic neoplasms. All PNENs are potential(neurendocrine tumors PNETs) or overt(neuroendocrine carcinomas PNECs) malignant,but a subset of PNETs is low-risk. Even in case of low-risk PNETs surgical resection is frequently required to treat hormone-related symptoms and to obtain an appropriate pathological diagnosis. Low-risk PNETs in the body and the tail are ideal for minimallyinvasive approaches which should be tailored to the individual patient. Generally,surgeons must aim for parenchyma sparing in these cases. In high-risk and malignant PNENs,indications for tumor resection are much wider than for pancreatic adenocarcinoma,in many cases due to the relatively benign tumor biology. Thus,patients with locally advanced and metastatic PNETs may benefit from extensive resection. In experienced hands,even multi-organ resections are accomplished with acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality rates and are associated with excellent long term survival. However,poorly differentiated neoplasms with high proliferation rates are associated with a dismal prognosis and may frequently only be treated with chemotherapy. The evidence on surgical treatment of PNENs stems from reviews of mostly singlecenter series and some analyses of nation-wide tumor registries. No randomized trial has been performed to compare surgical and non-surgical therapies in potentially resectable PNEN. Though such a trial would principally be desirable,ethical considerations and the heterogeneity of PNENs preclude realization of such a study. In the current review,we summarize recent advances in the surgical treatment of PNENs.展开更多
Objective At present,there is no appropriate system to evaluate the severe complications of liver surgery through the preoperative factors.This study aimed to design and verify a risk assessment system for the predict...Objective At present,there is no appropriate system to evaluate the severe complications of liver surgery through the preoperative factors.This study aimed to design and verify a risk assessment system for the prediction of severe post-operative complications after a hepatectomy based on the preoperative parameters.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 1732 patients who had undergone liver surgery.The severity of the complications was graded by Accordion Severity Grading of post-operative complications.The variables were screened by multivariate analysis,and graded scores were assigned to the selected variables.A logistic regression equation was used to form the liver operation risk formula(LORF)for the prediction of severe post-operative complications.The LORF was verified by the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve.Results The multivariate correlation analysis revealed the independent influencing factors of the severe post-operative complications of liver surgery were Child-Pugh grade(OR=4.127;P<0.001),medical diseases requiring drug treatment(OR=3.092;P<0.001),the number of liver segments to be removed(OR=2.209;P=0.006),organ invasion(OR=4.538;P=0.024),and pathological type(OR=4.023;P=0.002).The binomial logistic regression model was established to obtain the calculation formula(LORF)of the severe complication risk.The area under the ROC curve(AUC)of the LORF was 0.815.The cut-off value of the expected probability of severe complications was 0.3225(32.25%).Furthermore,in the validation data set,the corresponding AUC of the LORF was 0.829.Conclusion As a novel and simplified assessment system,the LORF could effectively predict the severe post-operative complications of liver surgery through the preoperative factors,and therefore it could be used to evaluate the risk of severe liver surgical complications before surgery.展开更多
BACKGROUND As a common gastrointestinal malignancy,colorectal cancer(CRC)poses a serious health threat globally.Robotic surgery is one of the future trends in surgical treatment of CRC.Robotic surgery has several tech...BACKGROUND As a common gastrointestinal malignancy,colorectal cancer(CRC)poses a serious health threat globally.Robotic surgery is one of the future trends in surgical treatment of CRC.Robotic surgery has several technical advantages over laparoscopic surgery,including 3D visualization,elimination of the fulcrum effect,and better ergonomic positioning,which together lead to better surgical outcomes and faster recovery.However,analysis of independent factors of postoperative complications after robotic surgery is still insufficient.AIM To analyze the incidence and risk factors for postoperative complications after robotic surgery in patients with CRC.METHODS In total,1040 patients who had undergone robotic surgical resection for CRC between May 2015 and May 2020 were analyzed retrospectively.Postoperative complications were categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo(C-D)classification,and possible risk factors were evaluated.RESULTS Among 1040 patients who had undergone robotic surgery for CRC,the overall,severe,local,and systemic complication rates were 12.2%,2.4%,8.8%,and 3.5%,respectively.Multivariate analysis revealed that multiple organ resection(P<0.001)and level III American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA)score(P=0.006)were independent risk factors for overall complications.Multivariate analysis identified multiple organ resection(P<0.001)and comorbidities(P=0.029)as independent risk factors for severe complications(C-D grade III or higher).Regarding local complications,multiple organ resection(P=0.002)and multiple bowel resection(P=0.027)were independent risk factors.Multiple organ resection(P<0.001)and level III ASA score(P=0.007)were independent risk factors for systemic complications.Additionally,sigmoid colectomy had a lower incidence of overall complications(6.4%;P=0.006)and local complications(4.7%;P=0.028)than other types of colorectal surgery.CONCLUSION Multiple organ resection,level III ASA score,comorbidities,and multiple bowel resection were risk factors for postoperative complications,with multiple organ resection being the most likely.展开更多
BACKGROUND At present,there is no perfect system to evaluate pulmonary complications of liver surgery using perioperative variables.AIM To design and verify a risk assessment system for predicting postoperative pulmon...BACKGROUND At present,there is no perfect system to evaluate pulmonary complications of liver surgery using perioperative variables.AIM To design and verify a risk assessment system for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications(PPCs)after hepatectomy based on perioperative variables.METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on 1633 patients who underwent liver surgery.The variables were screened using univariate and multivariate analyses,and graded scores were assigned to the selected variables.Logistic regression was used to develop the liver operation pulmonary complication scoring system(LOPCSS)for the prediction of PPCs.The LOPCSS was verified using the receiver operating characteristic curve.RESULTS According to the multivariate correlation analysis,the independent factors which influenced PPCs of liver surgery were age[≥65 years old/<65 years old,odds ratio(OR)=1.926,P=0.011],medical diseases requiring drug treatment(yes/no,OR=3.523,P<0.001),number of liver segments to be removed(≥3/≤2,OR=1.683,P=0.002),operation duration(≥180 min/<180 min,OR=1.896,P=0.004),and blood transfusion(yes/no,OR=1.836,P=0.003).The area under the curve(AUC)of the LOPCSS was 0.742.The cut-off value of the expected score for complications was 5.The incidence of complications in the group with≤4 points was significantly lower than that in the group with≥6 points(2.95%vs 33.40%,P<0.001).Furthermore,in the validation dataset,the corresponding AUC of LOPCSS was 0.767.CONCLUSION As a novel and simplified assessment system,the LOPCSS can effectively predict PPCs of liver surgery through perioperative variables.展开更多
Objective:Even though enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)has been applied to liver resection worldwide,there is a lack of evidence covering its feasibility in laparoscopic major hepatectomy.This study aimed to preli...Objective:Even though enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)has been applied to liver resection worldwide,there is a lack of evidence covering its feasibility in laparoscopic major hepatectomy.This study aimed to preliminarily evaluate the superiority of ERAS in major liver resection.Methods:The data were collected from patients who underwent laparoscopic major hepatectomy from July 2014 to November 2020 in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine.The baseline characteristics,pathological features,surgical outcomes,medical costs,and postoperative pain scores were compared before and after propensity score matching(PSM).The patients were divided into the ERAS group and the routine group based on the treatment protocols.Results:Eighty-one patients who underwent laparoscopic major hepatectomy were retrospectively enrolled in the study.Before PSM,there were differences in pathology(p¼0.037)and surgical extent(p¼0.011)between the ERAS group(n¼42)and routine group(n¼39).After PSM,26 patients from each group were matched.For surgical outcomes,patients in the ERAS group had a significantly lower postoperative complication incidence than patients in the routine group(28.6%vs.53.8%,RR:0.531[0.303,0.929],p¼0.021)before PSM.However,after PSM,superiority was not observed in the ERAS group(30.8%vs.53.8%,RR:0.571[0.290,1.13],p¼0.092).The duration of abdominal tube retention(before PSM:5.0 d vs.10.0 d,p<0.001;after PSM:6.0 d vs.9.0 d,p¼0.001),the duration of urinary tube retention(before PSM:1.0 d vs.2.0 d,p<0.001;after PSM:1.0 d vs.2.0 d,p¼0.002),and hospital stay(before PSM:6.0 d vs.11.0 d,p<0.001;after PSM:7.0 d vs.11.5 d,p<0.001)was significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the routine group.A significant benefit on postoperative day 3(2 vs.3,p¼0.038)was observed with respect to the alleviation of pain after PSM.Conclusions:Our preliminary study revealed the superiority of ERAS in the setting of major liver resection,although further investigations in a large number of patients from multiple institutions are needed to evaluate the feasibility of ERAS.展开更多
Neuroendocrine neoplasms(NENs)of the gastroenteropancreatic system are rare and heterogeneous tumours,yet with increasing prevalence.The most frequent primary sites are the small intestine,rectum,pancreas,and stomach....Neuroendocrine neoplasms(NENs)of the gastroenteropancreatic system are rare and heterogeneous tumours,yet with increasing prevalence.The most frequent primary sites are the small intestine,rectum,pancreas,and stomach.For a localized disease,surgical resection with local lymph nodes is usually curative with good overall and disease free survival.More complex situation is the treatment of locally advanced lesions,liver metastases,and,surprisingly,small asymptomatic tumours of the rectum and pancreas.In this review,we focus on the current role of surgical management of gastroenteropancreatic NENs.We present surgical approach for the most frequent primary sites.We highlight the role of endoscopic surgery and the watch-and-wait strategy for selected cases.As liver metastases pose an important clinical challenge,we present current indications and contraindications for liver resection and a role of liver transplantation for metastatic NENs.展开更多
Over the last 40 years,the incidence and prevalence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms(GEP-NENs)have continued to increase.Compared to other epithelial neoplasms in the same organ,GEP-NENs exhibit indo...Over the last 40 years,the incidence and prevalence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms(GEP-NENs)have continued to increase.Compared to other epithelial neoplasms in the same organ,GEP-NENs exhibit indolent biological behavior,resulting in more chances to undergo surgery.However,the role of surgery in high-grade or advanced GEP-NENs is still controversial.Surgery is associated with survival improvement of well-differentiated highgrade GEP-NENs,whereas poorly differentiated GEP-NENs that may benefit from resection require careful selection based on Ki67 and other tissue biomarkers.Additionally,surgery also plays an important role in locally advanced and metastatic disease.For locally advanced GEP-NENs,isolated major vascular involvement is no longer an absolute contraindication.In the setting of metastatic GEP-NENs,radical intended surgery is recommended for patients with low-grade and resectable metastases.For unresectable metastatic disease,a variety of surgical approaches,including cytoreduction of liver metastasis,liver transplantation,and surgery after neoadjuvant treatment,show survival benefits.Primary tumor resection in GEP-NENs with unresectable metastatic disease is associated with symptom control,prolonged survival,and improved sensitivity toward systemic therapies.Although there is no established neoadjuvant or adjuvant strategy,increasing attention has been given to this emerging research area.Some studies have reported that neoadjuvant therapy effectively reduces tumor burden,improves the effectiveness of subsequent surgery,and decreases surgical complications.展开更多
Background:Despite advances in the diagnosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),70%-80%of patients are diagnosed with advanced stage disease.Portal vein tumor thrombus(PVTT)is among the most ominous signs ...Background:Despite advances in the diagnosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),70%-80%of patients are diagnosed with advanced stage disease.Portal vein tumor thrombus(PVTT)is among the most ominous signs of advanced stage disease and has been associated with poor survival if untreated.Data sources:A systematic search of MEDLINE(PubMed),Embase,Cochrane Library and Database for Systematic Reviews(CDSR),Google Scholar,and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence(NICE)databases until December 2022 was conducted using free text and MeSH terms:hepatocellular carcinoma,portal vein tumor thrombus,portal vein thrombosis,vascular invasion,liver and/or hepatic resection,liver transplantation,and systematic review.Results:Centers of surgical excellence have reported promising results related to the individualized surgical management of portal thrombus versus arterial chemoembolization or systemic chemotherapy.Critical elements to the individualized surgical management of HCC and portal thrombus include precise classification of the portal vein tumor thrombus,accurate identification of the subgroups of patients who may benefit from resection,as well as meticulous surgical technique.This review addressed five specific areas:(a)formation of PVTT;(b)classifications of PVTT;(c)controversies related to clinical guidelines;(d)surgical treatments versus non-surgical approaches;and(e)characterization of surgical techniques correlated with classifications of PVTT.Conclusions:Current evidence from Chinese and Japanese high-volume centers demonstrated that patients with HCC and associated PVTT can be managed with surgical resection with acceptable results.展开更多
Laparoscopic liver resection(LLR) has been progressively developed along the past two decades. Despite initial skepticism, improved operative results made laparoscopic approach incorporated to surgical practice and op...Laparoscopic liver resection(LLR) has been progressively developed along the past two decades. Despite initial skepticism, improved operative results made laparoscopic approach incorporated to surgical practice and operations increased in frequency and complexity. Evidence supporting LLR comes from case-series, comparative studies and meta-analysis. Despite lack of level 1 evidence, the body of literature is stronger and existing data confirms the safety, feasibility and benefits of laparoscopic approach when compared to open resection. Indications for LLR do not differ from those for open surgery. They include benign and malignant(both primary and metastatic) tumors and living donor liver harvesting. Currently, resection of lesions located on anterolateral segments and left lateral sectionectomy are performed systematically by laparoscopy in hepatobiliary specialized centers. Resection of lesions located on posterosuperior segments(1, 4a, 7, 8) and major liver resections were shown to be feasible but remain technically demanding procedures, which should be reserved to experienced surgeons. Hand-assisted and laparoscopy-assisted procedures appeared to increase the indications of minimally invasive liver surgery and are useful strategies applied to difficult and major resections. LLR proved to be safe for malignant lesions and offers some short-term advantages over open resection. Oncological results including resection margin status and long-term survival were not inferior to open resection. At present, surgical community expects high quality studies to base the already perceived better outcomes achieved by laparoscopy in major centers' practice. Continuous surgical training, as well as new technologies should augment the application of lap-aroscopic liver surgery. Future applicability of new technologies such as robot assistance and image-guided surgery is still under investigation.展开更多
文摘Liver transplantation is a major abdominal operation and the intimate anatomic relation of the liver with the right hemidiaphragm predisposes the patient to various manifestations in the chest cavity.Furthermore,chronic liver disease affects pulmonary function before and after liver transplantation resulting in a considerable percentage of patients presenting with morbidity related to chest complications.This review aims to identify the potential chest complications of surgical interest during or after liver transplantation.Complications of surgical interest are defined as those conditions that necessitate an invasive procedure(such as thoracocentesis or a chest tube placement)in the chest or a surgical intervention performed by a thoracic surgeon.These complications will be classified as perioperative and postoperative;the latter will be categorized as early and late.Although thoracocentesis or a chest tube placement is usually sufficient when invasive measures are deemed necessary,in some patients,thoracic surgical interventions are warranted.A high index of suspicion is needed to recognize and treat these conditions promptly.A close collaboration between abdominal surgeons,intensive care unit physicians and thoracic surgeons is of paramount importance.
文摘INTRODUCTIONLiver surgery,was started in the late 1950s in Chinaand has developed rapidly in the past 40 years.The study on the diagnosis and treatment of primaryliver cancer in China underwent four stages:①Inthe 1950s,the anatomical study of the liver lay asolid foundation for liver resection.①In
文摘AIM: To investigate the treatment efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatic malignant tumor and the relevant complications.METHODS: A total of 338 patients with 763 hepatic tumors underwent ultrasound-guided RFA (565 procedures).There were 204 cases of hepatic cellular carcinoma (HCC)with 430 tumors, the mean largest diameter was 4.0 cm.Of them, 48 patients (23.5%) were in stages Ⅰ-Ⅱ (UICC Systems) and 156 (76.5%) in stages Ⅲ-Ⅳ There were 134 cases of metastatic liver carcinoma (MLC), with 333metastases in the liver, the mean diameter was 4.1 cm,the liver metastases of 96 patients (71.6%) came from gastrointestinal tract. Ninety-three percent of the 338patients were treated using the relatively standard protocol. Crucial attention must be paid to monitor the abnormal changes in ultrasound images as well as the vital signs of the patients to find the possible hemorrhage and peripheral structures injury in time. The tumors were considered as ablated completely, if no viability was found on enhanced CT within 24 h or at 1 mo after RFA. These patients were followed up for 3-57 mo.RESULTS: The ablation success rate was 93.3% (401/430tumors) for HCC and was 96.7% (322/333 tumors) for MLC. The local recurrence rate for HCC and MLC was 7.9% (34/430 tumors) and 10.5% (35/333 tumors),respectively. A total of 137 patients (40.5%) underwent 2-11times of repeated ablations because of tumor recurrence or metastasis. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year survival rate was84.6%, 66.6%, and 63.1%, respectively;the survival rate from 48 patients of Ⅰ-Ⅱ stage HCC was 93.7%, 80.4%,and 80.4%, respectively. The major complication rate in this study was 2.5% (14 of 565 procedures), which consisted of 5 hemorrhages, 1 colon perforation, 5 injuries of adjacent structures, 2 bile leakages, and 1 skin burn.CONCLUSION: RFA, as a minimally invasive local treatment,has become an effective and relatively safe alternative for the patients of hepatic malignant tumor, even of advanced liver tumor, tumor recurrence, and liver metastases. Knowledge about possible complications and their control may increase the treatment efficacy and help to promote the use of RFA technique.
文摘The aim of this topic highlight is to review relevant evidence regarding the influence of the metabolic syndrome(MS) and its associated liver manifestation, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD), on the development of liver cancer as well as their impact on the results of major liver surgery. MS and NAFLD, whose incidences are significantly increasing in Western countries, are leading to a changing profile of the patients undergoing liver surgery. A MEDLINE search was performed for relevant articles using the key words "metabolic syndrome", "liver resection", "liver transplantation", "non alcoholic fatty liver disease", "non-alcoholic steatohepatitis" and "liver cancer". On one hand, the MS favors the development of primary liver malignancies(hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma)either through NAFLD liver parenchymal alterations(steatosis, steatohepatitis, fibrosis) or in the absence of significant underlying liver parenchyma changes. Also, the existence of NAFLD may have a specific impact on colorectal liver metastases recurrence. On the other hand, the postoperative period following partial liver resection and liver transplantation is at increased risk of both postoperative complications and mortality. These deleterious effects seem to be related to the existence of liver specific complications but also higher cardio-vascular sensitivity in a setting of MS/NAFLD. Finally, the long-term prognosis after curative surgery joins that of patients operated on with other types of underlying liver diseases. An increased rate of patients with MS/NAFLD referred to hepatobiliary units has to be expected. The higher operative risk observed in this subset of patients will require specific improvements in their perioperative management.
文摘Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms(PNENs) are rare and account for only 2%-4% of all pancreatic neoplasms. All PNENs are potential(neurendocrine tumors PNETs) or overt(neuroendocrine carcinomas PNECs) malignant,but a subset of PNETs is low-risk. Even in case of low-risk PNETs surgical resection is frequently required to treat hormone-related symptoms and to obtain an appropriate pathological diagnosis. Low-risk PNETs in the body and the tail are ideal for minimallyinvasive approaches which should be tailored to the individual patient. Generally,surgeons must aim for parenchyma sparing in these cases. In high-risk and malignant PNENs,indications for tumor resection are much wider than for pancreatic adenocarcinoma,in many cases due to the relatively benign tumor biology. Thus,patients with locally advanced and metastatic PNETs may benefit from extensive resection. In experienced hands,even multi-organ resections are accomplished with acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality rates and are associated with excellent long term survival. However,poorly differentiated neoplasms with high proliferation rates are associated with a dismal prognosis and may frequently only be treated with chemotherapy. The evidence on surgical treatment of PNENs stems from reviews of mostly singlecenter series and some analyses of nation-wide tumor registries. No randomized trial has been performed to compare surgical and non-surgical therapies in potentially resectable PNEN. Though such a trial would principally be desirable,ethical considerations and the heterogeneity of PNENs preclude realization of such a study. In the current review,we summarize recent advances in the surgical treatment of PNENs.
文摘Objective At present,there is no appropriate system to evaluate the severe complications of liver surgery through the preoperative factors.This study aimed to design and verify a risk assessment system for the prediction of severe post-operative complications after a hepatectomy based on the preoperative parameters.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 1732 patients who had undergone liver surgery.The severity of the complications was graded by Accordion Severity Grading of post-operative complications.The variables were screened by multivariate analysis,and graded scores were assigned to the selected variables.A logistic regression equation was used to form the liver operation risk formula(LORF)for the prediction of severe post-operative complications.The LORF was verified by the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve.Results The multivariate correlation analysis revealed the independent influencing factors of the severe post-operative complications of liver surgery were Child-Pugh grade(OR=4.127;P<0.001),medical diseases requiring drug treatment(OR=3.092;P<0.001),the number of liver segments to be removed(OR=2.209;P=0.006),organ invasion(OR=4.538;P=0.024),and pathological type(OR=4.023;P=0.002).The binomial logistic regression model was established to obtain the calculation formula(LORF)of the severe complication risk.The area under the ROC curve(AUC)of the LORF was 0.815.The cut-off value of the expected probability of severe complications was 0.3225(32.25%).Furthermore,in the validation data set,the corresponding AUC of the LORF was 0.829.Conclusion As a novel and simplified assessment system,the LORF could effectively predict the severe post-operative complications of liver surgery through the preoperative factors,and therefore it could be used to evaluate the risk of severe liver surgical complications before surgery.
文摘BACKGROUND As a common gastrointestinal malignancy,colorectal cancer(CRC)poses a serious health threat globally.Robotic surgery is one of the future trends in surgical treatment of CRC.Robotic surgery has several technical advantages over laparoscopic surgery,including 3D visualization,elimination of the fulcrum effect,and better ergonomic positioning,which together lead to better surgical outcomes and faster recovery.However,analysis of independent factors of postoperative complications after robotic surgery is still insufficient.AIM To analyze the incidence and risk factors for postoperative complications after robotic surgery in patients with CRC.METHODS In total,1040 patients who had undergone robotic surgical resection for CRC between May 2015 and May 2020 were analyzed retrospectively.Postoperative complications were categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo(C-D)classification,and possible risk factors were evaluated.RESULTS Among 1040 patients who had undergone robotic surgery for CRC,the overall,severe,local,and systemic complication rates were 12.2%,2.4%,8.8%,and 3.5%,respectively.Multivariate analysis revealed that multiple organ resection(P<0.001)and level III American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA)score(P=0.006)were independent risk factors for overall complications.Multivariate analysis identified multiple organ resection(P<0.001)and comorbidities(P=0.029)as independent risk factors for severe complications(C-D grade III or higher).Regarding local complications,multiple organ resection(P=0.002)and multiple bowel resection(P=0.027)were independent risk factors.Multiple organ resection(P<0.001)and level III ASA score(P=0.007)were independent risk factors for systemic complications.Additionally,sigmoid colectomy had a lower incidence of overall complications(6.4%;P=0.006)and local complications(4.7%;P=0.028)than other types of colorectal surgery.CONCLUSION Multiple organ resection,level III ASA score,comorbidities,and multiple bowel resection were risk factors for postoperative complications,with multiple organ resection being the most likely.
文摘BACKGROUND At present,there is no perfect system to evaluate pulmonary complications of liver surgery using perioperative variables.AIM To design and verify a risk assessment system for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications(PPCs)after hepatectomy based on perioperative variables.METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on 1633 patients who underwent liver surgery.The variables were screened using univariate and multivariate analyses,and graded scores were assigned to the selected variables.Logistic regression was used to develop the liver operation pulmonary complication scoring system(LOPCSS)for the prediction of PPCs.The LOPCSS was verified using the receiver operating characteristic curve.RESULTS According to the multivariate correlation analysis,the independent factors which influenced PPCs of liver surgery were age[≥65 years old/<65 years old,odds ratio(OR)=1.926,P=0.011],medical diseases requiring drug treatment(yes/no,OR=3.523,P<0.001),number of liver segments to be removed(≥3/≤2,OR=1.683,P=0.002),operation duration(≥180 min/<180 min,OR=1.896,P=0.004),and blood transfusion(yes/no,OR=1.836,P=0.003).The area under the curve(AUC)of the LOPCSS was 0.742.The cut-off value of the expected score for complications was 5.The incidence of complications in the group with≤4 points was significantly lower than that in the group with≥6 points(2.95%vs 33.40%,P<0.001).Furthermore,in the validation dataset,the corresponding AUC of LOPCSS was 0.767.CONCLUSION As a novel and simplified assessment system,the LOPCSS can effectively predict PPCs of liver surgery through perioperative variables.
基金supported by the Key Research and Development Project of Zhejiang Province to Dr.Xiao Liang(2021C03127)the National Natural Science Foundation of China to Dr.Xiao Liang(82072625)+1 种基金the Zhejiang Major Medical Science and Technology Plan supported by National Health Commission of China to Dr.Xiao Liang(WKJ-ZJ-2030)the Medical and Health Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province to Yeyuan Chu(2019PY038).
文摘Objective:Even though enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)has been applied to liver resection worldwide,there is a lack of evidence covering its feasibility in laparoscopic major hepatectomy.This study aimed to preliminarily evaluate the superiority of ERAS in major liver resection.Methods:The data were collected from patients who underwent laparoscopic major hepatectomy from July 2014 to November 2020 in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine.The baseline characteristics,pathological features,surgical outcomes,medical costs,and postoperative pain scores were compared before and after propensity score matching(PSM).The patients were divided into the ERAS group and the routine group based on the treatment protocols.Results:Eighty-one patients who underwent laparoscopic major hepatectomy were retrospectively enrolled in the study.Before PSM,there were differences in pathology(p¼0.037)and surgical extent(p¼0.011)between the ERAS group(n¼42)and routine group(n¼39).After PSM,26 patients from each group were matched.For surgical outcomes,patients in the ERAS group had a significantly lower postoperative complication incidence than patients in the routine group(28.6%vs.53.8%,RR:0.531[0.303,0.929],p¼0.021)before PSM.However,after PSM,superiority was not observed in the ERAS group(30.8%vs.53.8%,RR:0.571[0.290,1.13],p¼0.092).The duration of abdominal tube retention(before PSM:5.0 d vs.10.0 d,p<0.001;after PSM:6.0 d vs.9.0 d,p¼0.001),the duration of urinary tube retention(before PSM:1.0 d vs.2.0 d,p<0.001;after PSM:1.0 d vs.2.0 d,p¼0.002),and hospital stay(before PSM:6.0 d vs.11.0 d,p<0.001;after PSM:7.0 d vs.11.5 d,p<0.001)was significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the routine group.A significant benefit on postoperative day 3(2 vs.3,p¼0.038)was observed with respect to the alleviation of pain after PSM.Conclusions:Our preliminary study revealed the superiority of ERAS in the setting of major liver resection,although further investigations in a large number of patients from multiple institutions are needed to evaluate the feasibility of ERAS.
文摘Neuroendocrine neoplasms(NENs)of the gastroenteropancreatic system are rare and heterogeneous tumours,yet with increasing prevalence.The most frequent primary sites are the small intestine,rectum,pancreas,and stomach.For a localized disease,surgical resection with local lymph nodes is usually curative with good overall and disease free survival.More complex situation is the treatment of locally advanced lesions,liver metastases,and,surprisingly,small asymptomatic tumours of the rectum and pancreas.In this review,we focus on the current role of surgical management of gastroenteropancreatic NENs.We present surgical approach for the most frequent primary sites.We highlight the role of endoscopic surgery and the watch-and-wait strategy for selected cases.As liver metastases pose an important clinical challenge,we present current indications and contraindications for liver resection and a role of liver transplantation for metastatic NENs.
基金Supported by State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81930016Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China,No.LY21H160026。
文摘Over the last 40 years,the incidence and prevalence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms(GEP-NENs)have continued to increase.Compared to other epithelial neoplasms in the same organ,GEP-NENs exhibit indolent biological behavior,resulting in more chances to undergo surgery.However,the role of surgery in high-grade or advanced GEP-NENs is still controversial.Surgery is associated with survival improvement of well-differentiated highgrade GEP-NENs,whereas poorly differentiated GEP-NENs that may benefit from resection require careful selection based on Ki67 and other tissue biomarkers.Additionally,surgery also plays an important role in locally advanced and metastatic disease.For locally advanced GEP-NENs,isolated major vascular involvement is no longer an absolute contraindication.In the setting of metastatic GEP-NENs,radical intended surgery is recommended for patients with low-grade and resectable metastases.For unresectable metastatic disease,a variety of surgical approaches,including cytoreduction of liver metastasis,liver transplantation,and surgery after neoadjuvant treatment,show survival benefits.Primary tumor resection in GEP-NENs with unresectable metastatic disease is associated with symptom control,prolonged survival,and improved sensitivity toward systemic therapies.Although there is no established neoadjuvant or adjuvant strategy,increasing attention has been given to this emerging research area.Some studies have reported that neoadjuvant therapy effectively reduces tumor burden,improves the effectiveness of subsequent surgery,and decreases surgical complications.
文摘Background:Despite advances in the diagnosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),70%-80%of patients are diagnosed with advanced stage disease.Portal vein tumor thrombus(PVTT)is among the most ominous signs of advanced stage disease and has been associated with poor survival if untreated.Data sources:A systematic search of MEDLINE(PubMed),Embase,Cochrane Library and Database for Systematic Reviews(CDSR),Google Scholar,and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence(NICE)databases until December 2022 was conducted using free text and MeSH terms:hepatocellular carcinoma,portal vein tumor thrombus,portal vein thrombosis,vascular invasion,liver and/or hepatic resection,liver transplantation,and systematic review.Results:Centers of surgical excellence have reported promising results related to the individualized surgical management of portal thrombus versus arterial chemoembolization or systemic chemotherapy.Critical elements to the individualized surgical management of HCC and portal thrombus include precise classification of the portal vein tumor thrombus,accurate identification of the subgroups of patients who may benefit from resection,as well as meticulous surgical technique.This review addressed five specific areas:(a)formation of PVTT;(b)classifications of PVTT;(c)controversies related to clinical guidelines;(d)surgical treatments versus non-surgical approaches;and(e)characterization of surgical techniques correlated with classifications of PVTT.Conclusions:Current evidence from Chinese and Japanese high-volume centers demonstrated that patients with HCC and associated PVTT can be managed with surgical resection with acceptable results.
文摘Laparoscopic liver resection(LLR) has been progressively developed along the past two decades. Despite initial skepticism, improved operative results made laparoscopic approach incorporated to surgical practice and operations increased in frequency and complexity. Evidence supporting LLR comes from case-series, comparative studies and meta-analysis. Despite lack of level 1 evidence, the body of literature is stronger and existing data confirms the safety, feasibility and benefits of laparoscopic approach when compared to open resection. Indications for LLR do not differ from those for open surgery. They include benign and malignant(both primary and metastatic) tumors and living donor liver harvesting. Currently, resection of lesions located on anterolateral segments and left lateral sectionectomy are performed systematically by laparoscopy in hepatobiliary specialized centers. Resection of lesions located on posterosuperior segments(1, 4a, 7, 8) and major liver resections were shown to be feasible but remain technically demanding procedures, which should be reserved to experienced surgeons. Hand-assisted and laparoscopy-assisted procedures appeared to increase the indications of minimally invasive liver surgery and are useful strategies applied to difficult and major resections. LLR proved to be safe for malignant lesions and offers some short-term advantages over open resection. Oncological results including resection margin status and long-term survival were not inferior to open resection. At present, surgical community expects high quality studies to base the already perceived better outcomes achieved by laparoscopy in major centers' practice. Continuous surgical training, as well as new technologies should augment the application of lap-aroscopic liver surgery. Future applicability of new technologies such as robot assistance and image-guided surgery is still under investigation.