Markers of acute rejection and graft acceptance in liver transplantation

The evaluation of the immunosuppression state in liver transplanted patients is crucial for a correct posttransplant management and a major step towards the personalisation of the immunosuppressive therapy. However, current immunological monitoring after liver transplantation relies mainly on clinical judgment and on immunosuppressive drug levels, without a proper assessment of the real suppression of theimmunological system. Various markers have been studied in an attempt to identify a specific indicator of graft rejection and graft acceptance after liver transplantation. Considering acute rejection, the most studied markers are pro-inflammatory and immunoregulatory cytokines and other proteins related to inflammation. However there is considerable overlap with other conditions, and only few of them have been validated. Standard liver tests cannot be used as markers of graft rejection due to their low sensitivity and specificity and the weak correlation with the severity of histopathological findings. Several studies have been performed to identify biomarkers of tolerance in liver transplanted patients. Most of them are based on the analysis of peripheral blood samples and on the use of transcriptional profiling techniques. Amongst these, NK cell-related molecules seem to be the most valid marker of graft acceptance, whereas the role CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells has still to be properly defined.

Early plasmapheresis and rituximab for acute humoral rejection after ABO-compatible liver transplantation

Acute humoral rejection （AHR） is uncommon after ABO- compatible liver transplantation. Herein, we report two cases of AHR treated with plasmapheresis and rituximab in two ABO-compatible liver-transplant patients with preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies. Patient 1 experienced a biopsy-proven AHR at day 10 post-transplant. She was treated by steroid pulses, and OKT3. Because of persisting signs of biopsy-proven AHR at day 26, she was treated by plasmapheresis and rituximab. Uver enzyme levels did not improve, and she died on day 41. Patient 2 experienced a biopsy-proven AHR on day 10 post-transplant. She was treated by steroid pulses, plasmapheresis, and rituximab. Liver enzymes returned to within normal range 18 d after diagnosis. Uver biopsies, at 3 and 9 mo post-transplant, showed complete resolution of AHR. We conclude that plasmapheresis should be started as soon as AHR is diagnosed, and be associated with a B-cell depleting agent. Rituximab may be considered as a first-line therapy.

Effect of operation-synchronizing transfusion of apoptotic spleen cells from donor rats on acute rejection of recipient rats after liver transplantation

AIM: To study effect of operation-synchronizing transfusion of apoptotic spleen cells from donor rats on acute rejection of recipient rats after liver transplantation. METHODS: Two of Wistar rats were chosen randomly for normal liver pathology control and ten of SD rats chosen randomly for liver function control as blank group (no operation). The rest of Wistar and SD rats were divided into four groups: control group (only liver transplantation), Dex group (donors receiving intraperitoneal injection of dexamethasone), SpC group (recipients receiving infusion of spleen cells of donors), Dex-SpC group (recipients receiving infusion of apoptotic spleen cells of donors), with each group except blank group, containing 10 SD rats and 10 Wistar rats, respectively. Wistar rats received liver transplantation from SD rats, in the meantime they received infusion of spleen cells of donors, which were induced by an intraperitoneal injection of dexamethasone (3 mg/(d.kg)·b.w) for three days before liver transplantation. The serum alanine transaminase (ALT), total bilirubin (T bili), liver pathological changes and survival time were analysed. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 10.0 for Windows. Differences of the parametric data of ALT in means were examined by one-way ANOVA. Differences of ALT between two groups were examined by LSD. Differences of the nonparametric data of T bili in means and scores of pathology classification for acute rejection were examined by Kruskal-Willis H test. The correlations between ALT and T bili were analysed by Bivariate. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to demonstrate survival distribution. The log-rank test was used to compare the survival data. RESULTS: There were significant differences in ALT of the five groups (F= 23.164 P= 0.000), and ALT in Dex-SpC group was significantly higher than that in blank control, control, Dex, and SpC groups (P = 0.000), and ALT in SpC group was significantly higher than that in blank control (P= 0.000), control (P= 0.004), and Dex groups (P= 0.02). Results of nonparametric analysis of T bill showed that there were differences in T bill of the five groups (X2= 33.265 P= 0.000). T bili in Dex-SpC group was significantly higher than that in blank control, control, Dex, and SpC groups. T bili in SpC group was higher than that in blank control, control, and Dex groups. There were significant differences in scores of pathology classification for acute rejection in each of the groups (X2= 25.933, P= 0.000). The pathologically more serious acute rejection was found in Dex-SPC group than in other groups. No sign of acute rejection was observed in the blank control group. Slight acute rejection was observed in the control group. Slight-moderate acute rejection was observed in the Dex group. Moderate-acute rejection was observed in the SpC group. Severe-acute rejection was observed in the Dex-SpC group. The survival time in Dex-SpC group was shorter than in other groups (statistic = 11.13, P= 0.011). ALT and T bili were positively correlated (r= 0.747, P= 0.000, two-tailed). CONCLUSION: In order to reduce quantity of blood loss from rats after liver transplantation, only one of ALT or T bili is needed for liver function measurement of rats. Simultaneous injection of apoptotic spleen cells from donors induced by dexamethasone to liver transplantation rats aggravates acute rejection. One important mechanism of aggravation of acute rejection may be that apoptotic cells are not removed in time and that dead cells including apoptotic cells release inflammatory factors.

Correlation of CD95 and soluble CD95 expression with acute rejection status of liver transplantation

AIM: To analyze the expression levels of soluble form of CD95, CD95 ligand (sCD95 and SCD95L, respectively) in plasma and CD95 expression on CD3+cells in liver-transplanted recipients with acute rejection (AR). METHODS: Peripheral blood mohonuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from 30 clinically liver transplanted recipients. CD95 expression on CD3+ cells was quantitatively measured by two-color fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis. Lymphocyte surface phenotypes of CD4, CD8, CD16 and CD56 were determined by flow cytometry. Plasma levels of sCD95 and SCD95L were detected by Enzyme Linked-Immuno-Sorbent Assay (ELISA). The results were compared with that from normal healthy volunteers (n=15 individuals). RESULTS: FACS analysis showed that CD95 expression on CD3+ T cells was significantly increased in liver transplanted recipients with AR compared to that in stable recipients without rejection and infection or healthy individuals who did not undergo transplantation (18 676.93±11 588.34/molecule, 6 848.20±1 712.96/molecule, 6 418.01±2 001.95/molecule, respectively, P<0.01). Whereas no significant difference was seen between liver-transplanted stable recipients and healthy individuals. Furthermore, no significant differences were detected between each group with CD4/CD8 ratio or the percentage of CD16+56+cells. Plasma levels of sCD95 were significantly higher in transplanted recipients with AR compared to that in stable recipients or healthy individuals (391.88±196.00, 201.37±30.30, 148.83±58.25 pg/mL, respectively, P<0.01). In contrast, the plasma levels of sCD95L in liver-transplanted recipients were not significantly different from that in healthy individuals. CONCLUSION: The present results indicate that the increased CD95 expression on CD3+cells and the increased levels of sCD95 in plasma may modify the immunological situation of the recipients after transplantation or represent the ongoing graft rejection.

Late-onset acute rejection after living donor liver transplantation

AIM： TO investigate the incidence and risk factors of late-onset acute rejection （LAR） and to clarify the effectiveness of our immunosuppressive regime consisting of life-long administration of tacrolimus and steroids. METHODS： Adult living donor liver transplantation recipients （n = 204） who survived more than 6 mo after living donor liver transplantation were enrolled. Immunosuppression was achieved using tacrolimus and methylprednisolone. When adverse effects of tacrolimus were detected, the patient was switched to cyclosporine. Six months after transplantation, tacrolimus or cyclosporine was carefully maintained at a therapeutic level. The methylprednisolone dosage was maintained at 0.05 mg/kg per day by oral administration. Acute rejections that occurred more than 6 mo after the operation were defined as late-onset. The median follow-up period was 34 too. RESULTS： LAR was observed in 15 cases （7%） and no chronic rejection was observed. The incidence of hyperlipidemia, chronic renal failure, new-onset post-transplantation diabetes, and deep fungal infection were 13%, 2%, 24%, and 17%, respectively. Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine was required in 38 patients （19%）. Multivariate analysis revealed that a cyclosporine-based regimen was significantly associated with LAR.events happen at a low incidence, supporting the safety and efficacy of the present immunosuppression regimen for living donor liver transplantation.

Is biliary bile acid a good predictor for acute cellular rejection in living donor liver transplantation?

BACKGROUND:In liver transplantation,acute cellular rejection(ACR)is still a major complication that can lead to mortality.Bile secretion has been considered as a marker of early graft function. METHODS:The study included 41 adults who received living donor liver transplantation(LDLT)at Kyoto University Hospital between April 2007 and February 2008. The patients were stratified according to the presence or absence of ACR.Bile samples were collected from donors once and from recipients every other day for the first 2 weeks after transplantation.Total bile acid(BA)and taurine-conjugated bile acid(TCBA)in bile were measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy.The recipient/donor (R/D)BA ratio and R/D TCBA ratio were calculated. RESULTS:The ACR group(n=12)showed a greater decrease in BA post-transplantation than the non-ACR group,but this difference was not statistically significant. On both day 7 and day 9 post-transplantation the R/D TCBA was significantly different between the two groups (P=0.038 on day 7 and P=0.036 on day 9).The R/D TCBA ratio≥0.5 on days 7 and 9,and≥0.38 on day 11 post- transplantation were associated with better ACR-free survival. CONCLUSION:The recipient/donor TCBA ratio can be a predictor for ACR after LDLT as early as post- transplantation day 7.

The Role of sICAM-1 Detection in the Diagnosis of Acute Rejection Following Liver Transplantation

In order to evaluate the applied value of soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 （sICAM-l） in acute rejection （AR） following liver transplantation, the expression of sICAM-1 protein was sequentially detected by using ELISA in serum and bile of 43 patients receiving liver transplantation. In AR group, the expression levels of sICAM-1 protein were increased 3 days before and immediately on the establishment of AR diagnosis, and there was significant difference in the expression of bile between AR group and control group （P〈0.01）. After reversion of AR with hormone intensive therapy, there was significant difference in the sICAM-1 protein expression of serum and bile between AR group and control group. It was concluded that the sequential detection of sICAM-1 protein level in serum and bile was a reliable and noninvasive method for the early diagnosis of AR after liver transplantation and was valuable to observe the curative effects of anti-AR therapy.

Novel H1N1 influenza A virus infection in a patient with acute rejection after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND:The 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus was first identified in April 2009 and rapidly evolved into a pandemic. Recipients of solid-organ transplants have a higher risk for severe infection because of immunosuppression.There are limited reports of 2009 H1N1 influenza in liver transplant recipients,especially in China. METHODS:We present a case of a 48-year-old male liver transplant recipient with 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus.He received therapy for acute rejection after transplantation and was confirmed with H1N1 virus infection. RESULTS:The patient was started on oseltamivir(75 mg, orally twice daily)and had a benign hospital course,with defervescence and resolution of symptoms within 72 hours. The follow-up chest radiograph after discharge was normal. CONCLUSIONS:The 2009 H1N1 influenza in this hospitalized transplant recipient was relatively mild,and prolonged viral shedding was not noted.Oseltamivir can be a valid measure in immunocompromised individuals.

Hepatofugal Portal Flow Associated with Acute Rejection in Living-donor Auxiliary Partial Orthotopic Liver Transplantation:A Report of One Case and Literature Review

We report a case of reversible hepatofugal portal flow after auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) from a living donor in this study.On postoperative day 6,continuous hepatofugal portal flow was observed in the grafted liver without portal thrombosis and obstruction of the hepatic vein.Based on histological findings,acute rejection was the suspected cause.The normal portal venous flow was restored after steroid pulse and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) therapies.The patient was discharged on the 30th postoperative day.It was concluded that hepatofugal flow after liver transplantation is a sign of serious acute rejection,and can be successfully treated by anti-rejection therapy.

Translationally controlled tumor protein exerts a proin?ammatory role in acute rejection after liver transplantation

Background:Translationally controlled tumor protein(TCTP),which has been verified to have a proinflammatory activity,plays an important role in allergy.However,it remains unclear whether TCTP has an impact on the acute rejection(AR)after liver transplantation.Methods:Three protocols were used to delineate the role of TCTP in AR after liver transplantation.First,in rat orthotopic liver transplantation(OLT),the expression of TCTP was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA),real-time PCR,Western blot and immunofluorescence assays.Second,in mixed lymphocyte reaction(MLR),the role of TCTP in lymphocyte proliferation was measured by carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester(CFSE)labeling and the impact of TCTP on inflammatory factor release was detected by cytokine arrays.Third,in human OLT,the level of serum TCTP was detected by ELISA,and the relationship between TCTP and model for early allograft function(MEAF)score was assessed by Spearman's correlation.Results:In rat OLT,AR resulted in great harm to allografts,manifesting as deterioration of liver function,increasing inflammatory factors and infiltrating lymphocytes.Meanwhile,TCTP was overexpressed in serum and allografts.Higher level of TCTP was associated with higher rejection activity index(RAI).In an MLR protocol,TCTP knockdown inhibited the proliferation of mixed inflammatory cells and significantly suppressed the release of 15 cytokines and chemokines.In human OLT,the serum TCTP was up-regulated within a week after operation.Additionally,the increasing speed of serum TCTP positively correlated with MEAF scores(r=0.449;P=0.0088).

Efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid as an adjuvant treatment to prevent acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND： Acute cellular rejection（ACR） after liver transplantation（LT） is one of the most common problems faced by transplant recipients in spite of advances in immunosuppressive therapy. Recently, clinical trials reported that ursodeoxycholic acid（UDCA） reduced the incidence of ACR significantly.However, others have shown contradictory conclusion. Therefore,we performed a meta-analysis of rigorous randomized controlled trials（RCTs） to determine the efficacy of UDCA in reducing ACR after LT.DATA SOURCES： All RCTs that evaluated efficacy of UDCA as an adjuvant treatment to prevent ACR after LT were searched from PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ScienceDirect databases and Web of Science（from January 1981 to March 2012）. There was no language limitation in these searches. Relevant abstracts of international meetings were also searched. References of each included study were searched manually.RESULTS： A total of 234 patients from four high-quality RCTs（Jadad score 4 to 5） were included in this meta-analysis.Prophylactic use of UDCA did not decrease the incidence of ACR（RR： 0.94, 95% CI： 0.77-1.16, P0.05）, steroid-resistant rejection（RR： 0.77, 95% CI： 0.47-1.27, P0.05） and the number of patients with the multiple episodes of ACR（RR： 0.60, 95% CI：0.28-1.30, P0.05）. Different intervention programs（high-dose vs low-dose UDCA; early vs delayed UDCA treatment） also did not alter the outcomes.CONCLUSIONS： UDCA, as an adjuvant treatment, was not ableto prevent ACR and steroid-resistant rejection after LT. Further trials should be done to determine whether higher dose of UDCA will be beneficial.

Importance of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and leukocyte antigen/killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor genes in liver transplantation

Many mechanisms have been proposed to explain the hypothetical state of hepatic tolerance,which is described by eventual imbalances or deregulation in the balance of cytokines,mediators,effectors,and regulatory cells in the complex milieu of the liver.In this section,we will comment on the importance of donorspecific anti-human leukocyte antigen(HLA)antibodies(DSA)as well as the compatibility and pairings of HLA and killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor(KIR)genotypes in the evolution of liver transplantation.Thus,HLA compatibility,viral infections,and HLA-C/KIR combinations have all been linked to liver transplant rejection and survival.There have been reports of increased risk of acute and chronic rejection with ductopenia,faster graft fibrosis,biliary problems,poorer survival,and even de novo autoimmune hepatitis when DSAs are present in the recipient.Higher mean fluorescence intensity(MFI)values of the DSAs and smaller graft size were associated with poorer patient outcomes,implying that high-risk patients with preformed DSAs should be considered for selecting the graft placed and desensitization methods,according to the investigators.Similarly,in a combined kidney-liver transplant,a pretransplant with a visible expression of several DSAs revealed that these antibodies were resistant to treatment.The renal graft was lost owing to antibody-mediated rejection(AMR).The HLA antigens expressed by the transplanted liver graft influenced antibody elimination.Pathologists are increasingly diagnosing AMR in liver transplants,and desensitization therapy has even been employed in situations of AMR,particularly in patients with DSAs in kidney-hepatic transplants and high-class II MFI due to Luminex.In conclusion,after revealing the negative impacts of DSAs with high MFI,pretransplant virtual crossmatch techniques may be appropriate to improve evolution;however,they may extend cold ischemia periods by requiring the donor to be typed.

Clinical factors affecting rejection rates in liver transplantation

With improvements in survival, liver trans- plant recipients now suffer more morbidity from long-term immunosuppression. Considerations were given to develop individualized immunosuppression based on their risk of re- jection. METHOD： We retrospectively analyzed the data of 788 liver transplants performed during the period from October 1991 to December 2011 to study the relationship between acute cel- lular rejection （ACR） and various clinical factors. RESULTS： Multivariate analysis showed that older age （P=0.04, OR=0.982）, chronic hepatitis B virus infection （P=0.005, OR= 0.574）, living donor liver transplantation （P=0.02, OR=0.648） and use of interleukin-2 receptor antagonist on induction （P〈0.001, OR=0.401） were associated with fewer ACRs. Patients with fulminant liver failure （P=.004, OR=4.05） were more likely to develop moderate to severe grade ACR. CONCLUSIONS： Liver transplant recipients with older age, chronic hepatitis B virus infection, living donor liver trans- plantation and use of interleukin-2 receptor antagonist on in- duction have fewer ACR. Patients transplanted for fulminant liver failure are at higher risk of moderate to severe grade ACR. These results provide theoretical framework for developing individualized immunosuppression.

Increase of peripheral Th17 lymphocytes during acute cellular rejection in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Although many human inflammatory and autoimmune diseases were previously considered to be mediated by T helper type 1 (Th1) cells, the recently described Th17 cells play dominant roles in several of these diseases. We and others speculated that allograft rejection after organ transplantation may also involve Th17 cells. Episodes of acute rejection occur in 30% of liver transplants. This study aimed to determine the frequency of circulating Th17 cells in patients who had received liver transplants for benign end-stage liver disease and to identify any association between acute rejection episodes and levels of Th17 cells in the peripheral blood. METHODS: A prospective study compared Th17 cells from 76 consecutive benign end-stage liver disease patients who had undergone orthotopic liver transplantation from 2007 to 2011 with those from 20 age-matched healthy individuals. Peripheral blood samples were collected at different time points within one year after transplant. Blood samples and liver biopsies were also collected at the diagnosis of acute rejection. Percentages of circulating CD4+ IL-17+ cells were measured by flow cytometry The transplant patients were classified into two groups: a rejection group consisting of 17 patients who had an episode of acute rejection, and a non-rejection group comprising the remaining 59 patients with no acute rejection episodes Percentages of circulating Th17 cells were compared between the two groups and controls. RESULTS: The levels of circulating CD4+ IL-17+ T cells in the rejection group were higher during acute rejection than those in the non-rejection group (2.56±0.43% versus 1.79±0.44% P<0.001). The frequency of CD4+ IL-17+ cells in peripheral blood was positively correlated with the rejection activity index (r=0.79, P=0.0002).CONCLUSION: Circulating Th17 cells may be useful as a surrogate marker for predicting acute rejection in liver transplant recipients.

Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after acute liver allograft rejection treatment: A multicenter European experience

Background:During the last decades,several risk factors for the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)after liver transplantation(LT)have been investigated.However,the impact of two important drivers of oncogenesis,namely the immunosuppression and the treatment of acute cellular rejection(ACR)have been marginally addressed.This study aimed at investigating the impact of ACR treatment on the incidence of tumor recurrence in a large European HCC-LT population.Methods:Seven hundred and eighty-one adult patients transplanted between February 1,1985 and June 30,2016 were retrospectively analyzed.After propensity score match,116 patients treated for ACR using steroid boluses were compared with 115 patients who did not present any ACR or a histologic but clinical irrelevant ACR.Results:Steroid boluses treated patients had a 18-fold higher overall incidence of HCC recurrence than those non-treated patients(16.4%vs.0.9%;P<0.0001).At multivariate Cox regression analysis,steroid boluses used to treat ACR were an independent risk factor for HCC recurrence(HR=14.2;95%CI:1.8–110.4;P=0.010).Conclusions:The decision to treat ACR as well as to reinforce immunosuppression load should be cautiously taken in view of the presented results.Prospective studies are needed to further elucidate the clinical impact of immunosuppression on HCC recurrence after transplantation.

The scoring system for patients with severe sepsis after orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Because of the complicated pathological features after liver transplantation, severe sepsis is difficult to treat and often leads to death. This study was undertaken to analyze the role of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in patients with severe sepsis and to evaluate the effect of the scoring system. METHODS: Fifty-six patients conformed to the inclusion criteria. They were divided into two groups: non-OLT group (group A) and OLT group (group B). Besides the general data of the patients, the surveillance of blood lactate, the number of failed organs, acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ(APACHEⅡ) and mutiple organ dysfunction score (MODS) were evaluated at the 1st, 3rd and 7th day after OLT. RESULTS: The mortality during hospitalization was 30% in the non-OLT group and 57.6% in the other group. The level of blood lactate at the 1st day of OLT increased more significantly in the OLT group than in the non-OLT group (P<0.01). It was decreased but higher than that in the non-OLT group in the seven days after OLT. The number of failed organs in the OLT group was greater than that in the non-OLT group (P<0.01). The continuous score of APACHEⅡwas not significantly different in the two groups. But the continuous MODS in the OLT group was higher than that in the non-OLT group (P<0.01), which was consistent with the number of failed organs. CONCLUSIONS: The persistently higher level of blood lactate during 7 days may be a dependent risk factor. Immunosuppression may be another risk factor for OLT patients. The mortality of OLT in patients with severe sepsis in 28 days is almost double that in non-OLT patients. The MODS score is better than the APACHEⅡscore in the assessment of organ failure in OLT patients with severe sepsis. The standard scoring system could be improved or a new scoring system that includes the blood lactate score should be established for liver transplantation.

Diabetes mellitus is not associated with worse short term outcome in patients older than 65 years old post-liver transplantation

BACKGROUND Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is a global health care challenge and a leading indication of liver transplantation(LT).Hence,more patients with diabetes mellitus(DM)are undergoing LT,especially,above the age of 65.AIM To evaluate the impact of DM on short-term outcomes post-LT in patients over the age of 65.METHODS We collected data of patients who underwent LT from January 2001 until December 2019 using our electronic medical record.We assessed the impact of DM on short-term outcomes,one-year,post-LT based on the following variables:Survival at one year;acute cellular rejection(ACR)rates;intensive care unit(ICU)and hospital length of stay;and readmissions.RESULTS Total of 148 patients who are 65 year or older underwent LT during the study period.The mean age is 68.5±3.3 years and 67.6%were male.The median Model for End-stage Liver Disease score at time of transplantation was 22(6-39),39%of patients had hepatocellular carcinoma and 77.7%underwent living donor LT.The one-year survival was similar between DM patients and others,91%.ACR occurred in 13.5%of patients(P=0.902).The median ICU stay is 4.5-day P=0.023.The rates of ICU and 90-d readmission were similar(P=0.821)and(P=0.194),respectively.CONCLUSION The short-term outcome of elderly diabetic patients undergoing LT is similar to others.The presence of DM in elderly LT candidates should not discourage physicians from transplant consideration in this cohort of patients.

Outcome of split liver transplantation vs living donor liver transplantation:A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND The outcomes of liver transplantation(LT)from different grafts have been studied individually and in combination,but the reports were conflicting with some researchers finding no difference in both short-term and long-term outcomes between the deceased donor split LT(DD-SLT)and living donor LT(LDLT).AIM To compare the outcomes of DD-SLT and LDLT we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis.METHODS This systematic review was performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines.The following databases were searched for articles comparing outcomes of DD-SLT and LDLT:PubMed;Google Scholar;Embase;Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials;the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;and Reference Citation Analysis(https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/).The search terms used were:“liver transplantation;”“liver transplant;”“split liver transplant;”“living donor liver transplant;”“partial liver transplant;”“partial liver graft;”“ex vivo splitting;”and“in vivo splitting.”RESULTS Ten studies were included for the data synthesis and meta-analysis.There were a total of 4836 patients.The overall survival rate at 1 year,3 years and 5 years was superior in patients that received LDLT compared to DD-SLT.At 1 year,the hazard ratios was 1.44(95%confidence interval:1.16-1.78;P=0.001).The graft survival rate at 3 years and 5 years was superior in the LDLT group(3 year hazard ratio:1.28;95%confidence interval:1.01-1.63;P=0.04).CONCLUSION This meta-analysis showed that LDLT has better graft survival and overall survival when compared to DD-SLT.

HLA variants related to primary sclerosing cholangitis influence rejection after liver transplantation

AIM: To investigate influence of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and killer immunoglobuline-like receptor (KIR) genotypes on risks of acute rejection (AR) after liver transplantation (LTX).

Sinusoidal endotheliitis as a histological parameter for diagnosing acute liver allograft rejection

AIMTo investigated the feasibility of using sinusoidal endotheliitis (SE) as a histological marker for liver allograft rejection.METHODSWe compared the histological features of 88 liver allograft biopsies with acute cellular rejection (ACR) and 59 cases with no evidence of ACR. SE was scored as: (1) focal linear lifting up of the endothelial cells by lymphocytes with no obvious damage to adjacent hepatocytes; (2) focal disruption of the endothelial lining by a cluster of subendothelial lymphocytes (a group of &#x0003e; 3 lymphocytes); and (3) severe confluent endotheliitis with hemorrhage and adjacent hepatocyte loss.RESULTSThe sensitivity and specificity of SE was 81% and 85%, respectively. Using SE as the only parameter, the positive predictive value for ACR (PPV) was 0.89, whereas the negative predictive value for ACR (NPV) was 0.75. The correlation between RAI and SE was moderate (R = 0.44, P &#x0003c; 0.001) (Figure 3A), whereas it became strong (R = 0.65, P &#x0003c; 0.001) when correlating SE with the venous endotheliitis activity index only.CONCLUSIONOur data suggest that SE scoring could be a reliable and reproducible supplemental parameter to the existing Banff schema for diagnosing acute liver allograft rejection.