BACKGROUND Superior capsular reconstruction(SCR)with long head of biceps tendon(LHBT)transposition was developed to massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears(MIRCTs);however,the outcomes of this technique remain uncl...BACKGROUND Superior capsular reconstruction(SCR)with long head of biceps tendon(LHBT)transposition was developed to massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears(MIRCTs);however,the outcomes of this technique remain unclear.AIM To perform a systematic review of biomechanical outcomes and a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes after LHBT transposition for MIRCTs.METHODS We performed a systematic electronic database search on PubMed,EMBASE,and Cochrane Library.Studies of SCR with LHBT transposition were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.Biomechanical studies were assessed for main results and conclusions.Included clinical studies were evaluated for quality of methodology.Data including study characteristics,cohort demographics,and outcomes were extracted.A meta-analysis was conducted of the clinical outcomes.RESULTS According to our inclusion and exclusion criteria,a total of six biomechanical studies were identified and reported an overall improvement in subacromial contact pressures and prevention of superior humeral migration without limiting range of motion(ROM)after LHBT transposition for MIRCTs.A total of five clinical studies were included in the meta-analysis of LHBT transposition outcomes,consisting of 253 patients.The results indicated that compared to other surgical methods for MIRCTs,LHBT transposition had advantages of more significant improvement in ROM(forward flexion mean difference[MD]=6.54,95%confidence interval[CI]:3.07-10.01;external rotation[MD=5.15,95%CI:1.59-8.17];the acromiohumeral distance[AHD][MD=0.90,95%CI:0.21-1.59])and reducing retear rate(odds ratio=0.27,95%CI:0.15-0.48).No significant difference in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score,visual analogue scale score,and University of California at Los Angles score was demonstrated between these two groups for MIRCTs.CONCLUSION In general,SCR with LHBT transposition was a reliable and economical technique for treating MIRCTs,both in terms of biomechanical and clinical outcomes,with comparable clinical outcomes,improved ROM,AHD,and reduced the retear rates compared to conventional SCR and other established techniques.More high-quality randomized controlled studies on the long-term outcomes of SCR with LHBT transposition are required to further assess.展开更多
AIM: To demonstrate that long head of the biceps tendon(LHBT) tenodesis is possible more than 3 mo after rupture. METHODS: From September 2009 to January 2012 we performed tenodesis of the LHBT in 11 individuals(avera...AIM: To demonstrate that long head of the biceps tendon(LHBT) tenodesis is possible more than 3 mo after rupture. METHODS: From September 2009 to January 2012 we performed tenodesis of the LHBT in 11 individuals(average age 56.9 years, range 42 to 73) more than 3 mo after rupture. All patients were evaluated by Disabilites of the Arm Shoulder and Hand(DASH) and Mayo outcome scores at an average follow-up of 19.1 mo. We similarly evaluated 5 patients(average age 58.2 years, range 45 to 64) over the same time treated within 3 mo of rupture with an average follow-up of 22.5 mo.RESULTS: Tenodesis with an interference screw was possible in all patients more than 3 mo after rupture and 90% had good to excellent outcomes but two had recurrent rupture. All of those who had tenodesis less than 3 mo after rupture had good to excellent outcomes and none had recurrent rupture. No statistical difference was found for DASH and Mayo outcome scores between the two groups(P <0.05). CONCLUSION: Tenodesis of LHBT more than 3 mo following rupture had outcomes similar to tenodesis done within 3 mo of rupture but recurrent rupture occurred in 20%.展开更多
The long head of the biceps tendon is widely recognized as an important pain generator,especially in anterior shoulder pain and dysfunction with athletes and working individuals.The purpose of this review is to provid...The long head of the biceps tendon is widely recognized as an important pain generator,especially in anterior shoulder pain and dysfunction with athletes and working individuals.The purpose of this review is to provide a current understanding of the long head of the biceps tendon anatomy and its surrounding structures,function,and relevant clinical information such as evaluation,treatment options,and complications in hopes of helping orthopaedic surgeons counsel their patients.An understanding of the long head of the biceps tendon anatomy and its surrounding structures is helpful to determine normal function as well as pathologic injuries that stem proximally.The biceps-labral complex has been identified and broken down into different regions that can further enhance a physician’s knowledge of common anterior shoulder pain etiologies.Although various physical examination maneuvers exist meant to localize the anterior shoulder pain,the lack of specificity requires orthopaedic surgeons to rely on patient history,advanced imaging,and diagnostic injections in order to determine the patient’s next steps.Nonsurgical treatment options such as anti-inflammatory medications,physical therapy,and ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections should be utilized before entertaining surgical treatment options.If surgery is needed,the three options include biceps tenotomy,biceps tenodesis,or superior labrum anterior to posterior repair.Specifically for biceps tenodesis,recent studies have analyzed open vs arthroscopic techniques,the ideal location of tenodesis with intra-articular,suprapectoral,subpectoral,extra-articular top of groove,and extra-articular bottom of groove approaches,and the best method of fixation using interference screws,suture anchors,or cortical buttons.Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of the complications of each procedure and respond accordingly for each patient.Once treated,patients often have good to excellent clinical outcomes and low rates of complications.展开更多
The long head of the biceps tendon （LHBT） pathology has been implicated as a common source of shoulder pain. The patients may be more resistant to conservative treatment than those with isolated subacromial impingem...The long head of the biceps tendon （LHBT） pathology has been implicated as a common source of shoulder pain. The patients may be more resistant to conservative treatment than those with isolated subacromial impingement. Even though, the surgical options of this disease remain controversial. It has been reported that tenotomy and tenodesis of the biceps tendon were usually utilized. However, persistent pain, deformity, and muscle cramping were frequently observed. Transfer of the LHBT to the conjoint tendon was originally described by Post and Benca in 1982.4 Verma et all has performed the transfer under arthroscopy since 2004. Eighty percent of their patients reported good results with a minimum 2 years of follow-up. However, there was a steep learning curve to become proficient in their technique. We devised a more convenient transfer compared with O＇Brien＇s technique. Six patients received our modified arthroscopic transfers from May 2006 to May 2007. All of them obtained good results.展开更多
目的:探讨关节镜下高位关节内与小切口低位关节外结节间沟下肱二头肌长头腱(Long Head of the Biceps Tendon,LHBT)切断固定治疗伴有肱二头肌长头肌腱炎肩峰撞击综合征(subacromial impingement syndrome,SIS)的对照研究。方法:选取201...目的:探讨关节镜下高位关节内与小切口低位关节外结节间沟下肱二头肌长头腱(Long Head of the Biceps Tendon,LHBT)切断固定治疗伴有肱二头肌长头肌腱炎肩峰撞击综合征(subacromial impingement syndrome,SIS)的对照研究。方法:选取2019年月12月至2022年12月在我院诊治的伴有肱二头肌长头肌腱炎SIS患者92例,其中45例接受关节镜下高位关节内LHBT切断固定治疗(观察A组),47例接受小切口低位关节外结节间沟下LHBT切断固定治疗(观察B组),比较两组治疗前后的加州大学(UCLA)肩关节评分系统各维度评分及总分、Constant肩关节评分评分、美国肩肘关节医师协会(ASES)评分,以及临床治疗疗效。结果:治疗后,两组UCLA各维度评分、患者满意度及总分较治疗前均升高(P<0.05),但与观察B组比较,观察A组UCLA各维度评分、患者满意度及总分治疗前后的差值明显更低(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组Constant、ASES评分较治疗前均升高(P<0.05),但与观察B组比较,观察A组Constant、ASES评分治疗前后的差值明显更低(P<0.05)。与观察B组95.74%比较,观察A组临床治疗总有效率80.00%明显更低(P<0.05)。结论:与关节镜下高位关节内LHBT切断固定治疗相比较,小切口低位关节外结节间沟下LHBT切断固定治疗伴有肱二头肌长头肌腱炎SIS患者,可更有效促进肩关节功能恢复,提高临床治疗疗效。展开更多
目的:探讨肩关节镜下应用改良Chinese-way技术治疗巨大肩袖撕裂的临床疗效。方法:自2019年1月至2022年6月采用肩关节镜下改良Chinese-way技术治疗22例巨大肩袖撕裂患者,其中男10例,女12例;年龄46~76(64.14±7.45)岁;病程5~14(8.32&#...目的:探讨肩关节镜下应用改良Chinese-way技术治疗巨大肩袖撕裂的临床疗效。方法:自2019年1月至2022年6月采用肩关节镜下改良Chinese-way技术治疗22例巨大肩袖撕裂患者,其中男10例,女12例;年龄46~76(64.14±7.45)岁;病程5~14(8.32±2.42)个月;19例采用完全修补,3例采用部分修补。分别于术前和术后1年采用视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、加州大学洛杉矶分校(University of California Los Angeles,UCLA)评分评价疼痛与肩关节功能;并观察术后并发症情况,影像学随访重建组织结构的完整性,肩峰下间隙大小。结果:22例患者获得随访,时间12~34(17.14±5.93)个月。MRI随访4例发生再撕裂(患者对功能满意,未进一步处理)外,其余均未出现切口感染、周围神经损伤、锚钉松动脱落等并发症。术前及术后1年VAS分别为(8.05±1.12)分和(1.82±1.50)分;UCLA评分分别为(7.45±1.65)分和(31.41±2.87)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:肩关节镜下改良Chinese-way技术修补巨大肩袖撕裂,可明显缓解疼痛,改善肩关节功能,早期临床疗效满意。展开更多
目的探讨磁共振成像(MRI)下肩胛下肌(SSC)损伤与肱二头肌长头肌腱(LHBT)病变的相关性及临床特点。方法选择2020年9月至2021年12月在贵州中医药大学第一附属医院因肩痛就诊,同时行肩关节MRI检查提示存在SSC损伤合并LHBT病变的128例患者,...目的探讨磁共振成像(MRI)下肩胛下肌(SSC)损伤与肱二头肌长头肌腱(LHBT)病变的相关性及临床特点。方法选择2020年9月至2021年12月在贵州中医药大学第一附属医院因肩痛就诊,同时行肩关节MRI检查提示存在SSC损伤合并LHBT病变的128例患者,根据Lafosse分型、Slatis and Aalto分型,在MRI下对SSC损伤合并LHBT病变进行分级评估,采用Spearman等级相关分析探讨SSC损伤分型和LHBT病变分型的相关性。结果SSC损伤分型结果为28例Ⅰ型、22例Ⅱ型、36例Ⅲ型、18例Ⅳ型、24例V型,LHBT病变分型结果为85例Ⅰ型、16例Ⅱ型、27例Ⅲ型。Spearman等级相关分析结果显示,SSC损伤分型和LHBT病变分型呈正相关(r=0.662,P=0.000)。结论MRI有助于识别SSC损伤及LHBT病变,SSC损伤分型和LHBT病变分型呈正相关,临床上针对肩痛患者应注重MRI检查,以评估患者肩袖损伤、肱二头肌腱病变情况,并根据不同的分型诊断选择相应的治疗方式。展开更多
基金the National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81972125 and No.82172510.
文摘BACKGROUND Superior capsular reconstruction(SCR)with long head of biceps tendon(LHBT)transposition was developed to massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears(MIRCTs);however,the outcomes of this technique remain unclear.AIM To perform a systematic review of biomechanical outcomes and a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes after LHBT transposition for MIRCTs.METHODS We performed a systematic electronic database search on PubMed,EMBASE,and Cochrane Library.Studies of SCR with LHBT transposition were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.Biomechanical studies were assessed for main results and conclusions.Included clinical studies were evaluated for quality of methodology.Data including study characteristics,cohort demographics,and outcomes were extracted.A meta-analysis was conducted of the clinical outcomes.RESULTS According to our inclusion and exclusion criteria,a total of six biomechanical studies were identified and reported an overall improvement in subacromial contact pressures and prevention of superior humeral migration without limiting range of motion(ROM)after LHBT transposition for MIRCTs.A total of five clinical studies were included in the meta-analysis of LHBT transposition outcomes,consisting of 253 patients.The results indicated that compared to other surgical methods for MIRCTs,LHBT transposition had advantages of more significant improvement in ROM(forward flexion mean difference[MD]=6.54,95%confidence interval[CI]:3.07-10.01;external rotation[MD=5.15,95%CI:1.59-8.17];the acromiohumeral distance[AHD][MD=0.90,95%CI:0.21-1.59])and reducing retear rate(odds ratio=0.27,95%CI:0.15-0.48).No significant difference in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score,visual analogue scale score,and University of California at Los Angles score was demonstrated between these two groups for MIRCTs.CONCLUSION In general,SCR with LHBT transposition was a reliable and economical technique for treating MIRCTs,both in terms of biomechanical and clinical outcomes,with comparable clinical outcomes,improved ROM,AHD,and reduced the retear rates compared to conventional SCR and other established techniques.More high-quality randomized controlled studies on the long-term outcomes of SCR with LHBT transposition are required to further assess.
文摘AIM: To demonstrate that long head of the biceps tendon(LHBT) tenodesis is possible more than 3 mo after rupture. METHODS: From September 2009 to January 2012 we performed tenodesis of the LHBT in 11 individuals(average age 56.9 years, range 42 to 73) more than 3 mo after rupture. All patients were evaluated by Disabilites of the Arm Shoulder and Hand(DASH) and Mayo outcome scores at an average follow-up of 19.1 mo. We similarly evaluated 5 patients(average age 58.2 years, range 45 to 64) over the same time treated within 3 mo of rupture with an average follow-up of 22.5 mo.RESULTS: Tenodesis with an interference screw was possible in all patients more than 3 mo after rupture and 90% had good to excellent outcomes but two had recurrent rupture. All of those who had tenodesis less than 3 mo after rupture had good to excellent outcomes and none had recurrent rupture. No statistical difference was found for DASH and Mayo outcome scores between the two groups(P <0.05). CONCLUSION: Tenodesis of LHBT more than 3 mo following rupture had outcomes similar to tenodesis done within 3 mo of rupture but recurrent rupture occurred in 20%.
文摘The long head of the biceps tendon is widely recognized as an important pain generator,especially in anterior shoulder pain and dysfunction with athletes and working individuals.The purpose of this review is to provide a current understanding of the long head of the biceps tendon anatomy and its surrounding structures,function,and relevant clinical information such as evaluation,treatment options,and complications in hopes of helping orthopaedic surgeons counsel their patients.An understanding of the long head of the biceps tendon anatomy and its surrounding structures is helpful to determine normal function as well as pathologic injuries that stem proximally.The biceps-labral complex has been identified and broken down into different regions that can further enhance a physician’s knowledge of common anterior shoulder pain etiologies.Although various physical examination maneuvers exist meant to localize the anterior shoulder pain,the lack of specificity requires orthopaedic surgeons to rely on patient history,advanced imaging,and diagnostic injections in order to determine the patient’s next steps.Nonsurgical treatment options such as anti-inflammatory medications,physical therapy,and ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections should be utilized before entertaining surgical treatment options.If surgery is needed,the three options include biceps tenotomy,biceps tenodesis,or superior labrum anterior to posterior repair.Specifically for biceps tenodesis,recent studies have analyzed open vs arthroscopic techniques,the ideal location of tenodesis with intra-articular,suprapectoral,subpectoral,extra-articular top of groove,and extra-articular bottom of groove approaches,and the best method of fixation using interference screws,suture anchors,or cortical buttons.Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of the complications of each procedure and respond accordingly for each patient.Once treated,patients often have good to excellent clinical outcomes and low rates of complications.
文摘The long head of the biceps tendon （LHBT） pathology has been implicated as a common source of shoulder pain. The patients may be more resistant to conservative treatment than those with isolated subacromial impingement. Even though, the surgical options of this disease remain controversial. It has been reported that tenotomy and tenodesis of the biceps tendon were usually utilized. However, persistent pain, deformity, and muscle cramping were frequently observed. Transfer of the LHBT to the conjoint tendon was originally described by Post and Benca in 1982.4 Verma et all has performed the transfer under arthroscopy since 2004. Eighty percent of their patients reported good results with a minimum 2 years of follow-up. However, there was a steep learning curve to become proficient in their technique. We devised a more convenient transfer compared with O＇Brien＇s technique. Six patients received our modified arthroscopic transfers from May 2006 to May 2007. All of them obtained good results.
文摘目的:探讨关节镜下高位关节内与小切口低位关节外结节间沟下肱二头肌长头腱(Long Head of the Biceps Tendon,LHBT)切断固定治疗伴有肱二头肌长头肌腱炎肩峰撞击综合征(subacromial impingement syndrome,SIS)的对照研究。方法:选取2019年月12月至2022年12月在我院诊治的伴有肱二头肌长头肌腱炎SIS患者92例,其中45例接受关节镜下高位关节内LHBT切断固定治疗(观察A组),47例接受小切口低位关节外结节间沟下LHBT切断固定治疗(观察B组),比较两组治疗前后的加州大学(UCLA)肩关节评分系统各维度评分及总分、Constant肩关节评分评分、美国肩肘关节医师协会(ASES)评分,以及临床治疗疗效。结果:治疗后,两组UCLA各维度评分、患者满意度及总分较治疗前均升高(P<0.05),但与观察B组比较,观察A组UCLA各维度评分、患者满意度及总分治疗前后的差值明显更低(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组Constant、ASES评分较治疗前均升高(P<0.05),但与观察B组比较,观察A组Constant、ASES评分治疗前后的差值明显更低(P<0.05)。与观察B组95.74%比较,观察A组临床治疗总有效率80.00%明显更低(P<0.05)。结论:与关节镜下高位关节内LHBT切断固定治疗相比较,小切口低位关节外结节间沟下LHBT切断固定治疗伴有肱二头肌长头肌腱炎SIS患者,可更有效促进肩关节功能恢复,提高临床治疗疗效。
文摘目的:探讨肩关节镜下应用改良Chinese-way技术治疗巨大肩袖撕裂的临床疗效。方法:自2019年1月至2022年6月采用肩关节镜下改良Chinese-way技术治疗22例巨大肩袖撕裂患者,其中男10例,女12例;年龄46~76(64.14±7.45)岁;病程5~14(8.32±2.42)个月;19例采用完全修补,3例采用部分修补。分别于术前和术后1年采用视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、加州大学洛杉矶分校(University of California Los Angeles,UCLA)评分评价疼痛与肩关节功能;并观察术后并发症情况,影像学随访重建组织结构的完整性,肩峰下间隙大小。结果:22例患者获得随访,时间12~34(17.14±5.93)个月。MRI随访4例发生再撕裂(患者对功能满意,未进一步处理)外,其余均未出现切口感染、周围神经损伤、锚钉松动脱落等并发症。术前及术后1年VAS分别为(8.05±1.12)分和(1.82±1.50)分;UCLA评分分别为(7.45±1.65)分和(31.41±2.87)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:肩关节镜下改良Chinese-way技术修补巨大肩袖撕裂,可明显缓解疼痛,改善肩关节功能,早期临床疗效满意。
文摘目的探讨磁共振成像(MRI)下肩胛下肌(SSC)损伤与肱二头肌长头肌腱(LHBT)病变的相关性及临床特点。方法选择2020年9月至2021年12月在贵州中医药大学第一附属医院因肩痛就诊,同时行肩关节MRI检查提示存在SSC损伤合并LHBT病变的128例患者,根据Lafosse分型、Slatis and Aalto分型,在MRI下对SSC损伤合并LHBT病变进行分级评估,采用Spearman等级相关分析探讨SSC损伤分型和LHBT病变分型的相关性。结果SSC损伤分型结果为28例Ⅰ型、22例Ⅱ型、36例Ⅲ型、18例Ⅳ型、24例V型,LHBT病变分型结果为85例Ⅰ型、16例Ⅱ型、27例Ⅲ型。Spearman等级相关分析结果显示,SSC损伤分型和LHBT病变分型呈正相关(r=0.662,P=0.000)。结论MRI有助于识别SSC损伤及LHBT病变,SSC损伤分型和LHBT病变分型呈正相关,临床上针对肩痛患者应注重MRI检查,以评估患者肩袖损伤、肱二头肌腱病变情况,并根据不同的分型诊断选择相应的治疗方式。
