Objective: This study compared the clinicopathologic characteristics and overall survival of epithelial ovarian carcinoma in women younger versus older than 45 years in Bangladesh. Methods: A retrospective analysis id...Objective: This study compared the clinicopathologic characteristics and overall survival of epithelial ovarian carcinoma in women younger versus older than 45 years in Bangladesh. Methods: A retrospective analysis identified 129 epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients who were admitted to the National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, in Dhaka, Bangladesh from 2016 through 2017 for surgery. These patients were grouped into two categories: the younger group (≤45 years) and the older group (>45 years). Clinicopathological features of epithelial ovarian carcinoma were analyzed in each age group. Cox proportional hazards model identified factors affecting survival and Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log rank test compared outcomes for each age group. Results: The median age of the 129 women was 46 years (IQR: 38, 56) and median time of follow-up was 9 months (inter-quartile range: 4, 26.5). We found a significant difference in the CA-125 level (p < 0.044), age of menopause (p < 0.001), follow-up duration (p < 0.016), disease outcome (p < 0.005) and histopathological type (p < 0.021) between the two groups. No significant differences were found in breakdown of Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage of the disease. There was a significant difference in overall survival between the patients of two groups (p = 0.021) where there was a higher probability of death among the older cohort. The 5-year overall survival rates for the younger age versus older group were 34.0%, and 11.7% respectively. Independent prognostic factors by univariate analysis for the overall survival were age, FIGO stage, preoperative CA-125 and CEA level. However, when controlling for stage, survival was similar between age cohorts. Conclusions: Our data suggests that women in Bangladesh with epithelial ovarian cancer who are under the age of 45 years have a different clinical profile and better overall survival than women in the older age cohort.展开更多
While obesity and fat intake have been associated with the risk and prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer, the association between the lipid levels and epithelial ovarian cancer phenotype remains controversial. We co...While obesity and fat intake have been associated with the risk and prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer, the association between the lipid levels and epithelial ovarian cancer phenotype remains controversial. We conducted a retrospective study of 349 epithelial ovarian cancer patients who received treatment at Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, China between 2011 and 2017. We analyzed age at diagnosis, blood pressure, plasma glucose content, body mass index(BMI), lipid levels and clinical parameters. Severity of epithelial ovarian cancer was classified according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics(FIGO) grading system. Univariate analysis of the clinical factors according to the severity of epithelial ovarian cancer was followed by logistic regression analysis to identify clinical factors significantly associated with epithelial ovarian cancer severity. Univariate analysis indicated that age,BMI, triglyceride(TG), and high density lipoproteins(HDL) differed significantly among different stages of epithelial ovarian cancer(P〈0.05). In the logistic regression model, elevated TG(OR: 1.883; 95% CI= 1.207-2.937), and low HDL(OR: 0.497; 95% CI = 0.298-0.829) levels were significantly associated with the high severity epithelial ovarian cancer. Our data indicate that high TG and low HDL levels correlate with a high severity of epithelial ovarian cancer. These data provide important insight into the potential relationship between the lipid pathway and epithelial ovarian cancer phenotype and development.展开更多
Objective: To evaluate the relationship between the pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and the prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: 287 patients suffering from primary epithelial ovarian cancer from 19...Objective: To evaluate the relationship between the pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and the prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: 287 patients suffering from primary epithelial ovarian cancer from 1995 to 2005 were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The 3-, 5-, 10-year survival with systematic lymphadenectomy (SL) were slightly higher than those without SL, but there were no statistically significance (P > 0.05). The 3-, 5-, 10-year survival of clinical stages without SL were lower than those with SL, but there were no significant difference either (P > 0.05). The 3-,5-, and 10-year survival rates with SL were higher than those without SL with no statistically differences (P > 0.05) among the subgroups such as absent, ≤ 2 cm and > 2 cm residual tumor. The survival rates of the groups without residual tumor and the group with ≤ 2 cm residual tumor were significantly higher than that of > 2 cm (P < 0.005). On multivariate analysis, patient staging (P = 0.01) and size of residual disease after primary cytoreductive surgery (P < 0.001 and = 0.002, respectively) retained prognostic significance. SL was not proved to be an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.69). Conclusion: Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy can not improve and prolong the survival time significantly.展开更多
Advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer(EOC) is diffi cult to treat with low overall cure rates. A new strategy combining maximal cytoreductive surgery(CRS) with intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemothera...Advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer(EOC) is diffi cult to treat with low overall cure rates. A new strategy combining maximal cytoreductive surgery(CRS) with intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy(HIPEC) has been proposed to treat advanced stage EOC in the primary setting. Numerous small, heterogeneous studies have been conducted exploring outcomes in patients with predominantly advanced, recurrent or refractory disease treated with CRS + HIPEC. Although morbidity rates approaching 35% have been reported, oncologic outcomes are promising. Incorporation of HIPEC for the treatment of primary EOC has continued to gain interest. Several prospective phase 2 clinical trials were recently completed evaluating the impact of CRS + HIPEC in the primary setting. This article will briefl y discuss the benefi ts of optimal surgical cytoreduction and the theoretical basis of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced stage EOC, and will then review existing literature describing oncologic outcomes in EOC patients treated with HIPEC in the primary setting.展开更多
Objective:To determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves the prognoses in women with stage IC1 epithelial ovarian cancer(EOC).Methods:All eligible women diagnosed with stage IC1 EOC from 2003 to 2019 in Tongji Ho...Objective:To determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves the prognoses in women with stage IC1 epithelial ovarian cancer(EOC).Methods:All eligible women diagnosed with stage IC1 EOC from 2003 to 2019 in Tongji Hospital were included.Patient characteristics,tumor features,surgical types,and chemotherapeutic treatments were collected.Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis were performed to evaluate progression-free survival(PFS)and overall survival(OS).展开更多
BACKGROUND Normal size ovarian cancer syndrome(NOCS)is a challenge for clinicians regarding timely diagnosis and management due to atypical clinical and imaging features.It is extremely rare with only a few cases repo...BACKGROUND Normal size ovarian cancer syndrome(NOCS)is a challenge for clinicians regarding timely diagnosis and management due to atypical clinical and imaging features.It is extremely rare with only a few cases reported in the literature.More data are needed to clarify its biological behavior and compare the differences with abnormal size ovarian cancer.AIM To assess the clinical and pathological features of NOCS patients treated in our institution in the last 10 years and to explore risk factors for relapse and survival.METHODS Patients who were pathologically diagnosed with NOCS between 2008 and 2018 were included.Papillary serous ovarian carcinoma(PSOC)patients were initially randomly recruited as the control group.Demographics,tumor characteristics,treatment procedures,and clinical follow-up were retrospectively collected.Risk factors for progression-free survival and overall survival were assessed.RESULTS A total of 110 NOCS patients were included;80(72.7%)had primary adnexal carcinoma,two(1.8%)had mesotheliomas,18(16.4%)had extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma,and eight(7.3%)had metastatic tumors.Carbohydrate antigen(CA)125 and ascites quantity were lower in the NOCS cohort than in the PSOC group.The only statistically significant risk factors for worse overall survival(P<0.05)were the levels of CA199 and having fewer than six chemotherapy cycles.The 1-year,3-year,and 5-year survival rates were 75.5%,27.7%,and 13.8%,respectively.CONCLUSION The clinical symptoms of the NOCS group are atypical,and the misdiagnosis rate is high.Ascites cytology and laparoscopic exploration are valuable in the early diagnosis to avoid a misdiagnosis.The level of CA199 is the most important predictor of overall survival,and more than six cycles of chemotherapy contributes to the increased survival rates of NOCS patients.展开更多
BACKGROUND The prognosis of borderline ovarian tumors(BOTs)has been the concern of clinicians and patients.It is urgent to develop a model to predict the survival of patients with BOTs.AIM To construct a nomogram to p...BACKGROUND The prognosis of borderline ovarian tumors(BOTs)has been the concern of clinicians and patients.It is urgent to develop a model to predict the survival of patients with BOTs.AIM To construct a nomogram to predict the likelihood of overall survival(OS)in patients with BOTs.METHODS A total of 192 patients with histologically verified BOTs and 374 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer(EOC)were retrospectively investigated for clinical characteristics and survival outcomes.A 1:1 propensity score matching(PSM)analysis was performed to eliminate selection bias.Survival was analyzed by using the log-rank test and the restricted mean survival time(RMST).Next,univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify meaningful independent prognostic factors.In addition,a nomogram model was developed to predict the 1-,3-,and 5-year overall survival of patients with BOTs.The predictive performance of the model was assessed by using the concordance index(C-index),calibration curves,and decision curve analysis(DCA).RESULTS For clinical data,there was no significant difference in body mass index,preoperative CA199 concentration,or tumor localization between the BOTs group and EOC group.Women with BOTs were significantly younger than those with EOC.There was a significant difference in menopausal status,parity,preoperative serum CA125 concentration,Federation International of gynecology and obstetrics(FIGO)stage,and whether patients accepted postoperative adjuvant therapy between the BOT and EOC group.After PSM,patients with BOTs had better overall survival than patients with EOC(P value=0.0067);more importantly,the 5-year RMST of BOTs was longer than that of EOC(P value=0.0002,95%CI-1.137 to-0.263).Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that diagnosed age and surgical type were independent risk factors for BOT patient OS(P value<0.05).A nomogram was developed based on diagnosed age,preoperative serum CA125 and CA199 Levels,surgical type,FIGO stage,and tumor size.Moreover,the c-index(0.959,95%confidence interval 0.8708–1.0472),calibration plot of 1-,3-,and 5-year OS,and decision curve analysis indicated the accurate predictive ability of this model.CONCLUSION Patients with BOTs had a better prognosis than patients with EOC.The nomogram we constructed might be helpful for clinicians in personalized treatment planning and patient counseling.展开更多
Objectives: To compare the survival and perioperafive morbidity between primary debulking surgery (PDS) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NAC/IDS) in treating patients with adva...Objectives: To compare the survival and perioperafive morbidity between primary debulking surgery (PDS) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NAC/IDS) in treating patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 67 patients with stage IIIC or iV EOC treated at Peking University Cancer Hospital from January 2006 to June 2009. VVherein, 37 and 30 patients underwent PDS and NAC/ IDS, respectively. Results: No difference in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) was observed between NAC/IDS group and PDS group (OS: 41.2 vs. 39.1 months, P=0.23; PFS: 27.1 vs. 24.3 months, P=0.37). The optimal debulking rate was 60% in the NAC/IDS group, which was significantly higher than that in the PDS group (32.4%) (P=0.024). The NAC/IDS group had significantly less intraoperative estimated blood loss and transfusion, lower nasogastric intubation rate, and earlier ambulation and recovery of intestinal function than the PDS group (P〈0.05). Conclusions: NAC/IDS is less invasive than PDS, and offers the advantages regarding optimal cytoreduction rate, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative recovery, without significantly impairing the survival compared with PDS in treating patients with stage IIIC or IV EOC. Therefore, NAC/IDS may be a valuable treatment alternative for EOC patients.展开更多
We recruited consecutive patients with stage Ⅲ epithelial ovarian,tubal,and peritoneal cancers who had optimal residual tumor after primary cytoreductive surgery and who received intraperitoneal chemotherapy between ...We recruited consecutive patients with stage Ⅲ epithelial ovarian,tubal,and peritoneal cancers who had optimal residual tumor after primary cytoreductive surgery and who received intraperitoneal chemotherapy between 2002 and 2012.Two propensity score-matched sample cohorts were created.We found that the addition of paclitaxel as a second intraperitoneal agent on a 3-week dosing schedule did not yield significant incremental survival benefits over the intraperitoneal delivery of a single cisplatin-based regimen.If our findings could be confirmed by a prospective randomized study,then it would be interesting to explore the efficacy of shifting back to a dose-dense intraperitoneal delivery of paclitaxel or a dose-dense delivery of a new formulation of paclitaxel for the patients with stage III epithelial ovarian,tubal,and peritoneal cancers.展开更多
文摘Objective: This study compared the clinicopathologic characteristics and overall survival of epithelial ovarian carcinoma in women younger versus older than 45 years in Bangladesh. Methods: A retrospective analysis identified 129 epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients who were admitted to the National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, in Dhaka, Bangladesh from 2016 through 2017 for surgery. These patients were grouped into two categories: the younger group (≤45 years) and the older group (>45 years). Clinicopathological features of epithelial ovarian carcinoma were analyzed in each age group. Cox proportional hazards model identified factors affecting survival and Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log rank test compared outcomes for each age group. Results: The median age of the 129 women was 46 years (IQR: 38, 56) and median time of follow-up was 9 months (inter-quartile range: 4, 26.5). We found a significant difference in the CA-125 level (p < 0.044), age of menopause (p < 0.001), follow-up duration (p < 0.016), disease outcome (p < 0.005) and histopathological type (p < 0.021) between the two groups. No significant differences were found in breakdown of Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage of the disease. There was a significant difference in overall survival between the patients of two groups (p = 0.021) where there was a higher probability of death among the older cohort. The 5-year overall survival rates for the younger age versus older group were 34.0%, and 11.7% respectively. Independent prognostic factors by univariate analysis for the overall survival were age, FIGO stage, preoperative CA-125 and CEA level. However, when controlling for stage, survival was similar between age cohorts. Conclusions: Our data suggests that women in Bangladesh with epithelial ovarian cancer who are under the age of 45 years have a different clinical profile and better overall survival than women in the older age cohort.
基金supported by Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (ZK201606ZK201610)
文摘While obesity and fat intake have been associated with the risk and prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer, the association between the lipid levels and epithelial ovarian cancer phenotype remains controversial. We conducted a retrospective study of 349 epithelial ovarian cancer patients who received treatment at Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, China between 2011 and 2017. We analyzed age at diagnosis, blood pressure, plasma glucose content, body mass index(BMI), lipid levels and clinical parameters. Severity of epithelial ovarian cancer was classified according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics(FIGO) grading system. Univariate analysis of the clinical factors according to the severity of epithelial ovarian cancer was followed by logistic regression analysis to identify clinical factors significantly associated with epithelial ovarian cancer severity. Univariate analysis indicated that age,BMI, triglyceride(TG), and high density lipoproteins(HDL) differed significantly among different stages of epithelial ovarian cancer(P〈0.05). In the logistic regression model, elevated TG(OR: 1.883; 95% CI= 1.207-2.937), and low HDL(OR: 0.497; 95% CI = 0.298-0.829) levels were significantly associated with the high severity epithelial ovarian cancer. Our data indicate that high TG and low HDL levels correlate with a high severity of epithelial ovarian cancer. These data provide important insight into the potential relationship between the lipid pathway and epithelial ovarian cancer phenotype and development.
文摘Objective: To evaluate the relationship between the pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and the prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: 287 patients suffering from primary epithelial ovarian cancer from 1995 to 2005 were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The 3-, 5-, 10-year survival with systematic lymphadenectomy (SL) were slightly higher than those without SL, but there were no statistically significance (P > 0.05). The 3-, 5-, 10-year survival of clinical stages without SL were lower than those with SL, but there were no significant difference either (P > 0.05). The 3-,5-, and 10-year survival rates with SL were higher than those without SL with no statistically differences (P > 0.05) among the subgroups such as absent, ≤ 2 cm and > 2 cm residual tumor. The survival rates of the groups without residual tumor and the group with ≤ 2 cm residual tumor were significantly higher than that of > 2 cm (P < 0.005). On multivariate analysis, patient staging (P = 0.01) and size of residual disease after primary cytoreductive surgery (P < 0.001 and = 0.002, respectively) retained prognostic significance. SL was not proved to be an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.69). Conclusion: Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy can not improve and prolong the survival time significantly.
文摘Advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer(EOC) is diffi cult to treat with low overall cure rates. A new strategy combining maximal cytoreductive surgery(CRS) with intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy(HIPEC) has been proposed to treat advanced stage EOC in the primary setting. Numerous small, heterogeneous studies have been conducted exploring outcomes in patients with predominantly advanced, recurrent or refractory disease treated with CRS + HIPEC. Although morbidity rates approaching 35% have been reported, oncologic outcomes are promising. Incorporation of HIPEC for the treatment of primary EOC has continued to gain interest. Several prospective phase 2 clinical trials were recently completed evaluating the impact of CRS + HIPEC in the primary setting. This article will briefl y discuss the benefi ts of optimal surgical cytoreduction and the theoretical basis of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced stage EOC, and will then review existing literature describing oncologic outcomes in EOC patients treated with HIPEC in the primary setting.
基金This study was supported by grants from the National Key Technology R&D Program of China(No.2019YFC1005200,No.2019YFC1005202 and2018YFC1002103)。
文摘Objective:To determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves the prognoses in women with stage IC1 epithelial ovarian cancer(EOC).Methods:All eligible women diagnosed with stage IC1 EOC from 2003 to 2019 in Tongji Hospital were included.Patient characteristics,tumor features,surgical types,and chemotherapeutic treatments were collected.Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis were performed to evaluate progression-free survival(PFS)and overall survival(OS).
基金Supported by National Key Technology R&D Program of China,No.2019YFC1005200,and No.2019YFC1005202National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81501530,No.81802896,and No.81701530+1 种基金Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province,No.2017CFB800Hubei Province Health and Family Planning Scientific Research Project,No.WJ2017Z013,and No.WJ2019M127.
文摘BACKGROUND Normal size ovarian cancer syndrome(NOCS)is a challenge for clinicians regarding timely diagnosis and management due to atypical clinical and imaging features.It is extremely rare with only a few cases reported in the literature.More data are needed to clarify its biological behavior and compare the differences with abnormal size ovarian cancer.AIM To assess the clinical and pathological features of NOCS patients treated in our institution in the last 10 years and to explore risk factors for relapse and survival.METHODS Patients who were pathologically diagnosed with NOCS between 2008 and 2018 were included.Papillary serous ovarian carcinoma(PSOC)patients were initially randomly recruited as the control group.Demographics,tumor characteristics,treatment procedures,and clinical follow-up were retrospectively collected.Risk factors for progression-free survival and overall survival were assessed.RESULTS A total of 110 NOCS patients were included;80(72.7%)had primary adnexal carcinoma,two(1.8%)had mesotheliomas,18(16.4%)had extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma,and eight(7.3%)had metastatic tumors.Carbohydrate antigen(CA)125 and ascites quantity were lower in the NOCS cohort than in the PSOC group.The only statistically significant risk factors for worse overall survival(P<0.05)were the levels of CA199 and having fewer than six chemotherapy cycles.The 1-year,3-year,and 5-year survival rates were 75.5%,27.7%,and 13.8%,respectively.CONCLUSION The clinical symptoms of the NOCS group are atypical,and the misdiagnosis rate is high.Ascites cytology and laparoscopic exploration are valuable in the early diagnosis to avoid a misdiagnosis.The level of CA199 is the most important predictor of overall survival,and more than six cycles of chemotherapy contributes to the increased survival rates of NOCS patients.
基金Supported by National Key Technology R&D Program of China,No.2019YFC1005200,No.2019YFC1005202,and No.2018YFC1002103
文摘BACKGROUND The prognosis of borderline ovarian tumors(BOTs)has been the concern of clinicians and patients.It is urgent to develop a model to predict the survival of patients with BOTs.AIM To construct a nomogram to predict the likelihood of overall survival(OS)in patients with BOTs.METHODS A total of 192 patients with histologically verified BOTs and 374 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer(EOC)were retrospectively investigated for clinical characteristics and survival outcomes.A 1:1 propensity score matching(PSM)analysis was performed to eliminate selection bias.Survival was analyzed by using the log-rank test and the restricted mean survival time(RMST).Next,univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify meaningful independent prognostic factors.In addition,a nomogram model was developed to predict the 1-,3-,and 5-year overall survival of patients with BOTs.The predictive performance of the model was assessed by using the concordance index(C-index),calibration curves,and decision curve analysis(DCA).RESULTS For clinical data,there was no significant difference in body mass index,preoperative CA199 concentration,or tumor localization between the BOTs group and EOC group.Women with BOTs were significantly younger than those with EOC.There was a significant difference in menopausal status,parity,preoperative serum CA125 concentration,Federation International of gynecology and obstetrics(FIGO)stage,and whether patients accepted postoperative adjuvant therapy between the BOT and EOC group.After PSM,patients with BOTs had better overall survival than patients with EOC(P value=0.0067);more importantly,the 5-year RMST of BOTs was longer than that of EOC(P value=0.0002,95%CI-1.137 to-0.263).Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that diagnosed age and surgical type were independent risk factors for BOT patient OS(P value<0.05).A nomogram was developed based on diagnosed age,preoperative serum CA125 and CA199 Levels,surgical type,FIGO stage,and tumor size.Moreover,the c-index(0.959,95%confidence interval 0.8708–1.0472),calibration plot of 1-,3-,and 5-year OS,and decision curve analysis indicated the accurate predictive ability of this model.CONCLUSION Patients with BOTs had a better prognosis than patients with EOC.The nomogram we constructed might be helpful for clinicians in personalized treatment planning and patient counseling.
文摘Objectives: To compare the survival and perioperafive morbidity between primary debulking surgery (PDS) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NAC/IDS) in treating patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 67 patients with stage IIIC or iV EOC treated at Peking University Cancer Hospital from January 2006 to June 2009. VVherein, 37 and 30 patients underwent PDS and NAC/ IDS, respectively. Results: No difference in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) was observed between NAC/IDS group and PDS group (OS: 41.2 vs. 39.1 months, P=0.23; PFS: 27.1 vs. 24.3 months, P=0.37). The optimal debulking rate was 60% in the NAC/IDS group, which was significantly higher than that in the PDS group (32.4%) (P=0.024). The NAC/IDS group had significantly less intraoperative estimated blood loss and transfusion, lower nasogastric intubation rate, and earlier ambulation and recovery of intestinal function than the PDS group (P〈0.05). Conclusions: NAC/IDS is less invasive than PDS, and offers the advantages regarding optimal cytoreduction rate, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative recovery, without significantly impairing the survival compared with PDS in treating patients with stage IIIC or IV EOC. Therefore, NAC/IDS may be a valuable treatment alternative for EOC patients.
基金supported in part by the National Science Council,Taiwan, China(No.NSC 104-NU-E-010-004-NU & MOST 103-2410-H-264-004)
文摘We recruited consecutive patients with stage Ⅲ epithelial ovarian,tubal,and peritoneal cancers who had optimal residual tumor after primary cytoreductive surgery and who received intraperitoneal chemotherapy between 2002 and 2012.Two propensity score-matched sample cohorts were created.We found that the addition of paclitaxel as a second intraperitoneal agent on a 3-week dosing schedule did not yield significant incremental survival benefits over the intraperitoneal delivery of a single cisplatin-based regimen.If our findings could be confirmed by a prospective randomized study,then it would be interesting to explore the efficacy of shifting back to a dose-dense intraperitoneal delivery of paclitaxel or a dose-dense delivery of a new formulation of paclitaxel for the patients with stage III epithelial ovarian,tubal,and peritoneal cancers.