Objectives: To investigate the effect of lumbar interbody fusion via the oblique lateral approach (OLIF) in the treatment of single level lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods: Retrospective analysis was made on 32 cases ...Objectives: To investigate the effect of lumbar interbody fusion via the oblique lateral approach (OLIF) in the treatment of single level lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods: Retrospective analysis was made on 32 cases of single level lumbar spondylolisthesis treated by lumbar interbody fusion via the oblique lateral approach from July 2020 to July 2021. 14 males and 18 females;the age was (66.5 ± 11.5) years (55 - 82 years). 1) The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and complications were recorded;2) the scores of visual analog scale. VAS and Oswestry disability index (ODI) of low back pain and lower limb pain were collected before operation and at the last follow-up;by observing the imaging data, the height of the intervertebral space, the anterior convex angle of the intervertebral space, the anterior convex angle of the lumbar spine, the sagittal diameter of the dural sac and the spondylolisthesis were measured. Results: All patients successfully completed the operation, the average operation time was (103.9 ± 21.1) min, the average intraoperative bleeding volume was (72.3 ± 16.4) ml. There was no vascular injury during the operation, no infection occurred in all surgical incisions, and Class I/A healing was achieved. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain before operation and at the last follow-up were lower than those before operation, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05);the ODI at the last follow-up was lower than that before operation, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the height of intervertebral space, the height of intervertebral foramen and the sagittal diameter of dural sac were greater than those before operation, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05);the spondylolisthesis rate at the last follow-up was lower than that before operation, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Left thigh surface numbness occurred in 2 cases (6.3%) and disappeared after 1 week;Hip flexion weakness occurred in 1 case (0.03%), which recovered after 12 days;there were no complications such as retroperitoneal hematoma, ureteral injury, retrograde ejaculation, intestinal and lumbar plexus injury. Conclusion: The early clinical effect of OLIF in the treatment of single level lumbar spondylolisthesis is significant. This surgical method is minimally invasive, safe and effective, which can significantly reduce the amount of intraoperative bleeding and reduce the risk of postoperative complications. Its main working principle is to make the annulus fibrosus, posterior longitudinal ligament and ligamentum flavum shrink and recover the height of the intervertebral space through decompression, loosening and stretching of the intervertebral space, so as to achieve the reduction of the slipped vertebral body, increase the height of the intervertebral foramen Enlarge the spinal canal volume and eliminate dynamic compression to play an indirect decompression role, improve the symptoms of low back and leg pain, and reconstruct the stability of the spine through interbody fusion.展开更多
Summary： The effect and safety of anterior debridement and fusion with a minimally invasive ap- proach combined with posterior fixation via the Wiltse approach were assessed in the single-level lum- bar pyogenic spon...Summary： The effect and safety of anterior debridement and fusion with a minimally invasive ap- proach combined with posterior fixation via the Wiltse approach were assessed in the single-level lum- bar pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Seventeen patients from 2007 to 2009 underwent anterior debridement and fusion with a minimally invasive approach combined with posterior fixation via the Wiltse approach. Postoperative follow-up time was 24-41 months. Data included the patients＇ general information, mi- crobiology, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, intervertebral fusion rate, and preoperative and final follow-up scores for American Spinal Injury Association （ASIA） im- pairment, visual analogue scale （VAS）, and Oswestry Disability Index （ODI）. Ten patients had under- gone a prior spinal invasive procedure, and 7 had hematogenous infection. The infected segments in- cluded L1-2, L2-3, L3,~, and L4-5 in 1, 2, 5, and 9 cases, respectively. Thirteen bacterial cultures were posi- tive for Staphylococcus aureus （5 cases）, Staphylococcus epidermidis （4）, Streptococcus （3）, and Es- cherichia coli （1）. The operative time was 213.8＋45.6 min, and the intraoperative blood loss was 180.6-4-88.1 mL. Postoperative complications consisted of urinary retention （2 cases）, constipation （3）, and deep vein thrombosis （2）. On the final follow-up, VAS scores and ODIs were significantly lower than those of preoperation, while the ASIA grades improved. All the cases achieved good intervertebral bony fusion. Anterior debridement and fusion with a minimally invasive approach combined with poste- rior fixation via the Wiltse approach can successfully treat single-level lumbar pyogenic spondy- lodiscitis, with less trauma and reliable immobilization. It is a viable option for clinical application.展开更多
An aggressive separation and prolonged overstretching of the paraspinal muscles in the posterior midline approach during lumbar non fusion dynamic stabilization in cases of spondylolisthesis resulting from pars intera...An aggressive separation and prolonged overstretching of the paraspinal muscles in the posterior midline approach during lumbar non fusion dynamic stabilization in cases of spondylolisthesis resulting from pars interarticularis fracture may result in postoperative flat back deformity and intractable chronic pain. It is hypothesized that utilizing Wiltse paraspinal inter-muscular approach for this purpose may result in reduction of operative time, protection of integrity, vascularity, nerve supply and strength of paraspinal muscles, shortening of hospitalization and minimizing development of chronic postoperative back pain. So, I have performed this prospective descriptive study that involved 24 patients having single level lumbar instability at L4-5 or L5-S1 levels. All patients were operated upon using Wiltse minimal access posterolateral surgical technique for non-fusion dynamic stabilization. The final results revealed that males were 66%, females were 33% and ages were 42 ± 6 years. Trauma was reported in 12%. Low back pain and tenderness were reported in 100% and root affection reported in 25%. Plain X-ray and MRI were done in 100% and C.T. was done in 8% of cases. Level L4-5 was affected in 17% while level L5-S1 was affected in 83%. Anterolisthesis “grades 0” was found in 8%, grades 1 in 88% and retrolisthesis in 4% of cases. Operative time was 1 hour ± 10 min., blood loss was 60 ± 20 ml., patients ambulation was after 6 - 8 hours, hospital stay was 12 - 24 hours. None of cases were complicated with infection, screw loosening, or fixation system break. Back pain VAS diminished from 7 preoperative to 5 in 2nd day, then became 4 by 1 week, 3 by 1 month and 0 by 6 months. It was concluded that utilizing Wiltse approach for posterolateral lumbar stabilization minimizes tissue damage and improves the speed of recovery and outcome.展开更多
Objective To investigate the operation key points,instrument improvement and shortterm effects in total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) via a single posterior approach for thoracic and lumbar tumors.Methods A series of mo...Objective To investigate the operation key points,instrument improvement and shortterm effects in total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) via a single posterior approach for thoracic and lumbar tumors.Methods A series of modified展开更多
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of surgical treatment of lower lumbar fracture with mini-incision via retroperitoneal anterior approach. Methods The data of 21 cases with serious lower lumbar burst fract...Objective To investigate the clinical effects of surgical treatment of lower lumbar fracture with mini-incision via retroperitoneal anterior approach. Methods The data of 21 cases with serious lower lumbar burst fracture were analyzed retrospectively.展开更多
Objective To investigate the feasibility and surgical effects of posterior articular process approach for the treatment of L1-L3 lumbar disc herniation.Methods A retrospective study,of17patients with upper lumbar inte...Objective To investigate the feasibility and surgical effects of posterior articular process approach for the treatment of L1-L3 lumbar disc herniation.Methods A retrospective study,of17patients with upper lumbar intervertebml disc展开更多
We report a series of patients operated for one or multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis (with and without spondylolisthesis) using the minimal invasive bilateral interlaminar decompression. We discuss our results, compar...We report a series of patients operated for one or multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis (with and without spondylolisthesis) using the minimal invasive bilateral interlaminar decompression. We discuss our results, comparing this procedure (from a technical point of view) with the muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD) and the unilateral approach for bilateral decompression (ULBD). Clinical and outcome data of 62 consecutive patients were reviewed, using the Visual Analogue Scale for both low back pain (LBP) and legs pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for the degree of disability. Mean age was 68.88 ± 9.54 years and mean follow-up (FU) was 16.38 ± 11.12 months. A statistically significant improvement of LBP, legs pain and ODI was globally observed. At latest FU, patients with multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis significantly improved all scores and patients with spondylolisthesis significantly decreased their disability. No major complications occurred. Two cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collections were treated conservatively. No wound infection occurred. No progression of spondylolisthesis was observed. No reoperation was needed. Although efficacious in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, MILD and ULBD can have both some limitations. MILD has been found to decrease lumbar function in multilevel decompression (increasing sagittal translation and lumbar lordosis probably due to the removal of half of the spinous processes) and ULBD shows some disadvantages due to the difficulty of manipulating instruments through a small portal and the inadequate decompression due to a minimal exposure. The minimal invasive bilateral interlaminar decompression (in this technique, the access is bilateral but the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments and the spinous processes are preserved) allows wide access (bilateral exposure) with minimal invasiveness and very low morbidity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis at one or more levels.展开更多
文摘Objectives: To investigate the effect of lumbar interbody fusion via the oblique lateral approach (OLIF) in the treatment of single level lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods: Retrospective analysis was made on 32 cases of single level lumbar spondylolisthesis treated by lumbar interbody fusion via the oblique lateral approach from July 2020 to July 2021. 14 males and 18 females;the age was (66.5 ± 11.5) years (55 - 82 years). 1) The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and complications were recorded;2) the scores of visual analog scale. VAS and Oswestry disability index (ODI) of low back pain and lower limb pain were collected before operation and at the last follow-up;by observing the imaging data, the height of the intervertebral space, the anterior convex angle of the intervertebral space, the anterior convex angle of the lumbar spine, the sagittal diameter of the dural sac and the spondylolisthesis were measured. Results: All patients successfully completed the operation, the average operation time was (103.9 ± 21.1) min, the average intraoperative bleeding volume was (72.3 ± 16.4) ml. There was no vascular injury during the operation, no infection occurred in all surgical incisions, and Class I/A healing was achieved. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain before operation and at the last follow-up were lower than those before operation, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05);the ODI at the last follow-up was lower than that before operation, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the height of intervertebral space, the height of intervertebral foramen and the sagittal diameter of dural sac were greater than those before operation, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05);the spondylolisthesis rate at the last follow-up was lower than that before operation, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Left thigh surface numbness occurred in 2 cases (6.3%) and disappeared after 1 week;Hip flexion weakness occurred in 1 case (0.03%), which recovered after 12 days;there were no complications such as retroperitoneal hematoma, ureteral injury, retrograde ejaculation, intestinal and lumbar plexus injury. Conclusion: The early clinical effect of OLIF in the treatment of single level lumbar spondylolisthesis is significant. This surgical method is minimally invasive, safe and effective, which can significantly reduce the amount of intraoperative bleeding and reduce the risk of postoperative complications. Its main working principle is to make the annulus fibrosus, posterior longitudinal ligament and ligamentum flavum shrink and recover the height of the intervertebral space through decompression, loosening and stretching of the intervertebral space, so as to achieve the reduction of the slipped vertebral body, increase the height of the intervertebral foramen Enlarge the spinal canal volume and eliminate dynamic compression to play an indirect decompression role, improve the symptoms of low back and leg pain, and reconstruct the stability of the spine through interbody fusion.
基金supported by Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No.2012FFB02322)
文摘Summary： The effect and safety of anterior debridement and fusion with a minimally invasive ap- proach combined with posterior fixation via the Wiltse approach were assessed in the single-level lum- bar pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Seventeen patients from 2007 to 2009 underwent anterior debridement and fusion with a minimally invasive approach combined with posterior fixation via the Wiltse approach. Postoperative follow-up time was 24-41 months. Data included the patients＇ general information, mi- crobiology, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, intervertebral fusion rate, and preoperative and final follow-up scores for American Spinal Injury Association （ASIA） im- pairment, visual analogue scale （VAS）, and Oswestry Disability Index （ODI）. Ten patients had under- gone a prior spinal invasive procedure, and 7 had hematogenous infection. The infected segments in- cluded L1-2, L2-3, L3,~, and L4-5 in 1, 2, 5, and 9 cases, respectively. Thirteen bacterial cultures were posi- tive for Staphylococcus aureus （5 cases）, Staphylococcus epidermidis （4）, Streptococcus （3）, and Es- cherichia coli （1）. The operative time was 213.8＋45.6 min, and the intraoperative blood loss was 180.6-4-88.1 mL. Postoperative complications consisted of urinary retention （2 cases）, constipation （3）, and deep vein thrombosis （2）. On the final follow-up, VAS scores and ODIs were significantly lower than those of preoperation, while the ASIA grades improved. All the cases achieved good intervertebral bony fusion. Anterior debridement and fusion with a minimally invasive approach combined with poste- rior fixation via the Wiltse approach can successfully treat single-level lumbar pyogenic spondy- lodiscitis, with less trauma and reliable immobilization. It is a viable option for clinical application.
文摘An aggressive separation and prolonged overstretching of the paraspinal muscles in the posterior midline approach during lumbar non fusion dynamic stabilization in cases of spondylolisthesis resulting from pars interarticularis fracture may result in postoperative flat back deformity and intractable chronic pain. It is hypothesized that utilizing Wiltse paraspinal inter-muscular approach for this purpose may result in reduction of operative time, protection of integrity, vascularity, nerve supply and strength of paraspinal muscles, shortening of hospitalization and minimizing development of chronic postoperative back pain. So, I have performed this prospective descriptive study that involved 24 patients having single level lumbar instability at L4-5 or L5-S1 levels. All patients were operated upon using Wiltse minimal access posterolateral surgical technique for non-fusion dynamic stabilization. The final results revealed that males were 66%, females were 33% and ages were 42 ± 6 years. Trauma was reported in 12%. Low back pain and tenderness were reported in 100% and root affection reported in 25%. Plain X-ray and MRI were done in 100% and C.T. was done in 8% of cases. Level L4-5 was affected in 17% while level L5-S1 was affected in 83%. Anterolisthesis “grades 0” was found in 8%, grades 1 in 88% and retrolisthesis in 4% of cases. Operative time was 1 hour ± 10 min., blood loss was 60 ± 20 ml., patients ambulation was after 6 - 8 hours, hospital stay was 12 - 24 hours. None of cases were complicated with infection, screw loosening, or fixation system break. Back pain VAS diminished from 7 preoperative to 5 in 2nd day, then became 4 by 1 week, 3 by 1 month and 0 by 6 months. It was concluded that utilizing Wiltse approach for posterolateral lumbar stabilization minimizes tissue damage and improves the speed of recovery and outcome.
文摘Objective To investigate the operation key points,instrument improvement and shortterm effects in total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) via a single posterior approach for thoracic and lumbar tumors.Methods A series of modified
文摘Objective To investigate the clinical effects of surgical treatment of lower lumbar fracture with mini-incision via retroperitoneal anterior approach. Methods The data of 21 cases with serious lower lumbar burst fracture were analyzed retrospectively.
文摘Objective To investigate the feasibility and surgical effects of posterior articular process approach for the treatment of L1-L3 lumbar disc herniation.Methods A retrospective study,of17patients with upper lumbar intervertebml disc
文摘We report a series of patients operated for one or multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis (with and without spondylolisthesis) using the minimal invasive bilateral interlaminar decompression. We discuss our results, comparing this procedure (from a technical point of view) with the muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD) and the unilateral approach for bilateral decompression (ULBD). Clinical and outcome data of 62 consecutive patients were reviewed, using the Visual Analogue Scale for both low back pain (LBP) and legs pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for the degree of disability. Mean age was 68.88 ± 9.54 years and mean follow-up (FU) was 16.38 ± 11.12 months. A statistically significant improvement of LBP, legs pain and ODI was globally observed. At latest FU, patients with multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis significantly improved all scores and patients with spondylolisthesis significantly decreased their disability. No major complications occurred. Two cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collections were treated conservatively. No wound infection occurred. No progression of spondylolisthesis was observed. No reoperation was needed. Although efficacious in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, MILD and ULBD can have both some limitations. MILD has been found to decrease lumbar function in multilevel decompression (increasing sagittal translation and lumbar lordosis probably due to the removal of half of the spinous processes) and ULBD shows some disadvantages due to the difficulty of manipulating instruments through a small portal and the inadequate decompression due to a minimal exposure. The minimal invasive bilateral interlaminar decompression (in this technique, the access is bilateral but the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments and the spinous processes are preserved) allows wide access (bilateral exposure) with minimal invasiveness and very low morbidity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis at one or more levels.
