Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Chinese medicine methods(acupuncture,tui na,acupuncture knife,traditional Chinese medicine,traction)combined with nerve block treatment for lumbar disc herniation using B...Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Chinese medicine methods(acupuncture,tui na,acupuncture knife,traditional Chinese medicine,traction)combined with nerve block treatment for lumbar disc herniation using Bayesian mesh Meta-analysis.Methods:Randomized controlled studies of TCM methods combined with nerve block for lumbar disc herniation in CNKI,Wanfang,Vip,China Biomedical Literature Library,Pubmed,Web of science,and The Cochrance Library databases were searched for the period from the establishment of each database to May 2021.2 researchers independently followed the developed nerf criteria to Screening was performed.Bayesian model mesh Meta-analysis was performed using R,RStudio,and addis-1.16.6 software.Results:Twenty-seven papers with a total of 2074 subjects were finally included,involving six interventions,namely nerve block alone,herbal medicine combined with nerve block,acupuncture combined with nerve block,acupuncture combined with nerve block,traction combined with nerve block,and tui na combined with nerve block.The results of the net analysis showed that(1)in terms of efficiency,all interventions were better than simple nerve block except for traction combined nerve block,and acupuncture,acupuncture,tui-na and Chinese medicine combined nerve block were better than traction combined nerve block respectively,and the probability ranked first for acupuncture combined nerve block.(2)On the VAS score,except for traction combined with nerve block,other interventions were superior to simple nerve block,and the combination of herbal medicine,acupuncture,and acupuncture respectively was superior to traction combined with nerve block,and the intervention with the best probability ranking result was herbal medicine combined with nerve block.(3)There was no statistical difference between the two interventions compared in terms of JOA scores,and the probability ranked first for herbal medicine combined nerve block.Conclusion:Chinese medicine combined nerve block was superior to nerve block alone,and Chinese medicine combined nerve block and acupuncture combined nerve block measures were more effective in the treatment of LDH,and traction combined nerve block was less effective.展开更多
A nerve stimulation-guided lumbar plexus block is a well-established technique.It is not clear whether ultrasound guidance has additional value for this deep block technique.This study aimed to examine whether ultraso...A nerve stimulation-guided lumbar plexus block is a well-established technique.It is not clear whether ultrasound guidance has additional value for this deep block technique.This study aimed to examine whether ultrasound guidance using a paramedian transverse scan through the intertransverse space(PMTS-ITS)approach in combination with nerve stimulation reduces the onset time of a complete sensory block.Forty-four patients who were scheduled to undergo arthroscopic knee surgery with an ultrasound visibility score(UVS)of≥10 for the lumbar plexus were enrolled and randomly allocated to the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group(group U-N)or nerve stimulation group(group N)in this prospective,randomized,parallel-group,active-controlled study.The primary outcome was the onset time of a complete sensory block.The results showed that the onset time of a complete sensory block to pinprick and cold was 10(10–40)min and 10(10–40)min in group U-N,respectively,and 30(10–40)min and 20(10–40)min in group N(P=0.005,P=0.004),respectively.The performance time was 658±87 s in group U-N and 528±97 s in group N(P<0.001).There was no(0%)patient who required 5 or more needle passes in group U-N and 6(27.3%)in group N(P=0.028).The block failure rate was 9.1%in group U-N and 31.8%in group N(P>0.05).In conclusion,ultrasound guidance using the PMTS-ITS approach in combination with nerve stimulation led to a faster onset of a complete sensory block than nerve stimulation alone for a lumbar plexus block in patients with a UVS≥10.Ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation significantly decreased the number of patients who required 5 or more needle passes.展开更多
Background: Pneumatic arterial tourniquet is a utilized strategy in limb surgeries to provide bloodless field to facilitate surgical procedure. Be that as it may, arterial tourniquet has numerous injurious impacts inc...Background: Pneumatic arterial tourniquet is a utilized strategy in limb surgeries to provide bloodless field to facilitate surgical procedure. Be that as it may, arterial tourniquet has numerous injurious impacts including hemodynamic changes and tourniquet-induced pain which sometimes can be severe and intolerable. Objectives: Our primary aim was to assess the impact of performing “Lumbar Plexus Block and sciatic nerve block” with General Anesthesia (GA) on the degree of arterial tourniquet-induced hemodynamic effects. On the other hand, our secondary aims were: amount of postoperative analgesic prerequisites, patient satisfactory score and documented side effects. Settings and Design: Ain Shams University, Orthopedic operating theatre;a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Methods and Material: The physical status of 50 patients (both sexes) including I and II patients from American Society of Anesthesiologists, whose ages are from 20 - 40 years, is not so ideal when they are undergoing elective knee Arthroscopy. The duration lasts no more than ninety minutes under GA with application of tourniquet. Patients were allotted haphazardly to one of two groups. In Group C (Control group): Only GA. In Group B: LPB and sciatic nerve block were performed just before GA administration. Intraoperative hemodynamics was recorded at specific timings. Results: Incidence of tourniquet induced hypertension (TIH) was markedly less with Group B at: forty five, sixty, seventy five mins after tourniquet inflation and just before tourniquet deflation. Also, the total ketorolac consumption during first 24 hours of postoperative period was significantly less with Group B (p Conclusions: Combined Sciatic-Lumbar plexus blocks when combined with general anesthesia were very effective in attenuating TIH.展开更多
目的:探讨超声引导下腰骶丛神经阻滞联合全麻对行髋关节置换术老年病人术后谵妄(POD)的影响。方法:选取髋关节置换术老年病人80例,随机分为腰骶丛神经阻滞联合全麻组(h组)和全麻组(q组),各40例。2组病人均采用喉罩通气,维持脑电双频指数...目的:探讨超声引导下腰骶丛神经阻滞联合全麻对行髋关节置换术老年病人术后谵妄(POD)的影响。方法:选取髋关节置换术老年病人80例,随机分为腰骶丛神经阻滞联合全麻组(h组)和全麻组(q组),各40例。2组病人均采用喉罩通气,维持脑电双频指数40~60,术后静脉自控镇痛(PCA)。比较2组病人术中麻醉药物用量、手术相关指标;采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估病人术后疼痛情况;于术前(D0)、术后第1(D1)、3(D3)、7(D7)天分别测定病人意识模糊评估量表(CAM)评分,并抽取静脉血检测白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-6、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)、C反应蛋白(CRP)和S100β蛋白水平。结果:与q组相比,h组病人术中麻醉药物用量、术后拔管时间、术后24 h PCA次数、术后各时间点VAS评分、首次下床时间及出院时间均明显减少(P<0.01);h组术后IL-1β、IL-6、TNF-α、CRP、S100β蛋白水平、CAM评分及POD发生率均明显低于q组(P<0.01)。结论:超声引导下腰骶丛神经阻滞联合全麻较单纯全麻,可减少行髋关节置换术的老年病人麻醉药用量,完善镇痛,降低炎性反应和POD发生率,有助于病人术后快速康复。展开更多
AIM: To investigate the diagnostic validity and therapeutic value of lumbar facet joint interventions in managing chronic low back pain.METHODS: The review process applied systematic evidence-based assessment methodol...AIM: To investigate the diagnostic validity and therapeutic value of lumbar facet joint interventions in managing chronic low back pain.METHODS: The review process applied systematic evidence-based assessment methodology of controlled trials of diagnostic validity and randomized controlled trials of therapeutic efficacy. Inclusion criteria encompassed all facet joint interventions performed in a controlled fashion. The pain relief of greater than 50% was the outcome measure for diagnostic accuracy assessment of the controlled studies with ability to perform previously painful movements, whereas, for randomized controlled therapeutic efficacy studies, the primary outcome was significant pain relief and the secondary outcome was a positive change in functional status. For the inclusion of the diagnostic controlled studies, all studies must have utilized either placebo controlled facet joint blocks or comparative local anesthetic blocks. In assessing therapeutic interventions, short-term and long-term reliefs were defined as either up to 6 mo or greater than 6 mo of relief. The literature search was extensive utilizing various types of electronic search media including Pub Med from 1966 onwards, Cochrane library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, clinicaltrials.gov, along with other sources includingprevious systematic reviews, non-indexed journals, and abstracts until March 2015. Each manuscript included in the assessment was assessed for methodologic quality or risk of bias assessment utilizing the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies checklist for diagnostic interventions, and Cochrane review criteria and the Interventional Pain Management Techniques- Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment tool for therapeutic interventions. Evidence based on the review of the systematic assessment of controlled studies was graded utilizing a modified schema of qualitative evidence with best evidence synthesis, variable from level Ⅰ to level Ⅴ.RESULTS: Across all databases, 16 high quality diagnostic accuracy studies were identified. In addition, multiple studies assessed the influence of multiple factors on diagnostic validity. In contrast to diagnostic validity studies, therapeutic efficacy trials were limited to a total of 14 randomized controlled trials, assessing the efficacy of intraarticular injections, facet or zygapophysial joint nerve blocks, and radiofrequency neurotomy of the innervation of the facet joints. The evidence for the diagnostic validity of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks with at least 75% pain relief with ability to perform previously painful movements was level Ⅰ, based on a range of level Ⅰ to Ⅴ derived from a best evidence synthesis. For therapeutic interventions, the evidence was variable from level Ⅱ to Ⅲ, with level Ⅱ evidence for lumbar facet joint nerve blocks and radiofrequency neurotomy for long-term improvement(greater than 6 mo), and level Ⅲ evidence for lumbosacral zygapophysial joint injections for short-term improvement only.CONCLUSION: This review provides significant evidence for the diagnostic validity of facet joint nerve blocks, and moderate evidence for therapeutic radiofrequency neurotomy and therapeutic facet joint nerve blocks in managing chronic low back pain.展开更多
目的:运用贝叶斯网状Meta分析评价中医方法(针灸、推拿、针刀、中药、牵引)联合神经阻滞治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法:检索知网、万方、维普、中国生物医学文献库、Pubmed、Web of science、The Cochrance Library数据库中医方...目的:运用贝叶斯网状Meta分析评价中医方法(针灸、推拿、针刀、中药、牵引)联合神经阻滞治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法:检索知网、万方、维普、中国生物医学文献库、Pubmed、Web of science、The Cochrance Library数据库中医方法联合神经阻滞治疗腰椎间盘突出症的随机对照研究,检索时间为各库建库至2021年5月。2位研究员独立按照制定的纳排标准对文献进行筛选。采用R、RStudio、addis⁃1.16.6软件进行贝叶斯模型网状Meta分析。结果:最终纳入27篇文献,共计2074例受试者,涉及6种干预措施,分别为单纯神经阻滞、中药联合神经阻滞、针灸联合神经阻滞、针刀联合神经阻滞、牵引联合神经阻滞、推拿联合神经阻滞。网状分析结果显示:(1)在有效率上,除牵引联合神经阻滞外,其它干预措施均优于单纯神经阻滞,针灸、针刀、推拿、中药分别联合神经阻滞优于牵引联合神经阻滞,概率排在第一位的为针灸联合神经阻滞。(2)在VAS评分上,除牵引联合神经阻滞外,其它干预措施优于单纯神经阻滞,中药、推拿、针刀分别联合神经阻滞优于牵引联合神经阻滞,概率排序排结果最优的干预措施为中药联合神经阻滞。(3)在JOA评分上,两两干预措施之间比较无统计差异,概率排序第一的为中药联合神经阻滞。结论:中医疗法联合神经阻滞优于单纯神经阻滞,中药联合神经阻滞和针灸联合神经阻滞措施在治疗LDH疗效较好,牵引联合神经阻滞疗效较差。展开更多
基金National Natural Science Foundation of China(81674005)Major Research Projects of Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine(CI2021A0204)。
文摘Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Chinese medicine methods(acupuncture,tui na,acupuncture knife,traditional Chinese medicine,traction)combined with nerve block treatment for lumbar disc herniation using Bayesian mesh Meta-analysis.Methods:Randomized controlled studies of TCM methods combined with nerve block for lumbar disc herniation in CNKI,Wanfang,Vip,China Biomedical Literature Library,Pubmed,Web of science,and The Cochrance Library databases were searched for the period from the establishment of each database to May 2021.2 researchers independently followed the developed nerf criteria to Screening was performed.Bayesian model mesh Meta-analysis was performed using R,RStudio,and addis-1.16.6 software.Results:Twenty-seven papers with a total of 2074 subjects were finally included,involving six interventions,namely nerve block alone,herbal medicine combined with nerve block,acupuncture combined with nerve block,acupuncture combined with nerve block,traction combined with nerve block,and tui na combined with nerve block.The results of the net analysis showed that(1)in terms of efficiency,all interventions were better than simple nerve block except for traction combined nerve block,and acupuncture,acupuncture,tui-na and Chinese medicine combined nerve block were better than traction combined nerve block respectively,and the probability ranked first for acupuncture combined nerve block.(2)On the VAS score,except for traction combined with nerve block,other interventions were superior to simple nerve block,and the combination of herbal medicine,acupuncture,and acupuncture respectively was superior to traction combined with nerve block,and the intervention with the best probability ranking result was herbal medicine combined with nerve block.(3)There was no statistical difference between the two interventions compared in terms of JOA scores,and the probability ranked first for herbal medicine combined nerve block.Conclusion:Chinese medicine combined nerve block was superior to nerve block alone,and Chinese medicine combined nerve block and acupuncture combined nerve block measures were more effective in the treatment of LDH,and traction combined nerve block was less effective.
文摘A nerve stimulation-guided lumbar plexus block is a well-established technique.It is not clear whether ultrasound guidance has additional value for this deep block technique.This study aimed to examine whether ultrasound guidance using a paramedian transverse scan through the intertransverse space(PMTS-ITS)approach in combination with nerve stimulation reduces the onset time of a complete sensory block.Forty-four patients who were scheduled to undergo arthroscopic knee surgery with an ultrasound visibility score(UVS)of≥10 for the lumbar plexus were enrolled and randomly allocated to the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group(group U-N)or nerve stimulation group(group N)in this prospective,randomized,parallel-group,active-controlled study.The primary outcome was the onset time of a complete sensory block.The results showed that the onset time of a complete sensory block to pinprick and cold was 10(10–40)min and 10(10–40)min in group U-N,respectively,and 30(10–40)min and 20(10–40)min in group N(P=0.005,P=0.004),respectively.The performance time was 658±87 s in group U-N and 528±97 s in group N(P<0.001).There was no(0%)patient who required 5 or more needle passes in group U-N and 6(27.3%)in group N(P=0.028).The block failure rate was 9.1%in group U-N and 31.8%in group N(P>0.05).In conclusion,ultrasound guidance using the PMTS-ITS approach in combination with nerve stimulation led to a faster onset of a complete sensory block than nerve stimulation alone for a lumbar plexus block in patients with a UVS≥10.Ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation significantly decreased the number of patients who required 5 or more needle passes.
文摘Background: Pneumatic arterial tourniquet is a utilized strategy in limb surgeries to provide bloodless field to facilitate surgical procedure. Be that as it may, arterial tourniquet has numerous injurious impacts including hemodynamic changes and tourniquet-induced pain which sometimes can be severe and intolerable. Objectives: Our primary aim was to assess the impact of performing “Lumbar Plexus Block and sciatic nerve block” with General Anesthesia (GA) on the degree of arterial tourniquet-induced hemodynamic effects. On the other hand, our secondary aims were: amount of postoperative analgesic prerequisites, patient satisfactory score and documented side effects. Settings and Design: Ain Shams University, Orthopedic operating theatre;a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Methods and Material: The physical status of 50 patients (both sexes) including I and II patients from American Society of Anesthesiologists, whose ages are from 20 - 40 years, is not so ideal when they are undergoing elective knee Arthroscopy. The duration lasts no more than ninety minutes under GA with application of tourniquet. Patients were allotted haphazardly to one of two groups. In Group C (Control group): Only GA. In Group B: LPB and sciatic nerve block were performed just before GA administration. Intraoperative hemodynamics was recorded at specific timings. Results: Incidence of tourniquet induced hypertension (TIH) was markedly less with Group B at: forty five, sixty, seventy five mins after tourniquet inflation and just before tourniquet deflation. Also, the total ketorolac consumption during first 24 hours of postoperative period was significantly less with Group B (p Conclusions: Combined Sciatic-Lumbar plexus blocks when combined with general anesthesia were very effective in attenuating TIH.
文摘目的:探讨超声引导下腰骶丛神经阻滞联合全麻对行髋关节置换术老年病人术后谵妄(POD)的影响。方法:选取髋关节置换术老年病人80例,随机分为腰骶丛神经阻滞联合全麻组(h组)和全麻组(q组),各40例。2组病人均采用喉罩通气,维持脑电双频指数40~60,术后静脉自控镇痛(PCA)。比较2组病人术中麻醉药物用量、手术相关指标;采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估病人术后疼痛情况;于术前(D0)、术后第1(D1)、3(D3)、7(D7)天分别测定病人意识模糊评估量表(CAM)评分,并抽取静脉血检测白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-6、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)、C反应蛋白(CRP)和S100β蛋白水平。结果:与q组相比,h组病人术中麻醉药物用量、术后拔管时间、术后24 h PCA次数、术后各时间点VAS评分、首次下床时间及出院时间均明显减少(P<0.01);h组术后IL-1β、IL-6、TNF-α、CRP、S100β蛋白水平、CAM评分及POD发生率均明显低于q组(P<0.01)。结论:超声引导下腰骶丛神经阻滞联合全麻较单纯全麻,可减少行髋关节置换术的老年病人麻醉药用量,完善镇痛,降低炎性反应和POD发生率,有助于病人术后快速康复。
文摘AIM: To investigate the diagnostic validity and therapeutic value of lumbar facet joint interventions in managing chronic low back pain.METHODS: The review process applied systematic evidence-based assessment methodology of controlled trials of diagnostic validity and randomized controlled trials of therapeutic efficacy. Inclusion criteria encompassed all facet joint interventions performed in a controlled fashion. The pain relief of greater than 50% was the outcome measure for diagnostic accuracy assessment of the controlled studies with ability to perform previously painful movements, whereas, for randomized controlled therapeutic efficacy studies, the primary outcome was significant pain relief and the secondary outcome was a positive change in functional status. For the inclusion of the diagnostic controlled studies, all studies must have utilized either placebo controlled facet joint blocks or comparative local anesthetic blocks. In assessing therapeutic interventions, short-term and long-term reliefs were defined as either up to 6 mo or greater than 6 mo of relief. The literature search was extensive utilizing various types of electronic search media including Pub Med from 1966 onwards, Cochrane library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, clinicaltrials.gov, along with other sources includingprevious systematic reviews, non-indexed journals, and abstracts until March 2015. Each manuscript included in the assessment was assessed for methodologic quality or risk of bias assessment utilizing the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies checklist for diagnostic interventions, and Cochrane review criteria and the Interventional Pain Management Techniques- Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment tool for therapeutic interventions. Evidence based on the review of the systematic assessment of controlled studies was graded utilizing a modified schema of qualitative evidence with best evidence synthesis, variable from level Ⅰ to level Ⅴ.RESULTS: Across all databases, 16 high quality diagnostic accuracy studies were identified. In addition, multiple studies assessed the influence of multiple factors on diagnostic validity. In contrast to diagnostic validity studies, therapeutic efficacy trials were limited to a total of 14 randomized controlled trials, assessing the efficacy of intraarticular injections, facet or zygapophysial joint nerve blocks, and radiofrequency neurotomy of the innervation of the facet joints. The evidence for the diagnostic validity of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks with at least 75% pain relief with ability to perform previously painful movements was level Ⅰ, based on a range of level Ⅰ to Ⅴ derived from a best evidence synthesis. For therapeutic interventions, the evidence was variable from level Ⅱ to Ⅲ, with level Ⅱ evidence for lumbar facet joint nerve blocks and radiofrequency neurotomy for long-term improvement(greater than 6 mo), and level Ⅲ evidence for lumbosacral zygapophysial joint injections for short-term improvement only.CONCLUSION: This review provides significant evidence for the diagnostic validity of facet joint nerve blocks, and moderate evidence for therapeutic radiofrequency neurotomy and therapeutic facet joint nerve blocks in managing chronic low back pain.
文摘目的:运用贝叶斯网状Meta分析评价中医方法(针灸、推拿、针刀、中药、牵引)联合神经阻滞治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法:检索知网、万方、维普、中国生物医学文献库、Pubmed、Web of science、The Cochrance Library数据库中医方法联合神经阻滞治疗腰椎间盘突出症的随机对照研究,检索时间为各库建库至2021年5月。2位研究员独立按照制定的纳排标准对文献进行筛选。采用R、RStudio、addis⁃1.16.6软件进行贝叶斯模型网状Meta分析。结果:最终纳入27篇文献,共计2074例受试者,涉及6种干预措施,分别为单纯神经阻滞、中药联合神经阻滞、针灸联合神经阻滞、针刀联合神经阻滞、牵引联合神经阻滞、推拿联合神经阻滞。网状分析结果显示:(1)在有效率上,除牵引联合神经阻滞外,其它干预措施均优于单纯神经阻滞,针灸、针刀、推拿、中药分别联合神经阻滞优于牵引联合神经阻滞,概率排在第一位的为针灸联合神经阻滞。(2)在VAS评分上,除牵引联合神经阻滞外,其它干预措施优于单纯神经阻滞,中药、推拿、针刀分别联合神经阻滞优于牵引联合神经阻滞,概率排序排结果最优的干预措施为中药联合神经阻滞。(3)在JOA评分上,两两干预措施之间比较无统计差异,概率排序第一的为中药联合神经阻滞。结论:中医疗法联合神经阻滞优于单纯神经阻滞,中药联合神经阻滞和针灸联合神经阻滞措施在治疗LDH疗效较好,牵引联合神经阻滞疗效较差。
