AIM:To establish the role of magnetic resonance cholangiography(MRC)in diagnosis of biliary anatomy in living-donor liver transplantation(LDLT)donors.METHODS:A systematic review was performed by searching electronic b...AIM:To establish the role of magnetic resonance cholangiography(MRC)in diagnosis of biliary anatomy in living-donor liver transplantation(LDLT)donors.METHODS:A systematic review was performed by searching electronic bibliographic databases prior to March 2013.Studies with diagnostic results and fulfilled inclusion criteria were included.The methodological quality of the studies was assessed.Sensitivity,specificity and other measures of the accuracy of MRC for diagnosis of biliary anatomy in LDLT donors were summarized using a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model.Summary receiver operating characteristic(SROC)curves were used to summarize overall test performance.Publication bias was assessed using Deek’s funnel plot asymmetry test.Sensitivity analysis was adopted to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity.RESULTS:Twelve studies involving 869 subjects were eligible to the analysis.The scores of Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies for the included studies ranged from 11 to 14.The summary estimates of sensitivity,specificity,positive likelihood ratio,negative likelihood ratio,diagnostic OR of MRC in diagnosis of biliary anatomy in LDLT donor were 0.88(95%CI:0.84-0.92),0.95(95%CI:0.93-0.97),15.33(95%CI:10.70-21.95),0.15(95%CI:0.11-0.20)and 130.77(95%CI:75.91-225.27),respectively.No significant heterogeneity was detected in all the above four measures.Area under SROC curve was 0.971.Little publication bias was noted across the studies(P=0.557).Sensitivity analysis excluding a study with possible heterogeneity got a similar overall result,which suggested the little influence of this study on the overall results.CONCLUSION:Our results suggest that MRC is a high specificity but moderate sensitivity technique in diagnosis of biliary anatomy in LDLT donors.展开更多
AIM: To compare the value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) and standard T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in the evaluation process as adult-to-adult right lobe living donor liver tran...AIM: To compare the value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) and standard T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in the evaluation process as adult-to-adult right lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLTx) demands a successful outcome, and exact knowledge of the biliary tree is implicated to avoid biliary complications, postoperatively.METHODS: After starting the LDLTx program, 18 liver transplant candidates were selected for LDLTx by a stepwise evaluation process. ERC and standard T2-weighted MRC were performed to evaluate the biliary system of the donor liver. The anatomical findings of ERC and MRC mapping were compared using the Ohkubo classification. RESULTS: ERC allowed mapping of the whole biliary system in 15/15 (100%) cases, including 14/15 (93.3%) with biliary variants while routine MRC was only accurate in 2/13 (15.4%) cases. MRC was limited in depicting the biliary system proximal of the hepatic bifurcation. Postoperative biliary complications occurred in 2 donors and 8 recipients. Biliary complications were associated with Ohkubo type C, E or G in 6/8 recipients, and 2/3 recipients with biliary leak received a graft with multiple (≥2) bile ducts. CONCLUSION: Pretransplant ERC is safe and superior over standard MRC for detection of biliary variations that occur with a high frequency. However, precise knowledge of biliary variants did not reduce the incidence of postoperative biliary complications.展开更多
Living donor liver transplant(LDLT)is a major surgi-cal undertaking.Detailed pre-operative assessment of the vascular and biliary anatomy is crucial for safe and successful harvesting of the graft and transplantation....Living donor liver transplant(LDLT)is a major surgi-cal undertaking.Detailed pre-operative assessment of the vascular and biliary anatomy is crucial for safe and successful harvesting of the graft and transplantation.Computed tomography(CT)and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)are currently the imaging modalities of choice in pre-operative evaluation.These cross-sec-tional imaging techniques can reveal the vascular and biliary anatomy,assess the hepatic parenchyma and perform volumetric analysis.Knowledge of the broad indications and contraindications to qualify as a recipi-ent for LDLT is essential for the radiologist reporting scans in a pre-transplant patient.Similarly,awareness of the various anatomical variations and pathological states in the donor is essential for the radiologist to generate a meaningful report of his/her observations.CT and MRI have largely replaced invasive techniques such as catheter angiography,percutaneous cholan-giography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan-creatography.In order to generate a meaningful report based on these pre-operative imaging scans,it is also mandatory for the radiologist to be aware of the sur-geon’s perspective.We intend to provide a brief over-view of the common surgical concepts of LDLT and give a detailed description of the minimum that a radiologist is expected to seek and report in CT and MR scans per-formed for LDLT related evaluation.展开更多
文摘AIM:To establish the role of magnetic resonance cholangiography(MRC)in diagnosis of biliary anatomy in living-donor liver transplantation(LDLT)donors.METHODS:A systematic review was performed by searching electronic bibliographic databases prior to March 2013.Studies with diagnostic results and fulfilled inclusion criteria were included.The methodological quality of the studies was assessed.Sensitivity,specificity and other measures of the accuracy of MRC for diagnosis of biliary anatomy in LDLT donors were summarized using a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model.Summary receiver operating characteristic(SROC)curves were used to summarize overall test performance.Publication bias was assessed using Deek’s funnel plot asymmetry test.Sensitivity analysis was adopted to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity.RESULTS:Twelve studies involving 869 subjects were eligible to the analysis.The scores of Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies for the included studies ranged from 11 to 14.The summary estimates of sensitivity,specificity,positive likelihood ratio,negative likelihood ratio,diagnostic OR of MRC in diagnosis of biliary anatomy in LDLT donor were 0.88(95%CI:0.84-0.92),0.95(95%CI:0.93-0.97),15.33(95%CI:10.70-21.95),0.15(95%CI:0.11-0.20)and 130.77(95%CI:75.91-225.27),respectively.No significant heterogeneity was detected in all the above four measures.Area under SROC curve was 0.971.Little publication bias was noted across the studies(P=0.557).Sensitivity analysis excluding a study with possible heterogeneity got a similar overall result,which suggested the little influence of this study on the overall results.CONCLUSION:Our results suggest that MRC is a high specificity but moderate sensitivity technique in diagnosis of biliary anatomy in LDLT donors.
文摘AIM: To compare the value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) and standard T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in the evaluation process as adult-to-adult right lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLTx) demands a successful outcome, and exact knowledge of the biliary tree is implicated to avoid biliary complications, postoperatively.METHODS: After starting the LDLTx program, 18 liver transplant candidates were selected for LDLTx by a stepwise evaluation process. ERC and standard T2-weighted MRC were performed to evaluate the biliary system of the donor liver. The anatomical findings of ERC and MRC mapping were compared using the Ohkubo classification. RESULTS: ERC allowed mapping of the whole biliary system in 15/15 (100%) cases, including 14/15 (93.3%) with biliary variants while routine MRC was only accurate in 2/13 (15.4%) cases. MRC was limited in depicting the biliary system proximal of the hepatic bifurcation. Postoperative biliary complications occurred in 2 donors and 8 recipients. Biliary complications were associated with Ohkubo type C, E or G in 6/8 recipients, and 2/3 recipients with biliary leak received a graft with multiple (≥2) bile ducts. CONCLUSION: Pretransplant ERC is safe and superior over standard MRC for detection of biliary variations that occur with a high frequency. However, precise knowledge of biliary variants did not reduce the incidence of postoperative biliary complications.
文摘Living donor liver transplant(LDLT)is a major surgi-cal undertaking.Detailed pre-operative assessment of the vascular and biliary anatomy is crucial for safe and successful harvesting of the graft and transplantation.Computed tomography(CT)and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)are currently the imaging modalities of choice in pre-operative evaluation.These cross-sec-tional imaging techniques can reveal the vascular and biliary anatomy,assess the hepatic parenchyma and perform volumetric analysis.Knowledge of the broad indications and contraindications to qualify as a recipi-ent for LDLT is essential for the radiologist reporting scans in a pre-transplant patient.Similarly,awareness of the various anatomical variations and pathological states in the donor is essential for the radiologist to generate a meaningful report of his/her observations.CT and MRI have largely replaced invasive techniques such as catheter angiography,percutaneous cholan-giography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan-creatography.In order to generate a meaningful report based on these pre-operative imaging scans,it is also mandatory for the radiologist to be aware of the sur-geon’s perspective.We intend to provide a brief over-view of the common surgical concepts of LDLT and give a detailed description of the minimum that a radiologist is expected to seek and report in CT and MR scans per-formed for LDLT related evaluation.