The magnetic stabilization flow regime could also be created forGeldart-Bnonmagnetizable particles pro-vided some magnetizable particles are introduced and the magnetic field is applied.This study aimed toexplore the ...The magnetic stabilization flow regime could also be created forGeldart-Bnonmagnetizable particles pro-vided some magnetizable particles are introduced and the magnetic field is applied.This study aimed toexplore the size(d_(pM))and density(ρ_(pM))effects of magnetizable particles on its operating range.The upperlimit(Umb;)could not be determined from the △P_(b)-U_(g)↓curve but could from analyzing the variation of △P_(b)-fluctuation with increasing U_(g).Due to the variation of U_(mfH)(lower limit)with d_(pM) and ppw,both U_(mbH)-U_(mfH) and(U_(mbH)-U_(mfH))/U_(mfH) were used to quantify the operating range of magnetic stabilization.U_(mbH)-U_(mfH) varied hardly with ρ_(pM) but increased significantly with decreasing ρ_(pM).(U_(mbH)-U_(mfH))/U_(mfH)increased as d_(pM) or ρ_(pM) decreased.lt was more difficult for the nonmagnetizable particles to escape fromthe network formed by the smaller/lighter magnetizable particles.For the same magnitude of change,dp had a stronger effect than ρ_(pM) on(U_(mbH)-U_(mfH))/U_(mfH).Neither U_(mbH)-U_(mfH) nor(U_(mbH)-U_(mfH):)/Uma variedmonotonously with the minimum fluidization velocity of the magnetizable particles,indicating that nostraightforward criterion for matching the magnetizable particles to the given nonmagnetizable particlescould be established based on their minimum fluidization velocities to maximize the operating range ofmagnetic stabilization.展开更多
基金This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.21808232).
文摘The magnetic stabilization flow regime could also be created forGeldart-Bnonmagnetizable particles pro-vided some magnetizable particles are introduced and the magnetic field is applied.This study aimed toexplore the size(d_(pM))and density(ρ_(pM))effects of magnetizable particles on its operating range.The upperlimit(Umb;)could not be determined from the △P_(b)-U_(g)↓curve but could from analyzing the variation of △P_(b)-fluctuation with increasing U_(g).Due to the variation of U_(mfH)(lower limit)with d_(pM) and ppw,both U_(mbH)-U_(mfH) and(U_(mbH)-U_(mfH))/U_(mfH) were used to quantify the operating range of magnetic stabilization.U_(mbH)-U_(mfH) varied hardly with ρ_(pM) but increased significantly with decreasing ρ_(pM).(U_(mbH)-U_(mfH))/U_(mfH)increased as d_(pM) or ρ_(pM) decreased.lt was more difficult for the nonmagnetizable particles to escape fromthe network formed by the smaller/lighter magnetizable particles.For the same magnitude of change,dp had a stronger effect than ρ_(pM) on(U_(mbH)-U_(mfH))/U_(mfH).Neither U_(mbH)-U_(mfH) nor(U_(mbH)-U_(mfH):)/Uma variedmonotonously with the minimum fluidization velocity of the magnetizable particles,indicating that nostraightforward criterion for matching the magnetizable particles to the given nonmagnetizable particlescould be established based on their minimum fluidization velocities to maximize the operating range ofmagnetic stabilization.
