针对复杂装备体系(Complex Equipment System-of-systems,CES)优化设计中指标变量多、仿真依赖性强、易陷入局部最优的问题,提出一种基于正向解析式和多目标博弈理论(Multi-Objective Game Theory,MOGT)优化算法的CES优化设计方法。为提...针对复杂装备体系(Complex Equipment System-of-systems,CES)优化设计中指标变量多、仿真依赖性强、易陷入局部最优的问题,提出一种基于正向解析式和多目标博弈理论(Multi-Objective Game Theory,MOGT)优化算法的CES优化设计方法。为提升CES优化设计的可解释性,构建任务级—能力级—装备级的评估指标体系;在此基础上,基于装备机理和效用函数表征装备评估指标与作战能力之间的正向映射关系,并利用相邻优属度熵权法计算各指标权重;通过正向解析式与约束条件建立多目标优化模型,并采用MOGT优化算法获得最佳优化结果。以某作战推演平台中防空攻防想定为例,开展算例评估与验证分析。研究结果表明,该方法能够实现CES中最优设计方案的求解,可显著提高设计效率和降低设计成本,为下一代装备发展论证、设计评估和作战试验提供了基础性工作。展开更多
In the mid-19th century, out of their dissatisfaction with the neglect of the economic theories about other countries’ experiences in the British classic economics, the economists in the German Historical School wo...In the mid-19th century, out of their dissatisfaction with the neglect of the economic theories about other countries’ experiences in the British classic economics, the economists in the German Historical School worked hard to construct an economic theory that was congruent to the developmental stage in their own country’s culture and history. Their deeply-cherished concern about the reality in a transitional era when Germany was approaching modernization drove them to propose that the living condition of the working class be improved by the power of the state. In the late 80’s of the same century, the Methodenstreit of German Historical School versus the Austrian School broke out, after which the mainstream economics was well on its way in terms of theoretical refinement and scrutiny, whereas the influence from the Historical School gradually subsided. Even so, the lessons from the Historical School are still enlightening to research in contemporary social sciences. This paper describes the unique basics in the theory building of the Historical School; explains the background and meaning of its academic origin, research methodology, and the Methodenstreit; and from there, discusses implications for contemporary social sciences.展开更多
文摘针对复杂装备体系(Complex Equipment System-of-systems,CES)优化设计中指标变量多、仿真依赖性强、易陷入局部最优的问题,提出一种基于正向解析式和多目标博弈理论(Multi-Objective Game Theory,MOGT)优化算法的CES优化设计方法。为提升CES优化设计的可解释性,构建任务级—能力级—装备级的评估指标体系;在此基础上,基于装备机理和效用函数表征装备评估指标与作战能力之间的正向映射关系,并利用相邻优属度熵权法计算各指标权重;通过正向解析式与约束条件建立多目标优化模型,并采用MOGT优化算法获得最佳优化结果。以某作战推演平台中防空攻防想定为例,开展算例评估与验证分析。研究结果表明,该方法能够实现CES中最优设计方案的求解,可显著提高设计效率和降低设计成本,为下一代装备发展论证、设计评估和作战试验提供了基础性工作。
文摘In the mid-19th century, out of their dissatisfaction with the neglect of the economic theories about other countries’ experiences in the British classic economics, the economists in the German Historical School worked hard to construct an economic theory that was congruent to the developmental stage in their own country’s culture and history. Their deeply-cherished concern about the reality in a transitional era when Germany was approaching modernization drove them to propose that the living condition of the working class be improved by the power of the state. In the late 80’s of the same century, the Methodenstreit of German Historical School versus the Austrian School broke out, after which the mainstream economics was well on its way in terms of theoretical refinement and scrutiny, whereas the influence from the Historical School gradually subsided. Even so, the lessons from the Historical School are still enlightening to research in contemporary social sciences. This paper describes the unique basics in the theory building of the Historical School; explains the background and meaning of its academic origin, research methodology, and the Methodenstreit; and from there, discusses implications for contemporary social sciences.
