Xi Jinping’s Analysis of “A Common Future for Humanity”:Its Relation to Marx’s Das Kapital

President Xi Jinping’s analysis of “a common future for humanity” is one of the most important and original features of China’s foreign policy and of “Xi Jinping’s Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era”.This concept is comprehensible not only in classical Chinese but in Western philosophical thought.Therefore,it is a creative development of Marxism whose accurate relation to economic reality,provides an exceptionally firm basis for China’s foreign policy and that of other countries.

For a Legal Guarantee to Improve People’s Livelihood and Protect Human Rights——Thoughts on policy concerning Social Insurance Law (draft)

The People＇s Republic of China Social Insurance Law （draft） has undergone three readings at the Standing Committee of the National People＇s Congress. The Law, once promulgated, will be of great significance to implementation of the constitutional principle of ＂respecting and protecting human rights.＂ It will help regulate the various social insurance relationships and the rights and obligations of the parties involved.

Thoughts on the Issue of China's Human Rights

Overview of Some Basic Issues of China It is important to note China＇s human rights enlightenment dating back to the 1970s is not the product of external driving forces as some scholars believe.

Marx's Agricultural Intensive Management Thought and Its Guiding Significance

Through analyzing Marx's agricultural intensive management thought,this paper points out that the existence and development of agricultural management mode experience historical course and the development of agricultural intensification depends on many objective conditions.On the basis of this,it discusses the guiding significance of Marx's agricultural intensive management thought to China's agricultural development.It is required to fully realize basic current situations of China's agriculture,widely popularize agricultural mechanization and electrification,speed up artificial transformation of soil structure,promote chemical application of agriculture,make rational use of water resource,and spread improved seeds.

The Mathematical and Physical Theory of Rational Human Intelligence: Complete Empirical-Digital Properties;Full Electrochemical-Mechanical Model (Part I: Mathematical Foundations)

The design of this paper is to present the first installment of a complete and final theory of rational human intelligence. The theory is mathematical in the strictest possible sense. The mathematics involved is strictly digital—not quantitative in the manner that what is usually thought of as mathematics is quantitative. It is anticipated at this time that the exclusively digital nature of rational human intelligence exhibits four flavors of digitality, apparently no more, and that each flavor will require a lengthy study in its own right. (For more information,please refer to the PDF.)

The Physical Laws and Mathematical Axioms of the Brain’s OS and the Traditional Fundamental Laws of Thought of Logic and Philosophy

This article presents four (4) additions to a book on the brain’s OS published by SciRP in 2015 [1]. It is a kind of appendix to the book. Some familiarity with the earlier book is presupposed. The book itself proposes a complete physical and mathematical blueprint of the brain’s OS. A first addition to the book (see Chapters 5 to 10 below) concerns the relation between the afore-mentioned blueprint and the more than 2000-year-old so-called fundamental laws of thought of logic and philosophy, which came to be viewed as being three (3) in number, namely the laws of 1) Identity, 2) Contradiction, and 3) the Excluded Middle. The blueprint and the laws cannot both be the final foundation of the brain’s OS. The design of the present paper is to interpret the laws in strictly mathematical terms in light of the blueprint. This addition constitutes the bulk of the present article. Chapters 5 to 8 set the stage. Chapters 9 and 10 present a detailed mathematical analysis of the laws. A second addition to the book (Chapter 11) concerns the distinction between the laws and the axioms of the brain’s OS. Laws are part of physics. Axioms are part of mathematics. Since the theory of the brain’s OS involves both physics and mathematics, it exhibits both laws and axioms. A third addition (Chapter 12) to the book involves an additional flavor of digitality in the brain’s OS. In the book, there are five (5). But brain chemistry requires a sixth. It will be called Existence Digitality. A fourth addition (Chapter 13) concerns reflections on the role of imagination in theories of physics in light of the ignorance of deeper causes. Chapters 1 to 4 present preliminary matter, for the most part a brief survey of general concepts derived from what is in the book [1]. Some historical notes are gathered at the end in Chapter 14.

马克思共同体思想视域下中国式现代化的理论创新与实践创造

马克思共同体思想从历史溯源、现实批判与未来构想三个层面揭示了社会形态演进的趋势和人类社会发展的一般规律,也蕴含着极为重要的现代化发展理念。从“自然形成的共同体”到“虚幻的共同体”再到“真正的共同体”,体现了现代化的出场、发展和超越逻辑。中国式现代化是中国共产党人对马克思共同体思想视域下现代化理论继承性运用、创造性转化、创新性发展的结果,体现了现代化一般与现代化特殊的辩证统一,既是对世界现代化理论的丰富创新也是对现代化新道路的伟大创造。

马克思人学理论视域下以人民为中心的发展思想探究

以人民为中心的发展思想立足于中国共产党革命、建设和改革开放的百年奋斗历程,汲取了马克思人学理论中的思想精华,在社会主义现代化的生动实践中不断发展。其中“现实的人”构成了以人民为中心的发展思想的逻辑起点,“人的价值”彰显了以人民为中心的发展思想的价值意蕴,“人的发展”表明了以人民为中心的发展思想的目标指向。在马克思人学理论视域下深入探究以人民为中心的发展思想的深刻内涵,有助于揭示百年大党永葆青春活力的内在根源,在推进中国式现代化进程中凝聚起团结奋斗的人民力量。

试论马克思《1844年经济学哲学手稿》的STS思想

建设有中国特色的STS学派,需要深入研究马克思主义经典著作中的STS思想。《1844年经济学哲学手稿》是马克思批判资本主义早期工业社会的经典著作,包含着丰富的STS思想。在资本主义社会,科学技术不仅是福同时也是祸;在科学技术与社会的互动中必须包含自然;科学技术的进步是人的本质确证;建立起关于人的科学以实现科技与人文的统一。总体而言,马克思是结合人的全面发展来考察科学技术与社会的互动,这对于中国STS学派建设具有重要的指导意义。

Higher Variations of the Monty Hall Problem (3.0, 4.0) and Empirical Definition of the Phenomenon of Mathematics, in Boole’s Footsteps, as Something the Brain Does

In Advances in Pure Mathematics (www.scirp.org/journal/apm), Vol. 1, No. 4 (July 2011), pp. 136-154, the mathematical structure of the much discussed problem of probability known as the Monty Hall problem was mapped in detail. It is styled here as Monty Hall 1.0. The proposed analysis was then generalized to related cases involving any number of doors (d), cars (c), and opened doors (o) (Monty Hall 2.0) and 1 specific case involving more than 1 picked door (p) (Monty Hall 3.0). In cognitive terms, this analysis was interpreted in function of the presumed digital nature of rational thought and language. In the present paper, Monty Hall 1.0 and 2.0 are briefly reviewed (§§2-3). Additional generalizations of the problem are then presented in §§4-7. They concern expansions of the problem to the following items: (1) to any number of picked doors, with p denoting the number of doors initially picked and q the number of doors picked when switching doors after doors have been opened to reveal goats (Monty Hall 3.0;see §4);(3) to the precise conditions under which one’s chances increase or decrease in instances of Monty Hall 3.0 (Monty Hall 3.2;see §6);and (4) to any number of switches of doors (s) (Monty Hall 4.0;see §7). The afore-mentioned article in APM, Vol. 1, No. 4 may serve as a useful introduction to the analysis of the higher variations of the Monty Hall problem offered in the present article. The body of the article is by Leo Depuydt. An appendix by Richard D. Gill (see §8) provides additional context by building a bridge to modern probability theory in its conventional notation and by pointing to the benefits of certain interesting and relevant tools of computation now available on the Internet. The cognitive component of the earlier investigation is extended in §9 by reflections on the foundations of mathematics. It will be proposed, in the footsteps of George Boole, that the phenomenon of mathematics needs to be defined in empirical terms as something that happens to the brain or something that the brain does. It is generally assumed that mathematics is a property of nature or reality or whatever one may call it. There is not the slightest intention in this paper to falsify this assumption because it cannot be falsified, just as it cannot be empirically or positively proven. But there is no way that this assumption can be a factual observation. It can be no more than an altogether reasonable, yet fully secondary, inference derived mainly from the fact that mathematics appears to work, even if some may deem the fact of this match to constitute proof. On the deepest empirical level, mathematics can only be directly observed and therefore directly analyzed as an activity of the brain. The study of mathematics therefore becomes an essential part of the study of cognition and human intelligence. The reflections on mathematics as a phenomenon offered in the present article will serve as a prelude to planned articles on how to redefine the foundations of probability as one type of mathematics in cognitive fashion and on how exactly Boole’s theory of probability subsumes, supersedes, and completes classical probability theory. §§2-7 combined, on the one hand, and §9, on the other hand, are both self-sufficient units and can be read independently from one another. The ultimate design of the larger project of which this paper is part remains the increase of digitalization of the analysis of rational thought and language, that is, of (rational, not emotional) human intelligence. To reach out to other disciplines, an effort is made to describe the mathematics more explicitly than is usual.

Special event:’Tracing Marx’s Thoughts’

The year 2018 marks the 200th anniversary of Karl Marx’s birth,the 170th anniversary of the publishing of the Communist Manifesto and the40th anniversary of China’s reform and opening-up drive.It also marks the beginning of a new era after the 19th National Congress of Communist Party of China.

从“天国”到“尘世”:马克思在《德法年鉴》时期的思想跃迁

《德法年鉴》时期作为青年马克思思想转变的关键时期,是其理论视野逐渐从“天国”到“尘世”、触碰人的解放的重要节点。沿着文本的印迹,可以看到:马克思以宗教批判的武器穿透“天国”的迷雾,摆脱了宗教世界;面对德国历史运动的局限和政治解放的内在限度,马克思以政治批判的武器跨越了政治国家;面对市民社会原则的化身和人的异己本质的流露,马克思“沉入”市民社会,抓住了当代问题的根源;在探索人的解放的过程中,马克思找到了人的解放的领导力量和普遍路径。马克思在研究视角从宗教世界、政治国家、市民社会到人的解放的不断转换中,走向现实。

马克思生态思想的主要内容及当代价值

生态是人与环境之间的系统关系。资本主义破坏了生态环境,导致了全球性生态问题,威胁着人类的生存。马克思生态思想形成于工业革命的时代,经历了萌芽、形成和成熟等阶段,关注了资本主义生态问题,分析了生态危机的制度根源,探索了解决生态危机的路径,要求从实践把握人与自然的关系。人与自然有着天然联系,资本主义导致了人与自然的对立,让人类不断向自然索取,提高了生产力,也破坏了生态平衡。马克思生态思想具有预见性和前瞻性、整体性和系统性、可持续性和实践性,能指导我国生态文明建设,建立美丽中国,实现可持续发展。

石油师现象对新时代人力资源管理的启示——基于马克思人力资源理论的视角

石油师队伍为我国油田的开发、建设做出了不可磨灭的贡献,成为祖国石油工业的脊梁,推动工业经济稳定发展。深入挖掘石油师的人力资源管理经验,并对其中的内容加以整合分析,这对进一步发展马克思人力资源理论具有重大意义,对于正确认识和把握现代人力资源相关理论,促进人力资源的有效开发与科学管理,具有重要的理论价值与实践导向。

马克思正义思想形成、转变、成熟的逻辑理路——从《青年在选择职业时的考虑》到《哥达纲领批判》

马克思正义思想是在批判资本主义形式正义的过程中孕育的,经过了形成、转变到成熟。从“现实的个人”的实践出发到“每个人自由全面”的解放,马克思自始至终关注的是个人自由平等、自我实现发展和全人类解放,其世界观和方法论围绕着全人类何以可能在未来理想社会中能够实现自由而全面的发展这一正义目标而确立。

基于马克思人本思想的人工智能审视

当前,人工智能是一种正在深刻改变世界、影响人类命运同时又不断迭代出新的发明成果的颠覆性技术,解构和重塑着现代人的生产生活。在智能时代的背景下,人的发展本质上是物质世界的人化发展,马克思人本思想为探讨人工智能“何以可能”与“可以何为”等问题提供了理论钥匙。人工智能以满足人的美好需要、增加人的自由时间和促进人的劳动复归等现实作用促进了人的自由全面发展,呼应了科学技术升级迭代的价值回归,但因其而衍生的“换人”问题、伦理问题和异化问题也需要人们高度重视、全面审视。只有这样,才能形成人工智能的社会主义应用,避免人工智能陷入资本逻辑支配之窠臼,从而提高社会生产力。

马克思反贫困思想及其对后脱贫时代贫困治理的现实启示

马克思反贫困思想形成的不同历史阶段体现着马克思历史活动的不同主题,萌芽时期表现为对人民贫苦的现实关注、初步形成时期包含着对人的解放问题的不懈探索、成熟时期显示出对政治经济学批判的不断深入。马克思反贫困思想体系的基本内容包括无产阶级贫困的实质、根源,解决贫困问题的必要前提、根本途径、最终目标,它是一个逻辑严密、内涵丰富的整体。马克思反贫困思想是中国特色反贫困理论的重要思想来源,启示我们在后脱贫时代的贫困治理中必须始终坚持以人民为中心的根本价值立场、充分彰显中国特色社会主义制度优势以解放和发展生产力、在全面推进中国式农业农村现代化建设中实现共同富裕。

马克思主义中国化思想发展轨迹及其阶段特征探论

马克思主义在中国早期传播虽没形成真正意义上的马克思主义中国化,但为马克思主义中国化思想得以孕育提供了必要前提;十月革命后的两年间成为了马克思主义中国化思想的孕育期,为马克思主义中国化思想的萌发奠定了现实基础;此后,马克思主义中国化思想大致经历了萌发期、攀升期、形成期、巩固期、推进期、奋进期、曲折期、挫折期、徘徊期、开拓期、丰富期、发展期等12个阶段。从孕育期到发展期的各个阶段分别呈现了自然、应然、使然、必然、阶进、骤进、升进、冒进、负进、求实、夯实、盈实、务实的显著特征,总体上是随着时代变迁和实践转换演绎了一个波浪式前进、螺旋式上升的大轨迹。

确立“人的发展经济学”的马克思主义理论基础——马克思人本思想、人本主义中国解读及人本经济学的质疑与分析

"人的发展经济学"作为政治经济学的一个分支学科,具有重要的理论意义和实践意义。当前,"人的发展经济学",无论国内还是国外,其理论基础尚有待确立。当务之急,是把人的发展问题建立在马克思主义的历史唯物主义理论基础上,建立在马克思主义关于人的本质规定和发展的理论基础上。马克思关于人的全面而自由发展理论,在国内外学术界,一直是一个议论颇多的领域。本文拟对近期理论界有关马克思人本思想、人本主义及其中国解读、人本经济学的提法和内容进行分析。

论马克思的人本理想与休闲教育目标

我们对休闲教育目标的理解应该以马克思的人学思想为理论原点。马克思的人本理论与历史上的人本理论最大的区别在于揭示出人的社会本质。马克思的休闲思想中蕴涵着深刻的人本内涵,凸现了人本理想。休闲教育的根本目的就是使人“成为人”,实现人的自由全面发展。