Discussion on the Logical Coordination between Legal Theory and Legal Practice——from the Perspective of the Legal Basis of NPC5s Discussion and Decisiomaking Power on Major Issues

The decision of local people's congresses to discuss major issues is a basic right granted to local people's congresses by the Chinese Constitution and laws.However,in practice,the implementation of the power of deliberation of major issues by local people's congresses is worrying.By applying the theory of Chinese traditionalism and unity in the theory of law,the theory of"sovereignty in the people"in the social contract theory of Western natural law school,Austin's"legal command theory55 in Western positivist law and Hart's"recognition""Rules theory"to argue that the integrity of rights necessarily involves the dual factors of decision-making and execution.At the same time,the existence and operation of the law always reflects the development of the political system.The realistic political situation requires us to make more precise and meticulous refinement of the external form and specific technical links of the legal system,and to coordinate the rules to make up the legal theory and Conflicts and conflicts in legal practice help to reform social institutions.

Strengthening Research on the Basic Legal Theory and Adapting Marxist Jurisprudence to the Chinese Context and the Needs of the Times

Innovative development of the legal theory research system requires strengthening research on the basic theory of law. Promoting research on the basic principles of Marxist jurisprudence is the fundamental premise for adapting Marxism to the Chinese context and the needs of the times. XI Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law is the fundamental criterion for the innovative development of the basic theory of law of contemporary China in the new era, and the adaptation of Marxism to the Chinese context and the needs of the times is the essential requirement for the innovative breakthrough of the basic theory of law of contemporary China.

On the Quadruple Qualities of Marxist Thought on Human Rights

Marxist human rights thought has realized an epochmaking change in human rights thought and has distinguished itself from capitalist human rights thought with its distinctive character.Marxist human rights thought has a humanistic character,starts from human nature and its essence,regards human rights as an important means to realize the all-round development of human beings and the fundamental proof of human liberation.Marxist human rights thought is characterized by being people-centered,and expresses the desire of the masses,with the proletariat as the main body,to realize a better life through the guarantee of human rights.Marxist human rights thought has a practical character,is based on practical materialism,advocates that human rights are derived from the social practice and promotes social practice toward civilization and progress.Marxist human rights thought has the character of rule of law,guides legal governance to the rule of good law,and lays the guarantee fot human rights on the foundation of substantive rule of law.

A Programmatic Document for Strengthening Legal Education and Legal Theory Research in the New Era: Interpretation of the Opinions on Strengthening Legal Education and Legal Theory Research in the New Era

The release of the Opinions on Strengthening Legal Education and Legal Theory Research in the New Era(hereinafter referred to as the“Opinions”)is a milestone in the history of legal education since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949.Standing at a new historical starting point for exercising law-based governance on all fronts and advancing the rule of law in China,this document outlines new development goals for legal education and legal theory research in the new era from both short-term and long-term perspectives.It adheres to the guidance of XI Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era,and puts forward the principles of upholding and strengthening the overall leadership under the Communist Party of China,adhering to the scientific guidance of XI Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law,accomplishing the core task of economic development and serving the overall interests of the country,fostering virtue through education and cultivating talent with both moral quality and legal literacy,following the objective law,and integrating the underlying tenets of Marxism with China’s realities and the fine traditional Chinese culture,thus establishing the principles for the new development of legal education and legal theory research in the new era.It proposes to strengthen top-level design and strategic arrangements,promote the reform and improvement of the law school system,accelerate the improvement of the legal education system,and innovatively develop the legal theory research system.Therefore,a new development landscape for legal education and legal theory research in the new era has been established.The Opinions clearly stipulates the leadership system,management system,and coordination mechanism for legal education and legal theory research,and creates a new development system for legal education and legal theory research in the new era.

On the Establishment of Chinese Self-Independent Knowledge System of Legal Science

Constructing the Chinese self-independent knowledge system of legal science is a great project to adapt Marxist legal science to the Chinese context and the needs of our times in the new era, a profound revolution in the field of legal science, a precursor and foundation for constructing a system of legal science with Chinese characteristics, an urgent need to train high-quality legal talents with both virtues and talents, and an inevitable requirement for promoting the Chinese path to the modernization of the rule of law. To carry out such a systematic project, it is imperative to focus on the seven basic principles and scientific methods that include adhering to the ideological guidance of XI Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law. The theory of the system of socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics, which is the cornerstone for the development of the Chinese self-independent knowledge system of legal science, has provided a necessary and much-needed theoretical paradigm for the development of the Chinese self independent knowledge system of legal science, has led to the innovative development of legal theory with Chinese characteristics in the new era, and will continue to do it.

中国特色社会主义市场经济法治理论的理论根源、演进脉络与经验启示

改革开放以来,中国共产党人坚持以马克思主义理论为指导,立足改革开放和社会主义现代化建设新时期、新时代中国特色社会主义经济发展状况和法治建设实践,领导市场经济法治建设经历了十一届三中全会以后的创立阶段、十三届四中全会以后的发展阶段、十六大以后的完善阶段和十八大以来的新发展阶段,在不同发展阶段的具体实际之下丰富和发展了马克思主义法治理论关于法治对经济基础的保障功能和经济基础对作为上层建筑的法治的推动作用的理论论断,对新时代法治经济建设具有重要的理论价值和实践意义。

中国式法治现代化理论在高校思政教育中的融入策略探析

在中国特色社会主义建设的伟大实践中,我国逐渐形成了具有中国特色的法治现代化理论。这一理论不仅为我国法治建设提供行动指南,也为高校思政教育提供了丰富的教学资源。高校作为培养社会主义建设者和接班人的重要阵地,应积极探索将中国式法治现代化理论融入思政教育的有效途径,以提升学生的法治素养,培养具备法治意识的新时代青年。为此,应对中国式法治现代化理论与高校思政教育现状以及中国式法治现代化理论融入高校思政教育的必要性展开研究,总结中国式法治现代化理论在高校思政教育中的融入策略,不断提高高校法治教育质量,努力培养具备高度法治素养的新时代大学生。

圣王之治:商鞅的法治论及其内在逻辑

《商君书》提出了理想政治统治的法家模式,其中包含一套相对完整的古典法治论:以圣王为起点,导向君主集权制的圣王法治。在“君-官-民”三方法治结构中,法既治民又治官,也抑制君主私人意志。商鞅法治论以最低限度的道德为底线,反对礼治、德治,但并不反对德性之治。商鞅贵势审数,以重刑主义、连坐思维、奖励告奸等措施严密法制,以信赏必罚树立公信,试图以强势的可操控性实现无为之治。商鞅法治论未能从根本上实现君主无为的制度化,也就无法从制度上保证法治的可持续性。

思想道德与法治课程精准教学探析

思想政治理论课实施精准教学是落实立德树人根本任务,帮助高职院校学生树立正确的世界观、人生观和价值观,培养德、智、体、美、劳全面发展的社会主义的建设者和接班人的客观现实需要。在遵循教育教学规律、学生成长规律和认知规律基础上从实施对象、教学内容、教学方法、教学评价和反馈等方面实施精准教学,提高教学的针对性、实效性、吸引力和感染力,能够有效达到预期教学目标,落实立德树人根本任务,为学生成人成才打下坚实的基础。

习近平生态文明法治理论的基础命题:环境与经济协同发展

习近平生态文明法治理论的基础命题是环境与经济协同发展。习近平生态文明法治理论将生态环境保护的地位提升至前所未有的高度,目的并不是为了使生态环境保护在整体上处于优先经济发展的地位,而是为了补齐生态环境保护相对于经济发展而言所存在的短板。环境与经济协同发展也是习近平生态文明法治理论的逻辑主线,体现在习近平生态文明法治理论的主要内容之中,它将习近平生态文明法治理论的各个部分融贯成一个体系。习近平生态文明法治理论不仅从各个方面全面论述和揭示了环境与经济协同发展的深刻道理,而且为环境与经济协同发展的实现提供了完备的方法论指导和保障,引领并推动人与自然和谐之中国式现代化建设更快更好地开展。

涉外法治人才培养策略的辩证思考

加快涉外法治人才培养是新时代法学教育的使命和责任。华东政法大学牵头成立上海高校涉外法治人才培养教育联盟,坚持“破”与“立”相统一,探索打破学科专业壁垒,创新人才培养方案;探索打破高校与社会的壁垒,推进法学教育与法治实践融合;探索打破高校之间的壁垒,搭建开放型涉外法治人才培养平台,构建新时代涉外法治人才培养体系。

中国法学自主知识体系建构中的传统法学理论资源现代转换

中国百余年来的法治国家、法治社会及法治政府建构,始终处在西方现代法学知识的强有力影响之下。伴随着中国法治现代化的深入推进,西方法学强势影响下的法学知识体系在实践解释上逐渐显得捉襟见肘,在概念体系及理论逻辑上也暴露出了明显问题,法学自主知识体系建构遂提上了议事日程。法学自主知识体系建构在理论上固然要妥善处理法治实践与法学知识的辩证关系,立足于中国法治实践,坚持马克思主义认识论的指导;同时也要妥善处理好传统与现代的辩证关系,尤其是涉及法学基本概念体系的提炼,以及法学思维方式及理论架构的优化,宜从中华传统优秀法学理论资源中汲取优质理论资源,通过“第二个结合”,获得法学自主知识体系建构的重大成果。

新文科视域下法律史研究的法学化论纲

作为法学学科体系中一门特征明显的交叉学科,法律史学可成为新文科理论与实践改革的优质素材,新文科理念的融入可有效提高法律史研究的科学性。法律史专业在国内法学院中的边缘化处境,不利于满足党的二十大报告提出的传承和发展中华优秀传统法律文化的要求。法律史研究内容、研究视角、研究方法等要素与法律实践较为脱节;同时,其研究成果的碎片化和表象化等倾向,严重影响法律史研究的科学发展及研究共同体的形成与稳固,也就难以形成能够反映中国风格与气派的学术研究成果,削弱我国法律文化在国际上的竞争力。认识新文科之于法律史研究的总体意义,并以新文科为标尺,检视当下法律史研究存在的不足之处,把新文科作为促进法律史研究法学化的重要抓手,探索其着力发展的具体路径,切实推动具有自主性的中国法律史学科体系和话语体系的形成与发展,无疑具有重要的学科价值。

论新时代特色法治理论的人民性

新时代特色法治理论是马克思主义唯物史观和中华传统法律文化民本思想的凝练升华,植根于新时代中国特色社会主义土壤,始终坚持依靠人民、为了人民和服务人民的政治立场。因此,新时代特色法治理论以人民至上为初心使命,以保障人民权益为根本宗旨,以人的自由全面发展为奋斗目标。新时代特色法治理论人民性的实现路径是:立法贯彻以民为本的思想,执法牢记为人民服务的宗旨,司法坚持人民至上的原则,守法彰显法律面前人人平等的理念。

“中国式法治现代化”的话语阐释

“中国式法治现代化”是习近平法治思想中“法治轨道论”的话语建构,它旨在传达的并不仅是其字面含义,即中国法治(法制)本身的现代化,而是“通过法治实现中国整体的现代化”。同时“中国式法治现代化”话语蕴含着中国法治(法制)本身的现代化。“中国式法治现代化”之“中国”强调,中国法治建设必须从中国基本国情出发,中国式法治现代化的实质就是建构基于中国传统和基本国情的现代法治。“中国式法治现代化”之“式”表明,中国法治现代化是一种不同于西方国家的中国特色的法治现代化,是一种可供发展中国家借鉴和推广的法治现代化典范。“式”的运用,使中国成功逆袭了西方对人类法治发展模式的话语权,增强了中国法治现代化在国内外的接受度、认同感和感召力。

习近平法治思想的马克思主义法学方法论

习近平法治思想是马克思主义中国化的飞跃,其中也包含了深邃的法学方法论,是解决法治领域一切困难与障碍的理论工具。其从马克思主客同一的辩证思维中汲取了法治运行的精准思路;从人民主权的历史唯物主义法学中凝练了法治实践的价值取向;从列宁苏维埃的法制探索中坚定了党对法治的全面领导,为法治道路和法治模式提供了方略,既包含方法层面的辩证思维,也蕴含价值层面的法治原则,还彰显本质层面的法律哲学与政治定力,是新时代中国的马克思主义法学方法论。

中国式法治现代化话语体系的建构逻辑——基于改革开放以来法治理论演进之考察

中国式法治现代化是党领导人民探索中国自主法治道路的伟大实践,中国式法治现代化的独特话语体系在这一历史进程中得以塑造和建构,并通过法治理论予以凝练、总结与表达。法治理论作为法治文明的重要组成部分,对法治实践进行提炼,与法治实践相融共进、深刻互动,不断引领和推动中国式法治现代化实现新的历史跨越。改革开放以来的中国式法治现代化话语体系在“阐释进路、表述立场、规范构造、知识谱系、实践向度”等方面呈现出“从法律体系论到法治体系论、从依法治国论到法治中国论、从国家法理论到党规国法系统论、从西方话语主导到寻求自主表达、从证成法治价值到探索法治实现”的建构逻辑,这是法治理论不断寻求和表达法治“中国性”的必然结果,揭示了中国探索法治现代化新道路的逻辑历程。

财经类高校卓越法治人才教育培养的理论与实践

财经类高校法学教育是我国法治人才培养的重要组成部分,在法治教育体系中发挥重要意义。当前财经类高校法治人才培养取得突出成绩,发展势头良好,但是在德育建设、师资保障和实践教学等过程中存在诸多滞后问题。对此,应当以习近平法治思想为指引,坚持立德树人、德法兼修,加强德育建设,同时创新方式方法,实行多样化师资保障机制,优化教师队伍。此外,注重实践教学,发挥实践第二课堂作用,实现财经类高校法学学科卓越法治人才教育跨越式发展。

习近平法治思想浙江实践对新时代高校法治人才培养的范式意义

习近平总书记指出,人才是衡量综合国力的重要指标。坚持和发展中国特色社会主义的本质要求和重要保障是依法治国。不断开创依法治国新局面,优质高效建设新时代法学“三大体系”离不开人才保障。高等学校肩负培养德法兼修的高素质法治人才的重任,是新时代法治人才培养的第一阵地。加强法治人才培养需要从实践中汲取养分。习近平法治思想的浙江实践,对于新文科建设背景下法治人才培养具有重大范式意义。归纳习近平法治思想浙江实践的范式意义,能够在理论和实践上指引价值认同形塑、法学知识传授、法治思维养成和司法能力训练的法治人才培养全过程。新时代法治人才培养要以人民性塑造新时代法治人才的价值认同,以系统性构建新时代法治人才的知识体系,以规范性训练新时代法治人才的法治思维,以创新性提升新时代法治人才的司法能力。

习近平法治思想的多维根脉、世界意义与实践要求

习近平法治思想的原创性成果丰富,是新时代法治建设最重要的标志性成果,在中国特色社会主义法治理论发展史上具有重要意义。准确把握习近平法治思想在理论、文化、实践方面的根脉,有助于我们深刻认识习近平法治思想的理论特质、民族特色、时代特征。习近平法治思想与资本主义法治理论存在本质区别,在全球化背景下具有规律上的共识性、理论上的先进性、方法上的可借鉴性。立足新时代新征程,要把牢贯彻落实习近平法治思想的实践要求,以其磅礴的真理力量有力推进我国法治建设事业。