The aim of this study was to assess the hygienic properties of swabs taken from the arm and coat of workers, work surfaces, refrigerated display cases, trays and packaging materials. As well as the safe properties of ...The aim of this study was to assess the hygienic properties of swabs taken from the arm and coat of workers, work surfaces, refrigerated display cases, trays and packaging materials. As well as the safe properties of samples of fresh chicken meat (wing, drumstick, chest) and chicken internal organs (heart and liver) from two butcheries. One of the goals was to determine whether education on hygienic conditions was carried out, influenced the hygienic condition of swabs and safety samples of fresh chicken meat offal. The results of the analysis showed that on the first day of sampling, the largest number of <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">aerobic</span></i><span> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">mesophilic</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">bacteria</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> were found in the swabs of the arm (butcher A-8.15 × 10</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CFU/ml), butcher (B-17.88 × 10</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CFU/ml) and the smallest in the packaging material (0.03 × 10</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CFU/ml). Comparing the results of the first and thirtieth sampling day was </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">a </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">visible decreas</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">e</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> in the number of </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">aerobic</span></i><span> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">mesophilic</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">bacteria</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Enterobacteriaceae</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> for all examined swabs from both butchers. In the samples of fresh chicken meat, the number of </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">aerobic</span></i><span> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">mesophilic</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">bacteria</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> during the first sampling was the highest in the drumstick samples (4.75 × 10</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CFU/ml) slightly less in the samples of the wing (3.78 × 10</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CFU/ml) in the butcher A, in </span></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">same time in the butcher B was 3.82 × 10</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CFU/ml. Microbiological analyzes samples of </span></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">thirtieth day showed that </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Escherichia</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>coli</i> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">has been found in both butchers in drumsticks A-0.8 CFU/ml, B butcher 0.4 CFU/ml. and offal butcher A 0.6 CFU/ml, butcher B 0.7 CFU/ml, but less than </span></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span></span></span><span><span><span>first day. It is important to say that education of workers in butcher shops has shown that it can improve good hygiene practices in butcher shops and safety of fresh chicken meat. Education in Good Hygiene Practice has positive impact on safety of fresh chicken meat in examined butcheries.</span></span></span>展开更多
文摘The aim of this study was to assess the hygienic properties of swabs taken from the arm and coat of workers, work surfaces, refrigerated display cases, trays and packaging materials. As well as the safe properties of samples of fresh chicken meat (wing, drumstick, chest) and chicken internal organs (heart and liver) from two butcheries. One of the goals was to determine whether education on hygienic conditions was carried out, influenced the hygienic condition of swabs and safety samples of fresh chicken meat offal. The results of the analysis showed that on the first day of sampling, the largest number of <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">aerobic</span></i><span> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">mesophilic</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">bacteria</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> were found in the swabs of the arm (butcher A-8.15 × 10</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CFU/ml), butcher (B-17.88 × 10</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CFU/ml) and the smallest in the packaging material (0.03 × 10</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CFU/ml). Comparing the results of the first and thirtieth sampling day was </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">a </span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">visible decreas</span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">e</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> in the number of </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">aerobic</span></i><span> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">mesophilic</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">bacteria</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Enterobacteriaceae</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> for all examined swabs from both butchers. In the samples of fresh chicken meat, the number of </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">aerobic</span></i><span> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">mesophilic</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">bacteria</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> during the first sampling was the highest in the drumstick samples (4.75 × 10</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CFU/ml) slightly less in the samples of the wing (3.78 × 10</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CFU/ml) in the butcher A, in </span></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">same time in the butcher B was 3.82 × 10</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> CFU/ml. Microbiological analyzes samples of </span></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">thirtieth day showed that </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Escherichia</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>coli</i> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">has been found in both butchers in drumsticks A-0.8 CFU/ml, B butcher 0.4 CFU/ml. and offal butcher A 0.6 CFU/ml, butcher B 0.7 CFU/ml, but less than </span></span></span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span></span></span><span><span><span>first day. It is important to say that education of workers in butcher shops has shown that it can improve good hygiene practices in butcher shops and safety of fresh chicken meat. Education in Good Hygiene Practice has positive impact on safety of fresh chicken meat in examined butcheries.</span></span></span>