Comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and open discectomy for single-segment lumbar disc herniation

BACKGROUND Lumbar disc herniation is a common disease.Endoscopic treatment may have more advantages than traditional surgery.AIM To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of microendoscopic discectomy(MED)and open discectomy with lamina nucleus enucleation in the treatment of singlesegment lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.METHODS Ninety-six patients who were operated at our hospital were selected for this study.Patients with single-segment lumbar disc herniation were admitted to the hospital from March 2018 to March 2019 and were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group with 48 cases in each group.The former group underwent lumbar discectomy and the latter underwent laparotomy and nucleus pulpectomy.Surgical effects were compared between the two groups.RESULTS In terms of surgical indicators,the observation group had a longer operation time,shorter postoperative bedtime and hospital stay,less intraoperative blood loss,and smaller incision length than the control group(P<0.05).The excellent recovery rate did not differ significantly between the observation group(93.75%)and the control group(91.67%).Visual analogue scale pain scores were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group at 1 d,3 d,1 mo,and 6 mo after surgery(P<0.05).The incidence of complications was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group(6.25%vs 22.92%,P<0.05).CONCLUSION Both MED and open discectomy can effectively improve single-segment lumbar disc herniation,but MED is associated with less trauma,less bleeding,and a lower incidence of complications.

Double tractors swing microendoscopic discectomy technique for multi-segmental lumbar disc herniation

Objective To evaluate the effect of double tractors swing microendoscopic discectomy technique in multisegmental lumbar disc herniation.Methods From December 2006 to November 2009,153 patients with multisegmental lumbar disc herniation

Microendoscopic discectomy for treatment of lumbar disc herniation

A lumbar microendoscopic discectomy(MED)is a minimally invasive surgical technique performed through a tubular device which is designed for the pain relieve caused by herniated discs pressing the nerve roots.In 1997,a new minimally invasive surgical approach for the management of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation,MED was introduced.This technique uses a tubular retractor system and a microendoscope for visualization rather than the operating microscope.However,recent literature suggests that MED is an effective microendoscopic system which has a fine long-term outcome in treating lumbar disc herniation.This article describes the operative techniques and outcomes reported in the literature for MED.

Comparison of nerve conduction and injury degree in patients with lumbar disc herniation after microendoscopic discectomy and fenestration discectomy

Objective: To study the difference of nerve conduction and injury degree in patients with lumbar disc herniation after microendoscopic discectomy and fenestration discectomy. Methods: Patients with single-segment lumbar disc herniation who were treated in Dazhou Central Hospital between May 2014 and February 2017 were selected as the research subjects, the history data were reviewed and the operation methods were referred to divide them into FD group and MED group who received fenestration discectomy and microendoscopic discectomy respectively. The conduction velocity of common peroneal nerve and tibial nerve were detected before operation and 4 weeks after operation;serum levels of nerve and muscle injury-related molecules as well as inflammation and stress-related molecules were detected before operation and 3 days after operation. Results: MNCV levels of common peroneal nerve and tibial nerve 4 weeks after operation as well as serum CRP, TNF-α, MDA and AOPP contents 3 d after operation of both groups of patients were significantly higher than those before operation, and the MNCV levels of common peroneal nerve and tibial nerve of MED group 4 weeks after operation were significantly higher than those of FD group while serum CRP, TNF-α, MDA and AOPP contents of MED group 3 d after operation were not significantly different from those of FD group;serum NSE, S100B, Tau, pNF-H, CPK, Myo and LDH contents of FD patients 3 d after operation were significantly higher than those before operation while serum NSE, S100B, Tau, pNF-H, CPK, Myo and LDH contents of MED group were not significantly different from those before operation. Conclusion: Microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation can relieve the nerve and muscle injury, and is equivalent to fenestration discectomy in activating the systemic stress and inflammatory response.

Two-level percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for highly migrated upper lumbar disc herniation: A case report

BACKGROUND The technique of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy(PELD)as a transforaminal approach has been used to treat highly migrated lower lumbar disc herniations.However,due to the different anatomic characteristics of the upper lumbar spine,conventional transforaminal PELD may fail to remove the highly migrated upper lumbar disc nucleus pulposus.Therefore,the purpose of this study was to describe a novel surgical technique,two-level PELD,for the treatment of highly migrated upper lumbar disc herniations and to report its related clinical outcomes.CASE SUMMARY A 60-year-old male presented with a complaint of pain at his lower back and right lower limb.The patient received 3 mo of conservative treatments but the symptoms were not alleviated.Physical examination revealed a positive femoral nerve stretch test and a negative straight leg raise test for the right leg,and preoperative visual analog scale(VAS)score for the lower back was 6 points and for the right leg was 8 points.Magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)demonstrated L2-L3 disc herniation on the right side and the herniated nucleus pulposus migrated to the upper margin of L2 vertebral body.According to physical examination and imaging findings,surgery was the primary consideration.Therefore,the patient underwent surgical treatment with two-level PELD.The pain symptom was relieved and the VAS score for back and thigh pain was one point postoperatively.The patient was asymptomatic and follow-up MRI scan 1 year after operation revealed no residual nucleus pulposus.CONCLUSION Two-level PELD as a transforaminal approach can be a safe and effective procedure for highly migrated upper lumbar disc herniation.

Spinal surgeons＇ learning curve for lumbar microendoscopic discectomy： a prospective study of our first 50 and latest 10 cases

Background Microendoscopic discectomy （MED） is a minimally invasive operation that allows rapid recovery from surgery for lumbar disc herniation, but has replaced traditional open surgery in few hospitals because most surgeons avoid its long learning curve. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of lumbar MED at stages of spinal surgeons＇ learning curve. Methods Fifty patients receiving MED from June 2002 to February 2003 were divided into chronological groups of ten each： A-E. The control group F was ten MED patients treated later by the same medical team （September-October 2006）. All operations were performed by the same team of spinal surgeons with no MED experience before June 2002. We compared groups by operation time, blood loss, complications and need for open surgery after MED failure. Results Operation times by group were： A, （107±14） minutes; B, （85±13） minutes; C, （55±19） minutes; D, （52±12） minutes; E, （51±13） minutes; and F, （49±15） minutes. Blood loss were： A, （131±73） ml; B, （75±20） ml; C, （48±16） ml; D, （44±17） ml; E, （45±18） ml; and F, （45±16） ml. Both operation time and blood loss in groups C, D, E and F were smaller and more stable compared with groups A and B. Japanese Orthopedic Association assessment （JOA） score of each group in improvement rate immediately and one year after operation were as follows （in percentage）： A, （79.8±8.8）/（89.8±7.7）; B, （78.6±8.5）/（88.5±7.8）; C, （80.8±11.3）/（90.8±6.7）; D, （77.7±11.4）/（88.9±9.3）; E, （84.0±8.7）/（89.6±9.0）; and F, （77.8±11.6）/ （86.9±8.4）. Groups showed no statistical difference in improvement rates. Complications developed in three patients in group A, two in group B, and none in the other groups. Conclusions Spinal surgeons performing MED become proficient after 10-20 operations, when their skill becomes fairly sophisticated. Patients＇ improvement rate is the same regardless of surgeons＇ phase of learning curve.

Ultrasound guidance for transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy may prevent radiation exposure: A case report

BACKGROUND Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy(PELD)has become a mature and mainstream minimally invasive surgical technique for treating lumbar disc herniation(LDH).Repeated fluoroscopy,with more than 30 shots on average,is inevitable to ensure its accuracy and safety.However,exposure to X-rays may pose a threat to human health.We herein report a case of ultrasound(US)-assisted PELD in two levels of LDH to explore a new possibility that can reduce the radiation dose during puncture and cannulation in PELD.CASE SUMMARY A 38-year-old man with low back pain and left leg pain for more than 7 years came to our clinic,his symptoms had aggravated for 1 month,and he was diagnosed with L3-4 and L4-5 disc herniations.He received US-guided PELD with good results:His straight leg elevation increased from 40 to 90 degrees after PELD,and his visual analog scale(VAS)and Oswestry Disability Index scores both significantly decreased immediately and 6 mo after PELD.With the guidance of US,he received only two shots of fluoroscopy(fluoroscopic time:4.4 s;radiation dose:3.98 mGy).To our knowledge,this is the first case of US-guided puncture and cannulation of PELD for LDH at two levels.CONCLUSION US could be used to guide PELD and has the potential to largely reduce radiation than traditional X-ray guidance.

Technique of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy is a minimally invasive surgery with little pain, less blood loss, less hospital stay and the surgery can be done in local anesthesia, which was started during late 20th century. Kambin and Gellmann in 1973 in the United States and Hijikata in Japanin 1977 individually preformed posterolateral percutaneous nucleotomy for the resection of the nucleus pulposus and release of compressed exiting nerve root, which is now spreading through the world and many surgeons are developing their skill but it needs experience and patience for successful outcomes. Along with advanced instruments now the surgery can be performed only giving a small skin incision of 8 - 10 mm and is as effective as the conventional method of surgery and open microdiscectomy surgery for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. In this review, we are explaining the technique of minimally invasive Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy surgery along its advantages and complications which can be encountered while performing this technique.

The Clinical Effect of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy in the Treatment of Low Lumbar Single Segment Disc Herniation

Objective: To observe the clinical effect percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) in the treatment of single lumbar disc herniation. Methods: From August 2017 to June 2019, 42 patients with low lumbar single segment lumbar disc herniation were treated with percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy surgery in our hospital. The operation time, incision size, bleeding volume and hospitalization time were recorded respectively. The patients were evaluated before operation, 1 month and 6 months after operation. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and assessment were used to evaluate the lumbocrural pain. The JOA score and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to evaluate the lumbar function, and the modified macnab score was used to evaluate the clinical effect in the last follow-up. Results: All the 42 patients successfully completed the operation without any other operation. There were no severe complications such as dural injury and nerve root injury. The operation time was (76.98 ± 8.58) min, the incision size was (8.45 ± 1.2) mm, the bleeding volume was (20.14 ± 2.93) ml, and the hospitalization time was (4.55 ± 1.13) d. One month and six months after the operation, the visual analogue scale (VAS), the evaluation of lumbar function (Oswestry) and the disability index (ODI) were significantly improved compared with those before the operation (P Conclusion: The treatment of low lumbar but segmental lumbar disc herniation with percutaneous intervertebral foramen, with small incision, less bleeding and quick recovery, can improve the pain and dysfunction of patients.

Comparison of safety and efficiency of microendoscopic discectomy with automatic nerve retractor and with nerve hook

This study compares the safety and efficiency of two techniques in microendoscopic discectomy(MED)for lumbar disc herniation.The two techniques are MED with automatic nerve retractor and MED with nerve hook which had been widely used for many years.The former involves a newly developed MED device which contains three parts to protect nerve roots during operation.Four hundred and twenty-eight patients underwent MED treatments between October 2010 and September 2015 were recruited and randomized to either intraoperative utilization of automatic nerve retractor(n紏315,group A)or application of nerve hook during surgery(n=113,group B).Operation time and intraoperative bleeding volume were evaluated.Simultaneously,Visual Analogue Scales(VAS)and muscle strength grading were performed preoperatively,and 1,2,3 days,1,2 weeks,3 and 6 months postoperatively.No dramatic difference of pain intensity was observed between the two groups before surgery and 6 months after surgery(P>0.05).The operation time was shorter in group A(30.3061.89 min)than that in group B(59.4163.25 min).Group A(67.83613.14 ml)experienced a significant decrease in the amount of blood loss volume when compared with group B(100.04615.10 ml).There were remarkable differences of VAS score and muscle strength grading after postoperative 1,2,3 days,1,2 weeks and 3 months between both groups(P≤0.05).MED with automatic nerve retractor effectively shortened operation time,decreased the amount of bleeding,down-regulated the incidence of nerve traction injury.

Comparison of pain media and inflammatory factors after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and traditional fenestration operation treatment of protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disc

Objective:To compare the differences in pain mediators and inflammatory factors after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and traditional fenestration operation treatment of protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disc. Methods:80 patients with protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disc treated in our hospital between March 2013 and December 2015 were collected and divided into observation group and control group (n=40) according to randomized parallel contrast. Control group received traditional fenestration operation and observation group received percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy. Before operation and 1 week after operation, fluorescence spectrophotometry was used to determine serum pain medium levels;ELISA was used to determine pro-inflammatory factor and anti-inflammatory factor levels. Results:Before operation, differences in serum pain medium and inflammatory factor levels were not statistically significant between two groups (P>0.05). 1 week after operation, serum pain media norepinephrine (NE), dopamine (DA), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and substance P (SP) levels as well as pro-inflammatory factors interleukin-1β(IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-18 (IL-18) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) levels of observation group were lower than those of control group (P<0.05) while serum anti-inflammatory factors interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin 10 (IL-10), soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor I (sTNF-RI) levels were higher than those of control group (P<0.05). Conclusions:Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy can effectively treat protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disc and is more advantageous in alleviating patients’ perception of pain and reducing inflammation.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy versus Conventional Open Discectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial

Introduction: The majority of series considered the conventional open discectomy as the gold standard for the treatment of lumbar disc prolapse. Despite of the popularity of the lumbar endoscopic discectomy nowadays, many neurosurgeons still prefer conventional open discectomy. Purpose: Our study has been designed to compare between percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and conventional open discectomy;regarding surgical results, complications, clinical and functional outcomes. Patients and Methods: This study is a clinical prospective randomized controlled trial conducted upon 30 patients suffering from prolapsed lumbar disc, from December 2016 to May 2018. Those patients were divided randomly into 2 groups, 15 patients each. One group treated by percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy (PELD) and the other group treated by conventional open discectomy (COD). Operative time, wound size, Intraoperative blood loss, Intraoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, Postoperative complication and the results of visual analogue score (VAS) and modified MacNab’s criteria were assessed. Results: This study included 30 patients (18 males and 12 females). The mean age was about 35 years. Although, there was postoperative improvement of the VAS and MacNab’s criteria in the two groups, there was no statistically significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative VAS of low back pain and radicular pain for the two groups in the follow up period. Conclusion: Both techniques give good results for patients;each technique has some advantages over the other.

LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF FENESTRATED DISCECTOMY FOR LUMBAR DISC

Objective To evaluate the long-term outcomes of fenestrated discectomy for lumbar disc herniation and analyze the correlative influence factors. Methods Eighty-two cases of lumbar disc herniation, from February 1996 to May 1999, were retrospectively studied. All patients were treated with simple fenestrated discectomy. The average follow-up time was 8 years and 7 months (from 7 years to10 years and 3months). There were 13, 38 and 31 cases at L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1 level, respectively. Results The average scales before operation were as following: Japanes Orthopaedics Association (JOA) scale 6.5 (5-9), visual analysis scale (VAS) of low back pain 4.8 (0-8), and VAS of sciatica 7.2 (4-10). At the final follow-up, the above parameters were 13.2 (10-14), 1.8 (0-10) and 1.2 (0-7), respectively. The average increase ratio of JOA scale was 78.8%. The average disc-vertebra height ratio (Mochida method) was 80.2%. At the final follow-up, 7 cases reoccurred disc herniation. The final clinical satisfaction rate was 80% (modified Macnab method).Conclusion With appropriate surgical indications, the successful long-term outcomes could be expected with fenestrated discectomy. Discectomy improves sciatica to a greater extent than low back pain. The occurrence of low back pain is related to intervertebral disc height, segment stability, disc degeneration, and lumbar muscle disability.

Comparison of the pain and inflammatory stress after percutaneous transforaminal endoscope discectomy and open fenestration discectomy

Objective:To study the differences in pain and inflammatory stress after percutaneous transforaminal endoscope discectomy and open fenestration discectomy.Methods: Patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital between January 2013 and January 2017 were selected and randomly divided into two groups: Percutaneous transforaminal endoscope discectomy (PTED) group and control group. Patients in PTED group received percutaneous transforaminal endoscope discectomy, while control group received open fenestration discectomy. Serum levels of pain substances SP, NPY, PGE2 and NGF, inflammatory mediators IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-17 and MMP3 as well as stress response substances Cor, NE, OH-, O2- and MDA of two groups of patients were determined the same day after surgery and 3 days after surgery.Results: The same day after surgery and 3 d after surgery, serum SP, NPY, PGE2, NGF, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-17, MMP3, Cor, NE, OH-, O2- and MDA levels of PTED group were significantly lower than those of control group. Conclusion: Percutaneous transforaminal endoscope discectomy for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation causes less postoperative pain and inflammatory stress than open fenestration discectomy.

Comparison of simple discectomy and instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of lumbar disc herniation combined with Modic endplate changes

Background The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the surgical outcomes of simple discectomy and instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion （iPLIF） in patients with lumbar disc herniation and Modic endplate changes.Our hypothesis was that iPLIF could provide better outcome for patients with refractory lumbar disc herniation and Modic changes （LDH-MC）.Methods Ninety-one patients with single-segment LDH-MC were recruited.All patients experienced low back pain as well as radicular leg pain,and low back pain was more severe than leg pain.Forty-seven patients were treated with discectomy and 44 were treated with iPLIE The outcomes of both low back pain and radicular leg pain using visual analogue scale （VAS） as well as the clinical outcome related to low back pain using Japanese Orthopaedic Association （JOA） score were assessed before and 18 months after surgery,respectively.Results Both low back and leg pain were significantly improved 18 months after simple discectomy and iPLIE Compared to patients undergoing simple discectomy,low back pain was significantly reduced in patients undergoing iPLIE but there was no significant difference in leg pain between two groups.Solid fusion was achieved in all patients who underwent iPLIF.Conclusions In patients with LDH-MC,iPLIF can yield significantly superior outcome on the relief of low back pain compared to simple discectomy.Simple discectomy can relieve radicular leg pain as efficient as iPLIE Accordingly,iPLIF seems to be a reliable treatment for patients with LDH-MC and predominant low back pain.

Surgical Outcome of Fusion in Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation

Background Data: Recurrent lumbar disc herniation means re-herniation of disc on the same site and at the same level where a previous discectomy had been performed: recurrent lumbar disc herniation occurs in 7% to 24% of patient underwent discectomy. Tow mean surgical options after reherniated lumbar disc are revision discectomy alone or revision discectomy with fusion discectomy alone in recurrent lumbar disc herniation may not be an efficient treatment without fusion. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of revision discectomy with fusion in management of recurrent lumbar disc. Study Design: Retrospective study reviewed all patient underwent revision discectomy with fusion, they were 40 patients operated for recurrent lumbar disc from September 2014 to April 2018 in Al-Azhar University Hospital Damietta. Pre- and post-operative data collection and analysis of the outcome were completed based on the “Japanese Orthopedic Association score” (JOAs), and radiographic follow-up. Patients and Methods: 40 patients (30 male and 10 female) underwent revision discectomy with fusion as surgical management for reherniated lumbar disc from September 2014 to April 2018. All patients presented with low back pain and radicular pain with mean duration of 18 months. The patients were investigated by standard plain X-ray CT SCAN and MRI of the lumbar spine. All patients had a discectomy and postero-lateral fusion in revision surgery. These patients followed post operatively clinically for improving pain and neural function, and radiologically for disc removal stability and fusion. Results: The age ranged from 30 to 60 years, mean age was 45 years, male to female ratio 3:1. Follow-up ranged from 18 - 30 months with a mean follow-up 24 months. 30 patients had an excellent outcome, 6 patients had a good outcome, 2 patients had a fair outcome, and 2 patients had a poor outcome. Conclusion: Recurrent lumbar disc herniation occurs in 7% to 24% of patient underwent discectomy. Revision surgery when indicated can be done by various techniques. Revision discectomy with fusion for reherniated lumbar disc is effective and safe with confident results.

Clinical Outcome of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Surgery (PELS) in Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Lumbar disc herniation is a spinal problem seen in both young and old people causing pain in the back with pain and numbness in lower extremity leading to disability limiting daily activities. When conservative treatments are ineffective, then it is treated by surgeries, more recently with minimal invasive percutaneous endoscopic lumbar surgery (PELS). One of the mostly accepted PELS by spinal surgeons is percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy, which can be performed for any age. The main aim of this review was to evaluate clinical outcome and safety based on the Oswestry Disable Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and MacNab criteria and complications of PELS surgery and its advantages in clinical basis.

Early efficacy of endoscopic translaminar and intervertebral foraminal approaches in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

Objective:To investigate the early efficacy of two approaches for lumbar disc herniation under spinal endoscopy.Methods:45 cases of lumbar disc herniation were divided into interlaminar approach(27 cases)and intervertebral foramen approach(18 cases)according to different surgical approaches.Postoperative pain visual analogue scale(VAS)was used.Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)lumbar spine score(JOA)and modified Macnab criteria were used to evaluate the postoperative outcome.Results:(1)VAS score.There is no interaction effect between the access mode and the time factor(F=0.620,P=0.603).There were statistically significant differences in pain VAS scores between preoperative and postoperative time points,that is,there was a time effect(F=2157.488,P=0.000).The overall VAS scores of the two groups were compared,and the difference was not statistically significant,that is,there was no grouping effect(F=2.610,P=0.114).The VAS score of pain in both groups decreased with time,and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant before surgery,at discharge,1 month after surgery and 3 months after surgery(t=0.067,P=0.947;t=1.415,P=0.164;t=0.564,P=0.575;t=0.442,P=0.660);JOA score.There is no interaction effect between the access mode and the time factor(F=1.296,P=0.280).The difference of JOA score between preoperative and postoperative time points was statistically significant,that is,there was a time effect(F=1464.830,P=0.000).JOA scores of the two groups showed an increasing trend with time,and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant before surgery,at discharge,1 month after surgery and 3 months after surgery(t=0.067,P=0.947;t=1.415,P=0.164;t=0.564,P=0.575;t=0.442,P=0.660);(2)The improved Macnab standard was used to evaluate the excellent and good rate at 3 months after surgery.In the interlaminar group,12 cases were excellent,13 cases were good and 2 cases were fair.The excellent and good rate was 92.6%.In the intervertebral foramen group,7 cases were excellent,10 cases were good and 1 case was fair.The excellent and good rate was 94.4%.The overall excellent and good rate of the two groups was 93.3%.Conclusion:Both approaches can achieve satisfactory efficacy in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation,which is worthy of clinical application.However,for beginners,l5-s1 lumbar disc herniation is more suitable for intervertebral disc approach,so as to achieve satisfactory efficacy.

椎间孔镜靶向单通道髓核摘除术对腰椎融合术后相邻节段椎间盘突出症的临床运用分析

目的探讨椎间孔镜靶向单通道髓核摘除术(TO-PTED)对腰椎融合术后相邻节段椎间盘突出症(LDH)的临床运用。方法选取2018年1月—2021年3月在我院行TO-PTED的45例腰椎融合术后相邻节段LDH患者为观察组,另随机选取同期在我院行椎板间开窗髓核摘除术的45例腰椎融合术后相邻节段LDH患者为对照组。比较两组患者的围手术期临床资料、手术前后的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、日本骨科协会评分(JOA)、影像学资料,采用改良MacNab标准来进行疗效的评价。结果观察组患者的手术时长、术中失血量、住院天数均显著低于对照组,术中X线透视次数、临床优良率显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者术后1个月、12个月的VAS评分显著低于术前,JOA评分显著高于术前(P<0.05)。观察组患者术后1个月、12个月的VAS评分显著低于同期对照组,JOA评分显著高于同期对照组(P<0.05)。术后1月观察组相对椎间高度及节段角度显著优于对照组,且术后12月,观察组相对椎间高度及节段角度维持优于对照组(P<0.05)。两组术前、术后1月及12月相对椎间孔面积均无显著变化,且两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论TO-PTED能明显缓解腰椎融合术后相邻节段LDH患者的疼痛状况,促进腰椎功能的恢复,具有创伤小、术中失血量少、术后恢复快等优点,疗效优于传统的椎板间开窗髓核摘除术,可在临床推广应用。