Objective To conduct a Meta-analysis of studies that compared the efficacies of mild ovarian stimulation and conventional long GnRH agonist protocol in patients under- going IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (I...Objective To conduct a Meta-analysis of studies that compared the efficacies of mild ovarian stimulation and conventional long GnRH agonist protocol in patients under- going IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Methods Meta-analysis was performed. All studies were published by July 2012 with data related to outcomes following mild ovarian stimulation compared with the conventional protocol. Odds ratios (ORs) and weighted/standardized mean difference (WMD/SMD) from individual study were pooled in fixed and random effect models. Main outcome measure was the efficacy of mild ovarian stimulation. Results Six articles were included in this Meta-analysis. The number of oocytes retrieved was lower, the cycle cancellation rate was higher and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was lower in the mild stimulation group than in conventional ovarian stimulation group. Clinical pregnancy rates were similar in both mild and conventional stimulation groups. Conclusions The level of evidence supporting the use of mild stimulation protocols in IVF is low, considering the fewer oocytes retrieved and the higher rates of cycle cancellation.展开更多
Objective:This study aimed to compare the efficacy of clomiphene citrate(CC)with human menopausal gonadotropin(hMG)and that of medroxyprogesterone acetate(MPA)with hMG in poor responders defined according to the Bolog...Objective:This study aimed to compare the efficacy of clomiphene citrate(CC)with human menopausal gonadotropin(hMG)and that of medroxyprogesterone acetate(MPA)with hMG in poor responders defined according to the Bologna criteria.Methods:The data of patients with poor ovarian response(POR)according to the Bologna criteria from September 2016 to November 2017 were retrospectively reviewed.All participants received either CC+hMG or the progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation protocol(PPOS)protocol.Results:A total of 340 patients and 563 in vitro fertilization cycles were analyzed in this study.The incidence of spontaneous luteinizing hormone(LH)surge and the mean LH level on trigger day were significantly lower in the PPOS group than in the CC+HMG group(0.04%vs.3.49%and 4.26±3.59 vs.9.38±6.92 mIU/mL,respectively,P<0.05);however,the incidence of premature ovulation was similar between the two groups.The number of viable embryos harvested was not statistically different between the two groups(1.7±1.1 vs.1.5±0.8,P=0.06).The mean dose and duration of hMG were significantly higher in the PPOS group than in the CC+hMG group(908.7±556.6 vs.177.9±214.5 IU and 6.0±3.4 vs.1.2±1.5 days,respectively,P<0.05).However,the number of oocytes retrieved,number of metaphase II oocytes,and fertilization rate were comparable between the two groups.Conclusions:The CC with low-dose gonadotropin strategy was superior to the MPA with hMG protocol for POR.展开更多
基金supported by grants from the Medical Research Council(No.XK02 200904)the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
文摘Objective To conduct a Meta-analysis of studies that compared the efficacies of mild ovarian stimulation and conventional long GnRH agonist protocol in patients under- going IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Methods Meta-analysis was performed. All studies were published by July 2012 with data related to outcomes following mild ovarian stimulation compared with the conventional protocol. Odds ratios (ORs) and weighted/standardized mean difference (WMD/SMD) from individual study were pooled in fixed and random effect models. Main outcome measure was the efficacy of mild ovarian stimulation. Results Six articles were included in this Meta-analysis. The number of oocytes retrieved was lower, the cycle cancellation rate was higher and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was lower in the mild stimulation group than in conventional ovarian stimulation group. Clinical pregnancy rates were similar in both mild and conventional stimulation groups. Conclusions The level of evidence supporting the use of mild stimulation protocols in IVF is low, considering the fewer oocytes retrieved and the higher rates of cycle cancellation.
文摘Objective:This study aimed to compare the efficacy of clomiphene citrate(CC)with human menopausal gonadotropin(hMG)and that of medroxyprogesterone acetate(MPA)with hMG in poor responders defined according to the Bologna criteria.Methods:The data of patients with poor ovarian response(POR)according to the Bologna criteria from September 2016 to November 2017 were retrospectively reviewed.All participants received either CC+hMG or the progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation protocol(PPOS)protocol.Results:A total of 340 patients and 563 in vitro fertilization cycles were analyzed in this study.The incidence of spontaneous luteinizing hormone(LH)surge and the mean LH level on trigger day were significantly lower in the PPOS group than in the CC+HMG group(0.04%vs.3.49%and 4.26±3.59 vs.9.38±6.92 mIU/mL,respectively,P<0.05);however,the incidence of premature ovulation was similar between the two groups.The number of viable embryos harvested was not statistically different between the two groups(1.7±1.1 vs.1.5±0.8,P=0.06).The mean dose and duration of hMG were significantly higher in the PPOS group than in the CC+hMG group(908.7±556.6 vs.177.9±214.5 IU and 6.0±3.4 vs.1.2±1.5 days,respectively,P<0.05).However,the number of oocytes retrieved,number of metaphase II oocytes,and fertilization rate were comparable between the two groups.Conclusions:The CC with low-dose gonadotropin strategy was superior to the MPA with hMG protocol for POR.