目的:评价适用于简明儿童少年国际神经精神访谈(Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for children and adolescents,MINI Kid)儿童版的信度和效度。方法:以北京大学第六医院门诊和病房患儿、某小学学生、某寄宿学校初中学...目的:评价适用于简明儿童少年国际神经精神访谈(Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for children and adolescents,MINI Kid)儿童版的信度和效度。方法:以北京大学第六医院门诊和病房患儿、某小学学生、某寄宿学校初中学生、四川地震后移居日照的儿童青少年共392人为研究对象,同时以学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症问卷(The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version,K-SADS-PL)为诊断的金标准;由评定者盲法评定,评价MINIKid量表效度、重测信度和内部一致性信度。结果:量表的评定者间一致性Kappa值均在0.80以上,重测信度0.90。以K-SADS-PL为诊断金标准,对MINI Kid儿童版进行效度检验显示,诊断灵敏度分别为注意缺陷多动障碍(32.0%)、对立违抗障碍(30.9%)、品行障碍(78.6%)、儿童情感障碍及情绪问题(66.3%)、抽动障碍(58.5%)、精神病性障碍(93.6%)、创伤后应激障碍(79.2%);诊断特异度分别为注意缺陷多动障碍(95.8%)、对立违抗障碍(94.5%)、品行障碍(94.5%)、儿童情感障碍及情绪问题(66.8%)、抽动障碍(98.8%)、精神病性障碍(98.6%)、创伤后应激障碍(92.7%)。对全部完成儿童版和父母版的319名儿童的两个版本结果进行并联诊断,显示诊断灵敏度分别为注意缺陷多动障碍(86.5%)、对立违抗障碍(83.5%)、品行障碍(92.9%)、儿童情感障碍及情绪问题(73.7%)、抽动障碍(73.6%)、精神病性障碍(97.9%);诊断特异度分别为注意缺陷多动障碍(95.9%)、对立违抗障碍(88.8%)、品行障碍(91.1%)、儿童情感障碍及情绪问题(66.7%)、抽动障碍(98.5%)、精神病性障碍(98.5%)。结论:除儿童情感障碍及情绪问题外,简明儿童少年国际神经精神访谈儿童版单独使用有很高的特异度,但灵敏度偏低,建议与父母版并联使用,以提高灵敏度。展开更多
目的:评价简明儿童少年国际神经精神访谈(Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for children and adolescents,MINI Kid)(父母版)的信度和效度。方法:以北京大学第六医院门诊和病房患儿、九一小学学生、海淀寄宿学校初中学生...目的:评价简明儿童少年国际神经精神访谈(Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for children and adolescents,MINI Kid)(父母版)的信度和效度。方法:以北京大学第六医院门诊和病房患儿、九一小学学生、海淀寄宿学校初中学生共369人为研究对象,由评定者盲法评定,同时以学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症问卷(The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version,K-SADS-PL)量表为诊断金标准,评价量表效度。测定量表的重测信度和内部一致性信度。结果:量表的评定者间一致性Kappa值均在0.80以上,重测信度0.90。以K-SADS-PL为诊断金标准,对MINI Kid父母版进行效度检验显示,诊断灵敏度分别为注意缺陷多动障碍(80.9%)、对立违抗障碍(78.0%)、品行障碍(75.0%)、儿童情感障碍及情绪问题(65.8%)、抽动障碍(66.0%)、精神病性障碍(91.5%)、广泛发育障碍(74.0%);诊断特异度分别为注意缺陷多动障碍(97.0%)、对立违抗障碍(91.1%)、品行障碍(94.2%)、儿童情感障碍及情绪问题(77.8%)、抽动障碍(99.2%)、精神病性障碍(99.6%)、广泛发育障碍(100.0%)。结论:简明儿童少年国际神经精神访谈父母版具有较好的信度和效度,适用于儿童精神障碍的流行病学研究。展开更多
AIM:To investigate the prevalence and physicians' detection rate of depressive and anxiety disorders in gastrointestinal(GI)outpatients across China. METHODS:A hospital-based cross-sectional survey was conducted i...AIM:To investigate the prevalence and physicians' detection rate of depressive and anxiety disorders in gastrointestinal(GI)outpatients across China. METHODS:A hospital-based cross-sectional survey was conducted in the GI outpatient departments of 13 general hospitals.A total of 1995 GI outpatients were recruited and screened with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale(HADS).The physicians of the GI departments performed routine clinical diagnosis and management without knowing the HADS score results.Subjects with HADS scores≥8 were subsequently interviewed by psychiatrists using the Mini International Neuropsy-chiatric Interview(MINI)to make further diagnoses. RESULTS:There were 1059 patients with HADS score ≥8 and 674(63.64%)of them undertook the MINI interview by psychiatrists.Based on the criteria of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edition),the adjusted current prevalence for depressive disorders,anxiety disorders,and comorbidity of both disorders in the GI outpatients was 14.39%, 9.42%and 4.66%,respectively.Prevalence of depressive disorders with suicidal problems[suicide attempt or suicide-related ideation prior or current;module C (suicide)of MINI score≥1]was 5.84%in women and 1.64%in men.The GI physicians'detection rate of depressive and anxiety disorders accounted for 4.14%. CONCLUSION:While the prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders is high in Chinese GI outpatients, the detection rate of depressive and anxiety disorders by physicians is low.展开更多
目的:分析简明国际神经精神访谈(轻)躁狂发作伴混合特征问卷[Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview(Hypo-)Manic Episode with Mixed Features-DSM-5 Module,MINI-M]中文版在轻躁狂或躁狂发作患者中的信效度。方法:对MINI-M...目的:分析简明国际神经精神访谈(轻)躁狂发作伴混合特征问卷[Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview(Hypo-)Manic Episode with Mixed Features-DSM-5 Module,MINI-M]中文版在轻躁狂或躁狂发作患者中的信效度。方法:对MINI-M问卷汉化后,采用多中心、方便抽样的方法,抽取躁狂或轻躁狂发作患者(n=110)进行问卷自评。以Cronbach′sα系数、条目与总分之间相关系数及重测相关系数评价MINI-M问卷的信度,采用主成分分析及探索性因子分析结构效度,基于临床诊断的受试者操作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC曲线)分析评价问卷的预测效度。结果:MINI-M问卷中文版Cronbach′sα为0.840,各条目与总分之间相关系数为0.549~0.834(P<0.05),第1周末重测相关系数为0.621(P<0.05)。主成分分析及探索性因子分析提取1个因子(对方差贡献率为55.795%)。ROC曲线分析显示,MINI-M≥2分为最佳临界值,其灵敏度、特异度分别为0.800和0.711,相应的混合特征检出率为38.2%(42/110),明显高于临床诊断率(18.2%,20/110)。结论:MINI-M问卷中文版在双相障碍躁狂或轻躁狂发作患者中具有良好的信效度,有助于提高临床医生对混合特征的识别与诊断率。展开更多
文摘目的:评价适用于简明儿童少年国际神经精神访谈(Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for children and adolescents,MINI Kid)儿童版的信度和效度。方法:以北京大学第六医院门诊和病房患儿、某小学学生、某寄宿学校初中学生、四川地震后移居日照的儿童青少年共392人为研究对象,同时以学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症问卷(The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version,K-SADS-PL)为诊断的金标准;由评定者盲法评定,评价MINIKid量表效度、重测信度和内部一致性信度。结果:量表的评定者间一致性Kappa值均在0.80以上,重测信度0.90。以K-SADS-PL为诊断金标准,对MINI Kid儿童版进行效度检验显示,诊断灵敏度分别为注意缺陷多动障碍(32.0%)、对立违抗障碍(30.9%)、品行障碍(78.6%)、儿童情感障碍及情绪问题(66.3%)、抽动障碍(58.5%)、精神病性障碍(93.6%)、创伤后应激障碍(79.2%);诊断特异度分别为注意缺陷多动障碍(95.8%)、对立违抗障碍(94.5%)、品行障碍(94.5%)、儿童情感障碍及情绪问题(66.8%)、抽动障碍(98.8%)、精神病性障碍(98.6%)、创伤后应激障碍(92.7%)。对全部完成儿童版和父母版的319名儿童的两个版本结果进行并联诊断,显示诊断灵敏度分别为注意缺陷多动障碍(86.5%)、对立违抗障碍(83.5%)、品行障碍(92.9%)、儿童情感障碍及情绪问题(73.7%)、抽动障碍(73.6%)、精神病性障碍(97.9%);诊断特异度分别为注意缺陷多动障碍(95.9%)、对立违抗障碍(88.8%)、品行障碍(91.1%)、儿童情感障碍及情绪问题(66.7%)、抽动障碍(98.5%)、精神病性障碍(98.5%)。结论:除儿童情感障碍及情绪问题外,简明儿童少年国际神经精神访谈儿童版单独使用有很高的特异度,但灵敏度偏低,建议与父母版并联使用,以提高灵敏度。
文摘目的:评价简明儿童少年国际神经精神访谈(Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for children and adolescents,MINI Kid)(父母版)的信度和效度。方法:以北京大学第六医院门诊和病房患儿、九一小学学生、海淀寄宿学校初中学生共369人为研究对象,由评定者盲法评定,同时以学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症问卷(The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version,K-SADS-PL)量表为诊断金标准,评价量表效度。测定量表的重测信度和内部一致性信度。结果:量表的评定者间一致性Kappa值均在0.80以上,重测信度0.90。以K-SADS-PL为诊断金标准,对MINI Kid父母版进行效度检验显示,诊断灵敏度分别为注意缺陷多动障碍(80.9%)、对立违抗障碍(78.0%)、品行障碍(75.0%)、儿童情感障碍及情绪问题(65.8%)、抽动障碍(66.0%)、精神病性障碍(91.5%)、广泛发育障碍(74.0%);诊断特异度分别为注意缺陷多动障碍(97.0%)、对立违抗障碍(91.1%)、品行障碍(94.2%)、儿童情感障碍及情绪问题(77.8%)、抽动障碍(99.2%)、精神病性障碍(99.6%)、广泛发育障碍(100.0%)。结论:简明儿童少年国际神经精神访谈父母版具有较好的信度和效度,适用于儿童精神障碍的流行病学研究。
基金Supported by The former Wyeth Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd., Madison,NJ,United States
文摘AIM:To investigate the prevalence and physicians' detection rate of depressive and anxiety disorders in gastrointestinal(GI)outpatients across China. METHODS:A hospital-based cross-sectional survey was conducted in the GI outpatient departments of 13 general hospitals.A total of 1995 GI outpatients were recruited and screened with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale(HADS).The physicians of the GI departments performed routine clinical diagnosis and management without knowing the HADS score results.Subjects with HADS scores≥8 were subsequently interviewed by psychiatrists using the Mini International Neuropsy-chiatric Interview(MINI)to make further diagnoses. RESULTS:There were 1059 patients with HADS score ≥8 and 674(63.64%)of them undertook the MINI interview by psychiatrists.Based on the criteria of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edition),the adjusted current prevalence for depressive disorders,anxiety disorders,and comorbidity of both disorders in the GI outpatients was 14.39%, 9.42%and 4.66%,respectively.Prevalence of depressive disorders with suicidal problems[suicide attempt or suicide-related ideation prior or current;module C (suicide)of MINI score≥1]was 5.84%in women and 1.64%in men.The GI physicians'detection rate of depressive and anxiety disorders accounted for 4.14%. CONCLUSION:While the prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders is high in Chinese GI outpatients, the detection rate of depressive and anxiety disorders by physicians is low.
