Background: Traditional full-incision double eyelid blepharoplasty has several significant disadvantages, including slow recovery and bilateral asymmetry, which results in high rates of patient dissatisfaction. These ...Background: Traditional full-incision double eyelid blepharoplasty has several significant disadvantages, including slow recovery and bilateral asymmetry, which results in high rates of patient dissatisfaction. These problems can be minimized using improved surgical techniques aimed at reducing tissue damage and bleeding, decreasing operation time, and especially at protecting the subcutaneous capillary network during the operation. We therefore aimed to guard the capillary network and reduce intraoperative bleeding using the practical technique of reverse orbicularis oculi muscle resection.Methods: Fifty cases of double eyelid blepharoplasty with traditional full-incision(group A) and 61 cases of reverse double eyelid blepharoplasty with a preserved capillary network(group B) were divided into two groups from October 1 to December 31, 2021 and from March 1 to May 31, 2022, respectively. The orbicularis oculi muscle was removed reversely from the front of the tarsal plate using double eyelid blepharoplasty, and the muscular membrane and subcutaneous capillary network were preserved. The operation time recorded in previous medical records was checked and compared with that of our novel technique. The recovery of double eyelid blepharoplasty was determined at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the operation and patient satisfaction was also compared with that in previous medical records of patients in group A.Results: The reverse double eyelid blepharoplasty procedure was less complicated and easier to control than the traditional full-incision double eyelid blepharoplasty methodology. The average operation time of the double eyelid blepharoplasty cases with traditional full-incision was significantly greater than that of the cases of reverse double eyelid blepharoplasty with the capillary network preserved(45.68 ± 5.27 min and 31.11 ± 5.58 min,respectively;t=14.018 9, P=0.000 0). Patient satisfaction was 42% and 78.69%, respectively, at 1 week postoperation(χ~2=15.724 8, P=0.000 1), 62% and 90.16% at 4 weeks post-operation(χ~2=12.490 2, P=0.000 4),and 90% and 95.08%, at 12 weeks post-operation(χ~2=1.061 1, P=0.303 0).Conclusion: Reverse double eyelid blepharoplasty with preserved subcutaneous capillary network effectively decreases the operation time and improves post-operative patient satisfaction. It is a double eyelid blepharoplasty method worthy of popularization.展开更多
Background: Asian Blepharoplasty (AB) is one of the most commonly performed aesthetic procedures today. Despite the increasing demand for AB and advancements in surgical techniques, creating an optimal upper eyelid cr...Background: Asian Blepharoplasty (AB) is one of the most commonly performed aesthetic procedures today. Despite the increasing demand for AB and advancements in surgical techniques, creating an optimal upper eyelid crease remains difficult. This study aimed to determine whether removing the preaponeurotic fat pad (PAF) had any effect on the revision surgery rates following primary Asian blepharoplasty. Methods: A retrospective comparative analysis was conducted on patients who underwent primary AB between January 2016 and December 2020. Patients were divided into PAF removed and PAF not removed groups. The outcomes in the groups were compared by the frequency of revision surgery following primary AB using the chi-square test (p Results: The study included 480 patients, 442 (92%) female and 38 (8%) male, and the final outcome was evaluated after 6 months postoperatively. 412 (86%) patients were observed to have PAF pads intraoperatively, while 68 (14%) had minimal/no PAF pads. In total, 115 (24%) patients underwent revision surgery, of whom 31 (27%) had PAF removed, 66 (57%) had PAF not removed, and 18 (16%) had minimal/no PAF noted. When compared to the PAF not removed group, the PAF removed group showed a significantly lower frequency of revision surgery between the two groups of patients (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: In the final outcome, not removing the PAF in primary AB indicated a strong association with an increase in revision surgery. The removal of PAF in primary AB showed a better overall outcome and patient satisfaction.展开更多
目的:观察眉下缘切口提升术联合重睑成形治疗中重度上睑皮肤松弛的美学效果。方法:回顾性分析2020年10月-2022年10月在笔者医院治疗的62例上睑皮肤松弛患者临床资料,根据治疗方法不同分为联合治疗组(n=32)和眉下切口组(n=30),联合治疗...目的:观察眉下缘切口提升术联合重睑成形治疗中重度上睑皮肤松弛的美学效果。方法:回顾性分析2020年10月-2022年10月在笔者医院治疗的62例上睑皮肤松弛患者临床资料,根据治疗方法不同分为联合治疗组(n=32)和眉下切口组(n=30),联合治疗组行眉下缘切口提升术联合重睑术,眉下切口组行眉下缘切口提升术,术后对患者进行随访,比较两组术后矫治效果,上睑缘至眉距离(The distance between the upper eyelid margin and the eyebrow,DEE)、睑裂宽度(The height of the palpebral fissure,HPF)、瞳孔中点睑缘与重睑距离(Middle pupil margin-fold distance,MPMFD)、角膜内侧睑缘与重睑距离(Medial corneal margin-fold distance,MCMFD)以及外眦处睑缘与重睑距离(Lateral canthus margin-fold distance,LCMFD)、上睑皱纹改善效果(Lemperle评分)、术后外观满意度、术后并发症发生率。结果:治疗后,联合治疗组DEE、HPF、MPMFD、MCMFD、LCMFD均高于对照组(P<0.05);治疗后,两组患者Lemperle评分均有所降低,但联合治疗组低于眉下切口组(P<0.05);治疗后,联合治疗组术后外观满意度96.88%高于眉下切口组76.67%(P<0.05);治疗后,联合治疗组与眉下切口组并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:眉下缘切口提升术联合重睑成形治疗中重度上睑皮肤松弛,能够有效改善上睑松弛情况,减少上睑皱纹,且患者外观满意度较高。展开更多
文摘Background: Traditional full-incision double eyelid blepharoplasty has several significant disadvantages, including slow recovery and bilateral asymmetry, which results in high rates of patient dissatisfaction. These problems can be minimized using improved surgical techniques aimed at reducing tissue damage and bleeding, decreasing operation time, and especially at protecting the subcutaneous capillary network during the operation. We therefore aimed to guard the capillary network and reduce intraoperative bleeding using the practical technique of reverse orbicularis oculi muscle resection.Methods: Fifty cases of double eyelid blepharoplasty with traditional full-incision(group A) and 61 cases of reverse double eyelid blepharoplasty with a preserved capillary network(group B) were divided into two groups from October 1 to December 31, 2021 and from March 1 to May 31, 2022, respectively. The orbicularis oculi muscle was removed reversely from the front of the tarsal plate using double eyelid blepharoplasty, and the muscular membrane and subcutaneous capillary network were preserved. The operation time recorded in previous medical records was checked and compared with that of our novel technique. The recovery of double eyelid blepharoplasty was determined at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the operation and patient satisfaction was also compared with that in previous medical records of patients in group A.Results: The reverse double eyelid blepharoplasty procedure was less complicated and easier to control than the traditional full-incision double eyelid blepharoplasty methodology. The average operation time of the double eyelid blepharoplasty cases with traditional full-incision was significantly greater than that of the cases of reverse double eyelid blepharoplasty with the capillary network preserved(45.68 ± 5.27 min and 31.11 ± 5.58 min,respectively;t=14.018 9, P=0.000 0). Patient satisfaction was 42% and 78.69%, respectively, at 1 week postoperation(χ~2=15.724 8, P=0.000 1), 62% and 90.16% at 4 weeks post-operation(χ~2=12.490 2, P=0.000 4),and 90% and 95.08%, at 12 weeks post-operation(χ~2=1.061 1, P=0.303 0).Conclusion: Reverse double eyelid blepharoplasty with preserved subcutaneous capillary network effectively decreases the operation time and improves post-operative patient satisfaction. It is a double eyelid blepharoplasty method worthy of popularization.
文摘Background: Asian Blepharoplasty (AB) is one of the most commonly performed aesthetic procedures today. Despite the increasing demand for AB and advancements in surgical techniques, creating an optimal upper eyelid crease remains difficult. This study aimed to determine whether removing the preaponeurotic fat pad (PAF) had any effect on the revision surgery rates following primary Asian blepharoplasty. Methods: A retrospective comparative analysis was conducted on patients who underwent primary AB between January 2016 and December 2020. Patients were divided into PAF removed and PAF not removed groups. The outcomes in the groups were compared by the frequency of revision surgery following primary AB using the chi-square test (p Results: The study included 480 patients, 442 (92%) female and 38 (8%) male, and the final outcome was evaluated after 6 months postoperatively. 412 (86%) patients were observed to have PAF pads intraoperatively, while 68 (14%) had minimal/no PAF pads. In total, 115 (24%) patients underwent revision surgery, of whom 31 (27%) had PAF removed, 66 (57%) had PAF not removed, and 18 (16%) had minimal/no PAF noted. When compared to the PAF not removed group, the PAF removed group showed a significantly lower frequency of revision surgery between the two groups of patients (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: In the final outcome, not removing the PAF in primary AB indicated a strong association with an increase in revision surgery. The removal of PAF in primary AB showed a better overall outcome and patient satisfaction.
文摘目的:观察眉下缘切口提升术联合重睑成形治疗中重度上睑皮肤松弛的美学效果。方法:回顾性分析2020年10月-2022年10月在笔者医院治疗的62例上睑皮肤松弛患者临床资料,根据治疗方法不同分为联合治疗组(n=32)和眉下切口组(n=30),联合治疗组行眉下缘切口提升术联合重睑术,眉下切口组行眉下缘切口提升术,术后对患者进行随访,比较两组术后矫治效果,上睑缘至眉距离(The distance between the upper eyelid margin and the eyebrow,DEE)、睑裂宽度(The height of the palpebral fissure,HPF)、瞳孔中点睑缘与重睑距离(Middle pupil margin-fold distance,MPMFD)、角膜内侧睑缘与重睑距离(Medial corneal margin-fold distance,MCMFD)以及外眦处睑缘与重睑距离(Lateral canthus margin-fold distance,LCMFD)、上睑皱纹改善效果(Lemperle评分)、术后外观满意度、术后并发症发生率。结果:治疗后,联合治疗组DEE、HPF、MPMFD、MCMFD、LCMFD均高于对照组(P<0.05);治疗后,两组患者Lemperle评分均有所降低,但联合治疗组低于眉下切口组(P<0.05);治疗后,联合治疗组术后外观满意度96.88%高于眉下切口组76.67%(P<0.05);治疗后,联合治疗组与眉下切口组并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:眉下缘切口提升术联合重睑成形治疗中重度上睑皮肤松弛,能够有效改善上睑松弛情况,减少上睑皱纹,且患者外观满意度较高。
