Minimal intervention is a method of traditional village protection.It refers to reducing human intervention in traditional villages as much as possible.If it is unavoidable,minimal intervention should be carried out i...Minimal intervention is a method of traditional village protection.It refers to reducing human intervention in traditional villages as much as possible.If it is unavoidable,minimal intervention should be carried out in accordance with the purpose of village development under the premise of maintaining the village style.The method is effective and feasible to the traditional villages facing the dual choice of protection and development in China.Shizhai Village is a traditional village with local cultural characteristics,whose natural landscape has obvious advantages.Combining analysis of government objectives and higher-level planning,regional homestay development background,and location conditions,construction planning of Shizhai Village’s homestay based onminimal intervention was put forward.The main idea of the planning is to propose three measures of non-intervention,low-degree intervention and intervention according to different land conditions.展开更多
BACKGROUND In recent decades,an increasing number of patients have received minimally invasive intervention for infected pancreatic necrosis(IPN)because of the benefits in reducing postoperative multiple organ failure...BACKGROUND In recent decades,an increasing number of patients have received minimally invasive intervention for infected pancreatic necrosis(IPN)because of the benefits in reducing postoperative multiple organ failure and mortality.However,there are limited published data regarding infection recurrence after treatment of this patient population.AIM To investigate the incidence and prediction of infection recurrence following successful minimally invasive treatment in IPN patients.METHODS Medical records for 193 IPN patients,who underwent minimally invasive treatment between February 2014 and October 2018,were retrospectively reviewed.Patients,who survived after the treatment,were divided into two groups:one group with infection after drainage catheter removal and another group without infection.The morphological and clinical data were compared between the two groups.Significantly different variables were introduced into the correlation and multivariate logistic analysis to identify independent predictors for infection recurrence.Sensitivity and specificity for diagnostic performance were determined.RESULTS Of the 193 IPN patients,178 were recruited into the study.Of them,9(5.06%)patients died and 169 patients survived but infection recurred in 13 of 178 patients(7.30%)at 7(4-10)d after drainage catheters were removed.White blood cell(WBC)count,serum C-reactive protein(CRP),interleukin-6,and procalcitonin levels measured at the time of catheter removal were significantly higher in patients with infection than in those without(all P<0.05).In addition,drainage duration and length of the catheter measured by computerized tomography scan were significantly longer in patients with infection(P=0.025 and P<0.0001,respectively).Although these parameters all correlated positively with the incidence of infection(all P<0.05),only WBC,CRP,procalcitonin levels,and catheter length were identified as independent predictors for infection recurrence.The sensitivity and specificity for infection prediction were high in WBC count(≥9.95×109/L)and serum procalcitonin level(≥0.05 ng/mL)but moderate in serum CRP level(cut-off point≥7.37 mg/L).The catheter length(cut-off value≥8.05 cm)had a high sensitivity but low specificity to predict the infection recurrence.CONCLUSION WBC count,serum procalcitonin,and CRP levels may be valuable for predicting infection recurrence following minimally invasive intervention in IPN patients.These biomarkers should be considered before removing the drainage catheters.展开更多
基金Sponsored by Characteristic Innovation Projectof Guangdong Provincial Department of Education (2016WTSCX119)“Thirteenth Five-year Plan” Discipline Co-construction Project of Guangdong Provincial Philosophy and Social Sciences in 2017 (GD17XGL62)。
文摘Minimal intervention is a method of traditional village protection.It refers to reducing human intervention in traditional villages as much as possible.If it is unavoidable,minimal intervention should be carried out in accordance with the purpose of village development under the premise of maintaining the village style.The method is effective and feasible to the traditional villages facing the dual choice of protection and development in China.Shizhai Village is a traditional village with local cultural characteristics,whose natural landscape has obvious advantages.Combining analysis of government objectives and higher-level planning,regional homestay development background,and location conditions,construction planning of Shizhai Village’s homestay based onminimal intervention was put forward.The main idea of the planning is to propose three measures of non-intervention,low-degree intervention and intervention according to different land conditions.
基金Supported by Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission,No.Z171100001017077Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Clinical Medicine Development of special funding support,No.XMLX201404Construction Project of Advanced Clinical Medicine Discipline of Capital Medical University,No.1192070312.
文摘BACKGROUND In recent decades,an increasing number of patients have received minimally invasive intervention for infected pancreatic necrosis(IPN)because of the benefits in reducing postoperative multiple organ failure and mortality.However,there are limited published data regarding infection recurrence after treatment of this patient population.AIM To investigate the incidence and prediction of infection recurrence following successful minimally invasive treatment in IPN patients.METHODS Medical records for 193 IPN patients,who underwent minimally invasive treatment between February 2014 and October 2018,were retrospectively reviewed.Patients,who survived after the treatment,were divided into two groups:one group with infection after drainage catheter removal and another group without infection.The morphological and clinical data were compared between the two groups.Significantly different variables were introduced into the correlation and multivariate logistic analysis to identify independent predictors for infection recurrence.Sensitivity and specificity for diagnostic performance were determined.RESULTS Of the 193 IPN patients,178 were recruited into the study.Of them,9(5.06%)patients died and 169 patients survived but infection recurred in 13 of 178 patients(7.30%)at 7(4-10)d after drainage catheters were removed.White blood cell(WBC)count,serum C-reactive protein(CRP),interleukin-6,and procalcitonin levels measured at the time of catheter removal were significantly higher in patients with infection than in those without(all P<0.05).In addition,drainage duration and length of the catheter measured by computerized tomography scan were significantly longer in patients with infection(P=0.025 and P<0.0001,respectively).Although these parameters all correlated positively with the incidence of infection(all P<0.05),only WBC,CRP,procalcitonin levels,and catheter length were identified as independent predictors for infection recurrence.The sensitivity and specificity for infection prediction were high in WBC count(≥9.95×109/L)and serum procalcitonin level(≥0.05 ng/mL)but moderate in serum CRP level(cut-off point≥7.37 mg/L).The catheter length(cut-off value≥8.05 cm)had a high sensitivity but low specificity to predict the infection recurrence.CONCLUSION WBC count,serum procalcitonin,and CRP levels may be valuable for predicting infection recurrence following minimally invasive intervention in IPN patients.These biomarkers should be considered before removing the drainage catheters.