BACKGROUND The main clinical treatment for esophageal cancer is surgery. Since traditional open esophageal cancer resection has the disadvantages of large trauma, long recovery period, and high postoperative complicat...BACKGROUND The main clinical treatment for esophageal cancer is surgery. Since traditional open esophageal cancer resection has the disadvantages of large trauma, long recovery period, and high postoperative complication rate, its clinical application is gradually reduced. The current report of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy(MIILE) is increasing. However, researchers found that patients with MIILE had a higher incidence of early delayed gastric emptying(DGE).AIM To investigate the influencing factors of postoperative early DGE after MIILE.METHODS A total of 156 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer at Deyang People's Hospital were enrolled. According to the criteria of DGE, patients were assigned to a DGE group(n = 49) and a control group(n = 107). The differences between the DGE group and the control group were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to further determine the influencing factors of postoperative early DGE. The receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was used to assess potential factors in predicting postoperative early DGE.RESULTS Age, intraoperative blood loss, chest drainage time, portion of anxiety score ≥ 45 points, analgesia pump use, postoperative to enteral nutrition interval, and postoperative fluid volume in the DGE group were higher than those in the control group. Perioperative albumin level in the DGE group was lower than that in the control group(P < 0.05). Age, anxiety score, perioperative albumin level,and postoperative fluid volume were independent factors influencing postoperative early DGE, and the differences were statistically significant(P <0.05). The ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve(AUC) foranxiety score was 0.720. The optimum cut-off value was 39, and the sensitivity and specificity were 80.37% and 65.31%, respectively. The AUC for postoperative fluid volume were 0.774. The optimal cut-off value was 1191.86 mL, and the sensitivity and specificity were 65.3% and 77.6%, respectively. The AUC for perioperative albumin level was 0.758. The optimum cut-off value was 26.75 g/L,and the sensitivity and specificity were 97.2% and 46.9%, respectively.CONCLUSION Advanced age, postoperative anxiety, perioperative albumin level, and postoperative fluid volume can increase the incidence of postoperative early DGE.展开更多
Robotic surgery systems,as emerging minimally invasive approaches,have been increasingly applied for the treatment of esophageal cancer because they provide a high-definition three-dimensional surgical view and mechan...Robotic surgery systems,as emerging minimally invasive approaches,have been increasingly applied for the treatment of esophageal cancer because they provide a high-definition three-dimensional surgical view and mechanical rotating arms that surpass the limitations of human hands,greatly enhancing the accuracy and flexibility of surgical methods.Robot-assisted McKeown esophagectomy(RAME),a common type of robotic esophagectomy,has been gradually implemented with the aim of reducing postoperative complications,improving postoperative recovery and achieving better long-term survival.Multiple centers worldwide have reported and summarized their experiences with the RAME,and some have also discussed and analyzed its perioperative effects and survival prognosis compared with those of video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy.Compared to traditional surgery,the RAME has significant advantages in terms of lymph node dissection although there seems to be no difference in overall survival or disease-free survival.With the continuous advancement of technology and the development of robotic technology,further development and innovation are expected in the RAME field.This review elaborates on the prospects of the application and advancement of the RAME to provide a useful reference for clinical practice.展开更多
Background:In China,the esophageal cancer is the most common tumor type,and the main treatment is still surgical treatment.Over the past decade,thoracic laparoscopy combined with esophageal cancer resection and neck a...Background:In China,the esophageal cancer is the most common tumor type,and the main treatment is still surgical treatment.Over the past decade,thoracic laparoscopy combined with esophageal cancer resection and neck anastomosis-McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy(MIE)has gained interest and known as a minimally invasive surgery for the middle esophageal cancer.However,the safety and operability of McKeown MIE remains to be confirmed clinically.The purpose of this article is to examine the clinical safety and operability of McKeown MIE,and compare the security and outcomes of McKeown MIE and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.Materials and methods:The clinical data of 312 patients with middle esophageal cancer in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2013 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.Among them,176 patients underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and 136 patients underwent McKeown MIE.Patients'demographics and perioperative outcomes were comparable between the two groups.Results:There were no significant differences in terms of operative time,postoperative hospital stay,restore fluid diet time,pathology,tumor node metastasis staging between the two groups.In the McKeown MIE group,the intraoperative blood loss was less than that in the Ivor-Lewis group(116.54±80.99 ml vs 152.78±115.35 ml,p=0.001).The total number of lymph nodes and the number of lymph nodes dissection in bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves were more than those in the Ivor-Lewis group(30.04±14.08 vs 27.51±11.34,p=0.039;5.74±4.27 vs 1.80±2.68,p<0.001).There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications.The overall survival for the McKeown MIE group was higher than the Ivor-Lewis group(p=0.013)and no significant difference was found on disease-free survival.Conclusion:McKeown MIE is safe and operational for middle esophageal cancer,which is consistent with the principle of tumor radicalization.展开更多
Esophageal resection is associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) might theoretically decrease this rate. We reviewed the current literature on MIE, with a focus on th...Esophageal resection is associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) might theoretically decrease this rate. We reviewed the current literature on MIE, with a focus on the available techniques, outcomes and comparison with open surgery. This review shows that the available literature on MIE is still crowded with heterogeneous studies with different techniques. There are no controlled and randomized trials, and the few retrospective comparative cohort studies are limited by small numbers of patients and biased by historical controls of open surgery. Based on the available literature, there is no evidence that MIE brings clear benef its compared to conventional esophagectomy. Increasing experience and the report of larger series might change this scenario.展开更多
BACKGROUND The first line treatment regimen for esophageal cancer is still surgical resection and the choice of surgical scheme depends on surgeon.Now the efficacy comparison of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy...BACKGROUND The first line treatment regimen for esophageal cancer is still surgical resection and the choice of surgical scheme depends on surgeon.Now the efficacy comparison of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy(HMIE)and open esophagectomy(OE)is still controversial.AIM To compare the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of HMIE and OE in patients with esophageal cancer.METHODS PubMed,EMBASE,and Cochrane Library databases were searched for related articles.The odds ratio(OR)or standard mean difference(SMD)with a 95%confidence interval(CI)was used to evaluate the effectiveness of HMIE and OE.RESULTS Seventeen studies including a total of 2397 patients were selected.HMIE was significantly associated with less blood loss(SMD=-0.43,95%CI:-0.66,-0.20;P=0.0002)and lower incidence of pulmonary complications(OR=0.72,95%CI:0.57,0.90;P=0.004).No significant differences were seen in the lymph node yield(SMD=0.11,95%CI:-0.08,0.30;P=0.26),operation time(SMD=0.24,95%CI:-0.14,0.61;P=0.22),total complications rate(OR=0.68,95%CI:0.46,0.99;P=0.05),cardiac complication rate(OR=0.91,95%CI:0.62,1.34;P=0.64),anastomotic leak rate(OR=0.95,95%CI:0.67,1.35;P=0.78),duration of intensive care unit stay(SMD=-0.01,95%CI:-0.21,0.19;P=0.93),duration of hospital stay(SMD=-0.13,95%CI:-0.28,0.01;P=0.08),and total mortality rates(OR=0.70,95%CI:0.47,1.06;P=0.09)between the two treatment groups.CONCLUSION Compared with the OE,HMIE shows less blood loss and pulmonary complications.However,further studies are necessary to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes of HMIE.展开更多
BACKGROUND Previous meta-analyses,with many limitations,have described the beneficial nature of minimal invasive procedures.AIM To compare all modalities of esophagectomies to each other from the results of randomized...BACKGROUND Previous meta-analyses,with many limitations,have described the beneficial nature of minimal invasive procedures.AIM To compare all modalities of esophagectomies to each other from the results of randomized controlled trials(RCTs)in a network meta-analysis(NMA).METHODS We conducted a systematic search of the MEDLINE,EMBASE,Reference Citation Analysis(https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/)and CENTRAL databases to identify RCTs according to the following population,intervention,control,outcome(commonly known as PICO):P:Patients with resectable esophageal cancer;I/C:Transthoracic,transhiatal,minimally invasive(thoracolaparoscopic),hybrid,and robot-assisted esophagectomy;O:Survival,total adverse events,adverse events in subgroups,length of hospital stay,and blood loss.We used the Bayesian approach and the random effects model.We presented the geometry of the network,results with probabilistic statements,estimated intervention effects and their 95% confidence interval(CI),and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve to rank the interventions.RESULTS We included 11 studies in our analysis.We found a significant difference in postoperative pulmonary infection,which favored the minimally invasive intervention compared to transthoracic surgery(risk ratio 0.49;95%CI:0.23 to 0.99).The operation time was significantly shorter for the transhiatal approach compared to transthoracic surgery(mean difference-85 min;95%CI:-150 to-29),hybrid intervention(mean difference-98 min;95%CI:-190 to-9.4),minimally invasive technique(mean difference-130 min;95%CI:-210 to-50),and robot-assisted esophagectomy(mean difference-150 min;95%CI:-240 to-53).Other comparisons did not yield significant differences.CONCLUSION Based on our results,the implication of minimally invasive esophagectomy should be favored.展开更多
Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate catheter-related infection rate(CRIR)for patients receiving minimally invasive esophagectomy(MIE),to identify the optimal catheterization approach and relationship betwee...Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate catheter-related infection rate(CRIR)for patients receiving minimally invasive esophagectomy(MIE),to identify the optimal catheterization approach and relationship between CRIR and post-operative complications.Methods In total,168 patients with esophageal carcinoma and undergoing MIE combined with preoperative deep venous catheterization(DVC)were analyzed in our institution(Qingdao Municipal Hospital,China),from 2014 to 2018.After completing DVC,catheter-tips together with intraductal venous blood samples were sent to the microbiology lab for bacterial strain culture.CRIR was statistically evaluated for the following clinical variables:gender,age,smoking status,drinking status,past history,tumor location,histologic grade,pathological T,N,and M category,anastomotic location,anastomotic leakage,anastomotic stricture,chylothorax,pneumonia,recurrent laryngeal nerve(RLN)injury,reflux esophagitis,catheterization site,and catheter-locking days.Results Among the 144 patients recruited in our study,105 catheters were inserted into the jugular vein and 39 catheters into the subclavian vein.The median age of these patients was 63 years(range:42–79 years),and the median catheter-locking period was seven days(range:4–21 days).Four catheters were identified with three types of strain colonizations,including Staphylococcus epidermidis,Staphylococcus aureus and Blastomyces albicans.Statistical data showed that patients diagnosed with catheter-related infection were likely to incur anastomotic leakage(66.67%,P<0.001)and pneumonia(27.27%,P<0.001);features such as tumors located in the upper esophagus(13.6%,P=0.003),and over seven catheterlocking days(10.00%,P<0.001)were attributed to a high CRIR.Conclusion Although both jugular and subclavian veins can be catheterized for patients with MIE,DVC is associated with more than seven catheter-locking days and upper esophagectomy,due to high CRIR.Furthermore,catheter-related infection is related to anastomotic leakage and pneumonia.展开更多
Surgical innovation and pioneering are important for improving patient outcome, but can be associated with learning curves. Although learning curves in surgery are a recognized problem, the impact of surgical learning...Surgical innovation and pioneering are important for improving patient outcome, but can be associated with learning curves. Although learning curves in surgery are a recognized problem, the impact of surgical learning curves is increasing, due to increasing complexity of innovative surgical procedures, the rapid rate at which new interventions are implemented and a decrease in relative effectiveness of new interventions compared to old interventions. For minimally invasive esophagectomy(MIE), there is now robust evidence that implementation can lead to significant learning associated morbidity(morbidity during a learning curve, that could have been avoided if patients were operated by surgeons that have completed the learning curve). This article provides an overview of the evidence of the impact of learning curves after implementation of MIE. In addition, caveats for implementation and available evidence regarding factors that are important for safe implementation and safe pioneering of MIE are discussed.展开更多
Objective:Minimally invasive esophagectomy(MIE)was first implemented in 1992 and various MIEs have been performed subsequently.The modified McKeown MIE that includes thoracoscopic and laparoscopic procedures with left...Objective:Minimally invasive esophagectomy(MIE)was first implemented in 1992 and various MIEs have been performed subsequently.The modified McKeown MIE that includes thoracoscopic and laparoscopic procedures with left neck anastomosis has been implemented in our institution since 2006.We herein report our first 5-year experience in 376 consecutive patients undergone the modified McKeown MIE for esophageal cancer to evaluate perioperative outcomes and survival.Methods:A total of 376 patients underwent a modified McKeown MIE from March 2016 toMarch 2021 at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine.Patient demographics and perioperative outcomes were collected and assessed,and overall survival and disease-free survival were analyzed.Results:All procedures were completed successfully with no conversions to open surgery.The median operative time was 240 min,and the median blood loss was 100 mL.The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 29,the median number of harvested thoracic lymph nodes was 18,and of harvested abdominal nodes was 10.The 30-day mortality rate was 0.27%and complications occurred in 133(35.4%)patients.The median follow-up period was 19(1-60)months,and 244 patients completed more than 1 year of follow-up.The 1-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 79.5%and 73.8%,respectively.Conclusion:The modified McKeown MIE is safe and feasible for esophageal cancer,offering satisfactory perioperative outcomes and acceptable oncologic survival.展开更多
Objective To assess the feasibility and clinical efficacy of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Methods From July 2007 to December 2009,eighty-one patients with esophageal cancer received combined...Objective To assess the feasibility and clinical efficacy of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Methods From July 2007 to December 2009,eighty-one patients with esophageal cancer received combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy with anastomosis in the neck. All clinical data were retrospectively reviewed. Results The median operative展开更多
AIM To introduce a two-step method for creating a gastric tube during laparoscopic-thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and assess its clinical application.METHODS One hundred and twenty-two patients with middle or ...AIM To introduce a two-step method for creating a gastric tube during laparoscopic-thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and assess its clinical application.METHODS One hundred and twenty-two patients with middle or lower esophageal cancer who underwent laparoscopicthoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy at Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute from March 2014 to March 2016 were included in this study,and divided into two groups based on the procedure used for creating a gastric tube. One group used a two-step method for creating a gastric tube,and the other group used the conventional method. The two groups were compared regarding the operating time,surgical complications,and number of stapler cartridges used.RESULTS The mean operating time was significantly shorter in the two-step method group than in the conventional method group [238(179-293) min vs 272(189-347) min,P < 0.01]. No postoperative death occurred in either group. There was no significant difference in the rate of complications [14(21.9%) vs 13(22.4%),P= 0.55] or mean number of stapler cartridges used [5(4-6) vs 5.2(5-6),P = 0.007] between the two groups.CONCLUSION The two-step method for creating a gastric tube during laparoscopic-thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy has the advantages of simple operation,minimal damage to the tubular stomach,and reduced use of stapler cartridges.展开更多
BACKGROUND There is no established correlation between 24-h esophageal pH-metry(Eso-pH)and the new laryngopharyngeal pH-monitoring system(Restech)as only small case series exist.Eso-pH was not designed to detect laryn...BACKGROUND There is no established correlation between 24-h esophageal pH-metry(Eso-pH)and the new laryngopharyngeal pH-monitoring system(Restech)as only small case series exist.Eso-pH was not designed to detect laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR)and Restech may detect LPR better.We have previously published a dataset using the two techniques in a large patient collective with gastroesophageal reflux disease.Anatomically,patients after esophagectomy were reported to represent an ideal human reflux model as no reflux barrier exists.AIM To use a human reflux model to examine our previously published correlation in these patients.METHODS Patients after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy underwent our routine follow-up program with surveillance endoscopies,computed tomography scans and further exams following surgery.Only patients with a complete check-up program and reflux symptoms were offered inclusion into this prospective study and evaluated using Restech and simultaneous Eso-pH.Subsequently,the relationship between the two techniques was evaluated RESULTS A total of 43 patients from May 2016-November 2018 were included.All patients presented with mainly typical reflux symptoms such as heartburn(74%),regurgitation(84%),chest pain(58%),and dysphagia(47%).Extraesophageal symptoms such as cough,hoarseness,asthma symptoms,and globus sensation were also present.Esophageal 24-hour pH-metry was abnormal in 88%of patients with a mean DeMeester Score of 229.45[range 26.4-319.5].Restech evaluation was abnormal in 61%of cases in this highly selective patient cohort.All patients with abnormal supine LPR were also abnormal for supine esophageal reflux measured by conventional Eso-pH.CONCLUSION Patients following esophagectomy and reconstruction with gastric interposition can ideally serve as a human reflux model.Interestingly,laryngopharyngeal reflux phases occur mainly in the upright position.In this human volume-reflux model,results of simultaneous esophageal and laryngopharyngeal(Restech)pHmetry showed 100%correlation as being explicable by one of our reflux scenarios.展开更多
基金Supported by Science and Technology Support Plan of Sichuan Deyang Technology Bureau,No.2015SZ023
文摘BACKGROUND The main clinical treatment for esophageal cancer is surgery. Since traditional open esophageal cancer resection has the disadvantages of large trauma, long recovery period, and high postoperative complication rate, its clinical application is gradually reduced. The current report of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy(MIILE) is increasing. However, researchers found that patients with MIILE had a higher incidence of early delayed gastric emptying(DGE).AIM To investigate the influencing factors of postoperative early DGE after MIILE.METHODS A total of 156 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer at Deyang People's Hospital were enrolled. According to the criteria of DGE, patients were assigned to a DGE group(n = 49) and a control group(n = 107). The differences between the DGE group and the control group were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to further determine the influencing factors of postoperative early DGE. The receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was used to assess potential factors in predicting postoperative early DGE.RESULTS Age, intraoperative blood loss, chest drainage time, portion of anxiety score ≥ 45 points, analgesia pump use, postoperative to enteral nutrition interval, and postoperative fluid volume in the DGE group were higher than those in the control group. Perioperative albumin level in the DGE group was lower than that in the control group(P < 0.05). Age, anxiety score, perioperative albumin level,and postoperative fluid volume were independent factors influencing postoperative early DGE, and the differences were statistically significant(P <0.05). The ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve(AUC) foranxiety score was 0.720. The optimum cut-off value was 39, and the sensitivity and specificity were 80.37% and 65.31%, respectively. The AUC for postoperative fluid volume were 0.774. The optimal cut-off value was 1191.86 mL, and the sensitivity and specificity were 65.3% and 77.6%, respectively. The AUC for perioperative albumin level was 0.758. The optimum cut-off value was 26.75 g/L,and the sensitivity and specificity were 97.2% and 46.9%, respectively.CONCLUSION Advanced age, postoperative anxiety, perioperative albumin level, and postoperative fluid volume can increase the incidence of postoperative early DGE.
文摘Robotic surgery systems,as emerging minimally invasive approaches,have been increasingly applied for the treatment of esophageal cancer because they provide a high-definition three-dimensional surgical view and mechanical rotating arms that surpass the limitations of human hands,greatly enhancing the accuracy and flexibility of surgical methods.Robot-assisted McKeown esophagectomy(RAME),a common type of robotic esophagectomy,has been gradually implemented with the aim of reducing postoperative complications,improving postoperative recovery and achieving better long-term survival.Multiple centers worldwide have reported and summarized their experiences with the RAME,and some have also discussed and analyzed its perioperative effects and survival prognosis compared with those of video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy.Compared to traditional surgery,the RAME has significant advantages in terms of lymph node dissection although there seems to be no difference in overall survival or disease-free survival.With the continuous advancement of technology and the development of robotic technology,further development and innovation are expected in the RAME field.This review elaborates on the prospects of the application and advancement of the RAME to provide a useful reference for clinical practice.
文摘Background:In China,the esophageal cancer is the most common tumor type,and the main treatment is still surgical treatment.Over the past decade,thoracic laparoscopy combined with esophageal cancer resection and neck anastomosis-McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy(MIE)has gained interest and known as a minimally invasive surgery for the middle esophageal cancer.However,the safety and operability of McKeown MIE remains to be confirmed clinically.The purpose of this article is to examine the clinical safety and operability of McKeown MIE,and compare the security and outcomes of McKeown MIE and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.Materials and methods:The clinical data of 312 patients with middle esophageal cancer in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2013 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.Among them,176 patients underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and 136 patients underwent McKeown MIE.Patients'demographics and perioperative outcomes were comparable between the two groups.Results:There were no significant differences in terms of operative time,postoperative hospital stay,restore fluid diet time,pathology,tumor node metastasis staging between the two groups.In the McKeown MIE group,the intraoperative blood loss was less than that in the Ivor-Lewis group(116.54±80.99 ml vs 152.78±115.35 ml,p=0.001).The total number of lymph nodes and the number of lymph nodes dissection in bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves were more than those in the Ivor-Lewis group(30.04±14.08 vs 27.51±11.34,p=0.039;5.74±4.27 vs 1.80±2.68,p<0.001).There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications.The overall survival for the McKeown MIE group was higher than the Ivor-Lewis group(p=0.013)and no significant difference was found on disease-free survival.Conclusion:McKeown MIE is safe and operational for middle esophageal cancer,which is consistent with the principle of tumor radicalization.
文摘Esophageal resection is associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) might theoretically decrease this rate. We reviewed the current literature on MIE, with a focus on the available techniques, outcomes and comparison with open surgery. This review shows that the available literature on MIE is still crowded with heterogeneous studies with different techniques. There are no controlled and randomized trials, and the few retrospective comparative cohort studies are limited by small numbers of patients and biased by historical controls of open surgery. Based on the available literature, there is no evidence that MIE brings clear benef its compared to conventional esophagectomy. Increasing experience and the report of larger series might change this scenario.
文摘BACKGROUND The first line treatment regimen for esophageal cancer is still surgical resection and the choice of surgical scheme depends on surgeon.Now the efficacy comparison of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy(HMIE)and open esophagectomy(OE)is still controversial.AIM To compare the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of HMIE and OE in patients with esophageal cancer.METHODS PubMed,EMBASE,and Cochrane Library databases were searched for related articles.The odds ratio(OR)or standard mean difference(SMD)with a 95%confidence interval(CI)was used to evaluate the effectiveness of HMIE and OE.RESULTS Seventeen studies including a total of 2397 patients were selected.HMIE was significantly associated with less blood loss(SMD=-0.43,95%CI:-0.66,-0.20;P=0.0002)and lower incidence of pulmonary complications(OR=0.72,95%CI:0.57,0.90;P=0.004).No significant differences were seen in the lymph node yield(SMD=0.11,95%CI:-0.08,0.30;P=0.26),operation time(SMD=0.24,95%CI:-0.14,0.61;P=0.22),total complications rate(OR=0.68,95%CI:0.46,0.99;P=0.05),cardiac complication rate(OR=0.91,95%CI:0.62,1.34;P=0.64),anastomotic leak rate(OR=0.95,95%CI:0.67,1.35;P=0.78),duration of intensive care unit stay(SMD=-0.01,95%CI:-0.21,0.19;P=0.93),duration of hospital stay(SMD=-0.13,95%CI:-0.28,0.01;P=0.08),and total mortality rates(OR=0.70,95%CI:0.47,1.06;P=0.09)between the two treatment groups.CONCLUSION Compared with the OE,HMIE shows less blood loss and pulmonary complications.However,further studies are necessary to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes of HMIE.
文摘BACKGROUND Previous meta-analyses,with many limitations,have described the beneficial nature of minimal invasive procedures.AIM To compare all modalities of esophagectomies to each other from the results of randomized controlled trials(RCTs)in a network meta-analysis(NMA).METHODS We conducted a systematic search of the MEDLINE,EMBASE,Reference Citation Analysis(https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/)and CENTRAL databases to identify RCTs according to the following population,intervention,control,outcome(commonly known as PICO):P:Patients with resectable esophageal cancer;I/C:Transthoracic,transhiatal,minimally invasive(thoracolaparoscopic),hybrid,and robot-assisted esophagectomy;O:Survival,total adverse events,adverse events in subgroups,length of hospital stay,and blood loss.We used the Bayesian approach and the random effects model.We presented the geometry of the network,results with probabilistic statements,estimated intervention effects and their 95% confidence interval(CI),and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve to rank the interventions.RESULTS We included 11 studies in our analysis.We found a significant difference in postoperative pulmonary infection,which favored the minimally invasive intervention compared to transthoracic surgery(risk ratio 0.49;95%CI:0.23 to 0.99).The operation time was significantly shorter for the transhiatal approach compared to transthoracic surgery(mean difference-85 min;95%CI:-150 to-29),hybrid intervention(mean difference-98 min;95%CI:-190 to-9.4),minimally invasive technique(mean difference-130 min;95%CI:-210 to-50),and robot-assisted esophagectomy(mean difference-150 min;95%CI:-240 to-53).Other comparisons did not yield significant differences.CONCLUSION Based on our results,the implication of minimally invasive esophagectomy should be favored.
文摘Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate catheter-related infection rate(CRIR)for patients receiving minimally invasive esophagectomy(MIE),to identify the optimal catheterization approach and relationship between CRIR and post-operative complications.Methods In total,168 patients with esophageal carcinoma and undergoing MIE combined with preoperative deep venous catheterization(DVC)were analyzed in our institution(Qingdao Municipal Hospital,China),from 2014 to 2018.After completing DVC,catheter-tips together with intraductal venous blood samples were sent to the microbiology lab for bacterial strain culture.CRIR was statistically evaluated for the following clinical variables:gender,age,smoking status,drinking status,past history,tumor location,histologic grade,pathological T,N,and M category,anastomotic location,anastomotic leakage,anastomotic stricture,chylothorax,pneumonia,recurrent laryngeal nerve(RLN)injury,reflux esophagitis,catheterization site,and catheter-locking days.Results Among the 144 patients recruited in our study,105 catheters were inserted into the jugular vein and 39 catheters into the subclavian vein.The median age of these patients was 63 years(range:42–79 years),and the median catheter-locking period was seven days(range:4–21 days).Four catheters were identified with three types of strain colonizations,including Staphylococcus epidermidis,Staphylococcus aureus and Blastomyces albicans.Statistical data showed that patients diagnosed with catheter-related infection were likely to incur anastomotic leakage(66.67%,P<0.001)and pneumonia(27.27%,P<0.001);features such as tumors located in the upper esophagus(13.6%,P=0.003),and over seven catheterlocking days(10.00%,P<0.001)were attributed to a high CRIR.Conclusion Although both jugular and subclavian veins can be catheterized for patients with MIE,DVC is associated with more than seven catheter-locking days and upper esophagectomy,due to high CRIR.Furthermore,catheter-related infection is related to anastomotic leakage and pneumonia.
文摘Surgical innovation and pioneering are important for improving patient outcome, but can be associated with learning curves. Although learning curves in surgery are a recognized problem, the impact of surgical learning curves is increasing, due to increasing complexity of innovative surgical procedures, the rapid rate at which new interventions are implemented and a decrease in relative effectiveness of new interventions compared to old interventions. For minimally invasive esophagectomy(MIE), there is now robust evidence that implementation can lead to significant learning associated morbidity(morbidity during a learning curve, that could have been avoided if patients were operated by surgeons that have completed the learning curve). This article provides an overview of the evidence of the impact of learning curves after implementation of MIE. In addition, caveats for implementation and available evidence regarding factors that are important for safe implementation and safe pioneering of MIE are discussed.
文摘Objective:Minimally invasive esophagectomy(MIE)was first implemented in 1992 and various MIEs have been performed subsequently.The modified McKeown MIE that includes thoracoscopic and laparoscopic procedures with left neck anastomosis has been implemented in our institution since 2006.We herein report our first 5-year experience in 376 consecutive patients undergone the modified McKeown MIE for esophageal cancer to evaluate perioperative outcomes and survival.Methods:A total of 376 patients underwent a modified McKeown MIE from March 2016 toMarch 2021 at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine.Patient demographics and perioperative outcomes were collected and assessed,and overall survival and disease-free survival were analyzed.Results:All procedures were completed successfully with no conversions to open surgery.The median operative time was 240 min,and the median blood loss was 100 mL.The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 29,the median number of harvested thoracic lymph nodes was 18,and of harvested abdominal nodes was 10.The 30-day mortality rate was 0.27%and complications occurred in 133(35.4%)patients.The median follow-up period was 19(1-60)months,and 244 patients completed more than 1 year of follow-up.The 1-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 79.5%and 73.8%,respectively.Conclusion:The modified McKeown MIE is safe and feasible for esophageal cancer,offering satisfactory perioperative outcomes and acceptable oncologic survival.
文摘Objective To assess the feasibility and clinical efficacy of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Methods From July 2007 to December 2009,eighty-one patients with esophageal cancer received combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy with anastomosis in the neck. All clinical data were retrospectively reviewed. Results The median operative
文摘AIM To introduce a two-step method for creating a gastric tube during laparoscopic-thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and assess its clinical application.METHODS One hundred and twenty-two patients with middle or lower esophageal cancer who underwent laparoscopicthoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy at Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute from March 2014 to March 2016 were included in this study,and divided into two groups based on the procedure used for creating a gastric tube. One group used a two-step method for creating a gastric tube,and the other group used the conventional method. The two groups were compared regarding the operating time,surgical complications,and number of stapler cartridges used.RESULTS The mean operating time was significantly shorter in the two-step method group than in the conventional method group [238(179-293) min vs 272(189-347) min,P < 0.01]. No postoperative death occurred in either group. There was no significant difference in the rate of complications [14(21.9%) vs 13(22.4%),P= 0.55] or mean number of stapler cartridges used [5(4-6) vs 5.2(5-6),P = 0.007] between the two groups.CONCLUSION The two-step method for creating a gastric tube during laparoscopic-thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy has the advantages of simple operation,minimal damage to the tubular stomach,and reduced use of stapler cartridges.
基金Cologne Fortune Scientific Grant Project,No.176/2016.
文摘BACKGROUND There is no established correlation between 24-h esophageal pH-metry(Eso-pH)and the new laryngopharyngeal pH-monitoring system(Restech)as only small case series exist.Eso-pH was not designed to detect laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR)and Restech may detect LPR better.We have previously published a dataset using the two techniques in a large patient collective with gastroesophageal reflux disease.Anatomically,patients after esophagectomy were reported to represent an ideal human reflux model as no reflux barrier exists.AIM To use a human reflux model to examine our previously published correlation in these patients.METHODS Patients after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy underwent our routine follow-up program with surveillance endoscopies,computed tomography scans and further exams following surgery.Only patients with a complete check-up program and reflux symptoms were offered inclusion into this prospective study and evaluated using Restech and simultaneous Eso-pH.Subsequently,the relationship between the two techniques was evaluated RESULTS A total of 43 patients from May 2016-November 2018 were included.All patients presented with mainly typical reflux symptoms such as heartburn(74%),regurgitation(84%),chest pain(58%),and dysphagia(47%).Extraesophageal symptoms such as cough,hoarseness,asthma symptoms,and globus sensation were also present.Esophageal 24-hour pH-metry was abnormal in 88%of patients with a mean DeMeester Score of 229.45[range 26.4-319.5].Restech evaluation was abnormal in 61%of cases in this highly selective patient cohort.All patients with abnormal supine LPR were also abnormal for supine esophageal reflux measured by conventional Eso-pH.CONCLUSION Patients following esophagectomy and reconstruction with gastric interposition can ideally serve as a human reflux model.Interestingly,laryngopharyngeal reflux phases occur mainly in the upright position.In this human volume-reflux model,results of simultaneous esophageal and laryngopharyngeal(Restech)pHmetry showed 100%correlation as being explicable by one of our reflux scenarios.
