Introduction: Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is a common shoulder injury, comprising 9% - 12% of shoulder girdle injuries. Optimal management remains challenging, with treatment decisions guided by the Rockw...Introduction: Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is a common shoulder injury, comprising 9% - 12% of shoulder girdle injuries. Optimal management remains challenging, with treatment decisions guided by the Rockwood classification system. Controversies surround grade III injuries, necessitating further classification. Non-operative treatment has shown favorable outcomes, while surgical interventions vary. Anatomical coracoclavicular reconstruction (ACCR) has demonstrated biomechanical advantages over traditional methods. Arthroscopic techniques offer advantages, minimizing deltoid detachment and allowing concurrent pathology identification. This study evaluates the outcomes of arthroscopic-assisted ACCR in chronic AC joint dislocation. Surgical Technique: Arthroscopic-assisted ACCR involves meticulous portal placement, tendon graft harvesting, diagnostic arthroscopy, and coracoid exposure. The clavicle tunnels were made to mimic the conoid and trapezoid ligament positions, using FibreTape#2 loop and Dog Bone Button for correct placement against the coracoid base, and passing the semitendinosus graft through to reconstruct the conoid ligament, reduction done and graft follow through for anatomical reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective cohort study at Hospital Kuala Lumpur analyzed 35 patients undergoing arthroscopic-assisted ACCR for Rockwood grade III - V AC joint dislocations. Inclusion criteria encompassed trauma ≥ 3 weeks prior, no prior shoulder injuries, and ≥12-month follow-up. Functional and radiological assessments utilized ASES scores and coracoclavicular distances, respectively. Statistical analysis employed descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Results: The mean age was 38.9 years (SD 11.26), and 34 of 35 patients were male. Grade IV injuries were predominant (37.1%). Waiting time for surgery averaged 234.9 days. Functional improvement was substantial postoperatively (ASES: 55.5 to 88.9). Radiological outcomes demonstrated reduced coracoclavicular distances and maintained reduction. No significant correlation was observed between injury grade and outcomes. Conclusion: Arthroscopic-assisted ACCR for chronic AC joint dislocation yields significant functional and radiological improvement, irrespective of injury grade. Waiting time for surgery exhibits minor impact on outcomes, emphasizing the procedure’s efficacy. Concomitant injuries do not impede success, highlighting the versatility of this approach in managing shoulder instability. The study contributes valuable insights into the nuanced management of chronic AC joint dislocations and supports the adoption of arthroscopic-assisted ACCR as a viable treatment option.展开更多
目的:比较双袢与“Y”形三袢TightRope纽扣钢板内固定治疗新鲜RockwoodⅢ~Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效及安全性。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年5月收治的74例肩锁关节脱位患者的病例资料,其中采用双袢TightRope纽扣钢板内固定治疗...目的:比较双袢与“Y”形三袢TightRope纽扣钢板内固定治疗新鲜RockwoodⅢ~Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效及安全性。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年5月收治的74例肩锁关节脱位患者的病例资料,其中采用双袢TightRope纽扣钢板内固定治疗者43例(双袢组),采用“Y”形三袢TightRope纽扣钢板内固定治疗者31例(三袢组)。比较2组患者的手术时间、喙锁间距差值、肩部疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、加州大学洛杉矶分校(University of California Los Angeles,UCLA)肩关节量表评分、Constant-Murley肩关节评分及并发症发生率。结果:双袢组的手术时间短于三袢组[(31.37±4.03)min,(50.94±5.66)min,t=17.387,P=0.000)]。术后6周、24周、1年以及末次随访时,双袢组的喙锁间距差值均高于三袢组[(1.60±1.76)mm,(0.26±0.23)mm,t=4.220,P=0.000;(2.11±2.11)mm,(0.31±0.31)mm,t=4.695,P=0.000;(2.19±2.19)mm,(0.38±0.37)mm,t=4.536,P=0.000;(2.21±2.21)mm,(0.40±0.39)mm,t=4.499,P=0.000]。末次随访时,2组患者的肩部疼痛VAS评分均较术前降低(t=32.538,P=0.000;t=24.849,P=0.000),2组患者的肩部疼痛VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义[(0.56±0.70)分,(0.55±0.72)分,t=0.058,P=0.954]。末次随访时,2组患者的UCLA肩关节量表评分均较术前增高(t=-108.72,P=0.000;t=-52.267,P=0.000),双袢组的UCLA肩关节量表评分低于三袢组[(47.02±1.71)分,(49.32±2.77)分,t=-2.490,P=0.015]。末次随访时,2组患者的Constant-Murley肩关节评分均较术前增高(t=-63.617,P=0.000;t=-67.607,P=0.000),双袢组的Constant-Murley肩关节评分低于三袢组[(94.58±2.70)分,(94.61±3.12)分,t=-2.135,P=0.036]。双袢组2例发生锁骨骨溶解,三袢组1例发生切口感染。2组患者并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。结论:双袢与“Y”形三袢TightRope纽扣钢板内固定治疗新鲜RockwoodⅢ~Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位,均能减轻肩关节疼痛,但双袢固定的手术时间更短、“Y”形三袢固定的肩关节功能恢复得更好。展开更多
A direct force on the superior aspect of the shoulder may cause acromioclavicular(AC) dislocation or separation. Severe dislocations can lead to chronic impairment, especially in the athlete and high-demand manual lab...A direct force on the superior aspect of the shoulder may cause acromioclavicular(AC) dislocation or separation. Severe dislocations can lead to chronic impairment, especially in the athlete and high-demand manual laborer. The dislocation is classified according to Rockwood. Types Ⅰ?and Ⅱ are treated nonoperatively, while types Ⅳ, Ⅴ and Ⅵ are generally treated operatively. Controversy exists regarding the optimal treatment of type Ⅲ dislocations in the high-demand patient. Recent evidence suggests that these should be treated nonoperatively initially. Classic surgical techniques were associated with high complication rates, including recurrent dislocations and hardware breakage. In recent years, many new techniques have been introduced in order to improve the outcomes. Arthroscopic reconstruction or repair techniques have promising short-term results. This article aims to provide a current concepts review on the treatment of AC dislocations with emphasis on recent developments.展开更多
目的观察微创内侧髌股韧带重建与开放手术下带线锚钉治疗急性创伤性髌骨脱位的疗效。方法选取甘肃省庆阳市人民医院2018年1月至2021年1月收治的98例急性创伤性髌骨脱位患者作为研究对象,通过数字表法随机将患者分为观察组和对照组,各49...目的观察微创内侧髌股韧带重建与开放手术下带线锚钉治疗急性创伤性髌骨脱位的疗效。方法选取甘肃省庆阳市人民医院2018年1月至2021年1月收治的98例急性创伤性髌骨脱位患者作为研究对象,通过数字表法随机将患者分为观察组和对照组,各49例。观察组给予微创内侧髌股韧带重建术治疗,对照组给予开放手术下带线锚钉治疗,对比2组患者手术前和手术7 d髌骨外侧角、髌骨适合角、髌骨外侧移动度、膝关节Lysholm评分、美国特种外科医院膝关节评分(hospital for special surgery,HSS);对比2组患者住院期间不良反应发生率。结果术后6个月,2组患者髌骨外侧角均升高,髌骨适合角和髌骨外侧移动度均降低,且相较于对照组,观察组髌骨外侧角更高,髌骨适合角和髌骨外侧移动度更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后6个月,2组患者Lysholm评分均升高,且相较于对照组,观察组Lysholm评分更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后6个月,2组患者HSS评分均升高,且相较于对照组,观察组HSS评分更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组不良反应发生率[14.28%(7/49)]高于观察组[2.04%(1/49)],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与开放手术下带线锚钉手术相比较,微创内侧髌股韧带重建对急性创伤性膑骨脱位患者运动轨迹以及膝关节功能的改善更为明显,且并发症发生率也更低。展开更多
文摘Introduction: Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is a common shoulder injury, comprising 9% - 12% of shoulder girdle injuries. Optimal management remains challenging, with treatment decisions guided by the Rockwood classification system. Controversies surround grade III injuries, necessitating further classification. Non-operative treatment has shown favorable outcomes, while surgical interventions vary. Anatomical coracoclavicular reconstruction (ACCR) has demonstrated biomechanical advantages over traditional methods. Arthroscopic techniques offer advantages, minimizing deltoid detachment and allowing concurrent pathology identification. This study evaluates the outcomes of arthroscopic-assisted ACCR in chronic AC joint dislocation. Surgical Technique: Arthroscopic-assisted ACCR involves meticulous portal placement, tendon graft harvesting, diagnostic arthroscopy, and coracoid exposure. The clavicle tunnels were made to mimic the conoid and trapezoid ligament positions, using FibreTape#2 loop and Dog Bone Button for correct placement against the coracoid base, and passing the semitendinosus graft through to reconstruct the conoid ligament, reduction done and graft follow through for anatomical reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective cohort study at Hospital Kuala Lumpur analyzed 35 patients undergoing arthroscopic-assisted ACCR for Rockwood grade III - V AC joint dislocations. Inclusion criteria encompassed trauma ≥ 3 weeks prior, no prior shoulder injuries, and ≥12-month follow-up. Functional and radiological assessments utilized ASES scores and coracoclavicular distances, respectively. Statistical analysis employed descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Results: The mean age was 38.9 years (SD 11.26), and 34 of 35 patients were male. Grade IV injuries were predominant (37.1%). Waiting time for surgery averaged 234.9 days. Functional improvement was substantial postoperatively (ASES: 55.5 to 88.9). Radiological outcomes demonstrated reduced coracoclavicular distances and maintained reduction. No significant correlation was observed between injury grade and outcomes. Conclusion: Arthroscopic-assisted ACCR for chronic AC joint dislocation yields significant functional and radiological improvement, irrespective of injury grade. Waiting time for surgery exhibits minor impact on outcomes, emphasizing the procedure’s efficacy. Concomitant injuries do not impede success, highlighting the versatility of this approach in managing shoulder instability. The study contributes valuable insights into the nuanced management of chronic AC joint dislocations and supports the adoption of arthroscopic-assisted ACCR as a viable treatment option.
文摘目的:比较双袢与“Y”形三袢TightRope纽扣钢板内固定治疗新鲜RockwoodⅢ~Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效及安全性。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年5月收治的74例肩锁关节脱位患者的病例资料,其中采用双袢TightRope纽扣钢板内固定治疗者43例(双袢组),采用“Y”形三袢TightRope纽扣钢板内固定治疗者31例(三袢组)。比较2组患者的手术时间、喙锁间距差值、肩部疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、加州大学洛杉矶分校(University of California Los Angeles,UCLA)肩关节量表评分、Constant-Murley肩关节评分及并发症发生率。结果:双袢组的手术时间短于三袢组[(31.37±4.03)min,(50.94±5.66)min,t=17.387,P=0.000)]。术后6周、24周、1年以及末次随访时,双袢组的喙锁间距差值均高于三袢组[(1.60±1.76)mm,(0.26±0.23)mm,t=4.220,P=0.000;(2.11±2.11)mm,(0.31±0.31)mm,t=4.695,P=0.000;(2.19±2.19)mm,(0.38±0.37)mm,t=4.536,P=0.000;(2.21±2.21)mm,(0.40±0.39)mm,t=4.499,P=0.000]。末次随访时,2组患者的肩部疼痛VAS评分均较术前降低(t=32.538,P=0.000;t=24.849,P=0.000),2组患者的肩部疼痛VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义[(0.56±0.70)分,(0.55±0.72)分,t=0.058,P=0.954]。末次随访时,2组患者的UCLA肩关节量表评分均较术前增高(t=-108.72,P=0.000;t=-52.267,P=0.000),双袢组的UCLA肩关节量表评分低于三袢组[(47.02±1.71)分,(49.32±2.77)分,t=-2.490,P=0.015]。末次随访时,2组患者的Constant-Murley肩关节评分均较术前增高(t=-63.617,P=0.000;t=-67.607,P=0.000),双袢组的Constant-Murley肩关节评分低于三袢组[(94.58±2.70)分,(94.61±3.12)分,t=-2.135,P=0.036]。双袢组2例发生锁骨骨溶解,三袢组1例发生切口感染。2组患者并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。结论:双袢与“Y”形三袢TightRope纽扣钢板内固定治疗新鲜RockwoodⅢ~Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位,均能减轻肩关节疼痛,但双袢固定的手术时间更短、“Y”形三袢固定的肩关节功能恢复得更好。
文摘A direct force on the superior aspect of the shoulder may cause acromioclavicular(AC) dislocation or separation. Severe dislocations can lead to chronic impairment, especially in the athlete and high-demand manual laborer. The dislocation is classified according to Rockwood. Types Ⅰ?and Ⅱ are treated nonoperatively, while types Ⅳ, Ⅴ and Ⅵ are generally treated operatively. Controversy exists regarding the optimal treatment of type Ⅲ dislocations in the high-demand patient. Recent evidence suggests that these should be treated nonoperatively initially. Classic surgical techniques were associated with high complication rates, including recurrent dislocations and hardware breakage. In recent years, many new techniques have been introduced in order to improve the outcomes. Arthroscopic reconstruction or repair techniques have promising short-term results. This article aims to provide a current concepts review on the treatment of AC dislocations with emphasis on recent developments.
文摘目的观察微创内侧髌股韧带重建与开放手术下带线锚钉治疗急性创伤性髌骨脱位的疗效。方法选取甘肃省庆阳市人民医院2018年1月至2021年1月收治的98例急性创伤性髌骨脱位患者作为研究对象,通过数字表法随机将患者分为观察组和对照组,各49例。观察组给予微创内侧髌股韧带重建术治疗,对照组给予开放手术下带线锚钉治疗,对比2组患者手术前和手术7 d髌骨外侧角、髌骨适合角、髌骨外侧移动度、膝关节Lysholm评分、美国特种外科医院膝关节评分(hospital for special surgery,HSS);对比2组患者住院期间不良反应发生率。结果术后6个月,2组患者髌骨外侧角均升高,髌骨适合角和髌骨外侧移动度均降低,且相较于对照组,观察组髌骨外侧角更高,髌骨适合角和髌骨外侧移动度更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后6个月,2组患者Lysholm评分均升高,且相较于对照组,观察组Lysholm评分更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后6个月,2组患者HSS评分均升高,且相较于对照组,观察组HSS评分更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组不良反应发生率[14.28%(7/49)]高于观察组[2.04%(1/49)],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与开放手术下带线锚钉手术相比较,微创内侧髌股韧带重建对急性创伤性膑骨脱位患者运动轨迹以及膝关节功能的改善更为明显,且并发症发生率也更低。
