Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy of urokinase in combined with minimally invasive hematoma puncture with YL-1 type needle in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage and the effect on blood sugar an...Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy of urokinase in combined with minimally invasive hematoma puncture with YL-1 type needle in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage and the effect on blood sugar and serum CRP.Methods:A total of 84 patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage who were admitted in our hospital were included in the study and divided into the minimally invasive group (n=53) and the conservative group (n=31) according to different treatment protocols. The patients in the two groups were given routine drug treatments. The patients in the observation group were given urokinase in combined with minimally invasive hematoma puncture with YL-1 type needle. The blood sugar and serum CRP levels before and after treatment in the two groups were compared. CT was performed to reexamine the cerebral hematoma and edema volume.Results: The serum CRP and blood sugar levels 3, 7 and 14 d after treatment in the minimally invasive group were significantly lower than those in the conservative group (P<0.05). The cerebral hematoma and edema volume 1, 3, 7, and 14 d after treatment in the minimally invasive group was significantly lower than that in the conservative group (P<0.05).Conclusions: Urokinase in combined with minimally invasive hematoma puncture with YL-1 type needle in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage can significantly alleviate the brain tissue injury, reduce the systemic inflammatory reaction and blood sugar level, and contribute to the rehabilitation.展开更多
BACKGROUND Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage is a common critical disease of the nervous system,comprising one fifth of all acute cerebrovascular diseases and has a high disability and mortality rate.It severely a...BACKGROUND Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage is a common critical disease of the nervous system,comprising one fifth of all acute cerebrovascular diseases and has a high disability and mortality rate.It severely affects the patients’quality of life.AIM To analyze the short-term effect and long-term prognosis of neuroendoscopic minimally invasive surgery for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.METHODS From March 2018 to May 2020,118 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage were enrolled in our study and divided into a control group and observation group according to the surgical plan.The control group used a hard-channel minimally invasive puncture and drainage procedure.The observation group underwent minimally invasive neuroendoscopic surgery.The changes in the levels of serum P substances(SP),inflammatory factors[tumor necrosis factor-α,interleukin-6(IL-6),IL-10],and the National Hospital Stroke Scale(NIHSS)and Barthel index scores were recorded.Surgery related indicators and prognosis were compared between the two groups.RESULTS The operation time(105.26±28.35)of the observation group was min longer than that of the control group,and the volume of intraoperative bleeding was 45.36±10.17 mL more than that of the control group.The hematoma clearance rates were 88.58%±4.69%and 94.47%±4.02%higher than those of the control group at 48 h and 72 h,respectively.Good prognosis rate(86.44%)was higher in the observation group than in the control group,and complication rate(5.08%)was not significantly different from that of the control group(P>0.05).The SP level and Barthel index score of the two groups increased(P<0.05)and the inflam-matory factors and NIHSS score decreased(P<0.05).The cytokine levels,NIHSS score,and Barthel index score were better in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Neuroendoscopic minimally invasive surgery is more complicated than hard channel minimally invasive puncture drainage in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage;however,hematoma clearance is more thorough,and the short-term effect and long-term prognosis are better than hard channel minimally invasive puncture drainage.展开更多
BACKGROUND Prophylactic drains have been used to remove intraperitoneal collections and detect complications early in open surgery.In the last decades,minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery has been performed world...BACKGROUND Prophylactic drains have been used to remove intraperitoneal collections and detect complications early in open surgery.In the last decades,minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery has been performed worldwide.However,reports on routine prophylactic abdominal drainage after totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy are few.AIM To evaluate the feasibility performing totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy without prophylactic drains in selected patients.METHODS Data of patients with distal gastric cancer who underwent totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with and without prophylactic drainage at China National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital from February 2018 to August 2019 were reviewed.The outcomes between patients with and without prophylactic drainage were compared.RESULTS A total of 457 patients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer were identified.Of these,125 patients who underwent totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy were included.After propensity score matching,data of 42 pairs were extracted.The incidence of concurrent illness was higher in the drain group(42.9%vs 31.0%,P=0.258).The overall postoperative complication rates were 19.5%and 10.6%in the drain(n=76)and no-drain groups(n=49),respectively;there were no significant differences between the two groups(P>0.05).The difference between the two groups based on the need for percutaneous catheter drainage was also not significant(9.8%vs 6.4%,P=0.700).However,patients with a larger body mass index(≥29 kg/m2)were prone to postoperative complications(P=0.042).In addition,the number of days from surgery until the first flatus(4.33±1.24 d vs 3.57±1.85 d,P=0.029)was greater in the drain group.CONCLUSION Omitting prophylactic drainage may reduce surgery time and result in faster recovery.Routine prophylactic drains are not necessary in selected patients.A prophylactic drain may be useful in high-risk patients.展开更多
With the advance of invasive interventions,the treatment model for infected necrotizing pancreatitis(INP)has shifted from open surgery to the step-up minimally invasive treatment.Late intervention,originating from the...With the advance of invasive interventions,the treatment model for infected necrotizing pancreatitis(INP)has shifted from open surgery to the step-up minimally invasive treatment.Late intervention,originating from the open surgery era,has been questioned in the minimally invasive period.With the emergence of new high-quality evidence about the timing for intervention,it seems to be increasingly apparent that,even in the age of minimal invasiveness,“late intervention”waiting for the necrotic collections to be encapsulated is still necessary.This opinion review mainly discusses the intervention timing for INP.展开更多
文摘Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy of urokinase in combined with minimally invasive hematoma puncture with YL-1 type needle in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage and the effect on blood sugar and serum CRP.Methods:A total of 84 patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage who were admitted in our hospital were included in the study and divided into the minimally invasive group (n=53) and the conservative group (n=31) according to different treatment protocols. The patients in the two groups were given routine drug treatments. The patients in the observation group were given urokinase in combined with minimally invasive hematoma puncture with YL-1 type needle. The blood sugar and serum CRP levels before and after treatment in the two groups were compared. CT was performed to reexamine the cerebral hematoma and edema volume.Results: The serum CRP and blood sugar levels 3, 7 and 14 d after treatment in the minimally invasive group were significantly lower than those in the conservative group (P<0.05). The cerebral hematoma and edema volume 1, 3, 7, and 14 d after treatment in the minimally invasive group was significantly lower than that in the conservative group (P<0.05).Conclusions: Urokinase in combined with minimally invasive hematoma puncture with YL-1 type needle in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage can significantly alleviate the brain tissue injury, reduce the systemic inflammatory reaction and blood sugar level, and contribute to the rehabilitation.
文摘BACKGROUND Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage is a common critical disease of the nervous system,comprising one fifth of all acute cerebrovascular diseases and has a high disability and mortality rate.It severely affects the patients’quality of life.AIM To analyze the short-term effect and long-term prognosis of neuroendoscopic minimally invasive surgery for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.METHODS From March 2018 to May 2020,118 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage were enrolled in our study and divided into a control group and observation group according to the surgical plan.The control group used a hard-channel minimally invasive puncture and drainage procedure.The observation group underwent minimally invasive neuroendoscopic surgery.The changes in the levels of serum P substances(SP),inflammatory factors[tumor necrosis factor-α,interleukin-6(IL-6),IL-10],and the National Hospital Stroke Scale(NIHSS)and Barthel index scores were recorded.Surgery related indicators and prognosis were compared between the two groups.RESULTS The operation time(105.26±28.35)of the observation group was min longer than that of the control group,and the volume of intraoperative bleeding was 45.36±10.17 mL more than that of the control group.The hematoma clearance rates were 88.58%±4.69%and 94.47%±4.02%higher than those of the control group at 48 h and 72 h,respectively.Good prognosis rate(86.44%)was higher in the observation group than in the control group,and complication rate(5.08%)was not significantly different from that of the control group(P>0.05).The SP level and Barthel index score of the two groups increased(P<0.05)and the inflam-matory factors and NIHSS score decreased(P<0.05).The cytokine levels,NIHSS score,and Barthel index score were better in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Neuroendoscopic minimally invasive surgery is more complicated than hard channel minimally invasive puncture drainage in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage;however,hematoma clearance is more thorough,and the short-term effect and long-term prognosis are better than hard channel minimally invasive puncture drainage.
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81772642Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research,No.CFH 2018-2-4022.
文摘BACKGROUND Prophylactic drains have been used to remove intraperitoneal collections and detect complications early in open surgery.In the last decades,minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery has been performed worldwide.However,reports on routine prophylactic abdominal drainage after totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy are few.AIM To evaluate the feasibility performing totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy without prophylactic drains in selected patients.METHODS Data of patients with distal gastric cancer who underwent totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with and without prophylactic drainage at China National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital from February 2018 to August 2019 were reviewed.The outcomes between patients with and without prophylactic drainage were compared.RESULTS A total of 457 patients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer were identified.Of these,125 patients who underwent totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy were included.After propensity score matching,data of 42 pairs were extracted.The incidence of concurrent illness was higher in the drain group(42.9%vs 31.0%,P=0.258).The overall postoperative complication rates were 19.5%and 10.6%in the drain(n=76)and no-drain groups(n=49),respectively;there were no significant differences between the two groups(P>0.05).The difference between the two groups based on the need for percutaneous catheter drainage was also not significant(9.8%vs 6.4%,P=0.700).However,patients with a larger body mass index(≥29 kg/m2)were prone to postoperative complications(P=0.042).In addition,the number of days from surgery until the first flatus(4.33±1.24 d vs 3.57±1.85 d,P=0.029)was greater in the drain group.CONCLUSION Omitting prophylactic drainage may reduce surgery time and result in faster recovery.Routine prophylactic drains are not necessary in selected patients.A prophylactic drain may be useful in high-risk patients.
文摘With the advance of invasive interventions,the treatment model for infected necrotizing pancreatitis(INP)has shifted from open surgery to the step-up minimally invasive treatment.Late intervention,originating from the open surgery era,has been questioned in the minimally invasive period.With the emergence of new high-quality evidence about the timing for intervention,it seems to be increasingly apparent that,even in the age of minimal invasiveness,“late intervention”waiting for the necrotic collections to be encapsulated is still necessary.This opinion review mainly discusses the intervention timing for INP.
