BACKGROUND Most greater tuberosity fractures can be treated without surgery but some have a poor prognosis.The surgical procedures for avulsion fractures of the humeral greater tuberosity include screw fixation,suture...BACKGROUND Most greater tuberosity fractures can be treated without surgery but some have a poor prognosis.The surgical procedures for avulsion fractures of the humeral greater tuberosity include screw fixation,suture anchor fixation,and plate fixation,all of which have treatment-associated complications.To decrease surgical complications,we used a modified suture bridge procedure under direct vision and a minimally invasive small incision to fix fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus.AIM To investigate the clinical efficacy and outcomes of minimally invasive modified suture bridge open reduction of greater tuberosity evulsion fractures.METHODS Sixteen patients diagnosed between January 2016 and January 2019 with an avulsion-type greater tuberosity fracture of the proximal humerus and treated by minimally invasive open reduction and modified suture bridges with anchors were studied retrospectively.All were followed up by clinical examination and radiographs at 3 and 6 wk,3,6 and 12 mo after surgery,and thereafter every 6 mo.Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively by a visual analog scale(VAS),the University of California Los Angeles(UCLA)shoulder score,the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon score(ASES),and range of motion(ROM)for shoulders.RESULTS Seven men and nine women,with an average age of 44.94 years,were evaluated.The time between injury and surgery was 1-2 d,with an average of 1.75 d.The mean operation time was 103.1±7.23 min.All patients achieved bone union within 3 mo after surgery.VAS scores were significantly decreased(P=0.002),and the mean degrees of forward elevation(P=0.047),mean degrees of abduction(P=0.035),ASES score(P=0.092)were increased at 3 wk.The UCLA score was increased at 6 wk(P=0.029)after surgery.The average degrees of external rotation and internal rotation both improved at 3 mo after surgery(P=0.012 and P=0.007,respectively).No procedure-related deaths or incision-related superficial or deep tissue infections occurred.CONCLUSION Modified suture bridge was effective for the treatment of greater tuberosity evulsion fractures,was easier to perform,and had fewer implants than other procedures.展开更多
Objective:To study the clinical effect of minimally invasive single-segment reduction and internal fixation in patients with thoracolumbar fractures.Methods:From June 2013 to June 2014,100 patients with thoracolumbar ...Objective:To study the clinical effect of minimally invasive single-segment reduction and internal fixation in patients with thoracolumbar fractures.Methods:From June 2013 to June 2014,100 patients with thoracolumbar fractures were selected as the subjects and they were randomly divided into observation group(50 cases)and control group(50 cases).The patients in the observation group were treated with minimally invasive singlesegment reduction and internal fixation.The patients in the control group were treated with short segmental fixation.The clinical effects of the two groups were compared.Results:There was no significant difference in the compression rate and Cobb angle between the two groups before and after operation(P>0.05).For all patients who were followed up for the last time,the Cobb angle was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).The social function,affective function and physical pain score of the observation group were significantly better than the control group(P<0.05).The amount of bleeding in the observation group was(250.4±41.0)ml,which was significantly lower than that in the control group(267.5±32.8)ml.The time required for the operation was(90.2±35.4)min,which was significantly lower than that of the control group(104.5±22.6)min(P<0.05).After treatment,the prognosis was 70.00%and the excellent and good rate was 98.00%,which was significantly higher than that of the control group(46.00%)and 78.00%(P<0.05).Conclusion:Thoracolumbar fractures in patients with dilated channel minimally invasive single-segment reduction and internal fixation treatment can effectively repair the patient's vertebral height and Cobb angle and the degree of correction after surgery was significantly better,safer and worthy of clinical recommended use.展开更多
Parpose:The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a new minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique with those of conventional open surgery for transverse patellar fractures.Methods:It was a retrospective s...Parpose:The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a new minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique with those of conventional open surgery for transverse patellar fractures.Methods:It was a retrospective study.Adult patients with closed transverse patellar fracture were included,and with open comminuted patellar fracture were excluded.These patients were divided into minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique(MIOT)group and open reduction and internal fixation(ORIF)group.Surgical time,frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy,visual analogue scale score,flexion,extension,Lysholm knee score,infection,malreduction,implant migration and implant irritation in two groups were recorded and compared.Statistical analysis was performed by the SPsS software package(version 19).A p<0.05 indicated statistical significance.Results:A total of 55 patients with transverse patellar fractures enrolled in this study,the minimally invasive technique was performed in 27 cases,and open reduction was performed in 28 cases.The surgical time in the ORIF group was shorter than that in the MIOT group(p=0.033).The visual analogue scale scores in the MIOT group were significantly lower than those in the ORIF group only in the first month after surgery(p=0.015).Flexion was restored faster in the MIOT group than that in the ORIF group at one month(p=0.001)and three months(p=0.015).Extension was recovered faster in the MIOT group than that in the ORIF group at one month(p=0.031)and three months(p=0.023).The recorded Lysholm knee scores in the MIOT group were always greater than those in the ORIF group.Complications,such as infection,malreduction,implant migration,and implant irritation,occurred more frequently in the ORIF group.Conclusion:Compared with the ORIF group,the MIOT group reduced postoperative pain and had less complications and better exercise rehabilitation.Although it requires a long operation time,MIOT may be a wise choice for transverse patellar fractures.展开更多
目的探讨关节镜辅助复位内固定(arthroscopically-assisted reduction and internal fixation,ARIF)结合加速康复外科(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)理念与开放复位内固定(open reduction and internal fixation,ORIF)治疗胫...目的探讨关节镜辅助复位内固定(arthroscopically-assisted reduction and internal fixation,ARIF)结合加速康复外科(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)理念与开放复位内固定(open reduction and internal fixation,ORIF)治疗胫骨平台后外侧骨折的临床疗效差异。方法回顾性选择2020年1月至2022年11月徐州市中心医院骨科胫骨平台后外侧骨折患者70例,根据治疗方法分为ARIF组(结合ERAS,n=32)和ORIF组(未结合ERAS,n=38)。所有患者住院后均通过影像学检查评估骨折类型,比较两组患者的手术时间、住院时间,采用视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评估患者术后早期疼痛,美国特种外科医院(hospital for special surgery,HSS)评分评估患者术后3个月膝关节功能,比较两组患者术后6个月双侧大腿周径差值。结果ARIF组患者的手术时间显著短于ORIF组[(67.84±9.89)min vs(85.16±9.18)min,P<0.001],住院时间显著短于ORIF组[(7.13±1.41)d vs(8.74±1.84)d,P<0.001]。术后第3天,ARIF组的VAS评分显著低于ORIF组[(4.00±1.44)分vs(5.39±1.24)分,P<0.001]。术后3个月,ARIF组患者的膝关节功能显著优于ORIF组,术后6个月髌骨上10 cm大腿周径差值显著小于ORIF组(P<0.001)。结论与ORIF相比,接受ARIF结合ERAS治疗胫骨平台后外侧骨折的患者术后恢复更快、住院时间更短、临床疗效更确切。展开更多
基金China Scholarship Council,No.201808080126Incubation Fund of Shandong Provincial Hospital,No.2020FY019+1 种基金Young Scholars Program of Shandong Provincial HospitalNatural Science Foundation of Shandong Province,No.ZR202102180575.
文摘BACKGROUND Most greater tuberosity fractures can be treated without surgery but some have a poor prognosis.The surgical procedures for avulsion fractures of the humeral greater tuberosity include screw fixation,suture anchor fixation,and plate fixation,all of which have treatment-associated complications.To decrease surgical complications,we used a modified suture bridge procedure under direct vision and a minimally invasive small incision to fix fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus.AIM To investigate the clinical efficacy and outcomes of minimally invasive modified suture bridge open reduction of greater tuberosity evulsion fractures.METHODS Sixteen patients diagnosed between January 2016 and January 2019 with an avulsion-type greater tuberosity fracture of the proximal humerus and treated by minimally invasive open reduction and modified suture bridges with anchors were studied retrospectively.All were followed up by clinical examination and radiographs at 3 and 6 wk,3,6 and 12 mo after surgery,and thereafter every 6 mo.Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively by a visual analog scale(VAS),the University of California Los Angeles(UCLA)shoulder score,the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon score(ASES),and range of motion(ROM)for shoulders.RESULTS Seven men and nine women,with an average age of 44.94 years,were evaluated.The time between injury and surgery was 1-2 d,with an average of 1.75 d.The mean operation time was 103.1±7.23 min.All patients achieved bone union within 3 mo after surgery.VAS scores were significantly decreased(P=0.002),and the mean degrees of forward elevation(P=0.047),mean degrees of abduction(P=0.035),ASES score(P=0.092)were increased at 3 wk.The UCLA score was increased at 6 wk(P=0.029)after surgery.The average degrees of external rotation and internal rotation both improved at 3 mo after surgery(P=0.012 and P=0.007,respectively).No procedure-related deaths or incision-related superficial or deep tissue infections occurred.CONCLUSION Modified suture bridge was effective for the treatment of greater tuberosity evulsion fractures,was easier to perform,and had fewer implants than other procedures.
文摘Objective:To study the clinical effect of minimally invasive single-segment reduction and internal fixation in patients with thoracolumbar fractures.Methods:From June 2013 to June 2014,100 patients with thoracolumbar fractures were selected as the subjects and they were randomly divided into observation group(50 cases)and control group(50 cases).The patients in the observation group were treated with minimally invasive singlesegment reduction and internal fixation.The patients in the control group were treated with short segmental fixation.The clinical effects of the two groups were compared.Results:There was no significant difference in the compression rate and Cobb angle between the two groups before and after operation(P>0.05).For all patients who were followed up for the last time,the Cobb angle was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).The social function,affective function and physical pain score of the observation group were significantly better than the control group(P<0.05).The amount of bleeding in the observation group was(250.4±41.0)ml,which was significantly lower than that in the control group(267.5±32.8)ml.The time required for the operation was(90.2±35.4)min,which was significantly lower than that of the control group(104.5±22.6)min(P<0.05).After treatment,the prognosis was 70.00%and the excellent and good rate was 98.00%,which was significantly higher than that of the control group(46.00%)and 78.00%(P<0.05).Conclusion:Thoracolumbar fractures in patients with dilated channel minimally invasive single-segment reduction and internal fixation treatment can effectively repair the patient's vertebral height and Cobb angle and the degree of correction after surgery was significantly better,safer and worthy of clinical recommended use.
基金funded by Basic Public Welfare Plan of Zhejiang Province(LGF20H060008)Ningbo Science and technology Service Project(2020F029).
文摘Parpose:The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a new minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique with those of conventional open surgery for transverse patellar fractures.Methods:It was a retrospective study.Adult patients with closed transverse patellar fracture were included,and with open comminuted patellar fracture were excluded.These patients were divided into minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique(MIOT)group and open reduction and internal fixation(ORIF)group.Surgical time,frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy,visual analogue scale score,flexion,extension,Lysholm knee score,infection,malreduction,implant migration and implant irritation in two groups were recorded and compared.Statistical analysis was performed by the SPsS software package(version 19).A p<0.05 indicated statistical significance.Results:A total of 55 patients with transverse patellar fractures enrolled in this study,the minimally invasive technique was performed in 27 cases,and open reduction was performed in 28 cases.The surgical time in the ORIF group was shorter than that in the MIOT group(p=0.033).The visual analogue scale scores in the MIOT group were significantly lower than those in the ORIF group only in the first month after surgery(p=0.015).Flexion was restored faster in the MIOT group than that in the ORIF group at one month(p=0.001)and three months(p=0.015).Extension was recovered faster in the MIOT group than that in the ORIF group at one month(p=0.031)and three months(p=0.023).The recorded Lysholm knee scores in the MIOT group were always greater than those in the ORIF group.Complications,such as infection,malreduction,implant migration,and implant irritation,occurred more frequently in the ORIF group.Conclusion:Compared with the ORIF group,the MIOT group reduced postoperative pain and had less complications and better exercise rehabilitation.Although it requires a long operation time,MIOT may be a wise choice for transverse patellar fractures.
文摘目的探讨关节镜辅助复位内固定(arthroscopically-assisted reduction and internal fixation,ARIF)结合加速康复外科(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)理念与开放复位内固定(open reduction and internal fixation,ORIF)治疗胫骨平台后外侧骨折的临床疗效差异。方法回顾性选择2020年1月至2022年11月徐州市中心医院骨科胫骨平台后外侧骨折患者70例,根据治疗方法分为ARIF组(结合ERAS,n=32)和ORIF组(未结合ERAS,n=38)。所有患者住院后均通过影像学检查评估骨折类型,比较两组患者的手术时间、住院时间,采用视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评估患者术后早期疼痛,美国特种外科医院(hospital for special surgery,HSS)评分评估患者术后3个月膝关节功能,比较两组患者术后6个月双侧大腿周径差值。结果ARIF组患者的手术时间显著短于ORIF组[(67.84±9.89)min vs(85.16±9.18)min,P<0.001],住院时间显著短于ORIF组[(7.13±1.41)d vs(8.74±1.84)d,P<0.001]。术后第3天,ARIF组的VAS评分显著低于ORIF组[(4.00±1.44)分vs(5.39±1.24)分,P<0.001]。术后3个月,ARIF组患者的膝关节功能显著优于ORIF组,术后6个月髌骨上10 cm大腿周径差值显著小于ORIF组(P<0.001)。结论与ORIF相比,接受ARIF结合ERAS治疗胫骨平台后外侧骨折的患者术后恢复更快、住院时间更短、临床疗效更确切。
