Background: We introduce a new catheter-based minimally invasive approach via frontal tuber for removing hypertensive intraventricular hemorrhage(IVH), and further compare its treatment efficacy with conventional exte...Background: We introduce a new catheter-based minimally invasive approach via frontal tuber for removing hypertensive intraventricular hemorrhage(IVH), and further compare its treatment efficacy with conventional external ventricular drainage (EVD).Methods: This study is prospective and randomized.Sixty cases of secondary intraventricular cast hemorrhage patients were randomly divided into two groups of 30 cases: modified ventricular puncture (MVP) group and control group.Preoperative Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and Graeb score were compared between the two groups.The postoperative manifestations of two groups were also analyzed and compared statistically, including evacuation rate of intraventricular hematoma in 24 h, the time with drainage tube, rebleeding, complicated by infection, shunt-dependent hydrocephalus and Glasgow outcome scale at 3 months.Results: 1.There was no significant difference in preoperative GCS score and the Graeb score between two groups (P ＞ 0.05).2.In the MVP group via frontal tuber approach, a substantial removal of intraventricular hematoma was achieved in all cases.The average evacuation rate of intraventricular hematoma reached 80.10 ± 10.16 ％, the average time of catheter drainage was 3.17 ± 0.87 days, the average GOS was 3.80 ± 0.92, no intracranial infection and secondary hemorrhage were observed following surgery in all cases, and shunt-dependent hydrocephalus occurred in 2 cases.In the control group, the hematoma evacuation rate was an average of 21.21 ± 7.81％, the time of drainage was an average of 7.63 ± 2.87 days, the GOS was an average of 3.20 ± 1.12, intracranial infection after surgery occurred in 5 cases, secondary hemorrhage was observed in 1 case, and shunt-dependent hydrocephalus occurred in 8 cases.Between the two groups there were significantly statistical difference in the hematoma evacuation rate, drainage duration, infection rate and GOS (all P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions: The new approach is safe, and can quickly remove the hematoma, and significantly shorten the time with a pipe.It can also reduce the occurrence of infection and hydrocephalus, and improve overall outcome of patients, but cannot reduce mortality.展开更多
目的评价改良微创血肿清除术在治疗基底节脑出血的临床应用价值。方法将2009年9月至2012年9月我院收治基底节脑出血178例患者随机分为A、B两组,其中A组88例采用传统微创穿刺粉碎清除术;B组90例采用改良微创穿刺血肿清除术治疗;术后随访1...目的评价改良微创血肿清除术在治疗基底节脑出血的临床应用价值。方法将2009年9月至2012年9月我院收治基底节脑出血178例患者随机分为A、B两组,其中A组88例采用传统微创穿刺粉碎清除术;B组90例采用改良微创穿刺血肿清除术治疗;术后随访1年,对比分析两组患者手术时间、术后再出血发生率、病死率、存活患者神经功能缺损评分、Barthel指数日常生活活动(ADL)量表评分之间的差异。结果 A组平均手术时间(55.2±3.4)min,B组平均手术时间(40.3±3.2)min,两组间比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后再出血发生率A组22.7%(20/88),B组23.3%(21/90),术后病死率A组17.0%(15/88),B组17.8%(16/90),两组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),存活患者神经功能缺损评分、Barthel指数日常生活活动(Activity of Daily Living Scale,ADL)量表评分之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论改良微创血肿清除术能显著降低手术时间,并不增加术后病死率及再出血发生率,近期神经功能缺损与远期疗效(日常生活活动能力)与传统术式无显著差别。展开更多
目的探讨超声引导下应用改良塞丁格穿刺技术经外周静脉穿刺置入中心静脉导管(peripherally inserted central catheter,PICC)在危重患者中的应用效果。方法在视锐5超声引导下应用改良塞丁格穿刺技术对16例危重患者行PICC。结果 16例危...目的探讨超声引导下应用改良塞丁格穿刺技术经外周静脉穿刺置入中心静脉导管(peripherally inserted central catheter,PICC)在危重患者中的应用效果。方法在视锐5超声引导下应用改良塞丁格穿刺技术对16例危重患者行PICC。结果 16例危重患者均成功置入PICC导管,无1例出现并发症。结论视锐5超声引导下应用改良塞丁格穿刺技术行PICC较常规置管具有准确定位靶向血管、提高穿刺成功率;同时能满足危重患者治疗及抢救的需要,有效提者抢救成功率和护理质量。展开更多
文摘Background: We introduce a new catheter-based minimally invasive approach via frontal tuber for removing hypertensive intraventricular hemorrhage(IVH), and further compare its treatment efficacy with conventional external ventricular drainage (EVD).Methods: This study is prospective and randomized.Sixty cases of secondary intraventricular cast hemorrhage patients were randomly divided into two groups of 30 cases: modified ventricular puncture (MVP) group and control group.Preoperative Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and Graeb score were compared between the two groups.The postoperative manifestations of two groups were also analyzed and compared statistically, including evacuation rate of intraventricular hematoma in 24 h, the time with drainage tube, rebleeding, complicated by infection, shunt-dependent hydrocephalus and Glasgow outcome scale at 3 months.Results: 1.There was no significant difference in preoperative GCS score and the Graeb score between two groups (P ＞ 0.05).2.In the MVP group via frontal tuber approach, a substantial removal of intraventricular hematoma was achieved in all cases.The average evacuation rate of intraventricular hematoma reached 80.10 ± 10.16 ％, the average time of catheter drainage was 3.17 ± 0.87 days, the average GOS was 3.80 ± 0.92, no intracranial infection and secondary hemorrhage were observed following surgery in all cases, and shunt-dependent hydrocephalus occurred in 2 cases.In the control group, the hematoma evacuation rate was an average of 21.21 ± 7.81％, the time of drainage was an average of 7.63 ± 2.87 days, the GOS was an average of 3.20 ± 1.12, intracranial infection after surgery occurred in 5 cases, secondary hemorrhage was observed in 1 case, and shunt-dependent hydrocephalus occurred in 8 cases.Between the two groups there were significantly statistical difference in the hematoma evacuation rate, drainage duration, infection rate and GOS (all P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions: The new approach is safe, and can quickly remove the hematoma, and significantly shorten the time with a pipe.It can also reduce the occurrence of infection and hydrocephalus, and improve overall outcome of patients, but cannot reduce mortality.
文摘目的评价改良微创血肿清除术在治疗基底节脑出血的临床应用价值。方法将2009年9月至2012年9月我院收治基底节脑出血178例患者随机分为A、B两组,其中A组88例采用传统微创穿刺粉碎清除术;B组90例采用改良微创穿刺血肿清除术治疗;术后随访1年,对比分析两组患者手术时间、术后再出血发生率、病死率、存活患者神经功能缺损评分、Barthel指数日常生活活动(ADL)量表评分之间的差异。结果 A组平均手术时间(55.2±3.4)min,B组平均手术时间(40.3±3.2)min,两组间比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后再出血发生率A组22.7%(20/88),B组23.3%(21/90),术后病死率A组17.0%(15/88),B组17.8%(16/90),两组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),存活患者神经功能缺损评分、Barthel指数日常生活活动(Activity of Daily Living Scale,ADL)量表评分之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论改良微创血肿清除术能显著降低手术时间,并不增加术后病死率及再出血发生率,近期神经功能缺损与远期疗效(日常生活活动能力)与传统术式无显著差别。
文摘目的探讨超声引导下应用改良塞丁格穿刺技术经外周静脉穿刺置入中心静脉导管(peripherally inserted central catheter,PICC)在危重患者中的应用效果。方法在视锐5超声引导下应用改良塞丁格穿刺技术对16例危重患者行PICC。结果 16例危重患者均成功置入PICC导管,无1例出现并发症。结论视锐5超声引导下应用改良塞丁格穿刺技术行PICC较常规置管具有准确定位靶向血管、提高穿刺成功率;同时能满足危重患者治疗及抢救的需要,有效提者抢救成功率和护理质量。
