Objective To investigate the operative method and evaluate the clinical outcomes of long proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA-long) in treating long-segment fracture in middle-up part of femoral bone.Methods From...Objective To investigate the operative method and evaluate the clinical outcomes of long proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA-long) in treating long-segment fracture in middle-up part of femoral bone.Methods From June 2006 to展开更多
Intertrochanteric fractures have become a severe public health problem in elderly patients.Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA)is a commonly used intramedullary fixation device for unstable intertrochanteric frac...Intertrochanteric fractures have become a severe public health problem in elderly patients.Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA)is a commonly used intramedullary fixation device for unstable intertrochanteric fractures.Pelvic perforation by cephalic screw is a rare complication.We reported an 84-year-old female who fell at home and sustained an intertrochanteric fracture.The patient underwent surgery with PFNA as the intramedullary fixation device.Routine postoperative examination revealed medial migration of the helical blade that eventually caused pelvic perforation.We performed a cemented total hip arthroplasty as the savage procedure.At the latest follow-up of 12 months after total hip arthroplasty,the patient had no pain or loosening of the prosthesis in the left hip.Pelvic perforation should be considered when choosing PFNA as the intramedullary fixation device,especially in patients with severe osteoporosis wherein the helical blade can be easily inserted during the operation.The lack of devices to avoid oversliding of the helical blade in PFNA is an unreported cause of this complication and should be considered in such cases.展开更多
Background:The reverse obliquity inter-trochanteric fracture is a distinct fracture pattern that is mechanically different from most inter-trochanteric fractures and the optional treatment of it is still controversial...Background:The reverse obliquity inter-trochanteric fracture is a distinct fracture pattern that is mechanically different from most inter-trochanteric fractures and the optional treatment of it is still controversial.The purpose of this study was to compare differences in the efficacy of a novel nail(medial support nail[MSN-II])and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA-II)in the treatment of reverse obliquity inter-trochanteric fractures(Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesfrogen/Orthopedic Trauma Association[AO/OTA]31-A3.1)using finite-element analysis.Methods:Modeling software was used to establish a three-dimensional model of MSN-II and PFNA-II and an A3.1 inter-trochanteric fracture model.Abaqus software was used to implement different force loads to compare finite-element biomechanical parameters such as the maximum stress in implant and the displacement of fracture site.Results:The femoral stress,implant stress and fracture site displacement of MSN-II was less than that of PFNA-II.The results indicated that the maximal femoral stress was 581 MPa for PFNA-II and 443 MPa for the MSN-II.The maximum stress values in the PFNA-II and MSN-II models were 291 and 241 MPa,respectively.The maximal displacements of the fracture site were 1.47 and 1.16 mm in the PFNA-II and MSN-II models,respectively.Conclusions:Compared with PFNA-II for inter-trochanteric fracture(AO/OTA 31-A3.1),MSN-II which was designed with a triangular stability structure can provide better biomechanical stability.The MSN-II may be a feasible option for the treatment of reverse obliquity inter-trochanteric fracture.展开更多
Purpose: The proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) is known to have advantages in enhancing the anchorage ability of internal fixation in elderly unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture patients. However...Purpose: The proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) is known to have advantages in enhancing the anchorage ability of internal fixation in elderly unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture patients. However whether it is superior to condylar blade fixation is not clear. This study aimed to determine which treatment has better clinical outcomes in older patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 86 patients over the age of 60 with unstable trochanteric fractures within the past 3 weeks, were included in this prospective study conducted from June 1, 2018, to May 31, 2021. All the intertrochanteric fractures were classified according to AO/OTA classification. Among them, 44 cases were treated with the Proximal Femoral Nail (PFNA2) with or without an augmentation screw, and 42 cases were treated with the Condylar Blade Plate. In addition, the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusion, postoperative weight-bearing time, hospitalization time, Harris score of hip function, Kyle’s criteria and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The mean duration of surgery for the PFN group was 66.8 minutes (on average), whereas for the condylar blade plate group, it was 99.30 minutes (on average). The PFNA2 group experienced less blood loss (average of 80 mL) compared to the condylar blade plate group (average of 120 mL). Union and partial weight-bearing occurred earlier in the PFNA2 group (14.1 weeks and 10.6 weeks, respectively) compared to the Condylar blade plate group (18.7 weeks and 15.8 weeks). In two patients from the PFNA2 group, screw backing out and varus collapse complications were encountered;however, these patients remained asymptomatic and did not require revision surgery. In two other patients, screw cut out and breakage of the nail at the helical screw hole leading to non-union of the proximal femur were observed during the nine-month follow-up, necessitating revision surgery with prosthetic replacement. Among the condylar blade plate group, three patients experienced complications, including blade breakage at the blade and plate junction. In two cases, the fracture united in varus, and in one case, the blade cut through, resulting in non-union of the femoral head, which required revision surgery. According to the Harris hip score and Kyle’s criteria, a good-excellent outcome was observed in 92.85% of cases in the PFNA2 group and 90.90% of cases in the condylar blade plate group. Conclusion: Both the Proximal Femoral Nail A2 and Condylar blade plate are effective implants for the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. The intramedullary implant promotes biological healing and allows for early ambulation with minimal complications. Similarly satisfactory restoration of anatomy and favorable radiological and functional results can be achieved with the biological fixation provided by the 95-degree condylar blade plate. However, the use of PFNA2 internal fixation technique has the advantage of less trauma in elderly patients than the 95-degree condylar blade plate.展开更多
[目的]探讨改良小切口股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail anti-rotation,PFNA)治疗股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效。[方法] 2019年1月—2021年1月对84例股骨转子间骨折采用PFNA术治疗,依据术前医患沟通结果,44例采用改良小切口PFNA术...[目的]探讨改良小切口股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail anti-rotation,PFNA)治疗股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效。[方法] 2019年1月—2021年1月对84例股骨转子间骨折采用PFNA术治疗,依据术前医患沟通结果,44例采用改良小切口PFNA术(小切口组),40例采用常规切口PFNA术(常规组),比较围手术期资料以及随访结果。[结果]两组均顺利完成手术,无严重术中并发症。小切口组切口总长度[(5.3±1.3) cm vs (7.0±1.4) cm,P<0.001]、术中出血量[(88.3±19.2) ml vs(106.3±22.4) ml,P<0.001]、透视次数[(12.0±2.5)次vs (15.2±3.2)次,P<0.001]均显著优于常规组。但是,两组间手术时间、下地行走时间、住院时间、切口愈合等级的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组均随访12个月以上,两组恢复完全负重时间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随着时间推移,两组VAS评分逐渐减少,Harris评分、髋伸屈ROM、髋内-外旋ROM逐渐增加(P<0.05)。术后相应时间点两组间VAS评分、Harris评分、髋伸屈ROM、髋内-外旋ROM的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。影像方面,两组骨折复位质量、骨折愈合时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组术后即刻、末次随访颈干角均显著大于术前(P<0.05),相应时间点,两组间颈干角的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。至末次随访时两组患者骨折均愈合,无内固定断裂、移位等不良影像改变。[结论]改良小切口PFNA术治疗股骨转子间骨折能减少术中创伤,临床效果与常规切口相当。展开更多
文摘Objective To investigate the operative method and evaluate the clinical outcomes of long proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA-long) in treating long-segment fracture in middle-up part of femoral bone.Methods From June 2006 to
基金National Key R&D Program of China,2018YFF0301103,The funding body will support the publication fees without affecting the diagnosis and treatment of the patient and the writing of the manuscript.
文摘Intertrochanteric fractures have become a severe public health problem in elderly patients.Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA)is a commonly used intramedullary fixation device for unstable intertrochanteric fractures.Pelvic perforation by cephalic screw is a rare complication.We reported an 84-year-old female who fell at home and sustained an intertrochanteric fracture.The patient underwent surgery with PFNA as the intramedullary fixation device.Routine postoperative examination revealed medial migration of the helical blade that eventually caused pelvic perforation.We performed a cemented total hip arthroplasty as the savage procedure.At the latest follow-up of 12 months after total hip arthroplasty,the patient had no pain or loosening of the prosthesis in the left hip.Pelvic perforation should be considered when choosing PFNA as the intramedullary fixation device,especially in patients with severe osteoporosis wherein the helical blade can be easily inserted during the operation.The lack of devices to avoid oversliding of the helical blade in PFNA is an unreported cause of this complication and should be considered in such cases.
基金This work was supported by a grant from the Capital Health Research and Development of Special Grants(No.2016-1-5012)。
文摘Background:The reverse obliquity inter-trochanteric fracture is a distinct fracture pattern that is mechanically different from most inter-trochanteric fractures and the optional treatment of it is still controversial.The purpose of this study was to compare differences in the efficacy of a novel nail(medial support nail[MSN-II])and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA-II)in the treatment of reverse obliquity inter-trochanteric fractures(Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesfrogen/Orthopedic Trauma Association[AO/OTA]31-A3.1)using finite-element analysis.Methods:Modeling software was used to establish a three-dimensional model of MSN-II and PFNA-II and an A3.1 inter-trochanteric fracture model.Abaqus software was used to implement different force loads to compare finite-element biomechanical parameters such as the maximum stress in implant and the displacement of fracture site.Results:The femoral stress,implant stress and fracture site displacement of MSN-II was less than that of PFNA-II.The results indicated that the maximal femoral stress was 581 MPa for PFNA-II and 443 MPa for the MSN-II.The maximum stress values in the PFNA-II and MSN-II models were 291 and 241 MPa,respectively.The maximal displacements of the fracture site were 1.47 and 1.16 mm in the PFNA-II and MSN-II models,respectively.Conclusions:Compared with PFNA-II for inter-trochanteric fracture(AO/OTA 31-A3.1),MSN-II which was designed with a triangular stability structure can provide better biomechanical stability.The MSN-II may be a feasible option for the treatment of reverse obliquity inter-trochanteric fracture.
文摘Purpose: The proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) is known to have advantages in enhancing the anchorage ability of internal fixation in elderly unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture patients. However whether it is superior to condylar blade fixation is not clear. This study aimed to determine which treatment has better clinical outcomes in older patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 86 patients over the age of 60 with unstable trochanteric fractures within the past 3 weeks, were included in this prospective study conducted from June 1, 2018, to May 31, 2021. All the intertrochanteric fractures were classified according to AO/OTA classification. Among them, 44 cases were treated with the Proximal Femoral Nail (PFNA2) with or without an augmentation screw, and 42 cases were treated with the Condylar Blade Plate. In addition, the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusion, postoperative weight-bearing time, hospitalization time, Harris score of hip function, Kyle’s criteria and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The mean duration of surgery for the PFN group was 66.8 minutes (on average), whereas for the condylar blade plate group, it was 99.30 minutes (on average). The PFNA2 group experienced less blood loss (average of 80 mL) compared to the condylar blade plate group (average of 120 mL). Union and partial weight-bearing occurred earlier in the PFNA2 group (14.1 weeks and 10.6 weeks, respectively) compared to the Condylar blade plate group (18.7 weeks and 15.8 weeks). In two patients from the PFNA2 group, screw backing out and varus collapse complications were encountered;however, these patients remained asymptomatic and did not require revision surgery. In two other patients, screw cut out and breakage of the nail at the helical screw hole leading to non-union of the proximal femur were observed during the nine-month follow-up, necessitating revision surgery with prosthetic replacement. Among the condylar blade plate group, three patients experienced complications, including blade breakage at the blade and plate junction. In two cases, the fracture united in varus, and in one case, the blade cut through, resulting in non-union of the femoral head, which required revision surgery. According to the Harris hip score and Kyle’s criteria, a good-excellent outcome was observed in 92.85% of cases in the PFNA2 group and 90.90% of cases in the condylar blade plate group. Conclusion: Both the Proximal Femoral Nail A2 and Condylar blade plate are effective implants for the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. The intramedullary implant promotes biological healing and allows for early ambulation with minimal complications. Similarly satisfactory restoration of anatomy and favorable radiological and functional results can be achieved with the biological fixation provided by the 95-degree condylar blade plate. However, the use of PFNA2 internal fixation technique has the advantage of less trauma in elderly patients than the 95-degree condylar blade plate.
文摘[目的]探讨改良小切口股骨近端防旋髓内钉(proximal femoral nail anti-rotation,PFNA)治疗股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效。[方法] 2019年1月—2021年1月对84例股骨转子间骨折采用PFNA术治疗,依据术前医患沟通结果,44例采用改良小切口PFNA术(小切口组),40例采用常规切口PFNA术(常规组),比较围手术期资料以及随访结果。[结果]两组均顺利完成手术,无严重术中并发症。小切口组切口总长度[(5.3±1.3) cm vs (7.0±1.4) cm,P<0.001]、术中出血量[(88.3±19.2) ml vs(106.3±22.4) ml,P<0.001]、透视次数[(12.0±2.5)次vs (15.2±3.2)次,P<0.001]均显著优于常规组。但是,两组间手术时间、下地行走时间、住院时间、切口愈合等级的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组均随访12个月以上,两组恢复完全负重时间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随着时间推移,两组VAS评分逐渐减少,Harris评分、髋伸屈ROM、髋内-外旋ROM逐渐增加(P<0.05)。术后相应时间点两组间VAS评分、Harris评分、髋伸屈ROM、髋内-外旋ROM的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。影像方面,两组骨折复位质量、骨折愈合时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组术后即刻、末次随访颈干角均显著大于术前(P<0.05),相应时间点,两组间颈干角的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。至末次随访时两组患者骨折均愈合,无内固定断裂、移位等不良影像改变。[结论]改良小切口PFNA术治疗股骨转子间骨折能减少术中创伤,临床效果与常规切口相当。
