The purpose of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy of breast conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy in the treatment of early breast cancer.Firstly,the clinical data of 74 patients with early br...The purpose of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy of breast conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy in the treatment of early breast cancer.Firstly,the clinical data of 74 patients with early breast cancer treated in our hospital from June 2015 to June 2016 were retrospectively analyzed.Among them,37 patients treated with breast-conserving surgery were set as the study group,and 37 patients treated with modified radical surgery were set as the control group,and the therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared.The results showed that compared with the control group,the incision length,intraoperative blood loss,operation time and hospital stay time were better in the study group,and the excellent and good rate of postoperative breast beauty was higher,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in distant metastasis rate,local recurrence rate,axillary lymph node recurrence rate and fatality rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Therefore,breast-conserving surgery and modified radical surgery have better efficacy in the treatment of early breast cancer,but breast-conserving surgery has more advantages,such as smaller incision,less intraoperative blood loss,shorter operative time and hospital stay,and better postoperative aesthetic effect,which can be used as the first choice for early breast cancer.展开更多
Objective:To study the clinical effect of breast conserving combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy and modified radical mastectomy in patients with early breast cancer.Methods:Female patients with early breast cance...Objective:To study the clinical effect of breast conserving combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy and modified radical mastectomy in patients with early breast cancer.Methods:Female patients with early breast cancer in clinical stage I and II were selected as the main objects of this study,the study period started from July 2017 to July 2020.In the breast conserving and sentinel lymph node biopsy patients,50 cases were randomly selected as the experimental group;50 cases in the modified radical mastectomy patients were randomly selected as the control group.The clinical intervention effect of the two groups was analyzed.Results:the perioperative indexes of the experimental group were shorter than those of the control group,the patients recovered faster,the incidence of complications in the experimental group was lower,and the quality of life scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant,the intervention effect of the experimental group was also better.Conclusion:The application of breast conserving and sentinel lymph node biopsy in the treatment of early breast cancer can promote the recovery of patients,shorten the operation time and reduce the rate of complications,which has significant clinical significance.展开更多
文摘The purpose of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy of breast conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy in the treatment of early breast cancer.Firstly,the clinical data of 74 patients with early breast cancer treated in our hospital from June 2015 to June 2016 were retrospectively analyzed.Among them,37 patients treated with breast-conserving surgery were set as the study group,and 37 patients treated with modified radical surgery were set as the control group,and the therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared.The results showed that compared with the control group,the incision length,intraoperative blood loss,operation time and hospital stay time were better in the study group,and the excellent and good rate of postoperative breast beauty was higher,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in distant metastasis rate,local recurrence rate,axillary lymph node recurrence rate and fatality rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Therefore,breast-conserving surgery and modified radical surgery have better efficacy in the treatment of early breast cancer,but breast-conserving surgery has more advantages,such as smaller incision,less intraoperative blood loss,shorter operative time and hospital stay,and better postoperative aesthetic effect,which can be used as the first choice for early breast cancer.
文摘Objective:To study the clinical effect of breast conserving combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy and modified radical mastectomy in patients with early breast cancer.Methods:Female patients with early breast cancer in clinical stage I and II were selected as the main objects of this study,the study period started from July 2017 to July 2020.In the breast conserving and sentinel lymph node biopsy patients,50 cases were randomly selected as the experimental group;50 cases in the modified radical mastectomy patients were randomly selected as the control group.The clinical intervention effect of the two groups was analyzed.Results:the perioperative indexes of the experimental group were shorter than those of the control group,the patients recovered faster,the incidence of complications in the experimental group was lower,and the quality of life scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant,the intervention effect of the experimental group was also better.Conclusion:The application of breast conserving and sentinel lymph node biopsy in the treatment of early breast cancer can promote the recovery of patients,shorten the operation time and reduce the rate of complications,which has significant clinical significance.