Objective:Patients with ductal-dependent pulmonary circulation require alternative bloodflow to provide and maintain adequate oxygenation.Modified Blalock-Taussig Shunt(MBTS)has been the standard for providing such a ...Objective:Patients with ductal-dependent pulmonary circulation require alternative bloodflow to provide and maintain adequate oxygenation.Modified Blalock-Taussig Shunt(MBTS)has been the standard for providing such a result.Currently,less invasive methods such as Arterial Duct(AD)stenting have been performed as alter-natives.This study aims to compare the outcome of AD stenting and MBTS.Method:Systematic research was performed in online databases using the PRISMA protocol.The outcomes measured were 30-day mortality,com-plication,unplanned intervention,oxygen saturation,duration of hospital,and ICU length of stay.Any compara-tive study provided with full text is included.The outcome of each study was analyzed using a trandom effects model with relative risk and mean difference as the effect size.Bias risk assessment was conducted using the New-castle-Ottawa Scale.All analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.1.Result:A total of 11 studies with 3154 samples included in this study.There is no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the two groups(p-value=0.10).However,there is significantly less complication(RR 0.53[0.35,0.82];p-value=0.004)and unplanned intervention(RR 0.59[0.38,0.92];p-value=0.02)in the AD stent group.Comparison of the Nakata index showed no significant difference(p-value=0.88).Post-operative oxygen saturation was measured signifi-cantly higher in the AD stenting(MD 1.80[0.85,2.74];p-value=0.0002).However,AD stent group shows sig-nificantly lower long-term oxygen saturation(MD-8.43[-14.38,-2.48];p-value=0.005).Both hospital and ICU length of stay was significantly shorter in the AD stent group(MD-8.30[-11.13,-5.48];p-value<0.00001;MD-5.09[-7.79,-2.38];p-value=0.0002).Conclusion:AD stenting provides comparable outcomes relative to MBTS as it provides less complication and unplanned intervention and higher post-procedural O2 saturation.However,MBTS proved its superiority in maintaining higher long-term oxygen saturation and still became the preferred option to manage complex cases where stenting is either challenging or unsuccessful.展开更多
目的比较不伴主、肺动脉侧枝(MAPCAs)的肺动脉闭锁伴室间隔缺损(PA/VSD)患者接受右心室至肺动脉(RV-PA)管道连接或改良体-肺动脉分流术(mBT)术后血气及血流动力学指标改变,以明确两种术式对氧供需平衡的影响。方法2006年7月至2007年10月...目的比较不伴主、肺动脉侧枝(MAPCAs)的肺动脉闭锁伴室间隔缺损(PA/VSD)患者接受右心室至肺动脉(RV-PA)管道连接或改良体-肺动脉分流术(mBT)术后血气及血流动力学指标改变,以明确两种术式对氧供需平衡的影响。方法2006年7月至2007年10月,对38例不伴MAPCAs的PA/VSD患者根据手术方式不同分为两组:RV-PA组(n=25)和mBT组(n=13)。比较围术期死亡率,术后48h内的血气及血流动力学指标,包括心率、血压、动脉血氧饱和度、混合静脉血氧饱和度、氧剩余参数和正性肌力药物评分等的改变。结果术后RV-PA组死亡率(4.0%)与mBT组(7.7%)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访33例,随访时间6～18个月。11例患者(其中mBT组4例、RV-PA组7例)在术后9～18个月接受了根治手术治疗,术后死亡1例,死于肺血管阻力过高,右心衰竭。术后24h、48h时RV-PA组和mBT组混合静脉血氧饱和度均分别高于本组术后6h(P<0.01),术后6h、24h和48 h RV-PA组收缩压均低于mBT组(P=0.048,0.043,0.045);平均动脉压均高于mBT组(P=0.048,0.046,0.049);舒张压均高于mBT组(P=0.038,0.034,0.040);正性肌力药物评分均低于mBT组(P=0.035,0.032,0.047)。结论RV-PA管道连接与mBT两种姑息手术,虽然术后血压和正性肌力药物评分有显著差异,但体循环氧输送基本相当,术后6h两组患者血流动力学状态达最低水平。展开更多
文摘Objective:Patients with ductal-dependent pulmonary circulation require alternative bloodflow to provide and maintain adequate oxygenation.Modified Blalock-Taussig Shunt(MBTS)has been the standard for providing such a result.Currently,less invasive methods such as Arterial Duct(AD)stenting have been performed as alter-natives.This study aims to compare the outcome of AD stenting and MBTS.Method:Systematic research was performed in online databases using the PRISMA protocol.The outcomes measured were 30-day mortality,com-plication,unplanned intervention,oxygen saturation,duration of hospital,and ICU length of stay.Any compara-tive study provided with full text is included.The outcome of each study was analyzed using a trandom effects model with relative risk and mean difference as the effect size.Bias risk assessment was conducted using the New-castle-Ottawa Scale.All analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.1.Result:A total of 11 studies with 3154 samples included in this study.There is no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the two groups(p-value=0.10).However,there is significantly less complication(RR 0.53[0.35,0.82];p-value=0.004)and unplanned intervention(RR 0.59[0.38,0.92];p-value=0.02)in the AD stent group.Comparison of the Nakata index showed no significant difference(p-value=0.88).Post-operative oxygen saturation was measured signifi-cantly higher in the AD stenting(MD 1.80[0.85,2.74];p-value=0.0002).However,AD stent group shows sig-nificantly lower long-term oxygen saturation(MD-8.43[-14.38,-2.48];p-value=0.005).Both hospital and ICU length of stay was significantly shorter in the AD stent group(MD-8.30[-11.13,-5.48];p-value<0.00001;MD-5.09[-7.79,-2.38];p-value=0.0002).Conclusion:AD stenting provides comparable outcomes relative to MBTS as it provides less complication and unplanned intervention and higher post-procedural O2 saturation.However,MBTS proved its superiority in maintaining higher long-term oxygen saturation and still became the preferred option to manage complex cases where stenting is either challenging or unsuccessful.
文摘目的比较不伴主、肺动脉侧枝(MAPCAs)的肺动脉闭锁伴室间隔缺损(PA/VSD)患者接受右心室至肺动脉(RV-PA)管道连接或改良体-肺动脉分流术(mBT)术后血气及血流动力学指标改变,以明确两种术式对氧供需平衡的影响。方法2006年7月至2007年10月,对38例不伴MAPCAs的PA/VSD患者根据手术方式不同分为两组:RV-PA组(n=25)和mBT组(n=13)。比较围术期死亡率,术后48h内的血气及血流动力学指标,包括心率、血压、动脉血氧饱和度、混合静脉血氧饱和度、氧剩余参数和正性肌力药物评分等的改变。结果术后RV-PA组死亡率(4.0%)与mBT组(7.7%)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访33例,随访时间6～18个月。11例患者(其中mBT组4例、RV-PA组7例)在术后9～18个月接受了根治手术治疗,术后死亡1例,死于肺血管阻力过高,右心衰竭。术后24h、48h时RV-PA组和mBT组混合静脉血氧饱和度均分别高于本组术后6h(P<0.01),术后6h、24h和48 h RV-PA组收缩压均低于mBT组(P=0.048,0.043,0.045);平均动脉压均高于mBT组(P=0.048,0.046,0.049);舒张压均高于mBT组(P=0.038,0.034,0.040);正性肌力药物评分均低于mBT组(P=0.035,0.032,0.047)。结论RV-PA管道连接与mBT两种姑息手术,虽然术后血压和正性肌力药物评分有显著差异,但体循环氧输送基本相当,术后6h两组患者血流动力学状态达最低水平。
