Using data from previous research on Quercus sect. Heterobalanus, the coexistence approach to Xix-abangma and Namling fossil sets, and altitudinal ranges of vegetation presented by fossil floras, a re-view and reevalu...Using data from previous research on Quercus sect. Heterobalanus, the coexistence approach to Xix-abangma and Namling fossil sets, and altitudinal ranges of vegetation presented by fossil floras, a re-view and reevaluation have been made of existing theories on the uplift of the Himalayas, especially the palaeoaltitudes of Xixabangma and Namling in Tibet. The Xixabangma fossil set has a palaeoaltitude range of 2500―3500 m, and has risen 2200―3400 m since the Pliocene. The lower and upper assem-blages of the Miocene Namling had palaeoaltitudes of 2500―3000 m and 2800―3000 m, respectively. Therefore, Namling has risen at least 1300 m since the Miocene, thereby challenging some existing theories that suggest Namling has been static since the Miocene.展开更多
基金the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 40332021, 30670159)Wu Zhengyi's Splendidly Contributing Award of Yunnan Province (Grant No. KIB-WU-2001-01)
文摘Using data from previous research on Quercus sect. Heterobalanus, the coexistence approach to Xix-abangma and Namling fossil sets, and altitudinal ranges of vegetation presented by fossil floras, a re-view and reevaluation have been made of existing theories on the uplift of the Himalayas, especially the palaeoaltitudes of Xixabangma and Namling in Tibet. The Xixabangma fossil set has a palaeoaltitude range of 2500―3500 m, and has risen 2200―3400 m since the Pliocene. The lower and upper assem-blages of the Miocene Namling had palaeoaltitudes of 2500―3000 m and 2800―3000 m, respectively. Therefore, Namling has risen at least 1300 m since the Miocene, thereby challenging some existing theories that suggest Namling has been static since the Miocene.
